At1g67390 refers to a specific gene locus in Arabidopsis thaliana, encoding a protein with the UniProt identifier Q9FYF4. This protein appears to be related to the Rieske-type iron-sulfur protein family, which includes the pheophorbide a oxygenase (PaO) . The protein is of particular interest in plant research because of its potential involvement in chlorophyll catabolism and cell death pathways in plants. Research suggests it may be homologous to the Accelerated Cell Death 1 (ACD1) protein, which plays crucial roles in programmed cell death and stress responses in plants . Understanding this protein's function can provide insights into fundamental plant physiological processes, including senescence, stress responses, and developmental pathways.
The At1g67390 Antibody has been validated for several research applications:
| Application | Validation Status | Recommended Dilution | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELISA | Validated | Titration recommended | Optimal dilution must be determined experimentally |
| Western Blot (WB) | Validated | Titration recommended | For identification of antigen |
| Immunohistochemistry | Not specifically validated | - | May require optimization |
| Immunoprecipitation | Not specifically validated | - | May require optimization |
The antibody has been specifically tested and validated for ELISA and Western blot applications, ensuring reliable antigen identification . For optimal results in any application, performing antibody titration experiments is strongly recommended to determine the ideal working concentration for your specific experimental conditions.
For optimal antibody performance and longevity, follow these storage and handling guidelines:
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as these can degrade antibody quality
The antibody is supplied in liquid form in a specific storage buffer: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4), with 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative
When handling the antibody, use aseptic technique to prevent contamination
Prior to use in experiments, centrifuge the antibody solution at 14,000×g at 2-8°C for 10 minutes to remove any potential aggregates
Carefully pipette from the supernatant, avoiding the bottom of the tube
For long-term storage of working dilutions, consider adding carrier proteins (e.g., BSA) to prevent adsorption to tube walls
These procedures will help maintain antibody activity and specificity throughout your research project.
Antibody optimization is critical for generating reliable and reproducible results:
Perform a titration experiment using serial dilutions of the antibody
For Western blotting:
Test a range of antibody concentrations (e.g., 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:5000)
Include positive and negative controls
Analyze signal-to-noise ratio at each concentration
Select the dilution that provides clear specific signal with minimal background
For ELISA:
Use a checkerboard titration approach with varying antigen and antibody concentrations
Plot signal intensity versus antibody concentration
Identify the optimal concentration that provides maximum specific signal with minimal non-specific binding
For proteogenomic analysis applications, the suggested starting amount for titration is ≤1.0 μg per million cells in 100 μL volume . Document all optimization experiments thoroughly to ensure reproducibility across your research project.
Incorporating appropriate controls is essential for accurate data interpretation:
| Control Type | Purpose | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Control | Confirms antibody functionality | Use known At1g67390-expressing Arabidopsis tissue |
| Negative Control | Assesses non-specific binding | Use tissue from At1g67390 knockout plants or non-plant tissue |
| Loading Control | Normalizes sample loading | Use antibodies against housekeeping proteins (e.g., actin, tubulin) |
| Secondary Antibody Control | Evaluates secondary antibody specificity | Omit primary antibody |
| Isotype Control | Assesses non-specific binding | Use matched isotype (Rabbit IgG) at equivalent concentration |
| Blocking Peptide Control | Confirms epitope specificity | Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide before assay |
Integrating antibody-based detection with multi-omics approaches can provide comprehensive insights into protein function:
Proteogenomics integration: The At1g67390 Antibody can be conjugated with oligonucleotides (similar to TotalSeq™ technology) for single-cell protein and RNA co-detection . This approach allows simultaneous examination of protein expression and transcriptome data at the single-cell level.
ChIP-seq applications: If modified for chromatin immunoprecipitation, the antibody could potentially identify genome-wide binding sites if the protein has DNA-binding capabilities.
Protein-protein interaction networks:
Use the antibody for co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Identify interaction partners in different physiological conditions
Map protein complexes during various developmental stages
Spatial proteomics:
Combine with cell fractionation to determine subcellular localization
Use for immunofluorescence microscopy to visualize tissue-specific expression patterns
Correlate with transcriptomic data for spatial expression analysis
Functional validation:
Use for protein depletion studies in conjunction with phenotypic assays
Correlate protein levels with metabolomic changes during stress responses
When planning multi-omic experiments, consider technical compatibility and sample preparation requirements carefully. For example, if combining with RNA-seq, ensure fixation methods preserve both protein epitopes and RNA integrity .
Understanding potential cross-reactivity is crucial for accurate data interpretation:
Homologous proteins: The polyclonal nature of this antibody means it recognizes multiple epitopes on the At1g67390 protein. This may lead to cross-reactivity with structurally similar proteins, particularly other Rieske-type iron-sulfur proteins in Arabidopsis or related plant species.
Species cross-reactivity: While the antibody is specifically raised against Arabidopsis thaliana protein, it may cross-react with homologous proteins in closely related plant species. The species reactivity is officially listed as Arabidopsis thaliana , but testing in other plant models should be conducted if cross-species application is desired.
Isoform specificity: If the At1g67390 gene produces multiple protein isoforms through alternative splicing, the antibody may detect all or only specific isoforms, depending on the location of the immunogen sequence.
To address cross-reactivity concerns:
Perform Western blot analysis using multiple plant tissues and species
Include samples from knockout or knockdown plants as negative controls
Consider epitope mapping to identify the specific regions recognized by the antibody
For critical experiments, validate results using alternative detection methods or a second antibody targeting a different epitope
Rigorous validation ensures reliable experimental results:
Genetic validation:
Compare antibody signal between wild-type and At1g67390 knockout/knockdown plants
Use CRISPR-Cas9 edited plants with specific mutations in the antibody epitope region
Test in transgenic plants with tagged versions of the target protein
Biochemical validation:
Perform peptide competition assays by pre-incubating the antibody with excess immunizing peptide
Conduct immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm target protein identity
Compare results with an alternative antibody targeting a different epitope of the same protein
Expression correlation:
Compare protein detection patterns with mRNA expression data across tissues and conditions
Correlate antibody signal intensity with quantitative PCR or RNA-seq data
Technical validation:
Test specificity across multiple applications (Western blot, ELISA, immunofluorescence)
Evaluate batch-to-batch consistency if using multiple antibody lots
Document all validation experiments with appropriate controls
A comprehensive validation approach increases confidence in experimental results and facilitates troubleshooting if inconsistencies arise.
Understanding protein interactions provides crucial insights into biological function:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Use At1g67390 Antibody to pull down the protein complex
Identify interacting partners by Western blot or mass spectrometry
Compare interaction profiles under different physiological conditions
Proximity labeling:
Generate fusion proteins with BioID or APEX2
Use the antibody to confirm expression of the fusion protein
Identify proximal proteins through streptavidin pulldown and mass spectrometry
Fluorescence techniques:
Perform Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) with labeled interaction partners
Use in situ Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) to visualize interactions in fixed tissue
Combine with immunofluorescence to determine subcellular localization of interactions
Crosslinking studies:
Use chemical crosslinkers to stabilize transient interactions
Immunoprecipitate with At1g67390 Antibody
Identify crosslinked partners by mass spectrometry
Split-reporter systems:
Generate fusion constructs with split fluorescent proteins or luciferase
Use the antibody to validate expression levels
Monitor interaction dynamics in real-time
When studying protein interactions, consider the native cellular environment and potential disruption of interactions during sample preparation. Membrane proteins or weakly interacting partners may require specialized approaches to preserve interactions during extraction and analysis.
Understanding the implications of polyclonal antibody characteristics is essential for proper data analysis:
To address these considerations:
Establish rigorous validation protocols for each new antibody lot
Document specific experimental conditions that optimize performance
Consider generating monoclonal antibodies for highly specific applications or quantitative analyses
For critical experiments, verify results with orthogonal methods
Methodical troubleshooting can resolve common detection issues:
| Issue | Potential Causes | Troubleshooting Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| No signal | Protein not expressed | Verify mRNA expression by qPCR or RNA-seq |
| Epitope destroyed during processing | Try alternative sample preparation methods | |
| Insufficient antibody concentration | Increase antibody concentration or incubation time | |
| Secondary detection failure | Test secondary antibody with a different primary | |
| Weak signal | Low protein abundance | Increase sample concentration or antibody incubation time |
| Suboptimal buffer conditions | Optimize buffer composition (pH, salt, detergents) | |
| Epitope masking | Try different extraction/denaturation conditions | |
| Antibody degradation | Use fresh antibody aliquot; check storage conditions | |
| High background | Non-specific binding | Increase blocking time/concentration; add carrier proteins |
| Excessive antibody concentration | Perform titration to find optimal concentration | |
| Insufficient washing | Increase wash duration or buffer stringency | |
| Cross-reactivity | Pre-absorb antibody with non-specific proteins |
For Western blot specific troubleshooting:
Try longer transfer times for high molecular weight proteins
Use different membrane types (PVDF vs. nitrocellulose)
Consider enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrates with higher sensitivity
Optimize blocking conditions (BSA vs. non-fat milk)
For ELISA specific troubleshooting:
Test different plate coating buffers and conditions
Optimize antigen concentration for coating
Evaluate different detection systems for improved sensitivity
Integrating this antibody with advanced imaging requires careful optimization:
Super-resolution microscopy:
Consider direct labeling with small fluorophores to minimize the probe size
For STORM/PALM, ensure high signal-to-noise ratio through optimized blocking and washing
For STED microscopy, select photostable fluorophores compatible with depletion lasers
Validate specificity in fixed samples before proceeding with complex imaging experiments
Live-cell imaging:
Consider generating Fab fragments for better tissue penetration
Minimize phototoxicity by using optimized labeling ratios
Validate that labeling doesn't interfere with protein function
Combine with fluorescent protein fusions for dual validation
Expansion microscopy:
Test antibody compatibility with expansion protocols
Optimize fixation to preserve epitopes through the expansion process
Consider using fluorophores stable under expansion conditions
Validate specificity and signal retention after expansion
Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM):
Use gold-conjugated secondary antibodies for electron microscopy detection
Optimize sample preparation to preserve ultrastructure and epitope accessibility
Consider pre-embedding labeling for improved sensitivity
Validate specificity at both light and electron microscopy levels
Technical considerations:
Use fiducial markers for image registration in multimodal imaging
Optimize fixation protocols to preserve both structure and antigenicity
Consider tissue clearing techniques for deep tissue imaging
Implement quantitative analysis workflows for objective signal evaluation
Investigating stress responses requires systematic experimental design:
Stress treatment protocols:
Apply standardized abiotic stressors (drought, salt, heat, cold, etc.)
Use pathogen infection or elicitor treatments for biotic stress
Implement time-course experiments to capture dynamic responses
Compare protein levels across different tissues and developmental stages
Protein expression analysis:
Monitor At1g67390 protein levels by Western blot before, during, and after stress
Correlate protein abundance with physiological parameters
Compare with transcriptomic data to identify post-transcriptional regulation
Use phytohormone treatments to dissect signaling pathways
Protein localization studies:
Track subcellular localization changes during stress response
Combine with organelle markers to confirm compartmentalization
Investigate potential stress-induced protein translocation
Correlate localization with protein function
Protein modifications:
Investigate post-translational modifications using specific antibodies
Combine immunoprecipitation with mass spectrometry to identify modifications
Analyze modification patterns across stress conditions
Correlate modifications with protein activity or localization changes
Functional studies:
Compare wild-type and knockout/knockdown plants under stress conditions
Analyze phenotypic differences and survival rates
Investigate downstream molecular changes
Develop mechanistic models of protein function during stress response
This systematic approach can provide comprehensive insights into the role of At1g67390 protein in plant stress responses, potentially revealing novel stress adaptation mechanisms.
Integrating experimental data with bioinformatic analysis enhances biological insights:
Sequence analysis tools:
Use BLAST and multiple sequence alignment to identify homologs across species
Predict protein domains and functional motifs using InterPro or PFAM
Analyze evolutionary conservation patterns to identify functional regions
Predict potential post-translational modification sites
Structural analysis:
Use AlphaFold or similar tools to predict protein structure
Identify potential interaction interfaces or functional domains
Map epitope regions recognized by the antibody
Model potential conformational changes under different conditions
Omics data integration:
Correlate protein abundance with transcriptomic data across conditions
Use tools like Cytoscape for network analysis of protein interactions
Integrate with metabolomic data to identify associated metabolic pathways
Apply machine learning approaches for pattern recognition across datasets
Visualization and analysis platforms:
Use R/Bioconductor packages for statistical analysis and visualization
Implement Python libraries for custom data analysis pipelines
Apply specialized plant biology databases (TAIR, Araport, BAR) for contextual information
Utilize gene ontology enrichment tools to identify functional patterns
Advanced analysis approaches:
Effective bioinformatic analysis can transform raw experimental data into meaningful biological insights, enabling hypothesis generation for further investigation.
Exploring protein conservation and divergence across species:
Cross-species reactivity testing:
Test antibody reactivity with homologous proteins in related plant species
Optimize extraction and detection protocols for each species
Identify conserved epitopes through sequence alignment and experimental validation
Document cross-reactivity patterns for reference
Evolutionary analysis:
Compare protein expression patterns across evolutionary diverse plant species
Correlate protein conservation with functional conservation
Identify lineage-specific adaptations or modifications
Analyze cellular localization across species to detect functional divergence
Stress response comparison:
Compare protein expression under identical stress conditions across species
Identify conserved and divergent stress response mechanisms
Correlate protein behavior with species-specific stress tolerance
Develop evolutionary models of stress adaptation
Developmental biology:
Compare protein expression during key developmental stages across species
Identify conserved developmental roles and species-specific functions
Analyze tissue-specific expression patterns
Correlate protein function with morphological or physiological adaptations
Methodological considerations:
Standardize extraction protocols to ensure comparable results
Develop quantitative normalization approaches for cross-species comparison
Consider generating species-specific standard curves for quantitative analyses
Validate findings with orthogonal approaches (e.g., mass spectrometry)
Comparative studies can reveal fundamental insights into plant evolution and adaptation, potentially identifying conserved mechanisms with agricultural or ecological significance.
Emerging technologies and methodological advances offer exciting opportunities for expanding the utility of At1g67390 Antibody:
Integration with single-cell technologies may provide unprecedented insights into cell-type specific expression patterns
Combination with CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for precise functional studies
Application in proteogenomic approaches for multi-omics data integration
Development of improved antibody formats with enhanced specificity or sensitivity
Adaptation for high-throughput screening applications