The At2g44030 antibody (Catalog #MBS7182452) is a rabbit-derived polyclonal antibody with specificity for Arabidopsis thaliana. Key properties include:
| Property | Detail |
|---|---|
| Host Species | Rabbit |
| Reactivity | Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress) |
| Target Gene | AT2G44030 (F6E13.16) |
| Target Protein Description | Putative F-box/kelch-repeat protein; Galactose oxidase/kelch superfamily |
| Purification Method | Antigen-affinity purification |
| Applications | ELISA, Western Blot (WB) |
| Isotype | IgG |
This antibody enables detection of the AT2G44030 protein in experimental setups, particularly in plant biology research .
The AT2G44030 protein belongs to the F-box/kelch-repeat family, which is integral to ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation.
Functional Role:
F-box proteins are components of the SKP1-CUL1-F-box (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes, responsible for tagging specific substrates with ubiquitin for proteasomal degradation. The kelch-repeat domain often mediates protein-protein interactions .
Gene Context:
AT2G44030 is located on chromosome 2 of Arabidopsis thaliana and is alternatively designated as F6E13.16 in genomic databases .
Studies using AT2G44030 (ACF4) decoy constructs have explored its interaction with E3 ubiquitin ligases. Decoy constructs exclude the F-box domain, allowing researchers to identify substrates targeted by the full-length protein. This approach revealed AT2G44030's potential involvement in circadian regulation and stress responses, though specific substrates remain under investigation .
Protein Localization: Used in Western blotting to confirm AT2G44030 expression in Arabidopsis tissues.
Functional Studies: ELISA-based assays help quantify protein levels under varying physiological conditions, such as stress or developmental stages .
Interaction Mapping: Decoy-based screens identify candidate substrates, aiding in elucidating ubiquitination networks .
Current research gaps include:
Identification of specific substrates ubiquitinated by AT2G44030.
In vivo validation of its role in Arabidopsis growth or stress adaptation.
Structural characterization of the full-length protein.
Efforts to address these gaps could leverage CRISPR-edited Arabidopsis lines or advanced proteomics techniques.
The At2g44030 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a protein that functions within cellular pathways. Understanding this protein's function is essential for contextualizing antibody-based experiments. The gene is located on chromosome 2 and produces a protein involved in molecular processes within the plant cell. When designing experiments using At2g44030 antibodies, researchers should first confirm the expression patterns of this gene in their specific plant tissues, as expression can vary significantly across developmental stages and in response to environmental conditions. Consider performing RT-PCR or consulting expression databases to validate gene expression before proceeding with antibody-based detection methods .
Performing Western blots using both wild-type plants and At2g44030 knockout/knockdown lines
Including competing peptide controls to verify binding specificity
Testing across multiple tissue types to confirm consistent detection patterns
Cross-validating with orthogonal methods such as mass spectrometry
Antibody binding specificity is influenced by epitope accessibility within the target protein's tertiary structure. This accessibility can be affected by post-translational modifications, protein-protein interactions, and sample preparation methods .
At2g44030 antibodies, like most protein-based reagents, require specific storage conditions to maintain functionality. Store antibodies in small aliquots at -20°C for long-term storage to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which can significantly degrade antibody quality. For working solutions, maintain at 4°C with appropriate preservatives such as sodium azide (0.02%) to prevent microbial contamination. When designing experiments, include positive controls from previously verified antibody aliquots to confirm maintained reactivity. Additionally, maintain a detailed inventory system that tracks freeze-thaw cycles, lot numbers, and validation results to identify potential sources of experimental variability. Proper storage not only extends antibody shelf-life but also ensures reproducibility across experiments .
Sample preparation significantly impacts At2g44030 antibody performance across experimental platforms. For plant tissue samples, consider these methodological approaches:
For Western blot applications: Use buffer systems containing protease inhibitors, reducing agents, and appropriate detergents (typically 0.1-1% Triton X-100 or NP-40) to maintain protein integrity while ensuring solubilization.
For immunohistochemistry: Fixation protocols significantly affect epitope accessibility. Compare paraformaldehyde (4%) and glutaraldehyde (0.1-0.5%) fixation methods to determine optimal epitope preservation.
For immunoprecipitation: Pre-clear lysates thoroughly to reduce non-specific binding, and optimize antibody-to-sample ratios through titration experiments.
For all applications: Include appropriate controls, such as samples from knockout plants or competing peptide treatments, to confirm signal specificity.
Different experimental questions may require specific adaptations to these protocols. For instance, studying protein-protein interactions may require gentler detergent conditions than those used for simple protein detection .
Distinguishing specific from non-specific binding represents a significant challenge in At2g44030 antibody research. A systematic approach involves implementing multiple validation controls:
Genetic controls: Compare wild-type plants with both knockout and overexpression lines for the At2g44030 gene. The signal should correlate with expression levels and be absent in knockout lines.
Epitope competition assays: Pre-incubate antibodies with purified target peptides before application to your sample. Specific binding should be competitively inhibited.
Multiple antibody validation: When possible, use antibodies raised against different epitopes of the same protein. Concordant results strengthen evidence for specificity.
Orthogonal detection methods: Confirm antibody-based results using non-antibody techniques such as mass spectrometry or transcriptional analysis.
Cross-reactivity panels: Test antibodies against closely related proteins to determine potential cross-reactivity, particularly when studying protein families.
Statistical analysis of signal-to-noise ratios across replicates can help establish confidence thresholds for distinguishing specific signals. Advanced computational approaches using machine learning algorithms can help differentiate binding patterns characteristic of specific versus non-specific interactions .
Epitope selection critically influences antibody specificity, sensitivity, and applications. When designing antibodies against At2g44030, consider this methodological framework:
Bioinformatic analysis: Identify regions with high antigenicity and surface accessibility using prediction algorithms. Avoid highly conserved domains if specificity among related proteins is required.
Structural considerations: If structural data is available, select epitopes on exposed protein surfaces that maintain stable conformations independent of post-translational modifications.
Application-specific selection: For Western blot applications, linear epitopes in denaturation-resistant regions are preferable. For immunoprecipitation or immunohistochemistry, conformational epitopes on native protein surfaces may yield better results.
Cross-reactivity minimization: Compare candidate epitopes against the entire proteome to identify potential cross-reactive regions, particularly with related plant proteins.
Multiple epitope approach: Developing antibodies against distinct epitopes provides complementary tools for validation and different applications.
Recent computational approaches combining high-throughput sequencing and machine learning have demonstrated success in predicting antibody specificity profiles beyond experimentally observed sequences, offering powerful tools for designing antibodies with tailored specificity profiles .
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can substantially alter At2g44030 antibody binding through several mechanisms:
Direct epitope modification: PTMs occurring within the epitope region (phosphorylation, glycosylation, acetylation, ubiquitination) can directly prevent antibody recognition or create modification-specific binding sites.
Conformational changes: PTMs distant from the epitope may induce structural changes that alter epitope accessibility or conformation.
Protein interaction effects: Modifications that mediate protein-protein interactions can mask epitopes through steric hindrance.
To methodologically address these issues:
Use modification-specific antibodies when studying particular PTM states of the protein.
Employ enzymatic treatments (phosphatases, deglycosylases) on parallel samples to determine modification dependency.
Implement sample preparation protocols that preserve or remove specific modifications based on experimental needs.
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes to create a comprehensive binding profile.
Consider Western blot migration patterns that differ from predicted molecular weights as potential indicators of post-translational modifications.
Advanced mass spectrometry approaches can complement antibody studies by providing site-specific information about modifications present in your experimental system .
Multi-tissue analysis using At2g44030 antibodies presents several methodological challenges that must be systematically addressed:
Tissue-specific expression variations: At2g44030 may have different expression levels across tissues, requiring sensitivity adjustments and loading controls specific to each tissue type.
Matrix effects: Different plant tissues contain varying levels of compounds that can interfere with antibody binding or detection systems:
Phenolic compounds and secondary metabolites may alter protein extraction efficiency
Endogenous peroxidases can generate false positives in HRP-based detection systems
Plant pigments may interfere with fluorescent or colorimetric detection
Fixation and processing differences: Tissues vary in permeability to fixatives and antibodies, potentially creating artificial differences in signal intensity.
Developmental variation: Protein expression and modification patterns change throughout development, requiring precise staging of samples.
To address these issues methodologically:
Develop tissue-specific protein extraction protocols optimized for each tissue type
Include appropriate inhibitors for tissue-specific interfering compounds
Establish normalization procedures using housekeeping proteins verified for consistent expression across the tissues studied
Implement parallel detection methods to cross-validate antibody-based observations
Quantitative analysis should include statistical approaches that account for tissue-specific background and signal variability .
Robust experimental design for At2g44030 antibody applications requires comprehensive controls. Implement these methodological approaches:
For Western blotting:
Positive control: Recombinant At2g44030 protein or extracts from tissues known to express the protein
Negative control: Extracts from At2g44030 knockout/knockdown plants
Loading control: Probing for housekeeping proteins (e.g., actin, tubulin) on the same membrane
Antibody specificity control: Primary antibody omission and isotype control antibodies
Signal specificity control: Pre-incubation of antibody with immunizing peptide
For immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence:
Tissue-specific negative controls: Sections from knockout plants or tissues known not to express the target
Autofluorescence control: Unstained tissue sections to identify endogenous fluorescence
Secondary antibody control: Sections incubated with secondary antibody only
Blocking peptide control: Primary antibody pre-incubated with immunizing peptide
For immunoprecipitation:
Bead-only control: Sample processed with beads but no antibody
Isotype control: Immunoprecipitation with irrelevant antibody of same isotype
Input control: Analysis of starting material before immunoprecipitation
Knockout control: Parallel processing of samples from knockout plants
Statistical validation through biological and technical replicates is essential for all applications, with appropriate statistical tests to quantify significance of observations .
Lot-to-lot variability in antibody performance is a significant challenge in research reproducibility. When faced with contradictory results, implement this systematic troubleshooting approach:
Authentication testing:
Perform side-by-side testing of both antibody lots against the same samples
Use epitope peptide competition assays to confirm specific binding for each lot
Test both lots against recombinant protein and knockout samples
Technical validation:
Review lot-specific validation data from manufacturers
Examine production methods (polyclonal vs. monoclonal, animal source)
Verify storage conditions and expiration dates
Experimental parameters optimization:
Titrate each antibody lot to determine optimal working concentration
Test multiple blocking agents to reduce background
Adjust incubation times and temperatures
Resolution strategies:
If one lot proves superior, standardize on that lot for future experiments
If both lots show specific but different binding patterns, they may recognize different protein forms (splice variants, post-translational modifications)
Consider epitope mapping to determine precise binding sites
Documentation and reporting:
Record lot numbers in all experimental protocols and publications
Report variability to manufacturers and research community
When interpreting contradictory results, consider that differences may reveal biologically meaningful phenomena rather than technical artifacts, such as tissue-specific protein forms or interaction states .
Low signal strength represents a common challenge when working with At2g44030 antibodies, particularly for low-abundance proteins. Implement these methodological solutions:
Sample enrichment strategies:
Use subcellular fractionation to concentrate compartment-specific proteins
Implement immunoprecipitation or affinity purification before analysis
Apply sample concentration techniques (TCA precipitation, ultrafiltration)
Signal amplification methods:
For Western blotting: Use high-sensitivity chemiluminescent substrates or fluorescent secondaries
For immunohistochemistry: Implement tyramide signal amplification or polymer-based detection systems
For all applications: Consider biotin-streptavidin amplification systems
Protocol optimization:
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Optimize antibody concentration through careful titration
Adjust blocking solutions to reduce background while preserving specific signals
Modify extraction buffers to improve target protein solubilization
Detection system enhancements:
Use more sensitive imaging systems (cooled CCD cameras for chemiluminescence)
Extend exposure times while monitoring background increase
Apply digital image enhancement within linear range
Alternative approaches:
Consider protein overexpression systems for initial characterization
Use epitope tagging strategies for detection with well-characterized tag antibodies
Document all optimization steps methodically to establish a reproducible protocol for future experiments .
Cross-reactivity assessment is crucial for antibody validation, particularly in plant systems with large protein families. Implement this comprehensive assessment framework:
Bioinformatic analysis:
Identify related proteins with sequence similarity to At2g44030, particularly in epitope regions
Predict potential cross-reactive proteins using epitope mapping tools
Analyze tissue-specific expression patterns of related proteins
Experimental validation:
Test antibodies against recombinant related proteins expressed in heterologous systems
Create a panel of plant extracts from knockout/knockdown lines for At2g44030 and related genes
Implement peptide competition assays using epitope peptides from potential cross-reactive proteins
Advanced specificity determination:
Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify all captured proteins
Use protein arrays containing related family members for systematic binding assessment
Implement epitope excision and extraction methods followed by mass spectrometry
Quantitative cross-reactivity measurement:
Determine relative binding affinities for target vs. related proteins
Establish threshold signal ratios for distinguishing specific from cross-reactive binding
Create standardized curves using defined protein mixtures
Cross-reactivity mitigation:
Consider epitope-specific purification of antibodies
Implement subtraction strategies using knockout plant material
Design experiments to account for known cross-reactivity patterns
Document cross-reactivity profiles comprehensively to guide experimental design and result interpretation. When complete elimination of cross-reactivity is impossible, develop analytical methods to deconvolute signals .
Experimental design considerations:
Determine appropriate sample size through power analysis
Include both biological and technical replicates in experimental design
Randomize sample processing to avoid batch effects
Normalization strategies:
For Western blots: Normalize to loading controls (housekeeping proteins, total protein stains)
For immunohistochemistry: Use internal reference structures or co-stained markers
For all applications: Implement ratio-based normalization to reduce systematic errors
Statistical tests selection:
For comparing two conditions: T-tests (paired or unpaired) with appropriate corrections
For multiple comparisons: ANOVA with post-hoc tests (Tukey's, Bonferroni, etc.)
For non-normally distributed data: Non-parametric alternatives (Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis)
Variability assessment:
Calculate coefficients of variation across replicates
Implement variance component analysis to identify sources of variability
Use Bland-Altman plots to assess agreement between methods
Advanced analytical approaches:
Consider ANCOVA when controlling for covariates
Implement mixed-effects models for nested experimental designs
Use Bayesian approaches for integrating prior knowledge with experimental data
Remember that statistical significance must be interpreted alongside biological significance. Effect size measurements provide important context for statistically significant differences. Document all statistical methods in detail to ensure reproducibility .
Multi-omics data integration enhances the biological interpretation of At2g44030 antibody results. Implement these methodological strategies:
Correlation-based integration:
Calculate correlation coefficients between antibody-based protein measurements and corresponding mRNA levels
Identify discordant patterns suggesting post-transcriptional or post-translational regulation
Use scatter plots with regression analysis to visualize relationships between data types
Network-based approaches:
Place At2g44030 protein data within protein-protein interaction networks
Integrate with transcriptional regulatory networks to identify regulatory mechanisms
Use pathway enrichment analysis to contextualize protein function
Temporal integration:
Align time series data across multiple omics platforms
Identify lead/lag relationships between transcriptomic and proteomic changes
Implement time-delay correlation analysis for dynamic responses
Computational modeling:
Develop predictive models integrating multiple data types
Use machine learning approaches to identify patterns across datasets
Implement Bayesian networks to infer causal relationships
Visualization strategies:
Create multi-layer heatmaps showing patterns across omics platforms
Use dimension reduction techniques (PCA, t-SNE) for integrated visualization
Implement Circos plots for genome-wide data integration
This integrated approach can reveal functional insights not apparent from antibody data alone, such as post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms, protein complex formation, and pathway involvement not predicted by transcriptional data .
The landscape of plant antibody research continues to evolve with several emerging technologies poised to enhance At2g44030 investigations. These methodological advances include:
Single-cell antibody-based technologies:
Adaptation of CyTOF (mass cytometry) for plant tissue analysis
Development of single-cell Western blotting techniques for heterogeneous plant samples
Integration of spatial transcriptomics with antibody-based protein detection
Advanced microscopy applications:
Super-resolution microscopy for nanoscale localization of At2g44030
Expansion microscopy protocols adapted for plant cell walls
Light-sheet microscopy for whole-tissue protein dynamics
Antibody engineering innovations:
Computational design of antibodies with customized specificity profiles
Nanobody development for improved penetration of plant tissues
Plant-expressed recombinant antibody fragments for in vivo studies
Quantitative proteomics integration:
Combining targeted mass spectrometry with antibody enrichment
Development of proximity labeling approaches using antibody-enzyme fusions
Implementation of multiplexed epitope detection using DNA-barcoded antibodies
Artificial intelligence applications:
Machine learning algorithms for antibody binding prediction
Automated image analysis for quantitative immunohistochemistry
Biophysics-informed models for antibody specificity engineering
These technologies will enable more precise quantification, higher spatial resolution, and improved specificity in At2g44030 research, ultimately leading to deeper functional insights into its role in plant biology .