The At1g09650 gene encodes a F-box/LRR-repeat/kelch-repeat protein involved in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, a key pathway for regulating protein degradation in plants. Key features include:
The Rabbit anti-At1g09650 polyclonal antibody (MyBioSource) is characterized as follows:
Detects endogenous At1g09650 protein (~70–90 kDa, depending on post-translational modifications) .
Recommended dilution: 1:500–1:2000 in non-reducing conditions .
Specificity: Targets the F-box domain but requires validation via knockout controls due to risks of cross-reactivity with structurally similar plant proteins .
Limitations:
While direct studies using this antibody are not cited in the provided sources, its utility aligns with broader applications of plant antibodies:
Methodological Answer:
Western blot: Use plant lysates from wild-type (Col-0) and AT1G09650 knockout mutants (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9-generated lines) to confirm antibody binding absence in mutants .
Immunolocalization: Compare staining patterns in wild-type vs. mutant root/shoot tissues under confocal microscopy.
Competitive ELISA: Pre-incubate antibodies with recombinant AT1G09650 protein to assess signal reduction .
| Validation Step | Expected Result (Wild-Type) | Expected Result (Knockout) |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | Band at predicted molecular weight (~X kDa) | No band observed |
| Immunolocalization | Tissue-specific fluorescence | Absent fluorescence |
Methodological Answer:
Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Use transgenic plants expressing epitope-tagged AT1G09650 (e.g., FLAG/HA) coupled with mass spectrometry for interactor identification .
Yeast Two-Hybrid: Screen an Arabidopsis cDNA library against AT1G09650 bait constructs .
Structural modeling: Predict interaction interfaces using AlphaFold2 and validate with site-directed mutagenesis .
Methodological Answer:
Antibody provenance audit: Compare clonal sources (polyclonal vs. monoclonal), immunogens (full-length vs. epitope-specific), and batch variability .
Context-dependent validation: Test antibodies under varying physiological conditions (e.g., stress treatments) to assess cross-reactivity with homologous proteins (e.g., AT1G09660) .
Quantitative SPR: Measure binding kinetics (KD) to recombinant AT1G09650 vs. homologs to quantify specificity .
Methodological Answer:
Phage display libraries: Screen random peptide libraries to identify linear epitopes .
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange (HDX-MS): Identify conformational epitopes by comparing deuterium uptake in antibody-bound vs. unbound AT1G09650 .
Cryo-EM: Resolve antibody-antigen complex structures at near-atomic resolution .
Methodological Answer:
Methodological Answer:
Normalization: Use housekeeping proteins (e.g., ACTIN2) and spike-in controls (e.g., recombinant GFP) .
Machine learning: Train models on historical datasets to predict antibody performance under specific conditions .
| Normalization Method | Use Case | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| ACTIN2 | General protein loading control | Tissue-specific expression variability |
| Recombinant GFP | Absolute quantification in extracts | Requires transgenic lines |
Methodological Answer: