At4g26340 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Basic Characteristics

The At4g26340 antibody is a polyclonal or monoclonal antibody generated against the protein product of the At4g26340 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana (mouse-ear cress). This gene is part of the plant's genome, though its specific biological function remains uncharacterized in publicly available literature. The antibody is cataloged with the following identifiers:

  • Product Code: CSB-PA816780XA01DOA

  • UniProt ID: Q8H1R7

  • Host Species: Immunogen-derived from Arabidopsis thaliana

  • Available Formats: 2 mL or 0.1 mL aliquots .

Table 1: Potential Workflows for At4g26340 Antibody

ApplicationPurposeExample Techniques
Protein LocalizationSubcellular tracking of At4g26340Fluorescence microscopy
Expression ProfilingQuantifying protein levels under stress or developmental conditionsWestern blot, ELISA
Interaction StudiesIdentifying binding partners via co-immunoprecipitationIP-MS (Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry)

Key Knowledge Gaps:

  • No peer-reviewed studies directly utilizing this antibody were identified in the provided sources.

  • The protein’s role in Arabidopsis metabolism, stress response, or growth regulation remains unelucidated.

Recommendations for Researchers

  • Validation: Perform independent validation using knockout Arabidopsis lines to confirm specificity.

  • Epitope Mapping: Use techniques like peptide arrays to identify the exact binding region.

  • Collaborative Studies: Partner with plant genomics consortia to explore At4g26340’s role in plant biology.

Limitations and Cautions

  • Cross-reactivity with homologous proteins in other plant species cannot be ruled out without empirical data.

  • Commercial listings lack detailed protocols or performance metrics (e.g., dilution ratios, buffer compatibility) .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
At4g26340 antibody; T25K17.150F-box/FBD/LRR-repeat protein At4g26340 antibody
Target Names
At4g26340
Uniprot No.

Q&A

Based on the analysis of current antibody research methodologies and challenges presented in the literature, here is a structured FAQ addressing key aspects of antibody development and validation relevant to academic investigations:

How do researchers validate antibody specificity for experimental use?

  • Methodological approach:

    • Perform immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by mass spectrometry to confirm target protein enrichment and detect off-target binding partners (e.g., 5E4 antibody's cross-reactivity with AMPD2/TRIM28)

    • Use isotype controls and knockout cell lines to establish baseline specificity

    • Conduct dot-blot assays with mutant vs. wild-type antigens (e.g., A4 antibody validation for I223R/H275Y neuraminidase)

Validation StepKey MetricsExample from Literature
IP + MSProtein identification confidence ≥95%5E4 antibody detected AMPD2/TRIM28 instead of GR
Mutant AnalysisBinding affinity ratio (mutant:WT)A4 antibody showed 600× stronger binding to mutant NA

What experimental designs effectively compare antibody binding affinities?

  • Core strategies:

    • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for kinetic analysis (kon/koff rates)

    • Bio-layer interferometry with low-density immobilization to avoid avidity effects

    • Flow cytometry with serial antibody dilutions on overexpression cell lines (e.g., ATG-101 binding to PD-L1/4-1BB)

What strategies improve antibody therapeutic potential while minimizing toxicity?

  • Bispecific engineering:

    • Implement PD-L1-directed 4-1BB activation to limit off-target effects (ATG-101 design)

    • Utilize cross-linking dependent activation mechanisms

  • Affinity maturation:

    • Perform site-saturation mutagenesis in CDR regions

    • Screen using yeast display systems with error-prone PCR

ParameterPre-OptimizationPost-Optimization
KD (pM)1,040 9.16
IC50 (nM)15.2 3.8

How to address antibody functional divergence between in vitro and in vivo models?

  • Validation pipeline:

    • Ex vivo human PBMC assays for immune cell activation profiles

    • Humanized mouse models with grafted target cells (e.g., AT1413 AML testing)

    • Dose-ranging studies comparing receptor occupancy vs. cytokine release

Methodological Recommendations

  • For structural studies: Combine X-ray crystallography (2.8Å resolution minimum) with molecular dynamics simulations to validate binding interfaces

  • In functional assays: Implement reporter cell systems (e.g., HEK-Blue IL-4/IL-13) for quantitative pathway inhibition measurements

  • For clinical translation: Conduct parallel human/murine cross-reactivity testing early in development

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.