At5g56810 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Gene and Protein Overview

AT5G56810 is a nuclear gene encoding a F-box/RNI-like/FBD-like domains-containing protein with roles in protein degradation via ubiquitination pathways . Key characteristics include:

AttributeDetail
Gene IDAT5G56810
Protein DomainsF-box, RNI-like, FBD-like
Cellular LocalizationPredominantly nuclear (based on domain homology)
Molecular Weight~30–40 kDa (estimated)
Functional RoleLikely involvement in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis and stress responses

Antibody Development and Applications

While no commercially available "At5g56810 Antibody" is explicitly cited in the provided sources, general antibody development principles and homologous systems suggest the following:

2.1. Design Considerations

  • Epitope Selection: A peptide sequence from the F-box domain (e.g., residues 50–70) might serve as an immunogen for polyclonal antibody generation .

  • Validation: Western blot (WB) and immunocytochemistry (ICC) would confirm specificity, as demonstrated for anti-ATF5 and anti-DEFA5 antibodies.

2.2. Potential Research Applications

ApplicationProtocol ReferenceUtility
Protein LocalizationImmunofluorescence (IF) Subcellular tracking in plant tissues
Expression ProfilingWestern Blot Quantifying protein levels under stress
Protein Interaction StudiesCo-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) Identifying ubiquitination substrates

Challenges in Antibody Specificity

Cross-reactivity risks (e.g., anti-GR antibody clone 5E4 binding AMPD2/TRIM28 ) highlight the need for rigorous validation:

3.1. Validation Steps

  1. Knockout Controls: Compare WT and at5g56810 mutant plants to confirm signal absence .

  2. Orthogonal Methods: Use mass spectrometry (MS) to verify immunoprecipitated targets .

  3. Adsorption Tests: Pre-incubate antibody with immunogen peptide to abolish binding .

Comparative Analysis with Plant Antibodies

Lessons from Arabidopsis antibody development:

Antibody TargetValidation MethodOutcomeRelevance to AT5G56810
ATF5WB, ELISA, ICC Confirmed cytoplasmic/nuclear localizationSupports multi-application validation
V5 TagImmunofluorescence Validated in HEK-293 cellsHighlights protocol adaptability
DEFA5IP, WB, ELISA Demonstrated specificity for IBD diagnosisEmphasizes clinical translation potential

Future Directions

  • CRISPR-Cas9 Tags: Fusion proteins (e.g., GFP-AT5G56810) could bypass antibody needs .

  • Phospho-Specific Antibodies: Target post-translational modifications (e.g., phosphorylation sites) .

  • High-Throughput Screens: Use antibody arrays to study AT5G56810 interactomes .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
At5g56810 antibody; MIK19.28 antibody; Putative F-box/FBD/LRR-repeat protein At5g56810 antibody
Target Names
At5g56810
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is the At5g56810 gene and why are antibodies targeting it important for research?

At5g56810 is a gene in the model plant organism Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes a protein involved in cellular processes. Antibodies targeting this protein are crucial for studying its expression, localization, and function in plant cells. These antibodies enable researchers to detect and quantify the protein in various experimental settings, including immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation, and immunohistochemistry.

Similar to how researchers study immunoglobulin G (IgG) in human systems, plant protein-specific antibodies allow for precise molecular characterization. Just as plasma B cells in humans can produce more than 10,000 IgG molecules every second , antibody production systems for plant proteins like At5g56810 need to be highly efficient to yield sufficient quantities for research applications.

How are At5g56810 antibodies typically generated for research purposes?

At5g56810 antibodies are typically generated through several methodological approaches:

  • Recombinant protein expression and immunization: The At5g56810 gene or specific fragments are cloned into expression vectors, expressed in bacterial, yeast, or insect cell systems, purified, and used to immunize animals (typically rabbits, mice, or chickens). The resulting polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies are then harvested and purified.

  • Genotype-phenotype linked antibody technology: Advanced methods link antibody genotype (sequence) with its phenotype (binding properties). As described in recent research, "we developed a new functional screening method that is compatible with NGS to rapidly identify antigen-specific clones" . This approach uses a dual-expression vector system where heavy-chain and light-chain variable fragments are linked, enabling expression of membrane-bound immunoglobulin.

  • Synthetic peptide approach: Specific peptide sequences from the At5g56810 protein are synthesized and conjugated to carrier proteins before immunization, resulting in antibodies that recognize specific epitopes.

What factors affect the specificity and sensitivity of At5g56810 antibodies?

Multiple factors influence the specificity and sensitivity of At5g56810 antibodies:

  • Epitope selection: The region of the At5g56810 protein used for immunization significantly impacts antibody specificity. Regions with high sequence conservation across related proteins may yield antibodies with cross-reactivity, while highly unique regions may produce more specific antibodies.

  • Antibody format: Different antibody formats exhibit varying specificities. Monoclonal antibodies recognize single epitopes, potentially offering higher specificity but lower sensitivity compared to polyclonal antibodies, which bind multiple epitopes.

  • Post-translational modifications: The presence or absence of post-translational modifications on At5g56810 can affect antibody binding. As seen in other antibody research, "despite this, approximately half of the autoantibodies bind to the α subunit and especially the main immunogenic region" , showing that specific regions may be more immunogenic.

  • Purification method: The method used to purify antibodies affects their performance. Research indicates, "all proteins were purified with PureSpeed IMAC resin, according to the manufacturer's instructions" , highlighting the importance of standardized purification protocols.

How can next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology be integrated with At5g56810 antibody research?

NGS technology can significantly enhance At5g56810 antibody research through several sophisticated approaches:

What are the molecular mechanisms that enable high efficiency production of antibodies, and how might this apply to At5g56810 antibody production?

Understanding the molecular mechanisms of high-efficiency antibody production can inform strategies for generating At5g56810 antibodies:

  • Plasma B cell efficiency: Studies of human plasma B cells have revealed their remarkable efficiency, "producing more than 10,000 IgG molecules every second" . This efficiency is achieved through specialized cellular machinery, including an expanded endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus, and upregulation of genes involved in protein synthesis and secretion.

  • Genetic factors: Research has identified "an atlas of genes linked to high production and release of the most common type of antibody found in the human body, known as immunoglobulin G" . These genetic insights can inform the design of expression systems for At5g56810 antibody production.

  • Single-cell analysis: Advanced single-cell techniques allow researchers to link antibody production levels to gene expression profiles. As described in recent work, scientists "captured thousands of single plasma B cells as well as their individual secretions, and then connected the amount of proteins each individual cell released to an atlas mapping tens of thousands of genes expressed by that same cell" .

  • Nanovial technology: Novel technologies such as "microscopic, bowl-shaped hydrogel containers called nanovials" enable the capture and analysis of individual antibody-secreting cells, facilitating the identification of high-producing cell lines for antibody manufacturing.

How can researchers reconcile contradictory findings when using different At5g56810 antibodies?

When faced with contradictory results from different At5g56810 antibodies, researchers should implement a systematic approach:

  • Epitope mapping: Determine the specific epitopes recognized by each antibody. Different antibodies may target distinct regions of At5g56810, explaining discrepancies in detection patterns. Research has shown that "the autoantibodies target the ECDs of the AChR subunits and are very heterogeneous" , suggesting epitope variability can significantly impact results.

  • Validation using genetic approaches: Test antibodies in tissues from At5g56810 knockout or overexpression lines to definitively assess specificity.

  • Multiple detection methods: Apply different techniques (western blot, immunoprecipitation, immunohistochemistry) with each antibody. Research indicates that "the RIPA detected all the positive sera found by the ELISA, but it also detected antibodies in 13.4% of SNMG patients" , showing that methodological differences can yield varying results.

  • Kinetic analysis: Consider employing surface plasmon resonance to quantitatively assess antibody-antigen binding. As described in antibody research, "kinetic analyses were performed at 25°C using a BIAcore 3000 machine" , providing precise affinity measurements.

What are the optimal experimental conditions for using At5g56810 antibodies in different applications?

Optimizing experimental conditions is essential for successful At5g56810 antibody applications:

ApplicationKey ParametersOptimization StrategiesCommon Pitfalls
Western BlotAntibody dilution, blocking buffer, incubation timeTitration experiments, testing different blocking agentsNon-specific binding, inadequate transfer
ImmunoprecipitationLysis buffer, antibody amount, bead typeComparing native vs. denaturing conditionsCo-precipitating interactors mistaken for target
ImmunohistochemistryFixation method, antigen retrieval, detection systemTesting multiple fixatives, optimizing retrieval timeAutofluorescence, epitope masking
ELISACoating buffer, antibody concentration, washing stringencyStandard curve generation, checkerboard titrationEdge effects, inconsistent washing
Flow CytometryCell preparation, antibody concentration, compensationTitration of antibody, optimizing permeabilizationInadequate controls, poor cell preparation

For each application, researchers should perform careful validation experiments. As noted in antibody research literature, "sources of AChR can be human muscle or, more commonly, AChR-expressing cell lines" , highlighting the importance of appropriate positive controls for validation.

How should researchers design experiments to accurately evaluate At5g56810 protein expression levels?

Designing robust experiments to evaluate At5g56810 protein expression requires careful methodological consideration:

  • Appropriate controls: Include positive controls (tissues known to express At5g56810), negative controls (tissues with minimal expression), and loading controls to normalize protein amounts.

  • Quantitative approaches: For precise measurement, consider quantitative western blotting with standard curves, or ELISA methods. Recent advances have developed "a simple but much more sensitive RIPA than the classical one... which allows decreasing the cut-off for positivity" .

  • Multiple detection methods: Combine different approaches (western blot, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry) to corroborate findings, as different methods may have varying sensitivities.

  • Replication strategy: Design experiments with:

    • Technical replicates (minimum three per condition)

    • Biological replicates (independent samples)

    • Experimental replicates (repeated on different days)

  • Statistical analysis: Apply appropriate statistical tests based on experimental design and data distribution. Report effect sizes along with p-values for more meaningful interpretation.

What validation steps are essential before using a new At5g56810 antibody in critical experiments?

Before using At5g56810 antibodies in critical experiments, comprehensive validation is essential:

  • Specificity testing: Verify antibody specificity using:

    • Genetic controls (knockout/knockdown)

    • Blocking peptides

    • Western blot analysis for correct size

    • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry

  • Sensitivity assessment: Determine the detection limit through serial dilutions of purified target protein or lysates from tissues with known expression levels.

  • Cross-reactivity evaluation: Test against related proteins and in non-target species to assess potential cross-reactivity. Research has shown that "in rare cases antibodies can be found in patients with other autoimmune disorders" , highlighting the importance of stringent specificity testing.

  • Reproducibility testing: Ensure consistent results across multiple experiments, lots, and users through standardized protocols.

  • Application-specific validation: Validate the antibody specifically for each intended application (western blot, immunohistochemistry, etc.), as performance can vary significantly between applications.

How can researchers address inconsistent results when using At5g56810 antibodies?

Inconsistent results with At5g56810 antibodies can be addressed through systematic troubleshooting:

  • Antibody validation reassessment: Confirm antibody specificity using knockout/knockdown controls or competing peptides. Consider that "the autoantibodies against the α subunit are more pathogenic than those against the other subunits" , suggesting that epitope-specific effects may influence results.

  • Sample preparation optimization: Inconsistent results may stem from variable protein extraction efficiency or degradation. Test different extraction buffers, protease inhibitors, and sample handling procedures.

  • Protocol standardization: Develop and strictly adhere to standardized protocols. Small variations in incubation times, temperatures, or buffer compositions can significantly impact results.

  • Fresh antibody preparation: Antibody degradation can cause inconsistent results. Prepare fresh working dilutions and validate antibody stability over time.

  • Experimental variables control: Systematically evaluate factors including:

    • Temperature fluctuations

    • Reagent lot variations

    • Equipment calibration

    • Operator technique

  • Statistical approach: Implement appropriate statistical methods to distinguish true biological variation from technical noise.

What analytical approaches can reveal subtle patterns in At5g56810 expression data?

Advanced analytical approaches can uncover nuanced patterns in At5g56810 expression data:

  • Multivariate analysis: Apply principal component analysis or hierarchical clustering to identify patterns across multiple experimental conditions or tissues.

  • Time-series analysis: For temporal studies, employ time-series statistical methods to identify dynamic patterns in At5g56810 expression.

  • Correlation analysis: Evaluate correlations between At5g56810 expression and other proteins or transcripts to identify potential functional relationships.

  • Normalization strategies: Consider multiple normalization approaches to ensure robust quantification:

    • Total protein normalization

    • Housekeeping protein normalization

    • Global signal normalization

  • Image analysis software: For immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence, utilize specialized software that can perform unbiased quantification of signal intensity and distribution.

  • Bayesian approaches: Implement Bayesian statistical methods to incorporate prior knowledge and handle uncertainty in complex datasets.

  • Machine learning algorithms: Apply supervised or unsupervised learning methods to identify complex patterns in large datasets combining multiple parameters.

How can conflicting data from different methodological approaches to At5g56810 detection be reconciled?

When faced with conflicting data from different methodological approaches, researchers should:

  • Evaluate method-specific constraints: Different methods have inherent limitations. For example, western blotting detects denatured proteins, while immunoprecipitation works with native conformations, potentially explaining contradictory results.

  • Consider epitope accessibility: In different experimental contexts, epitopes may be differentially accessible. Research has shown that "the autoantibodies target the ECDs of the AChR subunits and are very heterogeneous" , suggesting epitope accessibility can vary significantly.

  • Validate with orthogonal approaches: Employ non-antibody-based methods such as mass spectrometry or RNA-based approaches to provide independent validation.

  • Systematic method comparison: Design experiments specifically to compare methods under identical conditions, using the same samples and controls.

  • Biological context consideration: Contradictory findings may reflect genuine biological variability across different tissues, developmental stages, or environmental conditions rather than methodological issues.

  • Meta-analysis approach: When multiple studies or datasets exist, perform a systematic meta-analysis to identify consistent patterns and sources of variability.

What emerging technologies might enhance future At5g56810 antibody research?

Several emerging technologies hold promise for advancing At5g56810 antibody research:

  • Nanobody and single-domain antibody technologies: These smaller antibody formats may offer advantages for detecting At5g56810 in certain applications, particularly for accessing epitopes in complex structures.

  • CRISPR-based validation: CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing provides powerful tools for generating knockout and knockin models for definitive antibody validation.

  • Advanced imaging techniques: Super-resolution microscopy and expansion microscopy can provide unprecedented spatial resolution for At5g56810 localization studies.

  • Single-cell proteomics: Emerging technologies for protein analysis at the single-cell level may complement antibody-based approaches for studying At5g56810 expression heterogeneity.

  • Automated antibody generation and screening: As described in recent research, "by combining our screening system with robotic automation of experiments, it will be possible to obtain useful mAbs for various diseases quickly and in large quantities" , suggesting similar approaches could accelerate At5g56810 antibody development.

  • Standardized validation reporting: Implementation of comprehensive validation reporting standards will enhance reproducibility and reliability in At5g56810 antibody research across different laboratories and applications.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.