FES1 antibodies are widely used in proteomic and cellular studies:
Western Blot (WB): Detects FES1 in lysates (e.g., HL-60, THP-1 cells) .
ELISA: Quantifies recombinant FES1 (e.g., ABIN1617237 with His tag) .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Localizes FES1 in tissues (e.g., human colon cancer) .
| Application | Dilution Range | Key Reagents |
|---|---|---|
| WB | 1:1,000 – 1:6,000 | Recombinant FES1 protein (90% purity) |
| IHC | 1:50 – 1:500 | Antigen retrieval with TE buffer (pH 9.0) |
FES1 undergoes methionine oxidation during oxidative stress, reversibly inhibiting its NEF activity. This modification is regulated by methionine sulfoxide reductases Mxr1 and Mxr2 .
Consequence: Reduced Hsp70 nucleotide exchange and peptide release, potentially mitigating protein aggregation under stress .
FES1 is essential for the vacuolar import and degradation (Vid) pathway in yeast, independent of its NEF activity. Mutants (e.g., Fes1ΔRD) retain ability to degrade substrates like Fbp1 .
Mechanism: FES1 directly interacts with misfolded proteins, facilitating their routing to degradation machinery .
While nomenclature overlaps exist, FES1 (HSPBP1) is distinct from the proto-oncogene FES (tyrosine kinase):
Epistasis analysis of FES1, FRI, and FRL1 demonstrates that these genes do not operate in a linear pathway. Instead, they function cooperatively to enhance FLC expression. PMID: 16291783
FES1 antibody is a research reagent that primarily targets HSPBP1 (Hsp70 binding protein 1), a protein involved in protein folding and other biological processes. The human version of FES1/HSPBP1 has a canonical amino acid length of 359 residues and a protein mass of approximately 39.3 kilodaltons, with three identified isoforms. It's important to note that FES1 is sometimes confused with FES (feline sarcoma oncogene), which is a different protein entirely .
Western Blot (WB) represents the most common application for FES1 antibodies, followed by ELISA and Immunohistochemistry (IHC). These applications enable researchers to detect and measure the FES1 antigen in various biological samples. The antibody has been validated across multiple experimental platforms to ensure reliable detection of the target protein .
Different FES1 antibodies show reactivity with different species. Based on available product information, certain FES1 antibodies react with:
| Species/Model System | Antibody Reactivity | Common Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Human | Confirmed | WB, ELISA, IHC |
| Mouse | Some antibodies | WB, ELISA |
| Rat | Some antibodies | WB |
| Arabidopsis | Specific antibodies | WB, ELISA |
| Saccharomyces | Specific antibodies | WB, ELISA |
Researchers should carefully check product specifications to ensure compatibility with their experimental model .
Optimizing Western Blot protocols for FES1 antibody requires attention to several technical parameters:
Dilution ratios: Most FES1 antibodies perform optimally at dilutions between 1:2000-1:10000 for Western Blot applications
Sample preparation: Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation and ensure complete denaturation of target proteins
Blocking: BSA-based blocking buffers may offer superior performance compared to milk-based alternatives for certain epitopes
Incubation conditions: Extended incubation at 4°C (overnight) often improves signal specificity compared to shorter room temperature protocols
Detection system: Choose secondary antibodies and substrates appropriate for the expected expression level of your target protein
Distinguishing between FES (feline sarcoma oncogene product) and FES1 (HSPBP1/Hsp70 binding protein) is critical for experimental clarity:
Molecular weight: FES is observed at approximately 93-94 kDa (with variant forms at 79 kDa, 85 kDa, and 87 kDa), while FES1/HSPBP1 appears at approximately 39.3 kDa
Functional context: FES functions as a tyrosine-protein kinase acting downstream of cell surface receptors, whereas FES1 participates in protein folding pathways
Cellular localization: FES is involved in cytoskeletal regulation and cell signaling, while FES1 primarily functions in protein folding and chaperone mechanisms
Antibody validation: Verify target specificity through careful examination of product documentation, epitope information, and validation data
For optimal immunofluorescence results:
Use recommended dilutions (typically 1:150-1:600 for IF/ICC applications)
Optimize fixation methods based on epitope accessibility (paraformaldehyde, methanol, or acetone)
Include appropriate permeabilization steps for intracellular targets
Implement robust blocking to minimize non-specific binding
Include positive and negative controls for validation
Consider antigen retrieval methods if working with fixed tissue samples
Use appropriate mounting media with anti-fade properties to preserve signal
The choice between monoclonal and polyclonal FES1 antibodies depends on specific research objectives:
| Feature | Monoclonal Antibodies | Polyclonal Antibodies |
|---|---|---|
| Specificity | High specificity to a single epitope | Recognize multiple epitopes |
| Sensitivity | Generally lower sensitivity | Higher sensitivity |
| Batch consistency | Minimal variation | Significant variation |
| Antigen denaturation tolerance | Less robust to denaturation | More robust to denaturation |
| Ideal applications | Epitope-specific detection | Protein detection under variable conditions |
For FES1 research, consider monoclonal antibodies (such as Mouse Monoclonal antibodies) when epitope-specific detection is required, and polyclonal antibodies (such as Rabbit Polyclonal) when broader protein detection is the priority .
Advanced statistical approaches can significantly improve FES1 antibody data interpretation:
Finite mixture models can help classify samples into antibody-positive or antibody-negative groups
Scale mixtures of Skew-Normal distributions offer flexible modeling of asymmetric data often observed in antibody studies
Appropriate normalization methods enable reliable cross-experiment comparisons
Clustering algorithms can identify patterns in complex datasets
ROC curve analysis helps determine optimal cutoff values for positive/negative determination
Longitudinal data analysis provides insights for temporal studies
Systematic troubleshooting strategies for FES1 antibody experiments include:
Verify antibody integrity (checking storage conditions, expiration, freeze-thaw cycles)
Confirm target protein expression in your experimental system
Review buffer compositions and reagent quality
Examine each protocol step for potential technical errors
Test alternative sample preparation methods
Implement positive controls with known reactivity
Adjust incubation conditions (time, temperature, agitation)
Consult literature and technical support resources
When faced with contradictory results across different detection platforms:
Verify antibody specificity through additional validation techniques (knockout controls, recombinant protein)
Consider epitope accessibility issues that may differ between applications
Evaluate fixation and sample preparation effects on epitope recognition
Determine if post-translational modifications affect antibody binding
Use alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes of the same protein
Employ complementary detection methods (mass spectrometry, RNA analysis) to confirm expression patterns
Comprehensive validation strategies for FES1 antibodies include:
Genetic knockdown/knockout controls to confirm specificity
Peptide competition assays to verify epitope binding
Testing across multiple applications (WB, IF, ELISA) for consistent results
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry for definitive identification
Comparison with multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Testing in cell/tissue types with well-documented expression profiles
Cross-validation with gene expression data
Sample preparation significantly impacts experimental outcomes:
| Application | Critical Sample Preparation Factors |
|---|---|
| Western Blot | Lysis buffer composition, denaturation method, reducing agent concentration |
| Immunofluorescence | Fixation method, permeabilization protocol, blocking agent selection |
| ELISA | Sample dilution, matrix effects, pretreatment requirements |
| IHC | Tissue fixation duration, embedding method, section thickness |
Researchers should optimize each preparation step for their specific experimental system and target detection goals .
When investigating post-translational modifications:
Determine if your antibody's epitope contains potential modification sites
Consider specialized modification-specific antibodies when available
Implement enrichment strategies for modified protein forms
Use 2D gel electrophoresis to separate modified variants
Combine immunological methods with mass spectrometry for definitive identification
Compare native versus denaturing conditions to assess structural impacts
Design time-course experiments to capture dynamic modification patterns
Cross-species applications require careful consideration:
Confirm epitope conservation through sequence alignment analysis
Validate antibody reactivity in each species before conducting full experiments
Adjust protocol parameters for species-specific tissue characteristics
Consider fixation differences between model organisms
Implement species-appropriate positive controls
Account for background differences in detection systems
Evaluate potential cross-reactivity with homologous proteins
Correlate antibody results with species-specific expression data
For successful multiplexed imaging:
Ensure spectral compatibility between fluorophores in your panel
Validate antibody performance under multiplexed conditions
Consider sequential staining for challenging antibody combinations
Implement appropriate controls for spectral unmixing
Optimize signal amplification for low-abundance targets
Use nuclear counterstains for reliable cell identification
Apply computational approaches for colocalization analysis
Consider cyclic immunofluorescence for highly multiplexed imaging experiments