FET5 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

FET Protein Family Overview

FET proteins (FUS, EWSR1, TAF15) are RNA-binding proteins involved in transcription, RNA processing, and DNA repair. Pathologically, FET proteins form cytoplasmic aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases like frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD-FUS) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) .

2.1. Pathological Insights

  • Neurodegeneration: Cryo-EM studies identified TAF15 amyloid filaments in FTLD-FUS brains, with atomic models deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB: 8ONS) .

  • Subcellular Localization: TAF15 shifts to insoluble fractions in FTLD-FUS, confirmed via immunoblot using clones like TAF15-308A .

2.2. Antibody Applications

ApplicationClone (Example)Target ValidationSource
Immunohistochemistry24235-1-APStaining in cervical cancer, melanoma
ImmunoblotTAF15-308A (Bethyl)Insoluble protein detection in FTLD
ImmunofluorescenceTAF15-IHC-00094-1Nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling assays

FZD5 Antibody Context

If "FET5" refers to FZD5 (Frizzled-5), a Wnt receptor, commercial antibodies like MA5-17080 (Thermo Fisher) target residues 151–217 of human FZD5 .

FZD5 Antibody Characteristics:

ParameterDetailSource
Host/IsotypeMouse IgG2a
ApplicationsWB, ELISA, FACS
ReactivitiesHuman
Molecular Weight~64.5 kDa

Technical Considerations

  • Cross-Reactivity: FET protein antibodies (e.g., TAF15) require validation to exclude cross-reactivity with homologous FET members .

  • Antibody Engineering: Pipelines like ASAP-SML statistically distinguish antibody features (e.g., CDR motifs, germline) to optimize specificity .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
FET5 antibody; YFL041WIron transport multicopper oxidase FET5 antibody; EC 1.-.-.- antibody
Target Names
FET5
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
FET5 Antibody targets a multicopper oxidase involved in iron transport. This enzyme is crucial for the high-affinity uptake of ferrous iron (Fe2+). Its function is likely to involve oxidizing Fe2+ and releasing it from the transporter. FET5 is an essential component of the copper-dependent iron transport pathway.
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YFL041W

STRING: 4932.YFL041W

Protein Families
Multicopper oxidase family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is FET5 antibody and what protein family is it associated with?

FET5 antibody targets proteins in the fetuin family, similar to FETUB (fetuin B). Fetuins are secreted proteins with multiple glycosylation sites that participate in various biological processes. The FET5 antibody specifically recognizes epitopes on these target proteins, enabling their detection and quantification in experimental settings.

Fetuin family proteins are characterized by their secretory nature and typically contain post-translational modifications, particularly glycosylation sites. While specific information on FET5 is limited in the provided search results, related fetuin proteins like FETUB consist of approximately 382 amino acids and are secreted into extracellular environments .

When selecting a FET5 antibody for research, consider:

  • Target epitope specificity

  • Cross-reactivity with related proteins

  • Applications validated by the manufacturer (WB, ELISA, IHC, ICC)

  • Species reactivity (human, mouse, rat, etc.)

What are the primary applications for FET5 antibody in research settings?

FET5 antibody can be utilized across multiple experimental techniques based on typical antibody applications. The most common research applications include:

ApplicationTypical Dilution RangeSample PreparationDetection Method
Western Blot (WB)1:500-1:2000Denatured protein samplesChemiluminescence/Fluorescence
ELISA1:1000-1:5000Native protein in solutionColorimetric/Fluorometric
Immunohistochemistry (IHC-p)1:100-1:500Paraffin-embedded tissue sectionsChromogenic substrates
Immunocytochemistry (ICC)1:100-1:500Fixed cell preparationsFluorescence microscopy

For optimal results across these applications, researchers should validate antibody performance with positive and negative controls. Additionally, blocking with appropriate buffers (e.g., 5% BSA or non-fat milk) helps minimize non-specific binding and background signals .

How should researchers validate the specificity of FET5 antibody in their experimental systems?

Thorough validation of FET5 antibody specificity is critical for generating reliable research data. A comprehensive validation approach includes:

  • Positive and negative controls: Use samples known to express or lack the target protein.

  • Knockdown/knockout validation: Compare signals between normal samples and those where the target has been depleted through genetic approaches (siRNA, CRISPR, etc.).

  • Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with excess target peptide to confirm specific binding.

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Test antibody against related proteins to assess potential non-specific interactions.

  • Multiple antibody comparison: Confirm results using antibodies targeting different epitopes of the same protein.

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) can provide visual confirmation of antibody-antigen binding, as demonstrated in similar validation studies. In one study using AFM analysis, antibody attachments appeared as small ball-like features with heights of approximately 2.78 nm ± 0.22 nm, with subsequent antigen binding increasing feature heights by ~1.8 nm per bound antigen .

How can researchers optimize FET5 antibody-based biosensor development for diagnostic applications?

Development of antibody-based biosensors involves careful optimization of multiple parameters. For FET5 antibody integration into biosensor platforms, consider the following methodology:

  • Antibody immobilization strategy:

    • Chemical coupling via EDC/NHS chemistry

    • Streptavidin-biotin interaction for oriented attachment

    • Diazonium salt functionalization for carbon-based biosensors

  • Signal transduction mechanism:

    • Field-effect transistor (FET) platforms offer exceptional sensitivity

    • Surface plasmon resonance provides real-time binding kinetics

    • Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measures interfacial changes

  • Performance optimization:

    • Buffer composition affects both antibody stability and background signal

    • Surface blocking prevents non-specific binding (1% BSA or specialized blocking buffers)

    • Antibody density impacts sensitivity and dynamic range

Research has demonstrated that antibody-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube field-effect transistors (SWNT FETs) can achieve detection limits as low as 1 ng/ml for specific antigens. These systems show concentration-dependent responses following Hill-Langmuir binding thermodynamics, with response times of just minutes .

The Hill-Langmuir model provides a theoretical framework for understanding antibody-antigen binding kinetics, with the equation:

ΔVVmax=[L]n[L]n+Kdn\frac{\Delta V}{V_{max}} = \frac{[L]^n}{[L]^n + K_d^n}

Where ΔV represents the response signal, Vmax is the maximum signal, [L] is ligand concentration, Kd is the dissociation constant, and n is the Hill coefficient reflecting binding cooperativity .

What computational approaches can identify key sequence features of FET5 antibody that contribute to its binding specificity?

Modern computational methods can elucidate critical sequence determinants of antibody specificity. For analyzing FET5 antibody or designing variants with enhanced properties, researchers can implement:

  • Feature extraction and fingerprinting:

    • Identify germline origins of variable regions

    • Map CDR canonical structures

    • Calculate physicochemical properties (isoelectric point, hydrophobicity)

    • Extract frequent positional motifs, particularly in CDR-H3 regions

  • Machine learning models for specificity prediction:

    • Train models on antibody sequence datasets to identify distinguishing features

    • Implement statistical significance testing to prioritize relevant features

    • Use biophysics-informed models to disentangle multiple binding modes

  • Sequence-structure-function relationship analysis:

    • Homology modeling of antibody structures

    • Molecular docking simulations with target antigens

    • Energy function optimization for specificity engineering

The ASAP-SML (Antibody Sequence Analysis Pipeline using Statistical testing and Machine Learning) pipeline provides a systematic approach for identifying features that distinguish one set of antibody sequences from a reference set. This pipeline extracts feature fingerprints representing germline, CDR canonical structure, isoelectric point, and frequent positional motifs, then applies machine learning techniques to identify distinguishing features .

Research has shown that features associated with the antibody heavy chain, particularly the CDR-H3 region, are more likely to differentiate between antibodies with different targeting properties . This insight can guide focused engineering efforts when modifying FET5 antibody specificity.

How can researchers engineer FET5 antibody variants with customized specificity profiles?

Engineering antibodies with tailored specificity requires sophisticated experimental and computational approaches. For FET5 antibody customization, consider this methodological framework:

  • Experimental selection platforms:

    • Phage display with tailored selection conditions

    • Yeast surface display with fluorescence-activated cell sorting

    • Ribosome display for larger library screening

  • Computational design strategies:

    • Energy function optimization to minimize binding to desired targets while maximizing selectivity

    • Joint minimization of energy functions for cross-specific binding

    • De novo design of CDR regions based on structural constraints

  • Validation and characterization workflow:

    • Binding affinity determination via surface plasmon resonance or bio-layer interferometry

    • Epitope binning to confirm targeting of desired epitopes

    • Functional assays relevant to the intended application

Recent research demonstrated the generation of antibodies with custom specificity profiles by optimizing over energy functions associated with different binding modes. For cross-specific antibodies, researchers jointly minimized the energy functions associated with desired ligands. For highly specific antibodies, they minimized energy functions for desired ligands while maximizing those for undesired targets .

Design ObjectiveComputational ApproachExperimental Validation
High specificity for single targetMinimize E₍target₎, maximize E₍non-targets₎Competitive binding assays
Cross-reactivity with defined targetsJointly minimize E₍targets₎Multiplex binding assays
Reduced off-target bindingNegative selection against off-targetsTissue cross-reactivity panels

The implementation of these approaches has enabled the generation of antibody variants not present in initial libraries that demonstrate specificity to given combinations of ligands, highlighting the potential for rational design of antibodies with customized properties .

What are common causes of background or non-specific signals when using FET5 antibody, and how can they be mitigated?

Background and non-specific signals represent significant challenges in antibody-based detection. For FET5 antibody applications, these issues can be systematically addressed:

  • Sources of background signals:

    • Non-specific antibody binding to abundant proteins

    • Fc receptor interactions with cellular components

    • Secondary antibody cross-reactivity

    • Endogenous enzyme activity interfering with detection

  • Optimization strategies:

    • Titrate primary antibody concentration to minimize background while maintaining specific signal

    • Optimize blocking conditions (5% BSA, 5% non-fat milk, or commercial blocking buffers)

    • Include detergents (0.1-0.3% Tween-20) in wash buffers

    • Perform adsorption with tissue powder for tissue-based applications

  • Validation controls:

    • Include isotype control antibodies to assess non-specific binding

    • Perform secondary-only controls to evaluate background

    • Use antigen-depleted samples as negative controls

In biosensor applications, control experiments with high concentrations of non-target proteins like bovine serum albumin (BSA, 1 μg/mL) can approximate the effect of non-specific proteins present in patient samples. In one study, such control experiments showed minimal response to BSA compared to specific antigens, confirming sensor specificity .

How can researchers interpret contradictory results between different detection methods using FET5 antibody?

When facing discrepancies between experimental results using the same antibody across different methods, a systematic troubleshooting approach is essential:

  • Method-specific considerations:

    • Western blot detects denatured epitopes, while ELISA and IHC may require native conformations

    • Different sample preparation methods affect epitope accessibility

    • Detection sensitivity varies significantly between methods

  • Analysis framework for resolving contradictions:

    • Evaluate antibody performance using positive and negative controls in each assay

    • Consider target protein abundance and detection limits of each method

    • Assess target protein modifications that might affect antibody recognition

  • Confirmation strategies:

    • Validate results with multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes

    • Employ orthogonal detection methods independent of antibody recognition

    • Perform genetic manipulation (knockdown/overexpression) to verify specificity

How might advanced computational approaches enhance FET5 antibody engineering for increased specificity and affinity?

The integration of computational methods with experimental antibody engineering represents a frontier in antibody research. For advancing FET5 antibody properties:

  • Machine learning approaches:

    • Deep learning models trained on antibody-antigen complexes can predict binding properties

    • Natural language processing techniques applied to antibody sequences can identify functional motifs

    • Generative models can propose novel sequences with desired properties

  • Structure-based computational design:

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to assess binding stability

    • Free energy calculations to predict binding affinity changes

    • In silico affinity maturation through iterative sequence optimization

  • Emerging hybrid approaches:

    • High-throughput experimental data integration with computational predictions

    • Physics-informed neural networks that incorporate binding thermodynamics

    • Evolutionary algorithms guided by experimental feedback

Recent advances demonstrate that biophysics-informed models trained on experimentally selected antibodies can associate distinct binding modes with different ligands. This approach enables both prediction of outcomes for new ligand combinations and generation of novel antibody variants with predefined binding profiles .

The future of antibody engineering likely involves integration of high-throughput experimental data with computational models that capture the underlying physical principles of protein-protein interactions, allowing for more targeted and efficient development of antibodies with precisely tailored properties.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.