FLA19 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Absence of Direct References to "FLA19 Antibody"

  • Search Results Analysis: None of the 13 provided sources, including PubMed, PMC, BioRxiv, and industry documents (e.g., AstraZeneca, Sigma-Aldrich), mention "FLA19 Antibody."

  • Antibody Nomenclature: Antibodies are typically named using standardized conventions (e.g., mAb [Target]-[Clone ID] or INN/USAN designations). The term "FLA19" does not align with established naming systems for antibodies.

Similar Antibody Candidates

  • Flavivirus Antibodies:

    • mAb 2A10G6 (PubMed ): A broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody targeting the fusion loop of flaviviruses (DENV, WNV, JEV).

    • Clone D1-4G2-4-15 (Search Result ): Targets the flavivirus envelope protein but lacks the "FLA19" designation.

Hypothetical Relevance to "FLA19"

If "FLA19" refers to a fluorescently labeled antibody (e.g., Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated antibodies in Search Result ), no such naming convention exists in the provided data.

Recommended Verification Steps

Given the lack of corroborating evidence:

  1. Clarify the Target Antigen: Antibodies are defined by their target (e.g., CD19, HER2). Without this, identification is impossible.

  2. Check Nomenclature: Confirm whether "FLA19" is a proprietary/internal code (e.g., from unpublished studies or patent applications).

  3. Explore Typographical Errors: Potential candidates include:

    • FcLA19: Hypothetical Fc-engineered antibody (no matches in sources).

    • FLAb: A benchmark for antibody fitness prediction (BioRxiv ).

General Antibody Characterization Framework

For context, below is a template for antibody characterization, derived from methodologies in the search results:

Table 1: Key Antibody Characterization Criteria

ParameterExample Data (SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies )Relevance to Hypothetical "FLA19"
Target AntigenSARS-CoV-2 Spike RBDUnknown
IsotypeIgG1, IgG4Undefined
Binding MechanismBlocks ACE2 receptorUnclear
Therapeutic UseCOVID-19 prophylaxis/therapyNot applicable
Structural ClassVH3-53 with short CDRH3Uncharacterized
Clinical StagePhase III (AstraZeneca’s AZD7442 )No data

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
FLA19 antibody; At1g15190 antibody; F9L1.13Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein 19 antibody
Target Names
FLA19
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
FLA19 Antibody may function as a cell surface adhesion protein.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G15190

STRING: 3702.AT1G15190.1

UniGene: At.20307

Protein Families
Fasciclin-like AGP family
Subcellular Location
Secreted.

Q&A

What is the 1C19 antibody and what epitope does it recognize?

The 1C19 is a human monoclonal antibody that recognizes a novel conserved site in the envelope (E) protein domain II of dengue virus (DENV). Specifically, it targets the bc loop, which consists of amino acids 73 to 79 with the sequence RCPTQGE. This epitope differs from the more commonly targeted fusion loop (amino acids 98-111), which is associated with antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) effects . The unique targeting mechanism of 1C19 allows it to efficiently neutralize all four DENV serotypes while competing for binding against fusion loop antibodies that contribute to ADE .

How does the 1C19 antibody compare to other neutralizing antibodies in flavivirus research?

Unlike most cross-reactive antibodies that target the fusion loop, 1C19 targets a distinct epitope that provides balanced neutralization without enhancement. The table below compares key properties:

Property1C19 AntibodyFusion Loop Antibodies (e.g., 4G2)
Epitope targetbc loop (RCPTQGE)Fusion loop (aa 98-111)
NeutralizationAll four DENV serotypesVariable, often serotype-specific
ADE potentialMinimalHigh
Cross-reactivityHigh across DENV serotypesVariable across flaviviruses
Competition abilityCan compete against fusion loop AbsPrimary binding to fusion loop

The 1C19 antibody's ability to efficiently neutralize without enhancement makes it particularly valuable for both therapeutic development and as a model for vaccine design .

What methods can be used to generate antibodies targeting the 1C19 epitope?

Researchers can generate antibodies similar to 1C19 by immunizing animals with peptides containing multiple copies of the target epitope. The following methodology has proven effective:

  • Peptide design: Synthesize peptides containing five tandem copies of the target sequence:

    • For DENV/ZIKV: RCPTQGERCPTQGERCPTQGERCPTQGERCPTQGE

    • For JEV (with one amino acid difference): RCPTTGERCPTTGERCPTTGERCPTTGERCPTTGE

  • Immunization protocol:

    • Select 6-week-old female BALB/c mice

    • Primary immunization using Freund's complete adjuvant

    • Two booster immunizations using Freund's incomplete adjuvant

    • Collection of sera for antibody purification

This approach generates polyclonal antibodies that can be evaluated for neutralization ability and protective efficacy against the target viruses.

How should neutralization assays be designed to properly evaluate 1C19-like antibodies?

Focus reduction neutralization tests (FRNT) provide the most reliable assessment of neutralizing capability. The protocol should include:

  • Sample preparation:

    • Dilute sera samples via serial twofold dilutions (starting at 1:8)

    • Heat-inactivate samples for 30 min at 56°C

  • Cell infection:

    • Prepare a monolayer of BHK-21 cells in 24-well plates

    • Pre-mix virus (approximately 300 FFU per well) with sera at 4°C overnight

    • Inoculate cells with the virus-antibody mixture

    • Incubate at 37°C for 2 hours

  • Analysis:

    • Determine viral titers using focus-forming unit (FFU) assay

    • Calculate FRNT₅₀ as the reciprocal of the highest dilution producing 50% reduction in FFU compared to virus-only controls

This methodology allows for quantitative comparison of neutralizing potency across different antibodies and virus serotypes.

How can researchers evaluate whether 1C19-derived antibodies induce antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)?

ADE assessment is critical for flavivirus antibody research and requires both in vitro and in vivo approaches:

In vitro ADE assay:

  • Prepare heat-inactivated antibodies/sera in fourfold serial dilutions (starting at 1:8)

  • Mix with virus and incubate for 1 hour at 37°C to form immune complexes

  • Add K562 cells (which express Fc receptors) to the mixture (MOI = 0.1)

  • Incubate for 1.5 hours at 37°C

  • Wash and resuspend cells in fresh medium

  • Incubate for 3 days at 37°C

  • Determine viral titers by focus-forming assay

  • Calculate fold enhancement (viral titer with sera ÷ viral titer without sera)

In vivo ADE assay:

  • Intraperitoneally inject AG129 mice with PBS (control), 5 μg of mAb 4G2 (positive control), or test antibodies

  • Challenge with virus (e.g., 10⁴ FFU of DENV-4) 24 hours later

  • Collect blood samples on day 3 post-infection

  • Measure platelet counts and viremia titers

  • Monitor survival rates for 30 days

The combination of these assays provides comprehensive data on potential enhancement effects.

How can flow cytometry be optimized for analyzing antibody binding to flavivirus-infected cells?

Flow cytometry is essential for characterizing antibody binding patterns. Key considerations include:

A well-designed flow cytometry experiment provides critical data on antibody binding characteristics, competition with other antibodies, and expression patterns in infected versus uninfected cells.

What considerations are important for developing epitope-based vaccines using the 1C19 target sequence?

The unique properties of the 1C19 epitope make it promising for vaccine development:

  • Epitope presentation strategies:

    • Multimeric presentation (five tandem copies) enhances immunogenicity

    • Consider structural context to maintain native conformation

    • Evaluate carrier protein conjugation for improved T-cell help

  • Cross-protection potential:

    • DV/ZV-NTE (RCPTQGE-based) immunization provides protection against multiple DENV serotypes and ZIKV

    • JEV-NTE (RCPTTGE-based) immunization is specific to JEV

    • The single amino acid difference (Q vs T) appears crucial for specificity

  • Advantages over conventional approaches:

    • Reduced risk of ADE compared to whole virus or fusion loop-based approaches

    • Potentially broader protection against current and emerging strains

    • Simplified manufacturing compared to attenuated virus vaccines

The table below summarizes neutralization data from epitope-based immunization:

VirusJEV-NTE Immune SeraDV/ZV-NTE Immune Sera4G2 mAb (Control)
JEVStrong neutralizationMinimal neutralizationVariable
DENV-1Minimal neutralizationStrong neutralizationOften enhancing
DENV-2Minimal neutralizationStrong neutralizationOften enhancing
DENV-3Minimal neutralizationStrong neutralizationOften enhancing
DENV-4Minimal neutralizationStrong neutralizationOften enhancing
ZIKVMinimal neutralizationStrong neutralizationVariable

This demonstrates the specificity and cross-protection potential of epitope-targeted immunity .

How does protective efficacy of 1C19 epitope vaccines compare in animal models?

In vivo protective efficacy is a critical measure for potential vaccines. The data shows:

  • Protection against JEV:

    • JEV-NTE immune sera provide significant protection in JEV-infected ICR mice

    • DV/ZV-NTE immune sera confer limited cross-protection

  • Protection against DENV:

    • DV/ZV-NTE immune sera significantly protect AG129 mice against DENV challenge

    • JEV-NTE immune sera confer limited protection

    • Control sera (4G2) often enhance infection, increasing mortality

  • Correlations with neutralizing titers:

    • Higher FRNT₅₀ values generally correlate with improved protection

    • Protection appears to require titers above a threshold level

These findings support the translational potential of epitope-based vaccines targeting the 1C19 epitope region.

What are the key methodological challenges in studying conformational epitopes like that of 1C19?

Researchers face several technical challenges when working with conformational epitopes:

  • Epitope preservation:

    • Linear peptides may not fully recapitulate the three-dimensional structure

    • Native protein conformation is crucial for antibody recognition

    • Solution: Use structural biology approaches to inform peptide design

  • Specificity validation:

    • Single amino acid differences can dramatically alter specificity (RCPTQGE vs RCPTTGE)

    • Cross-reactivity must be carefully evaluated across related viruses

    • Solution: Comprehensive mutation analysis and cross-neutralization testing

  • Functional correlation:

    • Binding does not always correlate with neutralization

    • Multiple mechanisms may contribute to protection

    • Solution: Integrate binding assays with functional neutralization tests

How can researchers troubleshoot antibody-based flow cytometry experiments for flavivirus research?

Common flow cytometry challenges and solutions include:

ChallengePotential CauseSolution
High backgroundNon-specific bindingAdd FcR blocking reagents; Include proper isotype controls
Poor separationSuboptimal fluorophore selectionMatch antibody expression level with fluorophore brightness
Cell deathSample processing damageInclude viability dye; Optimize processing protocols
Spectral overlapFluorophore selection issuesCalculate complexity index (CI); Use compensation controls
Insufficient eventsRare population analysisIncrease acquisition time; Enrich target population
AggregationCell clumpingAdd EDTA; Filter samples; Include DNase

Implementing these solutions ensures robust and reproducible flow cytometry data for antibody characterization.

What emerging technologies could enhance the identification of 1C19-like broadly neutralizing antibodies?

Several advanced technologies are poised to accelerate discovery of broadly neutralizing antibodies:

  • Single B-cell approaches:

    • Direct isolation of antigen-specific B cells from convalescent patients

    • Single-cell RNA sequencing to identify paired heavy and light chains

    • Rapid expression and functional screening of candidates

  • Advanced structural biology:

    • Cryo-electron microscopy of antibody-virus complexes

    • X-ray crystallography of Fab-antigen complexes

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for epitope mapping

  • High-throughput screening platforms:

    • Multi-parameter flow cytometry for antibody functional profiling

    • Microfluidic systems for single-cell antibody secretion analysis

    • Computational approaches to predict cross-reactivity

How might the 1C19 epitope research inform strategies against other viral families?

The lessons from 1C19 research have broader implications:

  • Epitope selection principles:

    • Target conserved regions that are critical for viral function

    • Avoid epitopes known to induce enhancement

    • Focus on epitopes that generate broadly neutralizing responses

  • Cross-family applications:

    • Identify functionally similar regions in unrelated viruses

    • Apply epitope-focused vaccine design to other challenging pathogens

    • Develop platform technologies for rapid response to emerging viruses

  • Technological transfer:

    • Apply similar methodologies for antibody discovery to other viral families

    • Leverage structural understanding to design universal vaccines

    • Utilize similar in vitro and in vivo assessment protocols

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.