Search Results Analysis: None of the 13 provided sources, including PubMed, PMC, BioRxiv, and industry documents (e.g., AstraZeneca, Sigma-Aldrich), mention "FLA19 Antibody."
Antibody Nomenclature: Antibodies are typically named using standardized conventions (e.g., mAb [Target]-[Clone ID] or INN/USAN designations). The term "FLA19" does not align with established naming systems for antibodies.
Flavivirus Antibodies:
If "FLA19" refers to a fluorescently labeled antibody (e.g., Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated antibodies in Search Result ), no such naming convention exists in the provided data.
Given the lack of corroborating evidence:
Clarify the Target Antigen: Antibodies are defined by their target (e.g., CD19, HER2). Without this, identification is impossible.
Check Nomenclature: Confirm whether "FLA19" is a proprietary/internal code (e.g., from unpublished studies or patent applications).
Explore Typographical Errors: Potential candidates include:
For context, below is a template for antibody characterization, derived from methodologies in the search results:
The 1C19 is a human monoclonal antibody that recognizes a novel conserved site in the envelope (E) protein domain II of dengue virus (DENV). Specifically, it targets the bc loop, which consists of amino acids 73 to 79 with the sequence RCPTQGE. This epitope differs from the more commonly targeted fusion loop (amino acids 98-111), which is associated with antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) effects . The unique targeting mechanism of 1C19 allows it to efficiently neutralize all four DENV serotypes while competing for binding against fusion loop antibodies that contribute to ADE .
Unlike most cross-reactive antibodies that target the fusion loop, 1C19 targets a distinct epitope that provides balanced neutralization without enhancement. The table below compares key properties:
| Property | 1C19 Antibody | Fusion Loop Antibodies (e.g., 4G2) |
|---|---|---|
| Epitope target | bc loop (RCPTQGE) | Fusion loop (aa 98-111) |
| Neutralization | All four DENV serotypes | Variable, often serotype-specific |
| ADE potential | Minimal | High |
| Cross-reactivity | High across DENV serotypes | Variable across flaviviruses |
| Competition ability | Can compete against fusion loop Abs | Primary binding to fusion loop |
The 1C19 antibody's ability to efficiently neutralize without enhancement makes it particularly valuable for both therapeutic development and as a model for vaccine design .
Researchers can generate antibodies similar to 1C19 by immunizing animals with peptides containing multiple copies of the target epitope. The following methodology has proven effective:
Peptide design: Synthesize peptides containing five tandem copies of the target sequence:
Immunization protocol:
This approach generates polyclonal antibodies that can be evaluated for neutralization ability and protective efficacy against the target viruses.
Focus reduction neutralization tests (FRNT) provide the most reliable assessment of neutralizing capability. The protocol should include:
Sample preparation:
Dilute sera samples via serial twofold dilutions (starting at 1:8)
Heat-inactivate samples for 30 min at 56°C
Cell infection:
Prepare a monolayer of BHK-21 cells in 24-well plates
Pre-mix virus (approximately 300 FFU per well) with sera at 4°C overnight
Inoculate cells with the virus-antibody mixture
Incubate at 37°C for 2 hours
Analysis:
This methodology allows for quantitative comparison of neutralizing potency across different antibodies and virus serotypes.
ADE assessment is critical for flavivirus antibody research and requires both in vitro and in vivo approaches:
In vitro ADE assay:
Prepare heat-inactivated antibodies/sera in fourfold serial dilutions (starting at 1:8)
Mix with virus and incubate for 1 hour at 37°C to form immune complexes
Add K562 cells (which express Fc receptors) to the mixture (MOI = 0.1)
Incubate for 1.5 hours at 37°C
Wash and resuspend cells in fresh medium
Incubate for 3 days at 37°C
Determine viral titers by focus-forming assay
Calculate fold enhancement (viral titer with sera ÷ viral titer without sera)
In vivo ADE assay:
Intraperitoneally inject AG129 mice with PBS (control), 5 μg of mAb 4G2 (positive control), or test antibodies
Challenge with virus (e.g., 10⁴ FFU of DENV-4) 24 hours later
Collect blood samples on day 3 post-infection
Measure platelet counts and viremia titers
The combination of these assays provides comprehensive data on potential enhancement effects.
Flow cytometry is essential for characterizing antibody binding patterns. Key considerations include:
A well-designed flow cytometry experiment provides critical data on antibody binding characteristics, competition with other antibodies, and expression patterns in infected versus uninfected cells.
The unique properties of the 1C19 epitope make it promising for vaccine development:
Epitope presentation strategies:
Multimeric presentation (five tandem copies) enhances immunogenicity
Consider structural context to maintain native conformation
Evaluate carrier protein conjugation for improved T-cell help
Cross-protection potential:
Advantages over conventional approaches:
Reduced risk of ADE compared to whole virus or fusion loop-based approaches
Potentially broader protection against current and emerging strains
Simplified manufacturing compared to attenuated virus vaccines
The table below summarizes neutralization data from epitope-based immunization:
| Virus | JEV-NTE Immune Sera | DV/ZV-NTE Immune Sera | 4G2 mAb (Control) |
|---|---|---|---|
| JEV | Strong neutralization | Minimal neutralization | Variable |
| DENV-1 | Minimal neutralization | Strong neutralization | Often enhancing |
| DENV-2 | Minimal neutralization | Strong neutralization | Often enhancing |
| DENV-3 | Minimal neutralization | Strong neutralization | Often enhancing |
| DENV-4 | Minimal neutralization | Strong neutralization | Often enhancing |
| ZIKV | Minimal neutralization | Strong neutralization | Variable |
This demonstrates the specificity and cross-protection potential of epitope-targeted immunity .
In vivo protective efficacy is a critical measure for potential vaccines. The data shows:
Protection against JEV:
JEV-NTE immune sera provide significant protection in JEV-infected ICR mice
DV/ZV-NTE immune sera confer limited cross-protection
Protection against DENV:
Correlations with neutralizing titers:
Higher FRNT₅₀ values generally correlate with improved protection
Protection appears to require titers above a threshold level
These findings support the translational potential of epitope-based vaccines targeting the 1C19 epitope region.
Researchers face several technical challenges when working with conformational epitopes:
Epitope preservation:
Linear peptides may not fully recapitulate the three-dimensional structure
Native protein conformation is crucial for antibody recognition
Solution: Use structural biology approaches to inform peptide design
Specificity validation:
Single amino acid differences can dramatically alter specificity (RCPTQGE vs RCPTTGE)
Cross-reactivity must be carefully evaluated across related viruses
Solution: Comprehensive mutation analysis and cross-neutralization testing
Functional correlation:
Common flow cytometry challenges and solutions include:
Implementing these solutions ensures robust and reproducible flow cytometry data for antibody characterization.
Several advanced technologies are poised to accelerate discovery of broadly neutralizing antibodies:
Single B-cell approaches:
Direct isolation of antigen-specific B cells from convalescent patients
Single-cell RNA sequencing to identify paired heavy and light chains
Rapid expression and functional screening of candidates
Advanced structural biology:
Cryo-electron microscopy of antibody-virus complexes
X-ray crystallography of Fab-antigen complexes
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for epitope mapping
High-throughput screening platforms:
The lessons from 1C19 research have broader implications:
Epitope selection principles:
Target conserved regions that are critical for viral function
Avoid epitopes known to induce enhancement
Focus on epitopes that generate broadly neutralizing responses
Cross-family applications:
Identify functionally similar regions in unrelated viruses
Apply epitope-focused vaccine design to other challenging pathogens
Develop platform technologies for rapid response to emerging viruses
Technological transfer:
Apply similar methodologies for antibody discovery to other viral families
Leverage structural understanding to design universal vaccines
Utilize similar in vitro and in vivo assessment protocols