FLP2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of FLP2

FLP2 (gene designation flp-2) is a bacterial gene implicated in structural and functional roles within microbial systems. While its precise biological role remains under investigation, genetic studies have identified flp-2 in clinical isolates and experimental plasmids, suggesting involvement in microbial adhesion, virulence, or secretion systems .

FLP2 Antibody Development

Antibodies targeting FLP2 are critical tools for detecting and characterizing this protein in research. Development follows established protocols for monoclonal or polyclonal antibody generation, including:

  • Immunogen Design: Antigenic regions of FLP2 are selected based on sequence analysis and predicted epitopes .

  • Hybridoma Technology: B cells immunized with FLP2-derived antigens are fused with myeloma cells to produce monoclonal antibodies .

  • Recombinant Methods: Phage display or yeast libraries enable high-throughput screening for FLP2-specific binders .

Applications of FLP2 Antibody

FLP2 antibodies are utilized in diverse experimental workflows:

ApplicationMethodPurpose
Western BlottingSDS-PAGE immunoblottingDetect FLP2 expression in bacterial lysates
ImmunohistochemistryTissue section stainingLocalize FLP2 in biofilm or infection models
Functional StudiesKnockout validationConfirm FLP2 deletion in mutant strains

Antibody Performance

  • Specificity: FLP2 antibodies show no cross-reactivity with unrelated proteins like c-Fos or Fra1 in immunoblots .

  • Sensitivity: Detects endogenous FLP2 at concentrations as low as 1 ng/mL in ELISA .

Challenges and Future Directions

  • Characterization: Limited commercial availability necessitates in-house validation using techniques like PEPSCAN epitope mapping .

  • Therapeutic Potential: FLP2 antibodies could neutralize bacterial infections if proven to target virulence factors .

Key Reagents and Strains

Strain/PlasmidDescriptionSource
DF2200Wild-type Actinobacillus clinical isolatePMC (2006)
pBP022flp-2-T7 SD plasmidPMC (2006)
pBP024flp-2-T7 plasmidPMC (2006)

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
FLP2 antibody; At5g10625 antibody; F12B17_20Flowering-promoting factor 1-like protein 2 antibody; FPF1-like protein 2 antibody
Target Names
FLP2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody modulates the competence to flowering of apical meristems.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G10625

STRING: 3702.AT5G10625.1

UniGene: At.28549

Protein Families
FPF1 family
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in leaves and in some parts of the flowers, mainly in the sepals.

Q&A

What is FLP2 and what biological functions does it serve?

FLP-2 is a neuropeptide that plays a crucial role in arousing locomotion, particularly in C. elegans. Research has demonstrated that FLP-2 acts via an orexin-like receptor called FRPR-18, and FLP-2 and PDF-1 secretion are regulated by reciprocal positive feedback . Studies show that FLP-2 secretion is dramatically decreased during the L4/A molt compared to L4 stage animals in wild-type C. elegans, suggesting its importance in molt-associated locomotion quiescence . This molt-associated decrease in FLP-2 secretion is eliminated in npr-1 mutants, indicating that NPR-1 inhibits FLP-2 secretion during molts .

Functional studies using the flp-2 mutation (gk1039) have shown significantly reduced L4/A locomotion velocity and motile fraction compared to single mutants, demonstrating its specific role in locomotion regulation . Interestingly, the mutation had limited effect on adult locomotion in certain genetic backgrounds and no effect on foraging behavior, indicating that FLP-2 has specialized functions rather than affecting all behaviors universally .

How should researchers interpret differences in FLP2 expression data across multiple experimental platforms?

When analyzing FLP2 expression data across different platforms, researchers must consider several methodological factors:

PlatformQuantitative CapabilitySpatial ResolutionSensitivityBest Use Case
Western BlotModerateNoneModerateProtein size verification
ImmunohistochemistryLimitedHighModerateLocalization studies
ELISAHighNoneHighAbsolute quantification
Mass SpectrometryHighVariableVery highUnbiased detection

For robust interpretation:

  • Use standardized positive controls (purified FLP2 peptide) across all platforms to establish baseline detection levels

  • Implement appropriate normalization strategies for each method

  • Consider the specific limitations of each technique when interpreting discrepancies

  • Validate critical findings using orthogonal methods, particularly when results diverge

When evaluating mass spectrometry data, approaches such as those developed by Trinh et al. can enhance detection through optimized database searches, particularly important for detecting specific peptides in complex samples .

What validation steps are essential before using an FLP2 antibody in research?

Comprehensive validation of FLP2 antibodies is critical for ensuring experimental reliability. Based on established antibody characterization guidelines, researchers should complete the following validation steps:

  • Western blot analysis to confirm specificity by molecular weight and band pattern

  • Immunohistochemistry with wild-type and negative control samples (preferably FLP2 knockout/knockdown)

  • Peptide competition assays to verify specific binding to the FLP2 target

  • Cross-reactivity testing against related neuropeptides

  • Comparison of multiple antibodies targeting different FLP2 epitopes

The NeuroMab approach demonstrates the importance of comprehensive screening methods, where approximately 1,000 clones are screened in parallel ELISAs against both the immunogen and transfected cells expressing the target of interest . This approach significantly increases the chances of obtaining reliable reagents, as ELISA positivity alone may poorly predict usefulness in other applications .

How can researchers optimize FLP2 antibody conditions for immunohistochemistry?

Optimal conditions for FLP2 antibody use in immunohistochemistry require systematic optimization:

  • Fixation protocol: Test both paraformaldehyde (4%) and methanol fixation to determine which best preserves the FLP2 epitope

  • Antigen retrieval: Compare heat-induced epitope retrieval methods (citrate buffer pH 6.0 vs. EDTA buffer pH 9.0)

  • Blocking protocol: Test 5-10% normal serum from the secondary antibody species with 0.1-0.3% detergent

  • Antibody dilution: Establish a titration curve (typically 1:100 to 1:5000) to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio

  • Incubation conditions: Compare overnight incubation at 4°C versus extended incubation (48-72 hours) for weakly expressed targets

As demonstrated by NeuroMab's approach, using fixed and permeabilized cells expressing the antigen of interest in the screening process helps identify antibodies that will work effectively in immunohistochemistry . This strategy mimics the protocols used for brain sample preparation, increasing the likelihood of obtaining antibodies that perform well in actual research applications.

What controls should be included when using FLP2 antibodies in Western blotting?

For rigorous Western blot experiments with FLP2 antibodies, the following controls are essential:

  • Positive control: Samples known to express FLP2 (e.g., neural tissues in C. elegans)

  • Negative control: Samples lacking FLP2 expression (e.g., FLP2 knockout tissues)

  • Loading control: Detection of housekeeping proteins (β-actin, GAPDH) to ensure equal sample loading

  • Antibody specificity controls:

    • Primary antibody omission

    • Secondary antibody only

    • Peptide competition (pre-incubation with FLP2 peptide)

  • Molecular weight marker: To confirm the expected molecular weight of FLP2

Research on antibody characterization has revealed that approximately 50% of commercial antibodies fail to meet basic standards, resulting in estimated financial losses of $0.4-1.8 billion annually in the US alone . This underscores the critical importance of rigorous controls in all antibody-based experiments.

How should researchers approach FLP2 protein extraction to preserve epitope integrity?

Effective FLP2 protein extraction requires careful consideration of neuropeptide stability:

  • Buffer composition:

    • Use RIPA buffer with protease inhibitor cocktail for general extraction

    • Consider specialized neuropeptide extraction buffers containing 0.1M HCl for acid extraction

    • Add phosphatase inhibitors if studying phosphorylated forms

  • Temperature conditions:

    • Maintain samples at 4°C throughout extraction

    • Avoid freeze-thaw cycles that may degrade neuropeptides

  • Mechanical disruption:

    • For tissue samples, use gentle homogenization techniques

    • For cultured cells, use cell lysis buffer with brief sonication

  • Preservation additives:

    • Include 1mM EDTA to inhibit metalloproteinases

    • Add 1mM PMSF to inhibit serine proteases

    • Consider 5mM N-ethylmaleimide to preserve disulfide bonds

The careful preservation of epitope integrity is particularly important when studying neuropeptides like FLP-2, as their detection often relies on specific antibody-epitope interactions that can be disrupted by improper sample handling.

How can researchers use FLP2 antibodies to investigate neuropeptide signaling pathways?

FLP2 antibodies can be employed in sophisticated approaches to dissect neuropeptide signaling:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation to identify protein interactions:

    • Use FLP2 antibodies to pull down interaction partners

    • Perform reverse co-IP with FRPR-18 antibodies to confirm interactions

  • Proximity ligation assays:

    • Visualize direct interactions between FLP2 and FRPR-18 in situ

    • Quantify interaction events spatially and temporally

  • ChIP-seq analysis:

    • Study transcriptional regulation of FLP2 expression

    • Identify transcription factors controlling FLP2 production

  • Multi-label immunofluorescence:

    • Map FLP2 expression in relation to other neuropeptides

    • Establish cellular co-localization patterns

Research has shown that FLP-2 and PDF-1 secretion are regulated by reciprocal positive feedback, and NPR-1 inhibits FLP-2 secretion during molts . These specific pathways provide targets for investigating the molecular mechanisms governing FLP2 function using antibody-based approaches.

How can AI-driven approaches improve FLP2 antibody design?

AI technologies are revolutionizing antibody design with applications for FLP2 research:

  • Structure-based epitope prediction:

    • Computational identification of optimal FLP2 epitopes

    • Selection of regions with high antigenicity and accessibility

  • AI-powered antibody generation:

    • Tools like RFdiffusion can design antibody loops specialized for binding FLP2

    • Generation of human-like antibodies (scFvs) with improved specificity

  • In silico affinity maturation:

    • Computational evolution of antibody sequences to enhance binding affinity

    • Prediction of mutations that improve selectivity for FLP2 over related peptides

The Baker Lab has developed RFdiffusion, an AI tool fine-tuned to design human-like antibodies by focusing on antibody loops—the intricate, flexible regions responsible for binding . This technology produces novel antibody blueprints unlike any seen during training that can bind to user-specified targets, potentially enabling the creation of highly specific FLP2 antibodies .

What approaches can resolve contradictory results when using different FLP2 antibodies?

When faced with contradictory results from different FLP2 antibodies, researchers should implement this systematic troubleshooting approach:

  • Epitope mapping analysis:

    • Determine if antibodies recognize different FLP2 epitopes

    • Consider potential masking of epitopes in specific experimental conditions

  • Validation comparison:

    • Review validation data for each antibody

    • Prioritize results from antibodies with more comprehensive validation

  • Orthogonal confirmation:

    • Employ non-antibody detection methods (mass spectrometry)

    • Use genetic approaches (CRISPR knockouts) as definitive controls

  • Environmental variables:

    • Test if experimental conditions affect epitope accessibility

    • Evaluate whether post-translational modifications alter antibody recognition

The antibody characterization crisis has highlighted that many commercial antibodies lack adequate validation, which likely contributes to contradictory results in research . Using recombinant antibodies with defined sequences can help ensure consistency and reliability.

How are proteomics approaches enhancing FLP2 antibody applications?

Advanced proteomics methodologies are transforming FLP2 antibody applications:

  • Mass spectrometry validation:

    • Using targeted proteomics (SRM/MRM) to validate antibody specificity

    • Identifying and quantifying FLP2 peptides with high sensitivity

  • Database optimization:

    • Creating specialized databases for FLP2 detection in complex samples

    • Implementing data mining approaches similar to those used by Trinh et al. for antibody sequence analysis

  • Spatial proteomics integration:

    • Combining antibody-based detection with mass spectrometry imaging

    • Mapping FLP2 distribution with subcellular resolution

Trinh et al. demonstrated how mining extensive collections of antibody sequences can improve detection in proteomics data . Their approach involved digesting millions of antibody sequences in silico to create optimized databases for bottom-up proteomics, significantly enhancing peptide detection in complex samples . This methodology could potentially be adapted to improve FLP2 detection.

What are the advantages of recombinant FLP2 antibodies over traditional polyclonal antibodies?

Recombinant antibody technology offers significant advantages for FLP2 research:

CharacteristicTraditional PolyclonalRecombinant MonoclonalResearch Impact
SpecificityVariable, may recognize multiple epitopesHighly specific to single epitopeReduced background and cross-reactivity
ReproducibilityBatch-to-batch variationConsistent performanceMore reliable quantitative studies
SupplyLimited by immunizationUnlimited, renewableSustainable resource for long-term projects
SequenceUnknownDefinedEnables antibody engineering and improvement
CustomizationLimitedHighly customizableCan be optimized for specific applications

The shift toward recombinant antibodies with defined sequences addresses the reproducibility issues highlighted in antibody characterization research . For FLP2 studies, this technology offers the potential for creating standardized reagents that can be shared across the research community, enhancing data comparability and reliability.

How might single-cell approaches transform our understanding of FLP2 expression and function?

Single-cell technologies offer unprecedented insights into FLP2 biology:

  • Single-cell transcriptomics:

    • Profiling FLP2 expression at single-cell resolution

    • Identifying cell populations with differential FLP2 expression

  • Single-cell proteomics:

    • Quantifying FLP2 protein levels in individual cells

    • Correlating FLP2 expression with other cellular markers

  • Spatial transcriptomics:

    • Mapping FLP2 expression within intact tissue architecture

    • Correlating spatial distribution with functional outcomes

  • CyTOF with FLP2 antibodies:

    • Multiparameter analysis of FLP2 in relation to other cellular markers

    • High-dimensional phenotyping of FLP2-expressing cells

These technologies enable researchers to move beyond bulk tissue analysis to understand the heterogeneity of FLP2 expression and its functional implications at the cellular level. By revealing cell-specific patterns and regulatory mechanisms, these approaches may uncover previously unrecognized roles of FLP2 in diverse biological processes.

How can researchers address non-specific binding issues with FLP2 antibodies?

Non-specific binding challenges can be systematically addressed:

  • Blocking optimization:

    • Test alternative blocking agents (BSA, milk, commercial blockers)

    • Extend blocking time to 2-3 hours at room temperature

    • Add 0.1-0.5% Tween-20 to reduce hydrophobic interactions

  • Antibody dilution optimization:

    • Create a dilution series to identify optimal concentration

    • Consider two-step dilution approach (concentrating primary antibody while diluting secondary)

  • Washing protocol enhancement:

    • Increase wash buffer volume and duration

    • Add higher salt concentration (150-500mM NaCl) to reduce ionic interactions

    • Include low concentrations of non-ionic detergents

  • Pre-absorption techniques:

    • Pre-incubate antibody with related peptides to remove cross-reactive antibodies

    • Use lysates from FLP2-knockout tissues for pre-absorption

Research indicates that approximately 50% of commercial antibodies fail to meet basic standards for characterization , making thorough optimization and validation essential for obtaining reliable results with FLP2 antibodies.

What methodological considerations are important when quantifying FLP2 using immunoassays?

Accurate FLP2 quantification requires careful methodological considerations:

  • Standard curve preparation:

    • Use purified recombinant FLP2 for standard curves

    • Match standard matrix to sample matrix when possible

    • Prepare fresh standards for each assay

  • Sample preparation standardization:

    • Standardize extraction methods across all samples

    • Process all samples simultaneously when possible

    • Include spike-in controls to assess recovery efficiency

  • Antibody selection criteria:

    • Use antibodies validated specifically for quantitative applications

    • Confirm linear response across the expected concentration range

    • Verify absence of hook effect at high concentrations

  • Data analysis approach:

    • Apply appropriate curve-fitting models (4PL or 5PL for ELISA)

    • Calculate intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation

    • Establish lower and upper limits of quantification

When reporting quantitative FLP2 data, researchers should include detailed methodological information to enable reproducibility and proper interpretation of results.

The database search approaches developed by Trinh et al. highlight the importance of optimized methods for detecting specific peptides in complex samples , which is particularly relevant for quantifying low-abundance peptides like FLP2.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.