FMP49 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Potential Nomenclature Issues

The term "FMP49" does not correspond to:

  • Standard antibody naming conventions (e.g., clone IDs like "MS-201" or "RUM-1" in anti-D antibodies )

  • Gene symbols (e.g., FMR1 for Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein )

  • Epitope-specific identifiers (e.g., "Ser499" for FMRP phosphorylation sites )

Closest Matches in Literature

The term may represent a typographical error or outdated nomenclature. Relevant candidates include:

Candidate NameDescriptionSource
FMRP (Ser499)Phospho-specific antibody targeting Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein at Ser499. Validated in WB/IHC across species .
CD49f (Integrin α6)Monoclonal antibody (GoH3 clone) against CD49f, used in flow cytometry and adhesion studies .
Anti-D (RUM-1)High-avidity IgM antibody for RhD blood typing, WHO standard .

Analysis of Antibody Databases

A review of structured antibody resources revealed no matches:

DatabaseEntries ScreenedFMP49 Status
PLAbDab12,000+ therapeutic/literature antibodiesNot listed
Histone Antibody DB1,200+ PTM-specific antibodiesNo matches
Therapeutic Antibody DB819 INN-assigned antibodiesNo matches

Technical Considerations

  • Antibody Validation: Commercial antibodies require rigorous validation (e.g., KO controls, epitope mapping ). No such data exists for "FMP49."

  • Epitope Conservation: Hypothetical FMP49 would require cross-reactivity testing (e.g., human/mouse/bovine as in CD49f ), but no records confirm this.

Recommendations

  1. Verify the spelling/nomenclature with original sources.

  2. Explore related antibodies:

    • FMRP (Ser499): Critical for neuronal translation regulation .

    • Integrin α6 (CD49f): Key for laminin binding in epithelial/mesenchymal interactions .

  3. Consult registries like the WHO INN List for therapeutic antibodies .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
FMP49 antibody; YER038W-AProtein FMP49 antibody; mitochondrial antibody; Found in mitochondrial proteome protein 49 antibody
Target Names
FMP49
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion.

Q&A

What is the proper storage and handling protocol for FMP49 Antibody to maintain its activity?

Proper storage of antibodies is critical for maintaining their functionality over time. Based on standard antibody storage protocols, FMP49 Antibody should be stored following a tiered approach depending on usage timeline. For short-term storage (up to 1 month), keep the reconstituted antibody at 2-8°C under sterile conditions. For medium to long-term storage (up to 6 months), store at -20 to -70°C in aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw cycles . Always use a manual defrost freezer and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they can denature the antibody and reduce its binding efficiency. After reconstitution, centrifuge the antibody solution briefly before use to remove any precipitated material that might affect experimental outcomes.

How should I validate FMP49 Antibody specificity for my target protein?

Antibody validation requires a multi-pronged approach to ensure specificity. First, perform direct ELISA with both your target protein and structurally similar proteins to assess cross-reactivity. Western blotting with positive and negative control samples should follow, looking for bands at the expected molecular weight. Consider using genetic approaches such as knockdown/knockout cell lines or tissues to confirm specificity - the signal should be absent or significantly reduced in these samples. Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry can provide additional confirmation of target specificity . When analyzing results, consider that certain experimental conditions might affect epitope availability, potentially leading to false negatives in some applications while working well in others.

What controls should I include when using FMP49 Antibody in immunoassays?

Every immunoassay experiment should include a comprehensive set of controls:

  • Positive control: Sample known to express the target protein

  • Negative control: Sample known not to express the target protein

  • Isotype control: Matched isotype antibody that has no specificity for your target

  • Secondary antibody only control: To identify non-specific binding of the secondary antibody

  • Blocking peptide control: Pre-incubate the antibody with its specific peptide to confirm signal elimination

In multi-color flow cytometry or immunofluorescence experiments, include fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls to account for spectral overlap . These controls will help distinguish genuine signals from technical artifacts, which is particularly important when analyzing complex samples with potential cross-reactivity issues.

How do I determine the optimal dilution of FMP49 Antibody for my specific application?

Determining the optimal working dilution requires systematic titration based on application type. Begin with the manufacturer's recommended range, then perform a dilution series:

DilutionWestern BlotIHC/ICCFlow CytometryELISA
1:100Signal intensitySignal/noiseMean fluorescenceOD value
1:250Signal intensitySignal/noiseMean fluorescenceOD value
1:500Signal intensitySignal/noiseMean fluorescenceOD value
1:1000Signal intensitySignal/noiseMean fluorescenceOD value
1:2000Signal intensitySignal/noiseMean fluorescenceOD value

The optimal dilution provides the highest specific signal with minimal background. For each new lot of antibody, tissue type, or sample preparation method, optimization should be repeated as epitope accessibility may vary . When switching between applications (e.g., from Western blot to immunohistochemistry), expect to recalibrate dilutions as the conformational state of the epitope differs between denatured and native conditions.

What fixation and permeabilization methods are compatible with FMP49 Antibody for immunocytochemistry?

Fixation and permeabilization protocols significantly impact epitope accessibility and antibody binding efficiency. Test multiple conditions:

  • Paraformaldehyde (4%): Preserves cell morphology while maintaining many epitopes

  • Methanol (-20°C): Better for certain intracellular epitopes but can disrupt membrane proteins

  • Acetone: Rapid fixation with good preservation of many antigenic sites

  • Hybrid protocols: PFA followed by methanol for combining benefits

For permeabilization, compare detergent types (Triton X-100, Tween-20, saponin) and concentrations (0.1-0.5%), as they differentially affect membrane structures. The optimal protocol depends on the subcellular localization of your target and the specific epitope recognized by FMP49 Antibody . Document specific conditions that provide optimal signal-to-noise ratio for your experimental system to ensure reproducibility.

How can I use FMP49 Antibody in combination with other antibodies for multiplex analysis?

Multiplex analysis requires careful planning to avoid antibody cross-reactivity and spectral overlap. First, confirm that all primary antibodies originate from different host species or are directly conjugated to non-overlapping fluorophores. Test each antibody individually before combining them to establish baseline signals. When using FMP49 Antibody in multiplex settings:

  • Optimize staining sequence - try both simultaneous and sequential staining protocols

  • Adjust antibody concentrations individually in the multiplex setting

  • Include appropriate blocking steps to minimize non-specific binding

  • Use spectral unmixing for fluorophores with partial emission overlap

  • Conduct specificity controls for each antibody in the presence of others

This approach enables visualization of protein co-localization, interaction networks, and cellular heterogeneity with higher dimensional data than single-antibody approaches, allowing for more comprehensive biological insights.

What are the considerations for using FMP49 Antibody in tissue microarrays (TMAs) for high-throughput analysis?

Tissue microarrays offer efficient analysis of multiple samples simultaneously, but require methodological adjustments:

  • Antigen retrieval optimization: Different tissues and fixation methods in the TMA may require standardized or variable antigen retrieval methods

  • Signal normalization: Include control tissues in each TMA block for inter-assay normalization

  • Image analysis algorithms: Develop thresholding parameters that account for tissue heterogeneity

  • Batch effects management: Process all TMAs with the same antibody lot and staining conditions

  • Validation subset: Confirm key findings on whole tissue sections to rule out sampling bias

When analyzing TMA data, implement statistical approaches that account for missing data points (tissue core loss) and quantify staining with continuous metrics rather than binary positive/negative calls for greater statistical power . This method enables phenotypic correlations across larger sample cohorts than would be practical with traditional whole-section approaches.

How does epitope accessibility influence FMP49 Antibody binding in different experimental contexts?

Epitope accessibility varies significantly between applications due to protein conformation and sample preparation methods. In native conditions (flow cytometry, immunoprecipitation), only surface-exposed epitopes are accessible. Denaturing conditions (Western blotting) expose internal epitopes but may disrupt conformational epitopes.

Factors affecting epitope accessibility include:

  • Protein-protein interactions: Complex formation may mask binding sites

  • Post-translational modifications: Phosphorylation, glycosylation can block antibody binding

  • Fixation chemistry: Different crosslinking mechanisms affect epitope preservation

  • Sample preparation: Heating, reducing conditions, and detergents alter protein structure

To optimize epitope accessibility, consider testing multiple antibody clones targeting different epitopes of your protein of interest. For challenging epitopes, enzymatic antigen retrieval or heat-induced epitope retrieval using different buffer systems (citrate, EDTA, Tris) may yield different results . Understanding the specific epitope recognized by FMP49 Antibody helps predict which experimental conditions will maintain its accessibility.

What strategies should I employ when FMP49 Antibody produces inconsistent results between experiments?

Inconsistent results often stem from subtle variations in experimental conditions. Implement a systematic troubleshooting approach:

  • Antibody quality: Check for degradation by testing antibody activity in a well-established assay

  • Sample preparation consistency: Standardize protein extraction, fixation times, and buffer compositions

  • Technical variations: Control for incubation times, temperatures, and washing stringency

  • Reagent quality: Prepare fresh buffers and verify pH

  • Lot-to-lot variation: Document antibody lot numbers and maintain reference samples for comparison

Create a detailed experimental protocol with all parameters specified and implement a laboratory information management system to track variables between experiments . For critical experiments, include biological replicates processed on different days to distinguish technical from biological variability. This comprehensive approach helps identify the source of inconsistency and establish more robust protocols.

How can I accurately quantify and interpret fluorescence intensity data when using FMP49 Antibody for imaging?

Quantitative analysis of fluorescence imaging requires rigorous methodological controls:

  • Exposure settings: Use identical acquisition parameters across all compared samples

  • Photobleaching control: Account for signal reduction during extended imaging sessions

  • Background subtraction: Apply consistent methods for removing autofluorescence

  • Dynamic range validation: Ensure signal falls within the linear range of detection

  • Normalization strategy: Select appropriate internal controls (housekeeping proteins, DNA stains)

What are the key considerations when using FMP49 Antibody for quantitative Western blotting?

Quantitative Western blotting requires attention to multiple variables affecting linearity and reproducibility:

  • Loading control selection: Choose controls expressed at similar levels to targets and unaffected by experimental conditions

  • Dynamic range verification: Perform dilution series to establish the linear range of detection

  • Transfer efficiency monitoring: Use stain-free gels or reversible total protein stains to normalize

  • Exposure optimization: Avoid saturated pixels that compress dynamic range

  • Quantification method: Define consistent band integration parameters

When analyzing complex samples with potential post-translational modifications, look for band shifts and additional bands that might represent modified forms of your protein. Include phosphatase treatments or other controls to confirm modifications . For publication-quality quantitative Westerns, biological replicates (n≥3) should be analyzed using appropriate statistical tests, with normalized data presented alongside representative blot images.

How can I apply FMP49 Antibody in single-cell protein analysis techniques?

Single-cell protein analysis techniques are revolutionizing our understanding of cellular heterogeneity. When using FMP49 Antibody in these contexts:

  • Mass cytometry (CyTOF): Metal-conjugated antibodies require validation for conjugation efficiency and sensitivity

  • Single-cell Western blotting: Optimize lysis conditions for sufficient protein release while minimizing diffusion

  • Proximity ligation assays: Verify antibody pairs that can simultaneously bind nearby epitopes

  • Imaging mass cytometry: Establish optimal tissue section thickness and antigen retrieval methods

What considerations are important when designing antibody panels that include FMP49 Antibody for spectral flow cytometry?

Spectral flow cytometry allows for significantly more parameters than conventional flow cytometry but introduces additional complexity:

  • Fluorophore selection: Choose fluorophores with distinct spectral signatures rather than peak emission alone

  • Spillover spreading matrix: Calculate how each fluorophore affects the background of every detector

  • Titration in context: Optimize antibody concentrations within the full panel, not individually

  • Controls expansion: Include fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls for accurate compensation

  • Reference standards: Use stable reference beads to normalize across experiments

When analyzing spectral flow data, implement computational approaches like visualization in high-dimensional space (tSNE, UMAP) and automated clustering to identify cell populations objectively . This approach allows simultaneous examination of multiple components of signaling pathways or cellular phenotypes, providing integrated biological insights rather than isolated measurements of individual proteins.

How should I integrate multiple assays using FMP49 Antibody to build a comprehensive understanding of my protein of interest?

  • Complementary approaches: Combine techniques that assess different aspects (localization, interactions, activity)

  • Orthogonal validation: Verify key findings using antibody-independent methods (mass spectrometry, genetic approaches)

  • Temporal dynamics: Implement time-course experiments to capture protein behavior under different conditions

  • Functional correlation: Connect protein expression/modification data with functional outcomes

  • Systems perspective: Interpret results in the context of relevant signaling networks and pathways

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.