RFNR2 antibody is a polyclonal antibody raised against root-type ferredoxin-NADP(H) oxidoreductase (RFNR), specifically targeting the RFNR2 isoform in Arabidopsis thaliana and Zea mays (maize) . RFNR2 is a plastid-localized enzyme that catalyzes electron transfer between NADPH and ferredoxin, enabling critical processes like sulfur/nitrogen assimilation and lipid desaturation . The antibody recognizes both RFNR1 and RFNR2 isoforms but shows higher specificity for RFNR2 in wild-type roots .
Applications: Western blotting, plastid localization studies, and mutant phenotyping .
Cross-reactivity: Detects RFNR2 in Arabidopsis and maize roots, with additional recognition of leaf ferredoxin-NADP reductases .
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Dilution (Western) | 1:2,000 |
| Target size (kDa) | ~35–40 (varies by isoform) |
| Secondary antibody | Anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (1:10,000 dilution) |
Wild-type roots: RFNR2 is the dominant isoform, as shown by Western blotting using this antibody .
Mutant analysis:
RFNR2 deficiency disrupts primary root growth, as demonstrated by stunted roots in rfnr1;rfnr2 mutants .
Transcriptome analysis reveals RFNR2’s role in upregulating ferredoxin-dependent enzymes (e.g., SIR, NIR, FAD5-8) and root-type ferredoxin (FD3), highlighting its importance in redox homeostasis .
| Genotype | RFNR1 Signal | RFNR2 Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Wild-type (Col) | Present | Dominant |
| rfnr1 mutant | Absent | Present |
| rfnr2 mutant | Present | Absent |
| rfnr1;rfnr2 DM2 | Absent | Absent |
Data derived from immunoblots and RT-PCR .
RFNR2 antibody has been pivotal in elucidating interactions between RFNR isoforms and their downstream targets:
RFNR2 (Ferredoxin--NADP reductase, root isozyme 2, chloroplastic) is a crucial enzyme in non-photosynthetic tissues, particularly roots, where it facilitates electron transfer between NADPH and ferredoxin. This process is essential for various ferredoxin-dependent biological processes in plants. Research has demonstrated that RFNR plays a vital role in root growth and development, as mutants lacking both RFNR1 and RFNR2 exhibit severely stunted root growth . Specifically, RFNR2 is encoded by the gene AT1G30510 in Arabidopsis thaliana and appears to work redundantly with RFNR1 in supporting root development and function .
RFNR2 antibodies are typically supplied in lyophilized form and require specific storage conditions to maintain their integrity and functionality. They should be stored in manual defrost freezers to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can compromise antibody quality. Upon receipt, the antibody should be immediately stored at the recommended temperature. When shipped at 4°C, it's crucial to transfer the antibody to the appropriate long-term storage condition promptly . Proper storage ensures consistent experimental results and extends the functional lifespan of the antibody.
Verifying antibody specificity is essential for reliable experimental results. Researchers can employ multiple approaches:
Knockout/knockdown validation: Testing the antibody in wild-type versus RFNR2 knockout or knockdown samples to confirm absence or reduction of signal. The research literature shows successful use of T-DNA insertion mutants (rfnr2-1 and rfnr2-2) for this purpose .
Western blotting with recombinant protein: Using purified recombinant RFNR2 protein as a positive control.
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: This approach can confirm that the protein being detected is indeed RFNR2, similar to the approach used for NRF2 antibody validation where LC-MS/MS was employed to identify immunoprecipitated proteins .
Cross-reactivity testing: Comparing detection between RFNR1 and RFNR2 to ensure isoform specificity, particularly important since both proteins are structurally similar and often co-expressed .
Based on the published methodologies, an effective immunodetection protocol for RFNR proteins includes:
Sample preparation: Extract proteins from plant tissues (particularly roots) using an appropriate buffer containing protease inhibitors.
SDS-PAGE separation: Mix protein extract with dithiothreitol and incubate at 95°C for 3 minutes. Load approximately 15.3 μg of protein per lane on a 12% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Gel or similar .
Protein transfer: Transfer proteins to a PVDF membrane using a transfer system like the Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System .
Membrane blocking: Incubate the membrane for 1 hour in blocking buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.6, 0.1% [v/v] Tween-20) containing 5% (w/v) ECL Prime Blocking Agent .
Primary antibody incubation: Incubate the membrane with RFNR antibody at an appropriate dilution (research shows a 1:50,000 dilution for RFNR antibodies raised against maize RFNR works effectively) .
Secondary antibody and detection: After washing, incubate with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (anti-rabbit IgG at 1:50,000 dilution) and visualize using chemiluminescent detection .
Control visualization: Visualize total proteins using CBB Protein Safe Stain for loading control assessment .
Distinguishing between RFNR isoforms (particularly RFNR1 and RFNR2) requires careful experimental design:
Isoform-specific antibodies: If available, use antibodies raised against unique epitopes of each isoform.
Molecular weight differences: Though subtle, RFNR isoforms may migrate differently on SDS-PAGE. Research indicates that RFNR proteins can appear as multiple bands that may represent different phosphorylation states or isoforms .
Genetic controls: Include samples from single knockout mutants (rfnr1 or rfnr2) alongside wild-type and double mutant samples to identify isoform-specific bands.
Phosphatase treatment: Since phosphorylation can affect protein migration in SDS-PAGE, treating samples with phosphatase before immunoblotting can help clarify which bands represent phosphorylated versions of the same protein versus different isoforms, similar to the approach used with NRF2 antibodies .
Mass spectrometry validation: For definitive identification, excise bands of interest and perform mass spectrometry analysis to confirm protein identity .
RFNR2 antibodies enable several advanced research applications for studying RFNR physiological functions:
Protein localization studies: Immunofluorescence or immunogold electron microscopy can reveal the subcellular localization of RFNR2, providing insights into its functional domains within plant cells.
Developmental expression analysis: Immunoblotting of samples from different developmental stages can track changes in RFNR2 expression throughout plant growth.
Stress response studies: Examining RFNR2 protein levels under various stress conditions (nutritional, oxidative, etc.) can illuminate its role in stress adaptation. This is particularly relevant given that transcriptome analysis shows RFNR deficiency affects expression of genes related to biotic/abiotic stress responses .
Protein-protein interaction studies: Co-immunoprecipitation using RFNR2 antibodies can identify interacting partners, helping to map the functional network of RFNR2.
Post-translational modification analysis: Combining immunoprecipitation with mass spectrometry can identify modifications of RFNR2, providing insights into its regulation.
When faced with contradictory results in RFNR2 detection, researchers should consider:
Antibody cross-reactivity: As demonstrated with NRF2 antibodies, some antibodies may cross-react with unrelated proteins that co-migrate with the target protein in SDS-PAGE . For RFNR2, verify that the detected band is not another root protein with similar molecular weight.
Splice variants: Research shows RFNR2 has multiple splice variants (AT1G30510.1, AT1G30510.2, AT1G30510.3) that may behave differently in detection assays . RNA-seq data mapping to specific splice variants can help resolve discrepancies.
Protein stability differences: If detection results vary between experiments, consider that protein degradation rates might differ between samples. In the case study of NRF2, researchers distinguished true target protein from cross-reacting proteins by examining stability after translation inhibition .
Technical variations: Differences in sample preparation, electrophoresis conditions, or detection methods can lead to discrepancies. Standardize protocols and include appropriate controls.
Genetic background effects: The expression and detection of RFNR2 may vary depending on the plant's genetic background. Include proper genetic controls and consider backcrossing mutants to ensure consistent backgrounds.
Detecting low-abundance RFNR2 protein presents several challenges that can be addressed through methodological adjustments:
Sample enrichment: Concentrate samples through immunoprecipitation before detection, which can enhance signal strength for low-abundance proteins.
Enhanced detection systems: Utilize high-sensitivity chemiluminescent substrates or fluorescent secondary antibodies for improved detection limits.
Signal amplification: For immunofluorescence applications, tyramide-based signal enhancement may be necessary to obtain a detectable signal, as was required for some antibodies in the NRF2 study .
Increasing protein load: Load more total protein on gels, while ensuring linear detection range is maintained.
Optimized transfer conditions: Adjust transfer time and voltage for efficient transfer of RFNR2 to membranes, particularly important for proteins that may be difficult to transfer.
Specialized extraction protocols: Develop extraction methods optimized for RFNR2 recovery, potentially including specific detergents or buffers that enhance solubilization.
When facing ambiguous or multiple bands in RFNR2 immunoblots, researchers can employ these strategies:
Lambda phosphatase treatment: Treat samples with lambda phosphatase to eliminate phosphorylation-dependent mobility shifts, helping to consolidate multiple bands of the same protein .
Subcellular fractionation: Separate cellular compartments (cytosolic, membrane, nuclear, plastidic) before immunoblotting to help identify the true localization of RFNR2 versus potential cross-reactive proteins.
Translation inhibition experiments: Treat cells with translation inhibitors like emetine to distinguish between proteins with different half-lives. Research has shown this approach can help differentiate target proteins from cross-reactive proteins, as was demonstrated with NRF2 antibodies .
Comparative gel systems: Use different gel systems (e.g., Tris-glycine versus Bis-Tris) that may provide better separation of closely migrating proteins.
Mass spectrometry validation: Excise bands at specific molecular weights and perform mass spectrometry to definitively identify the proteins present, as was done in the NRF2 study to identify calmegin as a cross-reactive protein .
RFNR2 antibodies provide powerful tools for investigating ferredoxin-dependent processes in roots:
Pathway mapping: By tracking RFNR2 expression alongside ferredoxin-dependent enzymes, researchers can map electron flow pathways in non-photosynthetic tissues.
Metabolic flux analysis: Combining RFNR2 protein quantification with metabolomic approaches can reveal how electron transfer capacity influences downstream metabolic processes. This is particularly relevant as transcriptome analysis showed RFNR1 and 2 deficiency upregulated genes encoding ferredoxin-dependent enzymes and root-type ferredoxin .
Developmental regulation: Analyzing RFNR2 levels throughout root development can provide insights into when and where ferredoxin-dependent processes are most active.
Comparative analysis across species: Using RFNR2 antibodies across different plant species can reveal evolutionary conservation or divergence of ferredoxin-dependent root processes.
Environmental response mechanisms: Examining how RFNR2 levels respond to different environmental conditions can illuminate adaptation mechanisms in root metabolism.
Innovative applications of RFNR2 antibodies could include:
In vivo imaging: Developing fluorescently labeled RFNR2 antibody fragments for live-cell imaging of RFNR2 dynamics.
Proximity labeling: Combining RFNR2 antibodies with proximity labeling techniques to identify proteins in close physical association with RFNR2 in intact cells.
Single-cell analysis: Adapting RFNR2 immunodetection for single-cell proteomics to understand cell-to-cell variation in RFNR2 abundance within root tissues.
Antibody-based inhibition: Developing function-blocking antibodies that can inhibit RFNR2 activity in vitro or in semi-permeabilized cells to study immediate consequences of RFNR2 inhibition.
Multi-parametric flow cytometry: Creating protocols for intracellular staining of RFNR2 in protoplasts for flow cytometric analysis alongside other parameters.
Microfluidic applications: Integrating RFNR2 antibodies into microfluidic devices for rapid, small-volume detection of RFNR2 in limited samples.