The antibody recognizes the formylated lysine at position 122 of HIST1H3A, a subtype of histone H3. Formylation at this site is distinct from other modifications (e.g., acetylation, methylation) and plays a role in chromatin remodeling. The antibody is raised against a synthetic peptide derived from human HIST1H3A, specifically targeting the formylated K122 residue .
Immunoblotting: Detects a 15 kDa band in NIH/3T3 (mouse) and HeLa (human) cell lysates .
Peptide Array: Demonstrated high affinity for formylated K122 peptides, with negligible cross-reactivity to unmodified or other modified histones .
Cancer Research: Used to study formylation in breast cancer and other malignancies .
Stem Cell Biology: Investigates chromatin states in embryonic stem cells .
| Sample | Observation | Method | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human Colon Tissue | Nuclear staining with formylated K122 | IHC | |
| Mouse/Rat Kidney | Nucleus-specific staining | IHC | |
| HeLa Cells | 15 kDa band in WB, confirming target recognition | WB |
Epigenetic Regulation: Formylation at K122 may influence histone-DNA interactions or recruitment of reader proteins .
DNA Repair: Potential role in chromatin accessibility during repair processes .
Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody is a specialized immunological reagent that specifically recognizes and binds to histone H3.1 (HIST1H3A) when it contains a formyl group modification at lysine 122. This antibody enables researchers to study this specific post-translational modification of histone proteins . The antibody targets a core component of nucleosomes, which are fundamental units of chromatin structure that wrap and compact DNA, thereby regulating DNA accessibility to cellular machinery involved in transcription, replication, and repair .
The target protein (Histone H3.1) is identified by UniProt ID P68431 and has multiple synonyms including Histone H3/a, Histone H3/b, Histone H3/c, and others . The antibody is typically raised against synthetic peptides derived from human HIST1H3A containing the formylated lysine at position 122, such as the sequence IMP-(Fo)K-DI .
Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody has been validated for several key research applications:
These applications enable researchers to investigate the presence, abundance, and localization of H3K122 formylation in various experimental contexts . The antibody has demonstrated reactivity with human samples, and some versions may cross-react with mouse and rat samples due to the high conservation of histone sequences across species .
Lysine 122 is located in a critically important region of histone H3.1, positioned at the nucleosome dyad axis where DNA makes contact with the histone octamer. Formylation at this site has significant implications for chromatin structure and function:
Chromatin Structure Modulation: Formylation at K122 can directly affect nucleosome stability by altering the electrostatic interactions between histones and DNA .
Transcriptional Regulation: As part of the "histone code," this modification plays a role in regulating gene expression by influencing the accessibility of DNA to transcription factors and other regulatory proteins .
Cancer and Disease Associations: Altered patterns of histone formylation have been implicated in various pathological conditions, particularly cancer, where they may contribute to dysregulated gene expression .
Understanding the presence and dynamics of this modification provides insights into fundamental epigenetic mechanisms that control cellular processes and may be dysregulated in disease states .
Proper storage and handling are crucial for maintaining antibody performance:
Storage Temperature: Store at -20°C to -70°C for long-term preservation .
Avoid Freeze-Thaw Cycles: Minimize repeated freezing and thawing which can degrade antibody quality .
Working Aliquots: Upon receipt, divide into small aliquots to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Buffer Conditions: Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibodies are typically provided in buffers containing PBS, pH 7.4, with 150mM NaCl and often 50% glycerol as a cryoprotectant .
Handling: Work in clean environments to prevent contamination, and use proper aseptic techniques when accessing antibody solutions.
Following these storage and handling guidelines will help ensure consistent experimental results and extend the useful life of the antibody preparation.
Comprehensive validation of antibody specificity is essential for generating reliable research data. The following methodological approach is recommended:
Peptide Competition Assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with increasing concentrations of the immunizing peptide (formylated K122 peptide) before application in your detection method. Signal reduction confirms specificity for the formylated epitope .
Cross-Reactivity Assessment: Test against both formylated and unmodified peptides, as well as peptides with other modifications at K122 (acetylation, methylation) to ensure the antibody discriminates between different modifications .
Knockout/Knockdown Controls: When possible, use genetic models where the histone variant is depleted or where enzymes responsible for formylation are knocked out.
Mass Spectrometry Correlation: Validate antibody-based detection with mass spectrometry analysis of histone modifications to confirm the presence of formylation at K122.
Multiple Antibody Comparison: When available, compare results using different antibody clones (such as comparing monoclonal 32C1 with other antibodies targeting the same modification) .
A comprehensive validation plan incorporates multiple complementary approaches to ensure antibody specificity before proceeding with extensive experimental work.
For successful immunohistochemistry with Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody, consider the following protocol optimizations:
Tissue Preparation:
Fix tissues promptly (preferably in 10% neutral buffered formalin)
Limit fixation time to prevent epitope masking
Use positively charged slides for better tissue adherence
Antigen Retrieval:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 8.0-9.0)
Optimize retrieval time (typically 15-20 minutes at 95-100°C)
Blocking and Permeabilization:
Block with 5-10% normal serum from the species of the secondary antibody
Include 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for nuclear permeabilization
Antibody Incubation:
Detection System:
Use high-sensitivity detection systems (e.g., polymer-based)
Optimize counterstaining to visualize nuclear morphology without obscuring specific signals
Signal Evaluation:
Assess nuclear localization of staining
Document staining intensity and distribution patterns
Consider digital image analysis for quantification
These methodological details will help researchers achieve optimal staining results when using Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody for IHC applications.
Histone H3K122 formylation exists within a complex network of histone modifications that collectively regulate chromatin structure and function:
Spatial Context: K122 is located at the nucleosome dyad axis, a region where DNA makes direct contact with the histone octamer. Modifications at this site can directly influence nucleosome stability and DNA accessibility, distinct from modifications on histone tails .
Functional Relationship with Other Modifications:
Acetylation at K122: While K122 acetylation promotes transcriptional activation by destabilizing nucleosomes, formylation may have distinct effects
Crosstalk with Tail Modifications: H3K122 formylation likely functions in concert with modifications on histone tails (e.g., H3K4me3, H3K27ac) to fine-tune gene expression
Competitive Modifications: Formylation, acetylation, and other modifications at K122 are mutually exclusive, suggesting regulatory competition
Regulatory Enzymes:
Unlike well-characterized "writers" and "erasers" for acetylation and methylation, the enzymatic machinery responsible for formylation/deformylation is less well characterized
Potential links to metabolic state and oxidative stress have been proposed
Temporal Dynamics:
Evidence suggests that formylation may represent a more stable modification compared to the more dynamic acetylation, potentially serving as a longer-term epigenetic mark
Understanding how H3K122 formylation integrates with other histone modifications provides crucial context for interpreting experimental results and designing studies to elucidate specific functional consequences.
Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody has been utilized in several cutting-edge research areas:
Cancer Biology: Investigations into altered histone formylation patterns in various cancer types, particularly breast cancer, where this modification may contribute to oncogenic gene expression programs .
Stem Cell Research: Studies examining the role of histone formylation in maintaining pluripotency and during cellular differentiation processes .
Chromatin Architecture: Research exploring how formylation at the nucleosome dyad affects higher-order chromatin structure and nuclear organization.
Transcriptional Regulation: Investigations into the impact of H3K122 formylation on RNA polymerase accessibility and activity at specific genomic loci.
Metabolic Regulation of Epigenetics: Studies examining how cellular metabolic state influences histone formylation through changes in formyl-donor availability.
DNA Damage Response: Research into potential roles of H3K122 formylation in DNA repair processes and genomic stability maintenance.
These diverse research directions highlight the importance of having reliable antibodies against formylated H3K122 to advance understanding of this epigenetic modification's biological significance.
When encountering challenges with Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody experiments, consider the following methodological troubleshooting approaches:
Implementing these targeted troubleshooting strategies can help researchers overcome technical challenges and generate reliable data when working with Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) with Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody requires careful experimental design:
Starting Material Optimization:
Use 1-5 million cells per immunoprecipitation
Ensure high cell viability before fixation
Consider cell type-specific optimization (cancer vs. normal cells)
Crosslinking and Chromatin Preparation:
Optimize formaldehyde concentration (typically 1%) and fixation time (8-10 minutes)
Ensure efficient sonication to generate 200-500 bp fragments
Verify fragment size distribution by agarose gel electrophoresis
Immunoprecipitation Protocol:
Pre-clear chromatin with protein A/G beads
Determine optimal antibody amount (typically 2-5 μg per IP)
Include appropriate controls:
IgG negative control
Input DNA control
Total H3 antibody for normalization
Positive control targeting known abundant modifications (e.g., H3K4me3)
Library Preparation and Sequencing Considerations:
Use spike-in normalization standards for quantitative comparisons
Sequence to adequate depth (minimum 20-30 million reads)
Include biological replicates (minimum 2-3)
Data Analysis Approach:
Normalize to input and IgG controls
Consider integrative analysis with RNA-seq and other histone marks
Analyze genomic distribution relative to transcriptional elements
This methodological framework provides researchers with a starting point for designing rigorous ChIP-seq experiments to investigate the genomic distribution of H3K122 formylation.
When designing multiplex experiments to examine relationships between H3K122 formylation and other histone modifications, consider these methodological aspects:
Antibody Compatibility Assessment:
Verify host species compatibility for multi-color immunofluorescence
Test for potential cross-reactivity between antibodies
Validate each antibody individually before combining
Sequential ChIP Design (Re-ChIP):
Consider epitope accessibility in sequential immunoprecipitations
Optimize elution conditions between IPs to preserve epitopes
Verify recovery efficiency at each step
Multiplexed Detection Systems:
For imaging applications:
Select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap
Include appropriate single-stain controls
Perform sequential staining when using same-species antibodies
For flow cytometry:
Establish compensation controls
Validate signal specificity with blocking peptides
Consider fixation/permeabilization effects on epitope detection
Control for Biological Variables:
Account for cell cycle effects on histone modification patterns
Consider treatment timing when studying dynamic modifications
Include synchronization protocols when appropriate
Data Normalization Strategies:
Normalize modification-specific signals to total histone H3
Use spike-in controls for quantitative comparisons
Implement batch correction for experiments performed across multiple days
These methodological considerations enable researchers to generate reliable comparative data on H3K122 formylation in relation to other histone modifications.
For quantitative analysis of H3K122 formylation across experimental conditions, implement these methodological approaches:
Western Blot Quantification:
Extract histones using acid extraction protocols
Separate using SDS-PAGE with 15-18% gels for optimal histone resolution
Transfer to PVDF membranes (recommended over nitrocellulose for histones)
Probe with Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody at 1:500-1:2000 dilution
Normalize to total H3 levels using a modification-insensitive H3 antibody
Use fluorescent secondary antibodies for wider linear detection range
Include standard curves with recombinant histones when possible
ELISA-Based Approaches:
Develop sandwich ELISA with capture antibody against H3 and detection with Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody
Generate standard curves using synthetic formylated peptides
Normalize to total histone content
Consider commercial histone modification ELISA kits with compatible antibodies
Mass Spectrometry Analysis:
Perform histone propionylation to improve peptide properties for LC-MS/MS
Use antibody-based enrichment before MS analysis for low-abundance modifications
Implement parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) or selected reaction monitoring (SRM) for targeted quantification
Calculate modification stoichiometry by comparing modified to unmodified peptides
Imaging-Based Quantification:
Standardize image acquisition parameters across all samples
Implement nuclear segmentation for single-cell analysis
Normalize formylation signal to DAPI or total H3 staining
Use automated image analysis pipelines to reduce bias
These quantitative methodologies provide researchers with reliable approaches to measure changes in H3K122 formylation levels under different experimental conditions.
The relationship between H3K122 formylation and chromatin remodeling represents an emerging area of research:
Structural Implications:
H3K122 is located at the nucleosome dyad axis where DNA makes crucial contacts with the histone octamer
Formylation neutralizes the positive charge of lysine, potentially weakening histone-DNA interactions
This modification may create a more permissive chromatin structure for remodeling enzyme access
Interplay with Chromatin Remodeling Complexes:
Emerging evidence suggests that H3K122 formylation may influence the recruitment or activity of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes
The precise mechanisms of this interaction remain to be fully elucidated through biochemical and structural studies
Functional Consequences:
Altered nucleosome positioning and stability
Modified higher-order chromatin structure
Potentially increased accessibility for transcription factors and the transcriptional machinery
Methodological Approaches to Study This Relationship:
In vitro nucleosome reconstitution with formylated H3K122
Nucleosome remodeling assays comparing unmodified vs. formylated templates
Genome-wide nucleosome mapping in contexts with altered H3K122 formylation
These insights provide a foundation for designing experiments to further elucidate the functional significance of H3K122 formylation in chromatin dynamics and gene regulation.
Unlike many histone modifications with well-characterized enzymatic machinery, the specific writers and erasers of H3K122 formylation remain less defined. Consider these experimental approaches:
Candidate Enzyme Screening:
Generate a list of potential formyltransferases based on structural similarities to known histone-modifying enzymes
Perform siRNA/CRISPR knockdown screens of candidate enzymes
Quantify changes in H3K122 formylation levels using the antibody in Western blot or immunofluorescence assays
Metabolic Manipulation Experiments:
Modulate cellular one-carbon metabolism (potential source of formyl groups)
Trace experiments with isotope-labeled metabolic precursors
Monitor H3K122 formylation levels under various metabolic states
Mass Spectrometry-Based Enzyme Discovery:
Implement affinity purification using modified and unmodified H3K122 peptides
Identify differentially bound proteins by mass spectrometry
Validate candidates through biochemical assays
In Vitro Enzymatic Assays:
Develop assays using recombinant histone H3 as substrate
Test candidate enzymes for formyltransferase or deformylase activity
Confirm site specificity using mutated histones (K122A, K122R)
Temporal Dynamics Analysis:
Establish cell systems with inducible expression of tagged histones
Track modification appearance and disappearance kinetics
Correlate with cellular conditions or stimuli
These systematic approaches provide a framework for identifying and characterizing the enzymatic machinery responsible for regulating H3K122 formylation.
Research into the role of H3K122 formylation in disease contexts is still developing, with several emerging areas of investigation:
Cancer Associations:
Inflammatory Conditions:
Emerging evidence suggests connections between oxidative stress, inflammation, and histone formylation
Changes in one-carbon metabolism during inflammation may influence formylation levels
Potential role in inflammatory gene regulation programs
Neurodegenerative Disorders:
Preliminary studies exploring connections between altered histone formylation and neurodegenerative processes
Potential links to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neuronal cells
Metabolic Disorders:
Initial investigations into how metabolic dysregulation affects histone formylation patterns
Possible connections to insulin resistance and diabetes pathogenesis
Research Methodologies in Disease Contexts:
Patient-derived tissue analysis using Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody
Integration of genomic and epigenomic data from disease cohorts
Disease model systems to study functional consequences of altered formylation
This evolving understanding provides opportunities for researchers to explore H3K122 formylation as both a biomarker and potential therapeutic target in various disease contexts.
Implementing robust controls is essential for reliable interpretation of results with Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody:
Positive Controls:
Cell Line Standards:
Cell lines with known high levels of H3K122 formylation (based on literature)
Cells treated with inducers of histone formylation (e.g., oxidative stress agents)
Recombinant/Synthetic Standards:
Tissue Standards:
Tissues with documented H3K122 formylation (based on literature)
Serial sections of positive control tissues for IHC optimization
Negative Controls:
Antibody Controls:
Peptide Competition:
Antibody pre-incubated with excess formylated H3K122 peptide
Comparison with unformylated peptide pre-incubation
Genetic Controls:
Cells with H3.1 knockdown/knockout (when available)
K122 mutant constructs (K122A, K122R) expressed in cells
Technical Controls:
Secondary antibody-only controls
Blocking peptide controls
Cross-reactivity assessment with other modified peptides
Implementing these control strategies provides crucial validation of signal specificity and technical reliability in experiments using Formyl-HIST1H3A (K122) Antibody.
Sample preparation significantly impacts the detection of histone modifications, including H3K122 formylation:
Fixation Effects:
Formaldehyde Fixation: Common for IHC and IF, but may mask epitopes; requires optimization of fixation time (typically 10-15 minutes)
Methanol Fixation: Preserves some histone epitopes better than formaldehyde but can cause protein precipitation
Fresh-Frozen Samples: May preserve native epitopes but compromise morphology
FFPE Tissues: Require robust antigen retrieval methods to expose the H3K122 formylation epitope
Antigen Retrieval Methods:
Heat-Induced Epitope Retrieval (HIER): Most effective for histone modifications in FFPE tissues
Citrate Buffer (pH 6.0): Standard starting point for histone modifications
EDTA Buffer (pH 8-9): Alternative when citrate buffer yields suboptimal results
Enzymatic Retrieval: Generally less effective for histone modifications
Histone Extraction Protocols:
Acid Extraction: Gold standard for histone preparation in biochemical analyses
Triton Extraction: Preserves nuclear architecture for imaging applications
Direct Lysis: May result in lower sensitivity due to dilution of histones in whole cell lysates
Storage Considerations:
Freeze-Thaw Effects: Multiple cycles can degrade histone modifications
Long-term Storage: Stability of formylation during prolonged storage requires investigation
Stability in Paraffin Blocks: Epitope may deteriorate in very old archived samples
Optimizing sample preparation protocols is essential for reliable detection of H3K122 formylation and should be carefully considered in experimental design.