FRS8 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Key Features of FRMD8 Antibodies

AttributeDescription
TargetFRMD8 protein (gene aliases: Bili, Band4.1 inhibitor LRP interactor)
ApplicationsWestern blot, immunocytochemistry, immunohistochemistry, ELISA
Species SpecificityPrimarily studied in humans and mice (cross-reactivity depends on epitope)
FormsPolyclonal, monoclonal (e.g., tissue culture supernatant, purified IgG)

Antibody Structure

FRMD8 antibodies follow the classic immunoglobulin structure:

  • Heavy Chains: Determine isotype (IgG, IgM, etc.) and Fc-mediated effector functions .

  • Light Chains: Contribute to antigen-binding specificity via complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) .

  • Variable Regions: CDRs drive binding to FRMD8 epitopes, while framework regions (FRs) maintain structural stability .

Somatic Hypermutation in CDRs

During affinity maturation, FRMD8-specific antibodies undergo somatic hypermutation in CDRs to enhance antigen binding. For example:

Mutation SiteImpact on BindingExample
CDR2Enhanced affinity via amino acid substitutions (e.g., Ser→Ala, Gly→Tyr) H8L0 variant (K<sub>D</sub> = 1.75E+06)
CDR3Insertions/deletions alter epitope recognitionH11L0 variant (deletion S)

Diagnostic and Experimental Uses

FRMD8 antibodies are employed in:

  1. Western Blotting: Detection of FRMD8 in cell lysates or tissue homogenates .

  2. Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Localization of FRMD8 in tumor or inflammatory tissue sections .

  3. ELISA: Quantification of FRMD8 levels in biological fluids (e.g., serum, culture supernatant) .

Therapeutic Potential

While FRMD8 antibodies are not yet clinically approved, insights from analogous systems (e.g., anti-EDA antibodies) highlight potential strategies:

StrategyMechanismExample
Targeting Tumor AngiogenesisInhibiting FRMD8’s role in endothelial cell adhesion and migrationAnti-EDA antibodies (K<sub>D</sub> = 3.1–17 nM)
Antibody EngineeringHumanizing rodent antibodies for reduced immunogenicityDT40 cell-based affinity maturation

Production and Purification

ChallengeSolution
Low AffinityAffinity maturation via B cell-based systems (e.g., DT40 cells)
Cross-ReactivityImmunopurification using antigen-bound agarose to remove non-specific IgG
Glycosylation VariabilityProtein A/G chromatography to isolate homogeneous IgG fractions

Stability and Specificity

  • Physical Stability: FRMD8 antibodies may require stabilization via disulfide bonds or glycosylation optimization .

  • Epitope-Specific Binding: Avoid F(ab)<sub>2</sub> fragments if Fc-mediated effector functions (e.g., ADCC) are required .

Table 1: FRMD8 Antibody Forms and Applications

Antibody FormDescriptionUse Case
Whole AntiserumContains non-specific host proteinsInitial screening for FRMD8
IgG FractionPurified via ion exchange chromatographyHigh-affinity applications
F(ab)<sub>2</sub> FragmentDivalent, Fc-free fragmentTissue staining, reduced background

Table 2: Affinity Maturation Outcomes for Analogous Antibodies

CloneK<sub>D</sub> (M)CDR MutationFold Improvement
H8L01.75E+06H-CDR2:S→A, G→S2.29E-09
H9L02.66E+06H-CDR2:G→Y9.1-fold
F83.1E-09Humanized scFv8.2-fold cytotoxicity

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
FRS8 antibody; At1g80010 antibody; F18B13.10 antibody; F19K16.2Protein FAR1-RELATED SEQUENCE 8 antibody
Target Names
FRS8
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
FRS8 Antibody targets a putative transcription activator involved in regulating light control of development. It may play a role in controlling flowering time.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G80010

STRING: 3702.AT1G80010.1

UniGene: At.52575

Protein Families
FHY3/FAR1 family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus. Note=The nuclear localization is independent of the light treatment.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in hypocotyls, rosette and cauline leaves, inflorescences stems, flowers and siliques.

Q&A

Here’s a structured collection of FAQs tailored for academic researchers working with FRS8 antibodies, synthesized from peer-reviewed methodologies and experimental data:

What experimental factors influence FRS8 antibody performance in mechanistic studies?

Key variables:

FactorOptimization StrategySupporting Data
Epitope stabilityPre-treat lysates with protease inhibitorsNuclear extracts show stronger IRF8 signals than whole-cell lysates
Cross-reactivityValidate across species (e.g., Arabidopsis vs. human homologs )Plant FRS8 antibodies (e.g., CSB-PA882786XA01DOA ) lack human reactivity
Assay compatibilityUse HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for IHCAnti-Mouse HRP-DAB staining validated in tonsil tissue

How to address contradictory results in FRS8 expression levels across studies?

Advanced troubleshooting:

  • Context-dependent regulation: IRF8 (a related transcription factor) shows variable expression in malignant vs. normal B cells . Apply similar stratification for FRS8.

  • Quantitative normalization: Use Simple Western™ for precise quantification (0.5 mg/mL lysate loading ).

  • Multi-omics correlation: Cross-validate with RNA-seq (IRF8 mRNA-CD20 protein correlations provide a template).

What are robust experimental designs for studying FRS8 in gene regulatory networks?

Integrated workflow:

  • CRISPR screening: Identify FRS8-interacting partners (e.g., adapt MS4A1/CD20 screening protocols ).

  • Functional assays:

    • ADCP/ADCC: Adapt Rituximab-based phagocytosis assays with FRS8-modulated cells.

    • ChIP-seq: Optimize chromatin shearing (IRF8 studies used 25 µg nuclear extracts ).

How to optimize FRS8 detection in low-abundance systems?

Sensitivity enhancement:

  • Signal amplification: Combine tyramide-based systems with 15 µg/mL primary antibody .

  • Pre-analytical processing: For tissues, use immersion fixation over perfusion to preserve epitopes.

  • Multiplexing: Pair with flow cytometry (CD20 surface markers ) to contextualize FRS8 activity.

What computational tools complement FRS8 antibody-based research?

Emerging integration:

  • AI-driven design: Apply RFdiffusion models to predict FRS8-binding interfaces.

  • Structural validation: Use cryo-EM (as in C. difficile toxin studies ) for conformational epitope mapping.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.