gcd1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPCC794.01cProbable glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase C794.01c antibody; G6PD antibody; EC 1.1.1.49 antibody
Target Names
gcd1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets G6PD, an enzyme that catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the oxidative pentose-phosphate pathway. This pathway provides an alternative route for carbohydrate metabolism alongside glycolysis. The primary function of G6PD is to generate reducing power (NADPH) and pentose phosphates, essential components for fatty acid and nucleic acid synthesis.
Database Links
Protein Families
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

Basic Research Questions

  • What is GCDH and why are antibodies against it important in research?

    GCDH is a nuclear-encoded mitochondrial protein involved in the catabolic pathway of tryptophan, lysine, and hydroxylysine. It functions as a homotetramer of 43.3 kDa subunits that resides in the mitochondrial matrix . GCDH antibodies are essential research tools for investigating metabolic disorders, as GCDH activity reduction leads to accumulation of glutaric (GA) and 3-hydroxyglutaric (3HGA) acids, particularly in brain tissues and biological fluids of affected patients . These antibodies enable detection and quantification of GCDH in various experimental systems, supporting research on metabolic pathways and associated disorders.

  • What are the validated applications for GCDH antibody?

    GCDH antibodies have been validated for multiple research applications with specific recommended parameters:

    ApplicationRecommended DilutionValidated Samples/Tissues
    Western Blot (WB)1:500-1:3000HepG2 cells, SH-SY5Y cells
    Immunohistochemistry (IHC)1:50-1:500Human liver tissue
    ELISAApplication-dependentHuman samples

    The antibody has demonstrated reactivity with human samples in published literature, with cited reactivity in human, mouse, and rat samples . For optimal results, researchers should titrate the antibody in each specific testing system.

  • What is the molecular profile of GCDH protein for antibody detection?

    Understanding the molecular characteristics of GCDH is essential for accurate antibody-based detection:

    ParameterValue
    Calculated Molecular Weight48 kDa
    Observed Molecular Weight44-48 kDa
    GenBank Accession NumberBC002579
    Gene ID (NCBI)2639
    UNIPROT IDQ92947

    This information is crucial for proper identification of GCDH in experimental samples and for validating antibody specificity . The slight discrepancy between calculated and observed molecular weights should be considered when analyzing Western blot results.

  • What storage and handling conditions are recommended for GCDH antibodies?

    Proper storage and handling are critical for maintaining antibody effectiveness:

    • Store at -20°C, where it remains stable for one year after shipment

    • Aliquoting is unnecessary for -20°C storage

    • The antibody is typically supplied in PBS with 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol at pH 7.3

    • Some preparations (20μl sizes) contain 0.1% BSA as a stabilizer

    Following these recommendations ensures optimal antibody performance and extends shelf life for research applications.

  • What antigen retrieval methods are recommended for GCDH immunohistochemistry?

    For successful immunohistochemical detection of GCDH in tissues:

    • Primary recommendation: TE buffer pH 9.0 for antigen retrieval

    • Alternative method: Citrate buffer pH 6.0

    • Optimal dilution range for IHC applications: 1:50-1:500

    These parameters have been validated specifically for human liver tissue, which expresses high levels of GCDH. Researchers should optimize conditions when working with other tissue types.

Advanced Research Questions

  • How can researchers validate the specificity of GCDH antibodies in experimental systems?

    Rigorous validation of antibody specificity is essential for reliable research outcomes. Drawing from methodologies in antibody validation research, a comprehensive approach includes:

    • Genetic validation: Testing in wild-type versus GCDH knockout or knockdown models

    • Orthogonal validation: Confirming results with non-antibody-based methods such as mass spectrometry

    • Multiple independent antibodies: Verifying findings with different antibodies targeting various GCDH epitopes

    • Positive and negative controls: Including tissues known to express high levels of GCDH (liver, kidney) versus those with minimal expression

    Recent studies have emphasized the importance of genetic strategies for antibody validation, testing antibodies in cell lines with and without the target protein expression to confirm specificity .

  • What methodological approaches can address non-specific binding issues with GCDH antibodies?

    Non-specific binding is a common challenge in antibody-based research. Advanced methodological approaches to mitigate this issue include:

    • Antibody titration: Systematically testing multiple concentrations to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio

    • Enhanced blocking protocols: Using specialized blocking agents to reduce background

    • Cross-adsorption: Pre-incubating antibodies with related proteins to reduce cross-reactivity

    • Detection system optimization: Testing alternative secondary antibodies and detection chemistries

    • Multi-platform validation: Evaluating antibody performance across different detection platforms (e.g., chemiluminescence and fluorescence-based systems)

    Research has shown that even commercially available antibodies may produce non-specific bands, highlighting the need for thorough validation before experimental use .

  • How does the three-dimensional structure of GCDH influence antibody recognition and experimental design?

    The structural characteristics of GCDH have significant implications for antibody development and experimental applications:

    • GCDH functions as a homotetramer, potentially presenting complex epitopes not present in monomeric forms

    • Mitochondrial localization may restrict accessibility of certain epitopes in intact cells

    • Native protein folding influences epitope exposure and antibody recognition

    • Post-translational modifications may affect antibody binding

    Recent advances in antibody development demonstrate that antibodies raised against full-length proteins often recognize native structures more effectively than those developed against peptide fragments . For GCDH research, antibodies recognizing the native conformation would be particularly valuable for studies of functional protein in cellular contexts.

  • What advanced immunolocalization approaches are recommended for GCDH studies?

    For sophisticated localization studies of GCDH:

    • Co-localization with mitochondrial markers to confirm expected subcellular distribution

    • Super-resolution microscopy to precisely map GCDH distribution within mitochondria

    • Live-cell imaging with compatible tagged antibody fragments to study dynamics

    • Proximity ligation assays to investigate protein-protein interactions involving GCDH

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy for ultrastructural localization

    Research approaches for other mitochondrial proteins demonstrate that co-staining with organelle markers is essential for validating subcellular localization . For GCDH, confirming mitochondrial localization provides important validation of antibody specificity.

  • How can computational approaches enhance GCDH antibody design and application?

    Modern computational methods offer powerful tools for antibody development and optimization:

    • Energy-based preference optimization can guide antibody design toward improved specificity

    • Pre-trained diffusion models that jointly model sequences and structures enhance antibody engineering

    • Transformer-based language models adapted for antibody sequences can predict optimal binding characteristics

    • Molecular dynamics simulations can evaluate potential antibody-antigen interactions

    • Machine learning approaches can identify optimal epitopes for antibody targeting

    Recent research demonstrates that direct energy-based preference optimization can guide the generation of antibodies with both rational structures and considerable binding affinities to target antigens . These approaches could potentially be applied to develop next-generation GCDH antibodies with enhanced specificity and sensitivity.

  • What considerations are important when using GCDH antibodies for studies of metabolic disorders?

    When investigating metabolic disorders involving GCDH:

    • Account for tissue-specific expression patterns, with highest levels in liver and kidney

    • Consider disease-specific alterations in GCDH expression, localization, or post-translational modifications

    • Develop appropriate control samples that account for variable expression in patient cohorts

    • Evaluate how metabolic state might affect GCDH levels and detection sensitivity

    • Correlate antibody-based detection with functional enzymatic assays for comprehensive analysis

    Understanding the biochemical consequences of GCDH dysfunction (e.g., accumulation of glutaric and 3-hydroxyglutaric acids) provides important context for interpreting antibody-based studies in disease models.

  • How do antibody germline biases affect GCDH antibody performance and validation?

    Recent research on antibody development has highlighted how germline biases can impact antibody characteristics:

    • Antibody diversity arises primarily from V(D)J recombination and somatic hypermutation

    • Training data for antibody design often contains bias toward germline sequences

    • Language models used in antibody design may reproduce or amplify these biases

    • Pre-processing training data or model de-biasing techniques can mitigate these effects

    These insights from antibody research emphasize the importance of considering the origin and diversity of antibodies when selecting or developing GCDH-specific antibodies for research applications.

  • What experimental design strategies are recommended for comparative studies using multiple GCDH antibody clones?

    When conducting comparative studies with multiple GCDH antibody clones:

    • Standardize experimental conditions across all antibodies being tested

    • Include appropriate controls for each antibody (isotype, concentration-matched)

    • Test each antibody across multiple applications to assess versatility

    • Evaluate epitope mapping to understand potential differences in recognition sites

    • Consider how sample preparation methods might differentially affect epitope accessibility

    • Document full antibody metadata (clone, lot, concentration) for reproducibility

    This systematic approach allows researchers to select the optimal antibody for their specific experimental requirements while ensuring reliable and reproducible results.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.