GADL1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
PBS with 0.02% Sodium Azide, 50% Glycerol, pH 7.3. Store at -20°C. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Lead Time
We typically dispatch orders within 1-3 business days of receipt. Delivery times may vary depending on the method of purchase and location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery information.
Synonyms
GADL1Acidic amino acid decarboxylase GADL1 antibody; Aspartate 1-decarboxylase antibody; ADC antibody; HuADC antibody; EC 4.1.1.11 antibody; Cysteine sulfinic acid decarboxylase antibody; CSADC antibody; HuCSADC antibody; EC 4.1.1.29 antibody; Glutamate decarboxylase-like protein 1 antibody
Target Names
GADL1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
GADL1 Antibody may catalyze the decarboxylation of L-aspartate, 3-sulfino-L-alanine (cysteine sulfinic acid), and L-cysteate to beta-alanine, hypotaurine and taurine, respectively. It does not exhibit any decarboxylation activity toward glutamate.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. No difference in GADL1 expression was observed among lymphoblastoid cells from excellent-responders, non-responders or controls. Furthermore, lithium did not induce significant changes in GADL1 expression levels after 4 or 8 days. These results did not support an association of GADL1 expression in the determination of a lithium response in BD patients. PMID: 28214779
  2. Taurine biosynthesis in vertebrates involves two structurally related PLP-dependent decarboxylases (cysteine sulfinic acid decarboxylase and glutamic acid decarboxylase like 1). PMID: 26327310
  3. The study did not identify a major relationship between the GADL1 polymorphisms and lithium response in an Indian population. PMID: 25415457
  4. Genetic variations in GADL1 are associated with the response to lithium maintenance treatment for bipolar I disorder in patients of Han Chinese descent. PMID: 24369049
Database Links

HGNC: 27949

OMIM: 615601

KEGG: hsa:339896

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000282538

UniGene: Hs.657052

Protein Families
Group II decarboxylase family
Tissue Specificity
Expressed very weakly in neurons and not detected in astrocytes, brain or liver.

Q&A

What is GADL1 and why is it important in neurological and metabolic research?

GADL1 (glutamate decarboxylase-like 1) is a PLP-dependent decarboxylase enzyme that plays critical roles in the biosynthesis of β-alanine, carnosine, and anserine, particularly in the olfactory bulb, cerebral cortex, and skeletal muscle. Research has demonstrated that GADL1 has tissue-specific functions related to protection against oxidative stress and energy metabolism regulation . Human genetic studies have revealed associations between the GADL1 locus and several important phenotypes, including plasma levels of carnosine, muscle strength, and subjective well-being . The enzyme's multifunctionality makes it relevant for research spanning neuroscience, metabolism, aging, and oxidative stress protection mechanisms.

How does GADL1 differ structurally and functionally from other glutamate decarboxylase family members?

GADL1 shares structural features with both cysteine sulfinic acid decarboxylase (CSAD) and aspartate decarboxylase but has distinct substrate specificity . The major structural difference that affects substrate binding is the substitution of a serine residue (found in GAD) with a tyrosine residue in GADL1, effectively making the binding cavity smaller . While glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) uses glutamate as a substrate, GADL1 primarily acts on aspartate and cysteine sulfinic acid, indicating that side-chain length is a key determinant of productive binding . Compared to other PLP-dependent decarboxylases, GADL1 demonstrates significantly lower affinity and selectivity for its substrates, with extremely low activity in vitro despite its important physiological roles .

What are the specific tissue expression patterns of GADL1 in mammalian systems?

GADL1 shows distinct tissue-specific expression patterns, with highest levels detected in the olfactory bulb (OB), cerebral cortex, and skeletal muscle . Western blotting analysis reveals that in the olfactory bulb of wild-type mice, GADL1 appears as a wide band with an estimated molecular mass of 55-59 kDa, corresponding to several predicted protein variants with 502 to 550 amino acids . Less pronounced expression can also be found in the liver, cerebellum, heart, and kidney. This tissue-specific distribution correlates with the observed depletion patterns of β-alanine, carnosine, and anserine in these tissues when GADL1 is knocked out , suggesting specialized functions in different organ systems.

What are the optimal immunohistochemical protocols for detecting GADL1 in different tissue preparations?

For optimal immunohistochemical detection of GADL1, researchers should follow a standardized protocol adapted for PLP-dependent enzymes. Based on established practices with GADL1 antibodies:

  • Fix tissue in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24-48 hours followed by paraffin embedding.

  • Section tissues at 4-6 μm thickness.

  • Perform antigen retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) with heat treatment.

  • Block with 5% normal serum in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100.

  • Incubate with primary anti-GADL1 antibody at 1:100-500 dilution in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C .

  • Wash thoroughly and apply appropriate secondary antibody.

  • Develop using standard detection methods.

For immunofluorescence applications, similar protocols can be applied with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies at 1:50-500 dilution . When comparing expression across different tissues, it's essential to maintain consistent processing times and antibody concentrations to enable accurate quantification.

How can GADL1 knockout models be effectively designed and validated for functional studies?

Designing effective GADL1 knockout models requires careful consideration of gene structure and potential effects on neighboring genes. Based on established approaches:

  • Strategic targeting approach: Due to GADL1's proximity to the TGFBR2 gene, employ a conservative knockout strategy targeting specific functional domains rather than the entire gene. The proven approach involves deleting exon 7, which codes for part of the PLP-binding active site essential for enzymatic activity .

  • Validation methods:

    • Confirm genetic modification through genomic DNA sequencing and Southern blot analysis

    • Verify mRNA alterations using RNA sequencing and qRT-PCR of individual exons

    • Confirm protein absence using Western blotting with specific GADL1 antibodies (1:100 dilution)

    • Validate loss of enzymatic function by expressing the mutant protein and comparing activity to wild-type

  • Functional confirmation: Measure metabolite levels (β-alanine, carnosine, anserine) in tissues known to express GADL1 (olfactory bulb, cerebral cortex, skeletal muscle) using untargeted LC-MS metabolomic analyses and high-resolution magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy .

What considerations should be made when selecting control tissues for GADL1 immunodetection experiments?

When selecting appropriate controls for GADL1 immunodetection experiments, researchers should consider:

  • Positive controls: Include tissues with known high GADL1 expression such as olfactory bulb, cerebral cortex, and skeletal muscle from wild-type animals . These regions show robust GADL1 expression and serve as reliable positive controls.

  • Negative controls: GADL1 knockout mouse tissues represent ideal negative controls. If knockout tissues are unavailable, include tissues with minimal GADL1 expression or implement technical negative controls by omitting primary antibody .

  • Specificity verification: Assess antibody specificity by pre-absorption with recombinant GADL1 protein, which should eliminate specific staining. Commercially available recombinant proteins can be used for this purpose .

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Include tissues from GADL1 knockout models alongside wild-type samples to identify potential cross-reactivity with related decarboxylases such as GAD65, CSAD, or other PLP-dependent enzymes .

  • Tissue processing considerations: Match fixation methods, processing times, and section thickness between experimental and control samples to minimize technical variations .

What are the most common technical challenges when working with GADL1 antibodies and how can they be addressed?

Researchers working with GADL1 antibodies frequently encounter several technical challenges:

  • Cross-reactivity with related decarboxylases:

    • Challenge: GADL1 shares structural similarities with GAD65, GAD67, and CSAD

    • Solution: Validate antibody specificity using GADL1 knockout tissues and perform Western blot analysis to confirm the detected band matches the expected molecular weight (55-59 kDa)

  • Variable detection across tissues:

    • Challenge: GADL1 expression varies significantly between tissues

    • Solution: Optimize antibody concentration for each tissue type, with recommended dilutions of 1:100-1000 for Western blot and 1:100-500 for immunohistochemistry

  • Multiple isoform detection:

    • Challenge: GADL1 appears as multiple predicted protein variants (502-550 amino acids)

    • Solution: Use antibodies targeting conserved regions present in all isoforms or employ isoform-specific antibodies when studying specific variants

  • Weak signal strength:

    • Challenge: GADL1's relatively low abundance can result in weak signals

    • Solution: Enhance detection with signal amplification systems and extend primary antibody incubation to overnight at 4°C

  • Inconsistent results in fixed tissues:

    • Challenge: Excessive fixation can mask epitopes

    • Solution: Implement robust antigen retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 7.0) with heat treatment before antibody application

How can researchers optimize Western blot protocols specifically for GADL1 detection?

For optimal Western blot detection of GADL1, researchers should implement the following protocol refinements:

  • Sample preparation:

    • Extract proteins in buffer containing phosphatase and protease inhibitors

    • For tissue homogenates, centrifuge at 15,000g for 15 minutes at 4°C

    • Store final supernatants at -80°C

  • Protein loading and separation:

    • Load 40 μg of total protein or 10 μg of purified protein

    • Use 10% SDS-PAGE for optimal separation of the 55-59 kDa GADL1 protein

  • Transfer conditions:

    • Transfer to nitrocellulose membrane at 100V for 1 hour in cold transfer buffer containing 20% methanol

    • Verify transfer efficiency with reversible protein staining

  • Blocking and antibody incubation:

    • Block with 5% nonfat dried milk in TBST buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20)

    • Incubate with GADL1 antibody at 1:100 dilution in TBST with 5% BSA overnight at 4°C

  • Detection optimization:

    • Use horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies

    • Visualize with enhanced chemiluminescence substrate

    • For weak signals, increase exposure time or use more sensitive detection reagents

  • Controls and normalization:

    • Strip and reprobing with β-actin antibody for normalization

    • Include both positive controls (tissues with known GADL1 expression) and negative controls (GADL1 knockout tissues)

What approaches can be used to quantify GADL1 protein levels accurately across different experimental conditions?

Accurate quantification of GADL1 protein levels requires methodical approaches that address the enzyme's tissue-specific expression patterns:

  • Western blot densitometry:

    • Capture images within the linear dynamic range of detection

    • Normalize GADL1 band intensity to housekeeping proteins (β-actin) using densitometry software

    • Run a dilution series of positive control samples to establish a standard curve

  • ELISA-based quantification:

    • Commercial GADL1 antibodies can be used in sandwich ELISA format (1:500-3000 dilution)

    • Include recombinant GADL1 protein standards for absolute quantification

    • Perform technical triplicates to ensure reproducibility

  • Mass spectrometry approaches:

    • Implement targeted LC-MS/MS methods for absolute quantification

    • Use stable isotope-labeled peptide standards corresponding to unique GADL1 regions

    • This approach provides superior specificity when analyzing multiple GADL1 isoforms

  • Immunohistochemical quantification:

    • Use digital image analysis software to measure staining intensity

    • Establish consistent thresholds for positive staining

    • Normalize to tissue area or cell count

  • RNA-protein correlation analysis:

    • Perform parallel qRT-PCR and protein quantification

    • Establish tissue-specific correlation factors between mRNA and protein levels

    • Use these factors to estimate protein abundance when direct measurement is challenging

How should researchers interpret discrepancies between GADL1 mRNA expression and protein levels in experimental models?

When facing discrepancies between GADL1 mRNA and protein levels, researchers should consider several biological and technical factors:

  • Post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms:

    • GADL1 may undergo substantial post-transcriptional regulation, including mRNA stability differences across tissues

    • In GADL1 knockout models, some mRNA species may still be detected despite exon deletions. RNA sequencing of GADL1 knockout mice revealed that deletion of exon 7 resulted in the additional loss of exon 8 and generation of new splicing sites

  • Translation efficiency variations:

    • The efficiency of GADL1 mRNA translation may vary between tissues

    • When expressing mutant GADL1 lacking exons 7 and 8 in E. coli, protein yield was only 17% compared to wild-type, suggesting that structural changes affect protein stability

  • Protein stability differences:

    • GADL1 protein stability may be tissue-dependent

    • Cofactor binding (e.g., PLP) significantly affects stability of PLP-dependent enzymes like GADL1

  • Methodological considerations:

    • Validate RNA quantification methods by targeting multiple exons using qRT-PCR

    • For protein detection, ensure antibodies recognize epitopes present in all relevant isoforms

    • Confirm antibody specificity using knockout tissue controls

  • Functional correlations:

    • Assess metabolite levels (β-alanine, carnosine) as functional readouts of GADL1 activity

    • In tissues where mRNA-protein discrepancies exist, metabolite analysis can help determine functional significance

What are the known associations between GADL1 genetic variants and human phenotypes, and how might these inform antibody-based studies?

GADL1 genetic variants demonstrate significant associations with multiple human phenotypes that should inform antibody-based research approaches:

  • Carnosine metabolism:

    • Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the GADL1 intron are strongly associated with blood levels of acetylcarnosine (P = 8.17 × 10^-21)

    • These variants provide natural models for studying differential GADL1 expression and function

  • Neuropsychiatric phenotypes:

    • Strong associations exist between GADL1 locus and subjective well-being

    • This phenotype relates to somatic complaints including bodily pain, low energy, anxiety, and depression

    • Antibody studies should include brain regions involved in mood regulation

  • Muscle physiology:

    • GADL1 genetic variants associate with muscle strength measurements

    • This suggests functional roles in skeletal muscle that can be investigated using tissue-specific antibody staining

  • Therapeutic response variation:

    • A SNP (rs17026688) in GADL1 intron 6 showed strong association (P = 5.50 × 10^-37) with response to lithium in bipolar disorder, though this finding has been contested

    • Antibody studies might reveal differential protein expression associated with treatment-response variants

  • Research implications:

    • Design antibodies targeting regions containing or affected by these genetic variants

    • Perform comparative studies in tissues from individuals with different GADL1 haplotypes

    • Develop isoform-specific antibodies that can distinguish potential alternative splicing products associated with specific variants

How should researchers interpret GADL1 antibody immunostaining patterns in relation to the enzyme's known functions in carnosine biosynthesis?

Interpreting GADL1 immunostaining patterns requires careful correlation with the enzyme's established biochemical functions:

  • Tissue-specific expression patterns:

    • Strong GADL1 immunoreactivity in olfactory bulb, cerebral cortex, and skeletal muscle correlates with these tissues' high carnosine and anserine content

    • The relative intensity of immunostaining across tissues should reflect known metabolite distributions

  • Subcellular localization significance:

    • GADL1 is primarily cytosolic but may show different subcellular distributions in different tissues

    • Co-localization with carnosine synthase would support direct functional coupling in the carnosine biosynthetic pathway

  • Relationship to oxidative stress markers:

    • GADL1 knockout mice show increased levels of oxidative stress markers and compensatory upregulation of antioxidant enzymes

    • In olfactory bulb, GADL1-deficient mice exhibited a threefold increase in glutathione reductase levels (P = 0.0145)

    • Dual immunostaining for GADL1 and oxidative stress markers can reveal functional relationships

  • Developmental and age-related changes:

    • GADL1 knockout mice exhibit age-related growth retardation after 30 weeks

    • Immunostaining across developmental stages can reveal temporal patterns relevant to carnosine's role in aging

  • Correlation with metabolic alterations:

    • GADL1-deficient tissues show increased levels of many lipid species, particularly sphingolipids

    • Combined immunohistochemistry and metabolic imaging can help map relationships between GADL1 expression and lipid metabolism

How can GADL1 antibodies be utilized to investigate the enzyme's role in oxidative stress protection mechanisms?

GADL1 antibodies enable sophisticated investigation of the enzyme's role in oxidative stress protection through several advanced approaches:

  • Stress-induced expression dynamics:

    • Use GADL1 antibodies to track protein expression changes under controlled oxidative stress conditions

    • Studies in GADL1 knockout mice revealed increased levels of oxidative stress markers including methionine sulfoxide and γ-glutamyl peptides

    • Immunostaining can reveal whether GADL1 expression increases in response to oxidative challenges

  • Co-localization with antioxidant systems:

    • Perform dual immunofluorescence for GADL1 and antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD1, SOD2) and glutathione reductase (GSR)

    • GADL1 knockout mice showed a threefold increase in GSR levels in the olfactory bulb, suggesting compensatory mechanisms

  • Subcellular redistribution under stress conditions:

    • Investigate whether oxidative stress triggers GADL1 redistribution to specific cellular compartments

    • Subcellular fractionation followed by Western blotting can reveal compartment-specific changes

  • Tissue-specific vulnerability mapping:

    • Map GADL1 expression against tissue vulnerability to oxidative damage

    • Compare immunostaining intensity in regions showing different levels of stress markers

  • Interventional studies:

    • Use GADL1 antibodies to monitor protein levels during antioxidant supplementation or carnosine treatment

    • Determine whether interventions that modulate oxidative status affect GADL1 expression

  • Age-related changes:

    • Track GADL1 immunoreactivity across age groups in relation to accumulated oxidative damage

    • GADL1 knockout mice showed age-related changes, suggesting involvement in aging processes

What are the current methodological challenges in studying GADL1 enzymatic activity in situ, and how might antibody-based approaches help address these?

Studying GADL1 enzymatic activity in situ presents significant challenges that can be addressed through innovative antibody-based approaches:

  • Low enzymatic activity detection limits:

    • Challenge: GADL1 has extremely low catalytic efficacy in vitro despite important physiological roles

    • Previous studies reported inability to detect GADL1 enzyme activities in tissue lysates

    • Solution: Develop activity-state specific antibodies that recognize the enzyme-substrate complex or PLP-bound active form

  • Multiple potential physiological substrates:

    • Challenge: GADL1 may act on multiple substrates including aspartate and cysteine sulfinic acid

    • Solution: Combine substrate-specific enzymatic assays with proximity ligation assays using GADL1 antibodies to map substrate-specific activity patterns

  • Tissue heterogeneity effects:

    • Challenge: GADL1 activity varies dramatically across tissues and cell types

    • Solution: Use immunohistochemistry to identify GADL1-expressing cells followed by laser capture microdissection and targeted enzymatic assays

  • Distinguishing from related decarboxylases:

    • Challenge: Other PLP-dependent decarboxylases may contribute to measured activities

    • Solution: Combine selective inhibitors with GADL1 immunodepletion to isolate GADL1-specific activity

  • Linking structure to function:

    • Challenge: GADL1 activity depends on correctly formed active sites with bound PLP

    • Solution: Develop antibodies specifically recognizing the PLP-binding domain to distinguish potentially active enzyme from inactive forms

  • Technical approach integration:

    • Implement antibody-based activity mapping where tissues are incubated with GADL1 substrates

    • Capture enzyme-generated products using derivatization

    • Visualize spatial activity patterns through immunofluorescence co-localization

How can structural insights into GADL1's active site inform the development of more specific antibodies for research applications?

Structural analysis of GADL1's active site provides critical insights for developing highly specific antibodies:

  • Key structural determinants:

    • The GADL1 active site contains a tyrosine residue that makes the binding cavity smaller compared to GAD's serine residue at the equivalent position

    • Targeting this distinguishing region can generate antibodies that specifically recognize GADL1 without cross-reactivity

  • Substrate binding pocket epitopes:

    • Design antibodies against regions that contribute to GADL1's preference for aspartate over glutamate

    • The side-chain length recognition elements represent unique epitopes that distinguish GADL1 from related enzymes

  • PLP binding site considerations:

    • Generate antibodies against the PLP-binding domain to distinguish catalytically competent enzyme

    • GADL1 knockout studies confirmed that deletion of exons 7 and 8, which encode amino acids involved in cofactor binding, renders the enzyme completely inactive

  • Conformational epitope targeting:

    • Develop antibodies recognizing specific conformational states associated with substrate binding

    • This approach can generate reagents that selectively identify the active enzyme population

  • Isoform-specific epitopes:

    • GADL1 appears as multiple predicted protein variants with 502 to 550 amino acids

    • Design antibodies against unique regions of specific isoforms to study their differential expression

  • Application-specific design:

    • For immunoprecipitation: Target accessible surface epitopes avoiding the active site

    • For activity neutralization: Design antibodies that compete with substrate binding

    • For detection of denatured protein: Target linear epitopes within conserved regions

What emerging technologies might enhance the application of GADL1 antibodies in studying carnosine metabolism disorders?

Several cutting-edge technologies promise to revolutionize GADL1 antibody applications in carnosine metabolism research:

  • Single-cell antibody-based proteomics:

    • Apply mass cytometry (CyTOF) with GADL1 antibodies to map expression at single-cell resolution

    • This would reveal cell-specific variations in GADL1 expression that may be missed in tissue-level analyses

    • Particularly valuable for studying heterogeneous tissues like brain where GADL1 shows region-specific functions

  • CRISPR-engineered reporter systems:

    • Develop knock-in systems where endogenous GADL1 is tagged with fluorescent proteins

    • Validate these systems using established GADL1 antibodies

    • Enable real-time monitoring of GADL1 expression, localization, and turnover

  • Antibody-guided metabolomics:

    • Combine immunoprecipitation of GADL1 with metabolomic analysis of bound metabolites

    • This approach could identify novel substrates or regulatory molecules beyond known interactions

    • Would address the multifunctional nature of GADL1 suggested by structural studies

  • Advanced imaging techniques:

    • Implement expansion microscopy with GADL1 antibodies for super-resolution imaging

    • Apply STORM/PALM microscopy to visualize nanoscale organization of GADL1 in relation to metabolic machinery

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy to link GADL1 localization with ultrastructural features

  • Engineered antibody fragments:

    • Develop cell-penetrating antibody fragments targeting GADL1

    • These could be used to modulate enzyme activity in living cells

    • Would provide temporal control for studying GADL1's dynamic functions in carnosine metabolism

How might comparative studies of GADL1 across species inform our understanding of carnosine peptide evolution and function?

Comparative GADL1 studies across species provide unique evolutionary insights with significant research implications:

  • Evolutionary conservation analysis:

    • GADL1 antibodies with epitopes in conserved regions can be used for cross-species immunodetection

    • Compare GADL1 expression patterns across vertebrates with different carnosine utilization strategies

    • Correlate tissue-specific expression with species-specific physiological adaptations

  • Structure-function relationships:

    • Antibodies targeting conserved vs. divergent regions can map functionally critical domains

    • The tyrosine residue that makes GADL1's binding cavity smaller than GAD represents a key evolutionary adaptation

    • Immunological detection of structural variants could reveal evolutionary pressures on substrate specificity

  • Metabolic adaptations:

    • Compare GADL1 expression in species with different metabolic rates and oxidative stress tolerance

    • GADL1 knockout mice show vulnerability to oxidative stress, suggesting evolutionary selection for antioxidant functions

    • Species adapted to high oxidative stress (diving mammals, high-altitude species) may show specialized GADL1 regulation

  • Tissue-specific expression evolution:

    • Map GADL1 distribution across homologous tissues in different species

    • The pronounced expression in olfactory bulb suggests potential roles in chemosensory evolution

    • Comparative immunohistochemistry can reveal species-specific specialization of expression patterns

  • Methodological considerations:

    • Develop pan-species antibodies targeting ultraconserved epitopes

    • Validate species-specific reactivity using recombinant proteins

    • Complementary approaches including genomic analysis and metabolite profiling strengthen evolutionary interpretations

What are the implications of GADL1's multiple substrate specificity for developing targeted antibodies to study specific metabolic pathways?

GADL1's multi-substrate specificity presents both challenges and opportunities for developing pathway-specific antibody tools:

  • Conformation-specific antibodies:

    • GADL1 may adopt substrate-specific conformations when binding different substrates (aspartate vs. cysteine sulfinic acid)

    • Develop antibodies recognizing these distinct conformational states

    • These would enable visualization of pathway-specific enzyme populations

  • Active site occupation detection:

    • Engineer antibodies that selectively bind GADL1 when specific substrates occupy the active site

    • Structural analysis indicates that substrate side-chain binding involves different interactions

    • Such antibodies could map the relative engagement of GADL1 in different metabolic pathways

  • Post-translational modification targeting:

    • GADL1 activity may be regulated by PTMs that affect substrate preference

    • Develop modification-specific antibodies to link regulatory states with metabolic pathway engagement

    • Currently available commercial antibodies primarily detect unmodified GADL1

  • Metabolic context consideration:

    • GADL1 knockout mice show tissue-specific metabolic alterations beyond carnosine depletion

    • In addition to decreased β-alanine and carnosine, these mice had decreased taurine and increased lipid species

    • Design experimental approaches combining pathway-specific metabolite analysis with GADL1 immunodetection

  • Technical implementation strategy:

    • Generate a panel of epitope-specific antibodies targeting different regions

    • Correlate binding patterns with enzyme activity toward different substrates

    • Integrate computational modeling of substrate-binding conformations to guide antibody design

    • Validate specificity using tissues from GADL1 knockout models with metabolic rescue experiments

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.