GALNT4 Antibody catalyzes the initial step in O-linked oligosaccharide biosynthesis. This involves transferring an N-acetyl-D-galactosamine residue to a serine or threonine residue on the protein receptor. GALNT4 exhibits the highest activity towards Muc7, EA2, and Muc2, with lower activity compared to GALNT2. It glycosylates 'Thr-57' of SELPLG.
GALNT4 is a member of the UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase (GalNAc-T) family of enzymes that initiate mucin-type O-linked glycosylation in the Golgi apparatus. It's characterized by an N-terminal transmembrane domain, a stem region, a lumenal catalytic domain containing GT1 and Gal/GalNAc transferase motifs, and a C-terminal ricin/lectin-like domain . GALNT4 has been implicated in various disease processes, including cardiac hypertrophy and multiple cancer types, making it an important research target . Studies have shown that GALNT4 can directly bind to ASK1, inhibiting its dimerization and phosphorylation, which influences cardiac hypertrophy pathways .
GALNT4 antibodies are primarily used for:
Western Blot (WB) analysis to detect GALNT4 protein expression (~66-67 kDa)
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) to visualize GALNT4 in tissue sections
The choice of application depends on your research question and experimental design. Western blot is commonly used to quantify expression levels, while IHC provides spatial information about GALNT4 distribution in tissues .
When selecting a GALNT4 antibody, consider:
Species reactivity: Ensure compatibility with your experimental model (human, mouse, rat)
Application compatibility: Verify the antibody is validated for your intended application (WB, IHC, ELISA)
Clonality: Polyclonal antibodies offer broader epitope recognition, while monoclonal antibodies provide higher specificity
Immunogen information: Check if the antibody recognizes your region of interest (N-terminal, middle region, etc.)
Validation data: Review published literature and manufacturer data showing successful applications
For example, the sheep polyclonal antibody from R&D Systems (AF7528) has been validated for Western blot in human lung carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines, as well as mouse liver tissue .
For rigorous experimental design with GALNT4 antibodies, include:
Positive controls: Cell lines with known GALNT4 expression (A549, HepG2)
Negative controls: GALNT4 knockout cells generated via CRISPR/Cas9
Specificity controls: Pre-absorption with immunizing peptide or testing in GALNT4-KO models
Cross-reactivity assessment: Test for reactivity with other GALNT family members (particularly important as there are multiple GALNTs with similar structures)
A well-validated example from the literature demonstrated GALNT4 antibody specificity by confirming absence of signals in GALNT4-KO mice generated using CRISPR/Cas9 targeting .
For optimal Western blot detection of GALNT4:
Sample preparation: Lyse cells in buffer containing protease inhibitors
Protein loading: Load 20-50 μg of total protein per lane
Gel conditions: Run under reducing conditions using SDS-PAGE (8-10% gel)
Blocking: 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST
Primary antibody: Dilute according to manufacturer recommendation (typical range: 0.5-1 μg/mL)
Secondary antibody: Use appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary (e.g., anti-sheep IgG for AF7528)
Detection: Use enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL)
The expected molecular weight for GALNT4 is approximately 66-67 kDa . If you encounter non-specific bands, optimize antibody concentration or consider using different blocking reagents.
When troubleshooting weak or absent GALNT4 signals:
Check protein expression levels: Verify GALNT4 expression in your sample by RT-PCR
Optimize protein extraction: GALNT4 is a transmembrane Golgi protein, so ensure your lysis buffer effectively solubilizes membrane proteins
Adjust antibody concentration: Try a range of dilutions (1:200-1:1000 for WB)
Extend incubation time: Consider overnight incubation at 4°C
Use signal enhancement: Try more sensitive ECL substrates
Check antibody quality: Antibodies may lose activity over time; use freshly prepared aliquots
Verify transfer efficiency: Use Ponceau S staining to confirm protein transfer
If cell-specific expression is a concern, note that GALNT4 expression varies across cell types. In breast cancer cell lines, for example, luminal subtypes (MCF7, T47D) show higher expression than basal-like cells (MDA-MB series) .
For IHC detection of GALNT4 in tissue sections:
Fixation: 10% neutral-buffered formalin is standard
Sectioning: 4-5 μm thickness
Antigen retrieval: TE buffer (pH 9.0) is recommended, though citrate buffer (pH 6.0) may also work
Blocking: 3-5% normal serum from the same species as secondary antibody
Primary antibody: Dilute 1:20-1:200 depending on the antibody
Secondary antibody: Use appropriate detection system (HRP/DAB)
Counterstain: Hematoxylin for nuclear visualization
Mounting: Use permanent mounting medium
GALNT4 has been successfully detected in human prostate cancer tissue using this approach . Sample-dependent optimization may be necessary for different tissue types.
To validate GALNT4 antibody specificity:
Genetic validation: Compare staining between wild-type and GALNT4-KO tissues/cells
Peptide competition: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to block specific binding
Multiple antibodies: Use antibodies targeting different epitopes of GALNT4
siRNA knockdown: Compare staining in cells with and without GALNT4 knockdown
Correlation with mRNA: Verify that protein expression patterns correlate with mRNA expression
Cross-reactivity testing: Test reactivity with recombinant GALNT family members (e.g., GALNT1, GALNT3)
In published studies, GALNT4 antibody specificity was confirmed by demonstrating reduced signals in GALNT4-KO mice and cells where the gene was targeted using CRISPR/Cas9 .
To investigate GALNT4's functional role:
Gene knockout/knockdown approaches:
Overexpression studies:
Enzymatic activity assessment:
Protein interaction studies:
In cardiac hypertrophy models, GALNT4-KO mice showed accelerated pathology after transverse aortic constriction (TAC), while AAV9-GALNT4 mice exhibited protection, revealing GALNT4's cardioprotective function .
To detect GALNT4-mediated O-GalNAcylation:
Lectin-based methods:
Mass spectrometry approaches:
In vitro glycosylation assays:
Recombinant GALNT4 with synthetic peptide substrates
UDP-GalNAc incorporation assays
Immunoprecipitation strategies:
For example, researchers successfully demonstrated GALNT4-mediated O-GalNAcylation of TGF-β receptors by comparing wild-type versus GALNT4-KO cells using VVL-agarose pull-down .
GALNT4 substrate specificity characteristics:
Known substrates:
Determination methods:
Specificity characteristics:
GALNT4's ability to modify specific substrates that other GALNTs cannot highlights its unique role in the glycosylation machinery, with important implications for its function in disease contexts .
GALNT4 expression patterns in disease:
Breast cancer:
Upregulated in luminal breast tumors compared to normal breast tissues
No significant difference between basal-like subtypes and normal tissues
Higher expression correlates with better recurrence-free survival (RFS)
Expression levels higher in luminal subtypes (MCF7, T47D) than in basal-like cell lines (MDA-MB series)
Liver cancer (HCC):
Renal cancer:
Cardiac disease:
These variable expression patterns across different diseases highlight the context-dependent role of GALNT4, suggesting it may function as both a tumor suppressor and promoter depending on the tissue type and disease stage .
Selecting appropriate experimental models for GALNT4 research:
Cell line models:
Animal models:
Specialized models:
Each model offers distinct advantages. Cell lines provide controlled environments for mechanistic studies, while mouse models enable investigation of physiological relevance. The SimpleCell strategy specifically enhances detection of O-GalNAc modifications by preventing further glycan elaboration .
For quantitative assessment of GALNT4:
Expression quantification:
Activity assessment:
Functional readouts:
For example, researchers successfully quantified GALNT4's impact on cardiomyocyte hypertrophy by measuring cell cross-sectional area (CSA) and expression of hypertrophic markers (ANP, BNP) following GALNT4 manipulation .
Critical considerations for cancer studies using GALNT4 antibodies:
Context-dependent expression:
Technical considerations:
Antibody specificity verification is crucial (cross-reactivity with other GALNTs)
Sample preparation can affect glycoprotein detection (fixation impacts carbohydrate epitopes)
Expression in surrounding stroma vs. tumor cells must be distinguished in tissue samples
Functional implications:
Prognostic value:
Studies demonstrate that high GALNT4 expression correlates with better prognosis in breast cancer but may have different implications in other cancer types, highlighting the importance of cancer-specific interpretation .
To investigate GALNT4's role in signaling pathways:
Protein-protein interaction studies:
Signal transduction analysis:
Glycosylation-dependent mechanisms:
Inhibitor studies:
For example, researchers demonstrated that GALNT4 inhibits ASK1 signaling by preventing N-terminal dimerization, verified through a combination of co-immunoprecipitation, GST pull-down assays, and pathway inhibitor studies .
Current limitations and potential solutions:
Cross-reactivity concerns:
High homology between GALNT family members (20 in humans)
Solution: Epitope mapping and selection of unique regions for immunization
Validation using multiple approaches (GALNT4-KO models, peptide competition)
Application-specific performance:
Antibodies optimized for WB may not work well for IHC or IP
Solution: Application-specific validation and potentially different antibodies for different techniques
Species limitations:
Some antibodies show restricted species reactivity
Solution: Design conserved epitope-targeted antibodies or species-specific antibodies as needed
Glycoform detection:
Current antibodies detect protein backbone but not specific glycoforms
Solution: Development of glycoform-specific antibodies or complementary lectin-based approaches
Future approaches might include developing recombinant antibodies with higher specificity, monoclonal antibodies targeting GALNT4-specific epitopes, and antibodies capable of distinguishing between active and inactive GALNT4 conformations.
Emerging technologies with potential for GALNT4 research:
CRISPR-based approaches:
Base editors for introducing specific mutations without double-strand breaks
CRISPRi/CRISPRa for precise modulation of GALNT4 expression
CRISPR screens to identify GALNT4 substrates or regulators
Advanced imaging techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy for subcellular localization
Live-cell imaging of GALNT4 trafficking and activity
FRET/BRET for monitoring protein-protein interactions
Glycoproteomics technologies:
Enrichment strategies for O-GalNAc-modified peptides
Targeted glycoproteomics for specific substrates
Ion mobility mass spectrometry for improved glycopeptide analysis
Computational approaches:
AI-based prediction of O-glycosylation sites
Molecular dynamics simulations of GALNT4-substrate interactions
Systems biology modeling of glycosylation networks
Antibody engineering:
These technologies could overcome current limitations in studying GALNT4's diverse functions across cellular contexts and disease states.
Potential therapeutic approaches involving GALNT4:
Cardiac disease applications:
Cancer applications:
Context-dependent approaches based on cancer type and stage
GALNT4 restoration in cancers where it functions as a tumor suppressor
Inhibition of specific GALNT4-substrate interactions in cancers where it promotes progression
Combination with conventional therapies based on glycosylation patterns
Potential therapeutic modalities:
Small molecule modulators of GALNT4 activity
Peptide-based inhibitors of protein-protein interactions
AAV-mediated gene therapy for tissue-specific expression
RNA-based therapeutics (siRNA, antisense oligonucleotides)
The demonstrated role of GALNT4 in protecting against cardiac hypertrophy by inhibiting ASK1 signaling represents one of the most promising therapeutic applications, potentially offering a new strategy for heart failure prevention .
Strategies for improved clinical correlation:
Comprehensive biospecimen analysis:
Paired analysis of protein expression, glycosylation status, and mRNA levels
Multi-omics approaches integrating transcriptomics, proteomics, and glycomics
Spatial analysis in tissue samples (spatial transcriptomics, multiplexed IHC)
Clinical data integration:
Detailed patient phenotyping and longitudinal follow-up
Multi-parameter correlation with disease progression and treatment response
Machine learning approaches to identify patterns in complex datasets
Functional validation:
Patient-derived models (organoids, xenografts)
Genetic manipulation in relevant disease models
Correlation of glycosylation changes with functional outcomes
Standardized assessment methods:
Validated antibodies and protocols for consistent detection
Quantitative scoring systems for tissue analysis
Reference standards for comparing results across studies
For example, researchers have begun integrating GALNT4 expression data with recurrence-free survival information from breast cancer patients using tools like GEPIA and Kaplan-Meier plotter, revealing significant positive correlations between high GALNT4 expression and improved outcomes .