At2g19060 refers to a gene locus in Arabidopsis thaliana with Uniprot number O64469. The antibody against this protein enables various molecular investigations including protein detection, localization studies, and protein-protein interaction analyses. This antibody is particularly valuable for researchers investigating molecular pathways in this important model plant species, potentially including studies related to iron metabolism based on contextual data .
For effective utilization, researchers should consider experimental design that incorporates appropriate controls, optimization of antibody concentration, and validation of specificity before conducting comprehensive studies of At2g19060 protein function and regulation.
The At2g19060 Antibody can be employed in multiple research techniques:
Western blotting/Immunoblot analysis: For detecting and quantifying At2g19060 protein in plant tissue extracts, allowing comparison of expression levels under different conditions .
Immunoprecipitation (IP): To isolate At2g19060 protein complexes, enabling identification of interacting partners.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP): If At2g19060 functions as a DNA-binding protein or associates with chromatin, ChIP can identify its target DNA regions. The methodology described in search result outlines appropriate primer design and analysis approaches for ChIP-qPCR .
Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence: For visualizing protein localization at tissue, cellular, and subcellular levels.
ELISA: For quantitative detection in plant samples, similar to the methodology described for antibody testing in search result .
Each application requires specific optimization, and researchers should conduct preliminary experiments to determine optimal antibody dilutions and experimental conditions.
Proper experimental controls are essential for generating reliable data with At2g19060 Antibody:
Positive controls:
Wild-type Arabidopsis samples expressing At2g19060
Recombinant At2g19060 protein (if available)
Overexpression lines of At2g19060
Negative controls:
Technical controls:
Loading controls (actin, tubulin) for western blots
Input samples for ChIP or IP experiments (typically 5-10% of starting material)
Concentration gradient tests to determine optimal antibody dilution
As noted in search result , immunoprecipitation experiments should include parallel samples with non-specific antibody (IgG) and the specific antibody to distinguish true signals from background .
Based on the association between At2g19060 and research related to iron metabolism , the antibody can be employed to explore protein interaction networks through several methodological approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Use At2g19060 Antibody to pull down protein complexes from plant extracts
Analyze co-precipitated proteins via mass spectrometry
Validate interactions through reciprocal Co-IP experiments
Compare interaction profiles under iron-deficient versus iron-sufficient conditions
Proximity-dependent labeling:
Fusion of At2g19060 with biotin ligase followed by streptavidin pulldown
Validation of interactions using At2g19060 Antibody
Yeast two-hybrid confirmation:
Integration with transcriptome data:
Experimental design should include non-denaturing protein extraction conditions to preserve native interactions, and findings should be validated through multiple independent approaches.
For researchers employing At2g19060 Antibody in ChIP studies:
Chromatin preparation and crosslinking:
Optimize formaldehyde concentration (typically 1-3%) and crosslinking time
Verify chromatin fragmentation to achieve 200-500 bp fragments
Pre-clear chromatin with protein A/G beads to reduce background
Immunoprecipitation parameters:
Determine optimal antibody concentration through titration experiments
Include appropriate controls as described in search result : "Each sample had two immunoprecipitations, one for the non-specific antibody (IgG) and the other for the anti HA-antibody (specific)"
Reserve 5-10% of starting chromatin as input control
PCR primer design:
Data analysis:
If investigating relationships with iron metabolism, consider examining binding near genes involved in iron homeostasis pathways and validating findings through multiple biological replicates.
To establish functional relationships between At2g19060 and iron homeostasis:
Experimental design:
Protein and transcript analysis:
Iron status verification:
Phenotypic characterization:
Document morphological responses to iron availability
Measure physiological parameters like chlorophyll content or photosynthetic efficiency
Assess molecular responses using marker genes for iron deficiency
Data integration:
Correlate At2g19060 protein levels with phenotypic severity
Compare with published datasets on iron deficiency responses
Develop models of At2g19060 function in iron homeostasis networks
This comprehensive approach allows positioning At2g19060 within the broader context of iron regulatory networks in Arabidopsis.
For reliable western blot detection of At2g19060:
Sample preparation:
Harvest and flash-freeze plant tissue in liquid nitrogen
Grind to fine powder and extract proteins in buffer containing:
50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5
150 mM NaCl
1% Triton X-100
1 mM EDTA
Protease inhibitor cocktail
Centrifuge at 14,000 × g, 15 min, 4°C and quantify protein concentration
SDS-PAGE and transfer:
Separate 20-30 μg protein on 10-12% SDS-PAGE gel
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membrane
Verify transfer with Ponceau S staining
Immunodetection:
Block with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour
Incubate with At2g19060 Antibody at 1:1000 to 1:5000 dilution (based on similar dilution ranges mentioned in search result )
Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation
Wash 3 × 10 min with TBST
Incubate with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:10,000) for 1 hour
Wash 3 × 10 min with TBST and develop using ECL substrate
Controls and quantification:
Include molecular weight marker and appropriate controls
Reprobe with antibody against housekeeping protein for normalization
Perform densitometry analysis on biological replicates (n≥3)
This protocol provides a starting point that should be optimized for specific experimental conditions and antibody lot characteristics.
To determine At2g19060 subcellular localization:
Immunofluorescence approach:
Fix Arabidopsis tissues with 4% paraformaldehyde
Permeabilize with 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100
Block with 3% BSA and incubate with At2g19060 Antibody (1:100-1:500)
Visualize using fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody
Include DAPI nuclear stain and organelle-specific markers
Image using confocal microscopy
Subcellular fractionation:
Isolate subcellular compartments (cytosolic, nuclear, chloroplastic, mitochondrial)
Verify fraction purity using established marker proteins
Perform western blotting with At2g19060 Antibody on each fraction
Quantify distribution across compartments
Validation approaches:
Compare with GFP-tagged At2g19060 localization patterns
Examine co-localization with known iron homeostasis proteins
Assess potential relocalization under stress conditions
Since search result indicates potential relationships with cytosolic iron metabolism through GRXS17 associations , researchers should examine whether At2g19060 exhibits cytosolic localization or associates with specific organelles involved in iron homeostasis.
Rigorous antibody validation is essential for reliable research outcomes:
Western blot validation:
Compare signal between wild-type and knockout/knockdown lines
Verify detection of a single band at the expected molecular weight
Conduct peptide competition assay by pre-incubating antibody with immunizing peptide
Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry:
Heterologous expression:
Express recombinant At2g19060 in bacterial or yeast systems
Test antibody detection in expression system versus controls
Assess cross-reactivity with related proteins
Epitope mapping:
Determine which region of At2g19060 the antibody recognizes
Assess potential cross-reactivity based on sequence homology
Express protein fragments to confirm epitope specificity
Cross-validation:
Compare protein detection with transcript expression patterns
Validate localization using complementary approaches
Test multiple antibody lots if available
The inclusion of proper controls, as emphasized in search result regarding non-specific antibody (IgG) controls , is essential for distinguishing specific from non-specific signals in all validation experiments.
Researchers may encounter several issues when working with At2g19060 Antibody:
No signal detected:
Increase antibody concentration (try 1:500 dilution)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Increase protein loading (up to 50 μg)
Use more sensitive detection methods
Verify target protein expression in samples
Multiple bands or high background:
Optimize blocking conditions (increase to 5% BSA)
Increase antibody dilution (1:5000 or higher)
Extend washing steps (5 × 10 min TBST washes)
Use freshly prepared samples to avoid degradation products
Consider adding phosphatase inhibitors if phosphorylation affects recognition
Inconsistent results:
Standardize protein extraction methodology
Process samples in parallel under identical conditions
Verify equal loading with Ponceau S and housekeeping controls
Prepare working solutions in larger batches
Control incubation times and temperatures precisely
Detection in complex samples:
Consider enrichment by immunoprecipitation before detection
Use more sensitive ECL substrates
Optimize protein extraction buffer components
Test alternative membrane types (PVDF vs. nitrocellulose)
When optimizing antibody concentration, search result notes that "3 μl antibody (~4 μg) antibody (IgG or anti HA)" was used in their immunoprecipitation experiments, which may provide a reference point for initial testing .
For comprehensive understanding of At2g19060 function:
Multi-omics experimental design:
Collect parallel samples for protein analysis and RNA extraction
Include multiple timepoints and treatment conditions
Ensure adequate biological replication for statistical validity
Transcriptome analysis:
Protein-transcript correlation:
Quantify At2g19060 protein levels via western blot using the antibody
Compare with corresponding transcript levels via qRT-PCR
Identify conditions where protein and transcript levels diverge (suggesting post-transcriptional regulation)
ChIP integration (if applicable):
Network analysis:
Construct integrated networks incorporating protein-level and transcript-level data
Identify modules and pathways affected by At2g19060
Generate testable hypotheses about At2g19060 function
This integrative approach positions At2g19060 within its broader biological context and reveals potential regulatory roles.
For robust analysis of ChIP-qPCR experiments:
Data normalization methods:
Percent input method: Calculate enrichment as percentage of input chromatin
Fold enrichment over IgG: Compare specific antibody pulldown to non-specific IgG control
Reference gene normalization: Normalize to genes known not to be targets
Follow specific recommendations in "Analysis of ChIP-qPCR" from search result
Technical considerations:
Run technical triplicates for each qPCR reaction
Ensure primer efficiency between 90-110%
Include no-template controls and melting curve analysis
Calibrate with standard curves for absolute quantification
Statistical testing:
Apply Student's t-test for comparing two conditions
Use ANOVA for multiple condition comparisons
Implement multiple testing correction (Bonferroni or FDR)
Consider non-parametric tests if data distribution is non-normal
Advanced analysis:
Correlation analysis between binding and gene expression
Motif discovery in enriched regions
Comparative analysis across experimental conditions
Integration with published ChIP datasets
Visualization approaches:
Bar graphs showing fold enrichment with error bars
Genome browser tracks for contextualizing binding sites
Heatmaps for comparing binding patterns across multiple regions
Proper experimental design should include a minimum of three biological replicates and follow the methodological guidelines outlined in search result .
When protein data and phenotypic results don't align as expected:
Systematic troubleshooting:
Verify antibody specificity using methods described in Question 3.3
Investigate post-translational modifications that may affect protein function without changing levels
Consider temporal dynamics: protein levels may change rapidly while phenotypes develop gradually
Examine spatial patterns: tissue-specific effects may be masked in whole-plant analyses
Functional redundancy assessment:
Identify homologs or proteins with overlapping functions
Create multiple mutants to overcome redundancy
Test overexpression to determine if higher protein levels enhance phenotypes
Pathway analysis:
Environmental factors:
Test multiple growth conditions
Control for stress factors that might influence results
Consider developmental timing and circadian regulation
Dosage effects:
Determine if there's a threshold effect for phenotype manifestation
Use quantitative approaches to correlate protein levels with phenotypic severity
Consider using more sensitive phenotyping methods
This systematic approach helps resolve apparent contradictions between molecular and phenotypic data.
When extending research to multiple Arabidopsis ecotypes:
Sequence variation analysis:
Check sequence conservation of At2g19060 across ecotypes
Identify amino acid variations that might affect antibody recognition
Consider designing ecotype-specific antibodies if significant variation exists
Experimental design:
Include standard ecotypes (Col-0, Ler, Ws) alongside specialized ecotypes
Standardize growth conditions precisely
Process all samples in parallel to minimize technical variation
Implement blocking experimental design to control for batch effects
Validation requirements:
Test antibody specificity separately for each ecotype
Use recombinant proteins from different ecotypes to calibrate detection sensitivity
Include appropriate controls for each ecotype
Data normalization strategies:
Use highly conserved housekeeping proteins as loading controls
Consider relative quantification rather than absolute comparisons
Validate protein detection with transcript analysis
Interpretation framework:
Associate protein level differences with known phenotypic variations
Consider natural variation in iron homeostasis traits
Investigate correlations between protein levels and ecotype-specific adaptations
This approach ensures that comparative studies produce biologically meaningful insights rather than technical artifacts.
For investigating At2g19060's role in stress responses:
Stress treatment experimental design:
Multi-level analysis:
Monitor At2g19060 protein levels using the antibody during stress progression
Track potential subcellular relocalization using immunofluorescence
Identify stress-dependent protein interactions using co-immunoprecipitation
Measure downstream physiological parameters
Complementary assays:
Genetic approaches:
Compare wild-type, knockout, and overexpression lines under stress conditions
Use inducible expression systems for temporal control
Create reporter lines to track both protein expression and activity
Network integration:
This integrated approach positions At2g19060 within plant stress response networks and reveals its specific contributions to stress adaptation mechanisms.