At3g62280 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
At3g62280 antibody; T17J13.240GDSL esterase/lipase At3g62280 antibody; EC 3.1.1.- antibody; Extracellular lipase At3g62280 antibody
Target Names
At3g62280
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G62280

STRING: 3702.AT3G62280.1

UniGene: At.34144

Protein Families
'GDSL' lipolytic enzyme family
Subcellular Location
Secreted.

Q&A

What is At3g62280 and why would researchers need antibodies against it?

At3g62280 encodes a GDSL-like lipase in Arabidopsis thaliana and is implicated in plant development processes. The protein has been identified in studies of microspore formation and anther development, with expression patterns suggesting potential roles in reproductive development . Researchers use antibodies against this protein to study its expression, localization, and functional interactions in various developmental contexts and stress responses. Antibodies enable direct protein detection, complementing transcriptomic data which may not always correlate with protein levels due to post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms.

What types of antibodies would be most suitable for At3g62280 detection?

For plant proteins like At3g62280, both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies offer distinct advantages depending on research objectives:

Antibody TypeAdvantagesLimitationsRecommended Applications
PolyclonalRecognizes multiple epitopes; stronger signal; more tolerant of protein modificationsBatch-to-batch variation; higher cross-reactivity potentialInitial characterization; Western blotting; immunoprecipitation
MonoclonalConsistent supply; high specificity; reduced backgroundRecognizes single epitope; potentially lower sensitivityDistinguishing between related GDSL lipases; quantitative assays
When selecting between these options, consider that monoclonal antibodies like those described in antibody development platforms (such as MAGE) offer greater specificity but may miss protein variants, while polyclonal antibodies provide stronger signals but potential cross-reactivity with related lipases .

How should I validate an At3g62280 antibody before experimental use?

Rigorous validation is essential for trustworthy results, particularly for plant-specific proteins where commercial antibodies may have limited validation data:

  • Specificity testing: Compare wild-type plants with At3g62280 knockout/knockdown lines

  • Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to block specific binding

  • Western blot analysis: Verify single band of predicted molecular weight or explainable multiple bands

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against purified related GDSL lipases if available

  • Expression pattern correlation: Compare antibody detection with known transcription patterns from previous studies
    These validation steps are particularly important given that plant tissues contain numerous lipases with similar structures that could potentially cross-react with the antibody.

What applications are At3g62280 antibodies suitable for in plant research?

Based on antibody characteristics and research objectives, At3g62280 antibodies can be applied to:

  • Western blotting: Quantify protein expression across developmental stages or stress conditions

  • Immunohistochemistry: Visualize tissue and subcellular localization

  • Immunoprecipitation: Isolate protein complexes for interaction studies

  • ELISA: Quantitative measurement in tissue extracts

  • Flow cytometry: Single-cell analysis in plant protoplasts
    Each application requires specific optimization, such as extraction methods that effectively solubilize membrane-associated lipases while preventing degradation .

How should I design experiments to study At3g62280 expression during plant development?

For developmental studies, design a systematic approach:

  • Establish clear sampling timeline based on developmental stages (e.g., anther stages 4-7 and 8-12 as referenced in prior studies)

  • Include appropriate controls (wild-type vs. mutant plants)

  • Prepare protein extracts with detergent-based buffers optimized for lipases

  • Use quantitative Western blotting with internal loading controls

  • Compare protein expression with transcriptome data, particularly for stages where gene expression changes dramatically
    This approach is particularly relevant as prior research has shown stage-specific expression patterns of related genes during anther development, suggesting precise temporal regulation .

What protein extraction protocols work best for detecting At3g62280?

For optimal extraction of GDSL lipases like At3g62280:

Extraction ParameterRecommendationRationale
Buffer compositionTris-HCl (pH 7.5) with 0.5-1% non-ionic detergent (Triton X-100)Efficiently solubilizes membrane-associated lipases
AdditivesComplete protease inhibitor cocktail; 1-5 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanolPrevents degradation and maintains protein structure
Plant tissueFlash-frozen and ground in liquid nitrogenMinimizes proteolytic degradation
HomogenizationFine powder with mortar and pestle or mechanical disruptionEnsures complete tissue disruption
Extraction ratio3-5 mL buffer per gram of tissueProvides sufficient dilution for efficient extraction
This protocol accounts for the lipid-associated nature of GDSL esterases and is designed to maintain enzymatic activity while ensuring efficient extraction.

How can I correlate At3g62280 protein levels with gene expression data?

To meaningfully correlate protein and transcript levels:

  • Design experiments that sample the same tissues/conditions for both protein and RNA analysis

  • Include multiple time points to capture translation delays and protein turnover rates

  • Normalize protein quantification data appropriately (e.g., to total protein or housekeeping proteins)

  • Consider potential post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms, particularly in developmental contexts
    This approach is particularly important in light of research showing that some plant genes exhibit discrepancies between transcript and protein levels during development. For example, in studies of anther development, expression patterns of certain genes showed complex regulation that wasn't always reflected at the protein level .

How can At3g62280 antibodies be used to study protein-protein interactions?

For interaction studies with At3g62280:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Use At3g62280 antibodies to pull down the protein complex, followed by mass spectrometry identification of binding partners

  • Proximity ligation assay (PLA): Visualize protein interactions in situ using antibodies against At3g62280 and potential interaction partners

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP): If At3g62280 has any DNA-binding capacity or associates with transcription factors
    When designing these experiments, consider that GDSL lipases often function in complexes, and interaction partners may be tissue-specific or condition-dependent. Studies have shown that lipases can interact with different proteins during developmental processes .

What approaches can resolve contradictory results between transcriptional and protein expression data?

When transcript and protein levels don't correlate:

  • Verify antibody specificity in the specific tissue being studied

  • Assess protein stability through cycloheximide chase experiments

  • Examine potential post-translational modifications using specialized antibodies or mass spectrometry

  • Consider sampling more frequent time points to capture rapid changes in protein levels

  • Investigate microRNA-mediated regulation that might affect translation efficiency
    This comprehensive approach can reveal mechanisms like those observed in anther development studies, where genes including At3g62280 showed complex regulation patterns .

How can I use At3g62280 antibodies in combination with genetic approaches?

Integrating antibody-based detection with genetic manipulation:

  • Generate transgenic lines with epitope-tagged At3g62280 for parallel detection with both anti-epitope and anti-At3g62280 antibodies

  • Create domain-specific mutations and analyze effects on protein expression, localization, and function

  • Develop inducible systems to study immediate consequences of protein depletion

  • Combine with CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing for precise genetic manipulation
    This integrated approach provides more robust data than either genetic or antibody-based methods alone, particularly when studying multifunctional proteins like lipases.

Why might Western blots show unexpected band patterns with At3g62280 antibodies?

Multiple bands or unexpected molecular weights may result from:

IssuePossible CausesSolutions
Multiple bandsPost-translational modifications; alternative splicing; proteolytic processingCompare with predicted molecular weights; use knockout controls as reference
Band size discrepancyGlycosylation or other modifications; anomalous migrationTreat samples with deglycosylation enzymes; use gradient gels for better resolution
Weak signalLow expression; inefficient extraction; epitope maskingIncrease protein loading; optimize extraction buffer; try different antibody concentrations
No signalProtein degradation; incorrect developmental stageAdd fresh protease inhibitors; verify developmental timing; use positive control tissues
Reference studies have shown that protein detection can be challenging in plant reproductive tissues, where complex developmental changes occur .

What controls are essential for immunolocalization of At3g62280?

For reliable immunolocalization results:

  • Negative controls:

    • Primary antibody omission

    • Pre-immune serum control

    • Tissues from knockout/knockdown plants

    • Peptide competition control

  • Positive controls:

    • Tissues with known expression patterns

    • Co-localization with markers for expected subcellular compartments

    • Comparison with fluorescent protein fusions when available
      These controls are especially important for plant tissues, which often show high autofluorescence and can complicate immunofluorescence interpretation .

How can I optimize antibody-based detection in tissues with high background?

For problematic plant tissues:

  • Adjust blocking conditions: Test different blocking agents (BSA, milk, normal serum) and concentrations

  • Optimize antibody dilution: Titrate to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio

  • Modify wash conditions: Increase wash duration and detergent concentration

  • Try signal amplification methods: Biotin-streptavidin systems or tyramide signal amplification

  • Consider tissue preparation alternatives: Test different fixation protocols that may better preserve epitopes while reducing autofluorescence
    These optimizations are particularly relevant for reproductive tissues like anthers, where complex structures and developmental changes can increase background signals .

How can single-cell technologies be applied with At3g62280 antibodies?

Emerging single-cell approaches include:

  • Flow cytometry of plant protoplasts using fluorescently-labeled At3g62280 antibodies

  • Mass cytometry (CyTOF) with metal-conjugated antibodies for multiplexed protein detection

  • Single-cell Western blotting for protein quantification in individual cells

  • Integration with single-cell RNA-seq data to correlate transcription and translation at cellular resolution
    These technologies would be particularly valuable for understanding the heterogeneity of At3g62280 expression across different cell types during development or stress responses, building on the tissue-level analyses currently available .

What is the potential for developing activated At3g62280-specific antibodies?

Similar to approaches used for human proteins like activated C3 antibodies, developing antibodies that specifically recognize activated forms of At3g62280 could provide insights into its functional state:

  • Identify potential activation-specific epitopes through structural analysis

  • Generate antibodies against neo-epitopes exposed upon activation

  • Validate specificity using biochemical assays with activated and inactive protein forms

  • Apply in research to monitor when and where the protein becomes enzymatically active
    This approach would be particularly valuable for GDSL lipases, which likely undergo conformational changes upon activation, similar to the neo-epitope recognition principle described for the complement system .

How might machine learning approaches improve At3g62280 antibody development?

Emerging AI-based approaches like those described for MAGE (Monoclonal Antibody GEnerator) could significantly advance plant antibody development:

  • Sequence-based modeling to predict optimal epitopes for antibody generation

  • Structure-based design of antibodies with improved specificity and affinity

  • Computational screening to minimize cross-reactivity with related plant proteins

  • Design of paired heavy-light chain antibodies specifically targeting At3g62280
    These computational approaches could overcome limitations in traditional antibody development for plant proteins, which often receive less commercial attention than biomedical targets .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.