GLRB Antibody, FITC conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Conjugation Methodology

FITC conjugation involves covalent attachment to primary amines (lysine residues) on the antibody:

  • Optimal Conditions: pH 9.5, 25 mg/mL antibody concentration, 30–60 minutes at room temperature .

  • FITC-to-Antibody Ratio: Typically 3–6 FITC molecules per antibody to prevent quenching . Excess labeling (>6 FITC/IgG) reduces solubility and increases nonspecific binding .

  • Purification: DEAE Sephadex chromatography separates under-/over-labeled antibodies .

Immunological Applications

Primary Uses:

  • Immunofluorescence (IF): Detects GLRB in cultured cells and paraffin-embedded tissues at 1:50–200 dilutions .

  • Western Blot (WB): Identifies GLRB (~56 kDa) in brain and spinal cord lysates .

  • Flow Cytometry (FC): Labels surface glycine receptors in live-cell assays .

Performance Data:

ApplicationRecommended DilutionObserved Reactivity
IF (Cultured Cells)1:50–200Human, Mouse, Rat
WB1:500–1:2000Mouse brain, rat spinal cord

Performance Considerations

  • Binding Affinity: Higher FITC labeling indices correlate with reduced antigen-binding affinity due to steric hindrance .

  • Sensitivity vs. Specificity: Over-conjugation increases background noise in immunohistochemistry .

  • Validation: Antibodies are tested against recombinant epitope-tagged proteins and Positope™ controls to confirm specificity .

Recommended Protocols

  • Dilution Buffer: PBS with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for IF .

  • Staining Workflow:

    1. Fix cells with 4% paraformaldehyde.

    2. Permeabilize with 0.1% Triton X-100.

    3. Incubate with FITC-GLRB antibody (1:100–1:500) for 1 hour .

  • Light Sensitivity: Protect from light to prevent fluorophore degradation .

Research Findings

  • Tissue Localization: GLRB is highly expressed in mouse cerebellum and spinal cord, validated by IHC .

  • Species Variability: Human GLRB shows stronger IF signals compared to rodent isoforms .

  • Alternative Fluorophores: Compared to HRP/AP conjugates, FITC allows multiplexing with red-emitting dyes .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
We typically dispatch orders within 1-3 business days of receipt. Delivery times may vary depending on the shipping method and destination. Please contact your local distributor for specific delivery timeframes.
Synonyms
GLRBGlycine receptor subunit beta antibody; Glycine receptor 58 kDa subunit antibody
Target Names
GLRB
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Glycine receptors are ligand-gated chloride channels. GLRB does not form ligand-gated ion channels independently but functions as a component of heteromeric ligand-gated chloride channels. Channel activation is triggered by extracellular glycine. Heteropentameric channels composed of GLRB and GLRA1 exhibit higher sensitivity to glycine compared to homopentameric GLRA1. GLRB plays a significant role in regulating neuronal excitability and contributes to the generation of inhibitory postsynaptic currents.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Variants in the GLRB gene have been linked to the etiopathogenesis of fear and anxiety disorders. PMID: 28872638
  2. A genome-wide significant association was observed between the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and single non-coding nucleotide variants of the GLRB gene (rs78726293, P = 3.3 x 10 - 8; rs191260602, P = 3.9 x 10- 8). The expression of the GLRB gene was found to be modulated by rs7688285 in brain tissue and cell culture. PMID: 28167838
  3. Whole-exome sequencing in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) identified a second rare inherited genetic variant affecting GLRB, expressed in both inhibitory and excitatory synapses. PMID: 26055424
  4. Novel mutations in GLRB have been reported in individuals with hyperekplexia. PMID: 23182654
  5. Systematic DNA sequencing of GLRB in individuals with hyperekplexia revealed new missense mutations in GLRB, leading to M177R, L285R, and W310C substitutions. PMID: 23238346
  6. This study conclusively establishes GLRB as the third major gene associated with hyperekplexia, providing valuable insights into the genetic stratification and biological underpinnings of this neonatal/pediatric disorder. PMID: 23184146
  7. Distinct properties of the glycine receptor beta+/alpha- interface are characterized, providing a clear understanding of the heteromeric interface reconstituted in homomeric protein. PMID: 22535951
  8. A large family exhibiting Hereditary hyperekplexia (HH) was identified, resulting from a homozygous mutation in GLRB. PMID: 21391991
  9. A protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation site within the cytoplasmic domain of the beta-subunit of the GlyR (residue S403) was identified. Phosphorylation at this site leads to a decrease in the binding affinity between the receptor and gephyrin. PMID: 21829170
  10. The stoichiometry of recombinant heteromeric glycine receptors was elucidated through the identification of a pore-lining region point mutation. PMID: 14698963

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 4329

OMIM: 138492

KEGG: hsa:2743

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000264428

UniGene: Hs.32973

Involvement In Disease
Hyperekplexia 2 (HKPX2)
Protein Families
Ligand-gated ion channel (TC 1.A.9) family, Glycine receptor (TC 1.A.9.3) subfamily, GLRB sub-subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cell junction, synapse, postsynaptic cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein. Cell junction, synapse. Cell projection, dendrite. Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein. Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is the GLRB protein and why is it a target for immunological detection?

GLRB (Glycine receptor subunit beta, 58 kDa subunit) functions as a critical component of heteromeric ligand-gated chloride channels in the central nervous system. Unlike the alpha subunits, GLRB does not form functional ion channels independently but is essential for proper channel assembly and functionality. The protein plays a crucial role in inhibitory neurotransmission, making it an important target for neuroscience research. GLRB antibodies allow researchers to study its expression patterns, subcellular localization, and potential alterations in various neurological conditions. The detection of this protein is particularly valuable in research focusing on glycinergic transmission in the brain and spinal cord, where GLRB is predominantly expressed.

What are the critical specifications of commercially available GLRB antibodies with FITC conjugation?

Commercial GLRB antibodies with FITC conjugation typically feature the following specifications:

SpecificationDetailsReference
TargetGlycine receptor subunit beta (58 kDa)
UniProt IDP48167
ImmunogenRecombinant Human Glycine receptor subunit beta protein (355-472AA)
Host SpeciesTypically Rabbit
TypePolyclonal Antibody
Species ReactivityHuman (primary), with some cross-reactivity to mouse and rat
ConjugateFITC (Fluorescein isothiocyanate)
Buffer Composition50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4), 0.03% Proclin 300
StorageRecommended at -20°C or -80°C

The specificity of these antibodies is validated through techniques such as Western blotting against brain and spinal cord lysates, where they detect bands at approximately 56 kDa, corresponding to the expected molecular weight of GLRB.

How does the FITC conjugation process affect antibody functionality, and what parameters should be optimized?

The FITC conjugation process involves covalent attachment of the fluorescein isothiocyanate molecule to primary amines (primarily lysine residues) on the antibody structure . This process significantly impacts antibody functionality in several ways:

Impact on Binding Affinity: Research demonstrates a negative correlation between FITC-labeling index and binding affinity for target antigens . Higher degrees of labeling interfere with antigen recognition sites, particularly when lysines within or near the variable regions are modified.

Optimal Conjugation Parameters:

  • pH: The reaction should be maintained at pH 9.5 for optimal conjugation efficiency

  • Antibody Concentration: 25 mg/mL provides consistent conjugation results

  • Reaction Time: 30–60 minutes at room temperature balances conjugation efficiency with antibody stability

  • FITC-to-Antibody Ratio: The optimal range is 3–6 FITC molecules per antibody

Consequences of Over-Conjugation:

  • Reduced solubility of the antibody preparation

  • Internal quenching of fluorescence (paradoxically reducing signal intensity)

  • Increased non-specific binding and background noise

  • Compromised binding affinity

When developing a new experimental protocol, researchers should perform parallel conjugations with varying FITC concentrations and select the preparation that provides optimal signal-to-noise ratio for their specific application.

What are the validated application protocols for GLRB antibody with FITC conjugation in different experimental systems?

GLRB antibodies with FITC conjugation have been validated for multiple experimental applications:

Immunofluorescence (IF) in Cultured Cells and Tissues:

  • Recommended Dilutions: 1:50–1:200

  • Protocol: Fix cells with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilize with 0.1% Triton X-100, block with serum, incubate with FITC-conjugated GLRB antibody for 1-2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C, then wash and mount with anti-fade medium containing DAPI.

  • Key Consideration: Confirm specificity with appropriate negative controls and counter-staining with neuronal markers.

Western Blot Analysis (WB):

  • Recommended Dilutions: 1:500–1:2000

  • Expected Band: ~56 kDa in brain and spinal cord lysates

  • Note: Though uncommon, FITC-conjugated antibodies can be used in Western blotting with special detection systems.

Flow Cytometry (FC):

  • Application: Detection of surface glycine receptors in both fixed and live-cell assays

  • Protocol: Suspend cells at 1×10^6 cells/mL, use 100 μL per test, incubate with antibody (5-10 μg/mL) for 30 minutes at 4°C protected from light, wash twice, and analyze.

  • Excitation/Emission: 488 nm laser excitation, detection at ~530 nm

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA):

  • Validated application for GLRB detection

  • Protocol: Coat plates with target protein, block, incubate with FITC-GLRB antibody, detect with anti-FITC HRP-conjugated secondary antibody or directly measure fluorescence.

Each application requires thorough optimization, including titration of antibody concentration and validation with appropriate positive and negative controls.

How can differential scanning fluorimetry be used to assess antigen binding of FITC-conjugated GLRB antibodies without additional fluorophores?

Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) represents an innovative approach for assessing the antigen-binding capabilities of FITC-conjugated antibodies without requiring additional fluorescent probes . This method leverages the intrinsic fluorescence properties of the conjugated FITC to monitor conformational changes in the antibody upon antigen binding:

Methodological Principle:
When FITC-conjugated antibodies are gradually heated, the fluorescence emission characteristics change as protein unfolding occurs. The presence of bound antigen alters the thermodynamic stability of the antibody, resulting in measurable shifts in melting temperature (Tm) .

Protocol Overview:

  • Prepare serial dilutions of purified antigen (e.g., recombinant GLRB protein)

  • Mix FITC-conjugated GLRB antibody with each antigen concentration in appropriate buffer

  • Load samples into qPCR plates or other suitable formats for thermal ramping

  • Apply a temperature gradient (typically 25-95°C) while monitoring fluorescence intensity

  • Calculate melting temperatures from the resulting thermal denaturation curves

  • Compare Tm values between antibody-alone and antibody-antigen complexes

Data Interpretation:

  • Positive binding is indicated by a significant shift in Tm (typically >1°C)

  • The magnitude of the Tm shift often correlates with binding affinity

  • Multiple transitions may indicate domain-specific interactions or structural rearrangements

This technique allows researchers to verify that FITC conjugation has not compromised antigen recognition and provides a quantitative measure of binding functionality without the complications introduced by secondary detection systems .

What approaches can be used to quantitatively assess the impact of FITC labeling on GLRB antibody binding thermodynamics?

The thermodynamic parameters of antibody-antigen interactions can be significantly altered by FITC conjugation. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) offers a robust solution for quantitatively assessing these changes without interference from the fluorescent properties of FITC :

Advantages of ITC for FITC-Conjugated Antibodies:

  • Direct measurement of binding without reliance on fluorescence detection

  • Not subject to interference from FITC absorbance or emission

  • Provides complete thermodynamic profile (ΔH, ΔS, ΔG, and Ka)

  • Label-independent validation of binding functionality

Experimental Design:

  • Prepare a series of GLRB antibodies with increasing FITC conjugation ratios

  • Purify each conjugate to remove unreacted FITC

  • Characterize the degree of labeling spectrophotometrically

  • Perform ITC analysis by titrating purified GLRB antigen into each antibody preparation

  • Extract binding constants and thermodynamic parameters from the resulting isotherms

Comparative Thermodynamic Analysis:
Typical ITC results show systematic changes in binding parameters with increasing FITC labeling:

FITC:Antibody RatioAssociation Constant (Ka)Enthalpy Change (ΔH)Entropy Change (ΔS)Impact on Binding
0 (Unconjugated)10^8-10^9 M^-1Highly negativeFavorableBaseline reference
1-3Slight decreaseBecomes less negativeBecomes less favorableMinimal impact
4-6Moderate decrease (~40-60%)Significantly less negativeLess favorableNoticeable impact
>6Substantial decrease (>70%)Drastically alteredMay become unfavorableSeverely compromised

These quantitative assessments enable researchers to select optimally labeled conjugates that maintain binding properties while providing sufficient fluorescence for detection applications .

What control experiments should be conducted to validate FITC-conjugated GLRB antibody specificity and minimize non-specific binding?

Validating antibody specificity is critical for generating reliable experimental results. For FITC-conjugated GLRB antibodies, several control experiments should be systematically implemented:

Epitope Blocking Controls:

  • Pre-incubate FITC-GLRB antibody with excess recombinant immunogen (GLRB protein fragment 355-472AA)

  • Apply the blocked antibody to experimental samples in parallel with unblocked antibody

  • Specific staining should be absent or significantly reduced in the blocked condition

Tissue and Cell Type Specificity:

  • Compare staining patterns in tissues known to express GLRB (brain, spinal cord) versus tissues with minimal expression

  • Confirm that staining patterns match the expected distribution of glycinergic synapses

  • Validate using knockout/knockdown models when available

Secondary Antibody Controls (for indirect detection systems):

  • Include samples treated with secondary antibody only

  • Include isotype controls matched to the primary antibody host species and class

Minimizing Non-specific Binding:

  • Optimize blocking solutions (5-10% serum from the same species as the secondary antibody)

  • Include 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for effective permeabilization in fixed samples

  • Include 0.1% BSA in all antibody dilutions to reduce background

  • For tissue sections, consider autofluorescence quenching treatments

Research has demonstrated that FITC-conjugated antibodies with higher labeling indices (>6 FITC molecules per antibody) show increased non-specific staining . Therefore, using conjugates with moderate labeling indices (3-5 FITC per antibody) often provides the optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity .

How can researchers assess and mitigate the impact of FITC photobleaching on longitudinal imaging experiments?

FITC photobleaching presents a significant challenge for longitudinal imaging experiments, as the fluorophore's quantum yield decreases with repeated or prolonged exposure to excitation light. This challenge can be systematically addressed through the following approaches:

Quantitative Assessment of Photobleaching:

  • Prepare fixed control samples stained with FITC-GLRB antibody

  • Establish a baseline by imaging at fixed exposure settings

  • Subject samples to continuous or repeated illumination at 488 nm

  • Capture images at regular intervals (e.g., every 10 seconds for 5 minutes)

  • Measure and plot fluorescence intensity decay over time

  • Calculate the photobleaching half-life (t₁/₂) under your specific imaging conditions

Photobleaching Mitigation Strategies:

  • Chemical Additives: Include anti-fade agents such as p-phenylenediamine (1 mg/mL) or commercial anti-fade mounting media

  • Oxygen Scavengers: Incorporate enzymatic oxygen scavenging systems (glucose oxidase/catalase)

  • Imaging Parameters:

    • Reduce excitation intensity to minimum required for adequate signal

    • Minimize exposure time through camera binning or resonant scanning

    • Increase detector gain rather than excitation power

    • Use confocal pinholes at optimal settings (1.0-1.2 Airy units)

  • Acquisition Strategy:

    • Capture FITC channels first in multi-channel experiments

    • Use random sampling of fields rather than sequential areas

    • Implement focus stabilization to minimize repeated focusing

Computational Correction:
For quantitative analyses, researchers should incorporate photobleaching correction:

  • Determine the exponential decay constant (k) from control experiments

  • Apply correction factor: Icorrected = Imeasured × e^(kt)

  • Validate correction by measuring standard samples before and after experimental series

These strategies are particularly important when FITC-GLRB antibodies are used to quantify receptor expression levels or track dynamic receptor redistribution in live-cell imaging experiments.

How should researchers quantitatively compare FITC-GLRB antibody staining intensities across different experimental conditions?

Quantitative comparison of FITC-GLRB staining across experimental conditions requires rigorous controls and standardized analysis protocols to ensure valid interpretations:

Standardization Protocol:

  • Include calibration samples in each experiment (e.g., reference cell lines with known GLRB expression levels)

  • Process all experimental conditions simultaneously with identical reagents

  • Capture images using consistent acquisition parameters:

    • Fixed exposure time and gain settings

    • Identical objective and optical configuration

    • Same binning and resolution settings

  • Include internal control structures in each image for normalization

  • Avoid saturation in any pixel of the images being compared

Quantification Methodology:

  • Integrated Density Measurement: Calculate the product of area and mean fluorescence intensity for defined regions of interest

  • Background Subtraction: Apply consistent background subtraction using adjacent non-stained regions

  • Cell-by-Cell Analysis: For heterogeneous samples, perform single-cell segmentation and analysis

Recommended Normalization Approaches:

  • Normalize to nuclear counterstain intensity for variations in tissue thickness

  • Express results as ratio to invariant marker (e.g., neuronal structural proteins)

  • For tissue sections, normalize to internal control regions within the same section

Statistical Analysis Considerations:

  • Apply appropriate tests based on data distribution (parametric vs. non-parametric)

  • Account for batch effects through mixed-effects models when combining multiple experiments

  • Consider biological versus technical replicates in power calculations

The sensitivity of FITC-conjugated antibodies is influenced by the labeling index, with higher indices potentially providing increased detection sensitivity but at the cost of specificity . Therefore, when comparing different experimental conditions, researchers must ensure that the same antibody preparation (with identical FITC labeling index) is used throughout the study.

What advanced imaging techniques can enhance the resolution and specificity of FITC-conjugated GLRB antibody signals in complex neural tissues?

Standard wide-field and confocal microscopy techniques may provide insufficient resolution to study GLRB distribution at synaptic levels. Several advanced imaging approaches can significantly enhance both resolution and specificity:

Super-Resolution Microscopy Techniques:

  • Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) Microscopy:

    • Achieves 30-80 nm resolution with FITC-conjugated antibodies

    • Enables visualization of individual glycine receptor clusters

    • Protocol: Use lower laser powers (30-40% of maximum) to reduce photobleaching of FITC

  • Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (STORM):

    • Provides 10-20 nm resolution through single-molecule localization

    • Requires specialized imaging buffers compatible with FITC photoswitching

    • Enables quantification of receptor numbers within individual clusters

Signal Amplification Strategies:

  • Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA):

    • Can amplify weak FITC signals up to 100-fold

    • Protocol: Apply HRP-conjugated anti-FITC secondary antibody followed by FITC-tyramide substrate

    • Critical Control: Include non-specific binding controls due to increased sensitivity

  • Array Tomography:

    • Serial ultrathin sections (70-100 nm) with FITC-GLRB antibody staining

    • Digital reconstruction providing both improved axial resolution and quantitative reliability

    • Allows correlation with electron microscopy for ultrastructural context

Spectral Unmixing for Multicolor Imaging:
When combining FITC with other fluorophores in multiplex staining:

  • Acquire spectral profiles of each individual fluorophore

  • Perform spectral imaging across the emission range (500-550 nm for FITC)

  • Apply computational unmixing algorithms to separate overlapping signals

  • Validate with single-labeled control samples

Tissue Clearing Techniques Compatible with FITC:

  • Scale, CUBIC, or modified CLARITY protocols preserve FITC fluorescence

  • Enable imaging of GLRB distribution throughout intact neural circuits

  • Require careful optimization of clearing duration to prevent FITC signal loss

These advanced techniques have enabled researchers to characterize the nanoscale organization of glycine receptors at inhibitory synapses and their alterations in various neurological conditions with unprecedented detail and accuracy.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.