Glutelin-2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Biochemical Characteristics of Glutelin-2 Antibody

Glutelin-2 antibody is a polyclonal immunoglobulin raised against the 28 kD glutelin-2 (G2) protein, a major storage protein in maize (Zea mays) endosperm. This antibody is critical for studying the structural, functional, and subcellular properties of G2, which belongs to the glutelin family of prolamins. G2 is characterized by its solubility in alkaline solutions and a unique amino acid sequence featuring repeated Pro-Pro-Pro-Val-His motifs in its N-terminal region .

Immunological Specificity and Cross-Reactivity

The Glutelin-2 antibody exhibits partial cross-reactivity with a 14 kD low molecular weight (LMW) zein-2 (Z2) component due to shared antigenic determinants. This interaction has been confirmed through:

  • Immunoblotting: Detection of both 28 kD G2 and 14 kD Z2 in maize endosperm extracts .

  • ELISA: Quantitative analysis showing weaker reactivity with 14 kD Z2 compared to 28 kD G2 .

Mechanism of Cross-Reactivity

AssayObservationsCitation
ELISA (28 kD G2 serum)Strong reaction with 28 kD G2; weaker signal with 14 kD Z2
Antibody ElutionAffinity-purified antibodies from G2 and Z2 immunoblot bands cross-react

Subcellular Localization and Protein Body Dynamics

Glutelin-2 is localized to protein bodies (PBs) in maize endosperm, where it coexists with zeins. Key findings include:

  • Protein Body Composition: G2 accumulates in PBs without DTT treatment, while DTT solubilizes G2 due to disulfide bond disruption .

  • Immunogold Labeling: G2 is enriched in the periphery of PBs, distinct from zein localization .

Experimental Conditions Affecting Localization

ConditionImpact on G2 LocalizationCitation
No DTTG2 retained in PBs; co-localized with zeins
1 mM DTTG2 solubilized, leaving PBs enriched in zeins

Applications in Research

The Glutelin-2 antibody has enabled insights into:

  1. Protein Interactions: Detection of G2-Z2 complexes via immunoprecipitation, despite challenges in separating glutelins from zeins due to low solubility .

  2. Biosynthetic Pathways: Tracking G2 synthesis and processing via hybrid-selected mRNA translation assays .

  3. Comparative Studies: Contrasting G2 with cysteine-rich prolamins (e.g., zeins) and other glutelins (e.g., rice glutelins) .

Challenges and Limitations

  • Cross-Contamination: Zeins co-purify with G2 due to hydrophobic interactions, complicating immunoprecipitation .

  • Solubility Constraints: G2’s low solubility in non-reducing conditions limits its isolation without DTT, affecting antibody binding .

Future Directions

  • Subtype-Specific Antibodies: Development of epitope-targeted antibodies to distinguish G2 from Z2, as demonstrated in rice glutelin studies .

  • Structural Analysis: Use of cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography to map G2’s disulfide-bond architecture, informed by antibody-binding sites .

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
We typically dispatch orders within 1-3 business days of receipt. Delivery times may vary depending on the method of purchase and location. Please contact your local distributor for specific delivery timelines.
Synonyms
Glutelin-2 (27 kDa zein) (Alcohol-soluble reduced glutelin) (ASG) (Zein Zc2) (Zein-gamma)
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Glutelin-2 is a seed storage protein that comprises approximately 15% of the total endosperm protein content.
Database Links
Protein Families
Gliadin/glutenin family
Subcellular Location
Vacuole, aleurone grain membrane. Note=Border of the inner part of the membrane of endosperm protein bodies.

Q&A

What is Glutelin-2 Antibody and what epitopes does it target in rice grain proteins?

Glutelin-2 antibody (anti-GluA-2) is a polyclonal antibody specifically designed to recognize and bind to the GluA-2 protein, which is a major storage protein subtype found in rice grains. According to research, this antibody typically targets specific amino acid sequences within the acidic subunit of the GluA-2 protein .

The epitope regions commonly used for generating Glutelin-2 antibodies include the cysteine + 210–225 amino acid sequence of GluA-2 (C + KRNPQAYRREVEEWSQ) . These antibodies are generated using synthetic peptide sequences designed to elicit high specificity against the target protein while minimizing cross-reactivity with other glutelin subtypes.

Glutelin-2 antibodies are crucial tools for investigating protein accumulation patterns, studying protein trafficking, and analyzing mutant rice lines with altered storage protein profiles.

How are Glutelin-2 antibodies typically generated for research applications?

Glutelin-2 antibodies are primarily generated through the following methodological approach:

  • Epitope selection: Researchers select specific amino acid sequences unique to GluA-2, typically within the acidic subunit region. The chosen sequence for GluA-2 is often the cysteine + 210–225 amino acid sequence (C + KRNPQAYRREVEEWSQ) .

  • Peptide synthesis: The selected epitope sequence is chemically synthesized, often with an additional cysteine residue to facilitate conjugation to carrier proteins.

  • Host immunization: The synthetic peptides are injected into host animals (commonly rabbits) to stimulate an immune response. This follows a standardized immunization protocol with multiple booster injections over several weeks .

  • Antibody purification: The antibodies are purified from host serum using affinity chromatography with the corresponding synthetic peptide conjugated columns. The generated IgGs are then subdivided and typically maintained at −80°C until required .

This method ensures high specificity of the antibody to the target protein, which is essential for accurate experimental results in immunological studies.

What detection methods commonly employ Glutelin-2 antibody in rice protein research?

Glutelin-2 antibodies are versatile research tools employed in multiple detection methods:

1. Immunoblot analysis (Western blot):

  • Proteins are separated via SDS-PAGE (typically using 15% polyacrylamide gels)

  • Proteins are transferred to PVDF membranes (0.22-μm pore size)

  • Membranes are blocked using appropriate blocking buffer

  • Primary antibody incubation uses dilutions ranging from 1/1000 to 1/8000

  • Detection is performed using HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and chemiluminescence imaging systems

2. Immunofluorescence microscopy:

  • Used to visualize the spatial distribution of glutelin proteins in rice grain tissues

  • Can show differential distribution patterns between peripheral and internal endosperm regions

3. ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay):

  • Provides quantitative measurement of GluA-2 content in rice samples

  • Useful for comparing expression levels across different rice varieties or mutants

4. Immunoprecipitation:

  • Enables isolation of GluA-2 and its interacting proteins from complex mixtures

  • Helpful for studying protein-protein interactions and complex formation

Each method requires specific optimization of antibody concentration, incubation conditions, and detection parameters to achieve reliable results.

How can glutelin subtype-specific antibodies be validated for research applications?

Validating glutelin subtype-specific antibodies requires a multi-step approach to ensure specificity and reliability:

Expression of recombinant proteins:

  • Express recombinant glutelin acidic subunits in bacterial systems (typically E. coli)

  • For GluA-2, the 1–930 nucleotide sequence from rice annotation project (RAP) locus LOC_Os10g26060 is commonly used

  • Express other glutelin subtypes (GluB-1, GluB-4, GluC-1, GluD) as controls

Cross-reactivity testing:

  • Perform immunoblot analysis against each recombinant glutelin subtype

  • Test against total protein extracts from wild-type and glutelin-deficient mutant rice

  • Quantify signal intensity using software such as QuantityOne (ver. 4.6.9) to determine specificity ratios

Epitope analysis:

  • Verify antibody recognition of the specific epitope region

  • Test antibody binding to peptide arrays containing variants of the epitope sequence

  • Analyze potential cross-reactivity with homologous sequences in other proteins

Standardization procedure:

  • Establish optimal antibody concentration for each application

  • Determine linear detection range for quantitative applications

  • Document lot-to-lot variations in antibody performance

  • Include appropriate positive and negative controls in all experiments

This comprehensive validation ensures that experimental results accurately reflect the specific glutelin subtype being studied rather than reflecting cross-reactivity with other proteins.

What are the key considerations for analyzing protein-antibody interactions in glutelin research?

When analyzing protein-antibody interactions in glutelin research, several key factors must be considered:

Interface characteristics:

  • Antibody-antigen binding interfaces typically involve both hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions

  • Most epitopes are conformational rather than linear, highlighting the importance of protein structure in antibody recognition

  • Approximately 80% of epitopes contain three to eight different sequential patches, many containing only 1-3 residues

Binding specificity determinants:

  • Polar bonds provide significant specificity for antibodies

  • A substantial percentage of interface residues form both polar bonds and participate in hydrophobic clusters

  • This dual interaction profile enhances binding specificity while maintaining adequate binding energy

Methodological considerations:

  • Buffer composition can significantly affect antibody-antigen interactions

  • Temperature and pH conditions must be carefully controlled

  • The presence of detergents can disrupt hydrophobic interactions

  • Incubation time affects binding equilibrium and signal strength

Data interpretation guidance:

  • Background signals should be carefully controlled and subtracted

  • Signal intensity should be normalized to appropriate internal controls

  • Quantitative analyses should include standard curves with known concentrations

  • Multiple biological and technical replicates should be used for statistical validity

Understanding these factors helps researchers optimize experimental conditions and accurately interpret results when using glutelin-2 antibodies for protein detection and characterization.

How do glutelin-specific antibodies facilitate the study of rice grain development and protein trafficking?

Glutelin-specific antibodies, including glutelin-2 antibody, provide powerful tools for investigating protein dynamics during rice grain development:

Developmental expression profiling:

  • Immunoblotting at different developmental stages reveals temporal expression patterns

  • Samples are typically collected at defined days after flowering (DAF)

  • Analysis reveals how glutelin accumulation correlates with grain filling stages

Subcellular localization studies:

  • Immunofluorescence with glutelin subtype-specific antibodies shows distinct localization patterns

  • Glutelin signals are considerably stronger in the external compared to internal endosperm regions

  • Colocalization with organelle markers (using antibodies such as anti-TOC75 for chloroplasts or anti-ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase) reveals trafficking pathways

Protein body formation analysis:

  • Different glutelin subtypes show differential incorporation into protein bodies

  • Antibodies help track the formation and maturation of protein storage vacuoles

  • Combined with electron microscopy, antibodies help determine the ultrastructural organization of storage proteins

Trafficking mutant characterization:

  • Glutelin antibodies are essential for analyzing rice mutants with protein trafficking defects

  • In esp2 mutants, glutelin-2 antibodies help detect the abnormal accumulation of glutelin precursors

  • Comparison between wild-type and mutant lines reveals important mechanisms in protein sorting and processing

This multi-faceted approach using glutelin-specific antibodies has significantly advanced our understanding of the complex processes involved in rice grain development and storage protein accumulation.

What analytical challenges exist when using glutelin antibodies for quantitative studies?

Researchers face several analytical challenges when using glutelin antibodies for quantitative studies:

Extraction efficiency variations:

  • Different extraction buffers yield varying protein recovery rates

  • Protein solubility changes during grain development stages

  • Cross-linking of proteins during maturation affects extractability

  • Standardization of extraction methods is critical for comparative studies

Signal quantification considerations:

  • Chemiluminescence detection has a limited linear range (typically 2-3 orders of magnitude)

  • Signal saturation can occur at high protein concentrations

  • Different imaging systems (LAS 1000, ChemiDocTM MP) may produce varying results

  • Software-based quantification (e.g., QuantityOne) requires careful calibration

Antibody performance factors:

FactorImpactMitigation Strategy
Antibody affinityAffects signal intensityUse consistent antibody lots
Epitope accessibilityVaries with protein folding/environmentInclude denaturation controls
Cross-reactivityReduces specificityValidate against recombinant proteins
Batch variationIntroduces inconsistencyMaintain reference standards

Statistical analysis requirements:

  • Minimum of three biological replicates recommended

  • Technical replicates needed for each sample

  • Appropriate normalization to loading controls required

  • Statistical tests should account for non-normal distributions when present

Addressing these challenges requires rigorous experimental design, careful validation, and appropriate statistical analysis to ensure reliable quantitative results when using glutelin antibodies.

How can researchers optimize immunolocalization protocols for glutelin-2 detection in rice tissues?

Optimizing immunolocalization protocols for glutelin-2 detection requires attention to several critical parameters:

Tissue fixation and processing:

  • Fix rice grain tissues in 4% paraformaldehyde for optimal antigen preservation

  • Consider the developmental stage - immature grains (10-17 DAF) typically yield better results

  • Embedding medium selection is critical - paraffin works well for light microscopy while resin embedding preserves ultrastructure for electron microscopy

  • Section thickness (5-10 μm) balances structural integrity with antibody penetration

Antigen retrieval methods:

  • Heat-induced epitope retrieval (sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.0, 95°C for 20 minutes)

  • Enzymatic retrieval using proteinase K may improve signal for some samples

  • Detergent permeabilization (0.1% Triton X-100) facilitates antibody access

Blocking and antibody incubation:

  • Extended blocking (2-3 hours at room temperature) with 3-5% BSA reduces background

  • Primary antibody dilutions for glutelin-2 typically range from 1:500 to 1:2000

  • Overnight incubation at 4°C improves sensitivity

  • Multiple washing steps (minimum 3×15 minutes) are essential for specificity

Signal enhancement strategies:

  • Tyramide signal amplification can increase sensitivity for low-abundance proteins

  • Fluorophore selection should consider tissue autofluorescence properties

  • Confocal microscopy with appropriate filter settings improves signal-to-noise ratio

  • Z-stack imaging captures the three-dimensional distribution pattern

These optimizations help researchers achieve high-quality immunolocalization results when studying glutelin-2 distribution in rice grain tissues, revealing important insights into protein trafficking and accumulation patterns.

What approaches can resolve contradictory results when using different glutelin antibodies?

When researchers encounter contradictory results using different glutelin antibodies, several systematic approaches can help resolve these discrepancies:

Epitope mapping and antibody characterization:

  • Precisely determine the epitope regions recognized by each antibody

  • Assess whether epitopes are located in conserved or variable regions

  • Evaluate if epitopes are accessible in various protein conformations or aggregation states

  • Test antibody specificity against recombinant protein fragments and synthetic peptides

Technical validation strategy:

  • Use multiple detection methods (immunoblot, ELISA, immunofluorescence)

  • Apply different sample preparation techniques

  • Test antibodies on known positive and negative controls

  • Validate results with independent antibodies targeting different epitopes of the same protein

Consideration of biological variables:

  • Protein conformation may differ between developmental stages

  • Post-translational modifications can mask or create epitopes

  • Protein-protein interactions may block antibody access to epitopes

  • Proteolytic processing creates fragments with different epitope availability

Experimental design for resolution:

ApproachMethodologyExpected Outcome
Sequential epitope analysisTest antibodies against peptide arraysMaps precise binding regions
Knockout/knockdown validationUse CRISPR or RNAi lines lacking target proteinConfirms antibody specificity
Recombinant protein competitionPre-incubate antibody with purified targetValidates specific binding
Mass spectrometry verificationIdentify proteins in immunoprecipitated samplesConfirms antibody targets

By systematically investigating the source of contradictions through these approaches, researchers can determine which antibody provides the most reliable results for their specific experimental conditions and research questions.

How can glutelin-2 antibody be used to characterize rice storage protein mutants?

Glutelin-2 antibody serves as a powerful tool for characterizing rice storage protein mutants through several methodological approaches:

Accumulation pattern analysis:

  • Immunoblotting with glutelin-2 antibody reveals altered accumulation of GluA-2 proteins

  • The esp2 mutant notably demonstrates abnormal accumulation of glutelin precursors, which can be detected and quantified using glutelin-2 antibody

  • Comparative analysis between wild-type and mutant lines helps establish the precise molecular phenotype

Processing defect identification:

  • Size comparison between wild-type and mutant glutelin proteins

  • Detection of abnormal intermediates or precursors

  • Quantification of processing efficiency based on precursor:mature protein ratios

  • Assessment of post-translational modifications

Subcellular localization changes:

  • Immunofluorescence microscopy with glutelin-2 antibody reveals mislocalization in trafficking mutants

  • Co-localization with organelle markers identifies specific defects in protein body formation

  • Electron microscopy with immunogold labeling provides ultrastructural details of protein body morphology

Compensatory mechanism investigation:

  • Quantitative immunoblotting with multiple glutelin antibodies reveals whether other glutelin subtypes are upregulated to compensate for GluA-2 deficiency

  • Comparative analysis across developmental stages shows temporal changes in compensation patterns

  • Correlation with transcriptomic data helps determine if compensation occurs at transcriptional or post-transcriptional levels

This multifaceted approach using glutelin-2 antibody provides comprehensive characterization of rice storage protein mutants, offering insights into protein trafficking, processing, and storage mechanisms in rice endosperm.

What methodological approaches enable accurate quantification of glutelin-2 in different rice varieties?

Accurate quantification of glutelin-2 across different rice varieties requires robust methodological approaches:

Protein extraction optimization:

  • Use standardized extraction buffers (typically containing urea, thiourea, and reducing agents)

  • Implement consistent sample-to-buffer ratios (1:10 w/v recommended)

  • Apply identical extraction conditions (temperature, time, mechanical disruption)

  • Incorporate extraction efficiency controls (spiked standard proteins)

Quantitative immunoblotting protocol:

  • Establish standard curves using purified recombinant GluA-2 protein

  • Load equal total protein amounts (typically 10-20 μg per lane)

  • Include multiple technical replicates (minimum triplicate)

  • Apply densitometric analysis using standardized software (e.g., QuantityOne)

ELISA-based quantification:

  • Develop sandwich ELISA using glutelin-2 specific capture and detection antibodies

  • Generate standard curves using purified recombinant glutelin proteins

  • Implement four-parameter logistic regression for calibration

  • Account for matrix effects by preparing standards in protein-extracted buffer

Mass spectrometry validation:

MS ApproachAdvantagesLimitations
Label-free quantificationSimple sample preparationLower precision
AQUA peptide strategyHighest accuracyRequires synthetic peptides
TMT labelingMultiplexing capabilityRatio compression issues
MRM/PRMHigh sensitivityRequires method development

Statistical considerations:

  • Analyze minimum three biological replicates per variety

  • Apply appropriate normalization (to total protein or invariant proteins)

  • Use statistical tests that account for variance heterogeneity

  • Calculate confidence intervals for meaningful comparisons between varieties

These methodological approaches ensure accurate, reproducible quantification of glutelin-2 across different rice varieties, enabling reliable comparisons for breeding programs and functional studies.

How do antibody-antigen binding characteristics influence experimental design in glutelin research?

Understanding antibody-antigen binding characteristics is crucial for designing effective experiments in glutelin research:

Binding interface considerations:

  • Ab-Ag interfaces typically involve both hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions

  • Approximately 80% of epitopes contain three to eight different sequential patches

  • Conformational epitopes predominate over linear ones, affecting experimental approach selection

Experimental condition optimization based on binding properties:

  • Buffer composition must maintain protein conformation while allowing antibody access

  • pH conditions should be optimized based on the isoelectric points of both antibody and antigen

  • Temperature affects binding kinetics and should be standardized across experiments

  • Incubation times need optimization based on binding kinetics (typically longer for higher affinity)

Assay selection based on epitope characteristics:

  • For conformational epitopes: native conditions in immunoprecipitation or ELISA

  • For linear epitopes: denaturing conditions in Western blot

  • For complex structural epitopes: in situ methods like immunohistochemistry

Antibody concentration determination strategy:

  • Perform titration experiments to find optimal signal-to-noise ratio

  • Account for affinity differences between antibody lots

  • Consider potential prozone effects at very high antibody concentrations

  • Establish minimum detection thresholds for each experimental system

Understanding that "polar bonds are considered an important source of specificity for antibodies" helps researchers design appropriate washing conditions that maintain specific interactions while reducing non-specific binding. Additionally, knowing that hydrophobic interactions contribute significantly to binding energy influences detergent selection and concentration in experimental buffers.

These considerations allow researchers to design experiments that maximize specific detection while minimizing artifacts, leading to more reliable and reproducible results in glutelin research.

What emerging technologies will enhance glutelin-2 antibody applications in rice research?

Several emerging technologies are poised to revolutionize glutelin-2 antibody applications in rice research:

Advanced microscopy techniques:

  • Super-resolution microscopy (STORM, PALM) for nanoscale localization of glutelin proteins

  • Expansion microscopy to physically enlarge specimens for improved resolution

  • Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) to combine molecular specificity with ultrastructural context

  • Light sheet microscopy for rapid 3D imaging of developing rice grains

Single-cell proteomics integration:

  • Combining immunofluorescence with laser capture microdissection

  • Mass cytometry (CyTOF) adapted for plant tissue analysis

  • Imaging mass spectrometry to correlate antibody labeling with protein distribution

  • Single-cell Western blotting for heterogeneity analysis in endosperm cells

Antibody engineering approaches:

  • Recombinant antibody fragments (Fab, scFv) for improved tissue penetration

  • Site-specific conjugation methods for precise fluorophore attachment

  • Bispecific antibodies to simultaneously detect multiple glutelin subtypes

  • Nanobodies derived from camelid antibodies for superior resolution

Computational and AI-assisted analysis:

TechnologyApplicationBenefit
Machine learningAutomated image analysisHigher throughput, reduced bias
Molecular dynamicsEpitope accessibility predictionImproved antibody design
Digital pathology toolsQuantitative tissue analysisStandardized measurements
Spatial statisticsPattern recognitionDetection of subtle distribution changes

These technologies will enable more precise localization, improved quantification, and higher-throughput analysis of glutelin proteins in rice, advancing our understanding of grain development and protein accumulation mechanisms.

What methodological considerations apply when using glutelin-2 antibody in transgenic rice research?

When applying glutelin-2 antibody in transgenic rice research, researchers must address several methodological considerations:

Validation in transgenic backgrounds:

  • Confirm epitope conservation in modified proteins (especially for tagged constructs)

  • Test for potential cross-reactivity with introduced protein tags or reporters

  • Validate antibody performance against appropriate controls (wild-type, null segregants)

  • Establish detection limits specific to the transgenic line

Modified protein detection strategies:

  • Use combination of glutelin-2 antibody and tag-specific antibodies for fusion proteins

  • Develop epitope mapping to ensure antibody recognition sites are not disrupted

  • Implement sequential immunoprecipitation to distinguish native from modified proteins

  • Apply subcellular fractionation to separate compartment-specific protein populations

Quantification challenges in transgenic lines:

  • Account for potential changes in protein extractability

  • Develop standards specific to the modified protein

  • Implement spike-in controls to normalize extraction efficiency

  • Use ratiometric analysis comparing endogenous and transgenic proteins

Interpretation guidance for common observations:

  • Altered processing patterns may indicate disruption of trafficking pathways

  • Changes in subcellular localization suggest modified targeting signals

  • Differences in accumulation kinetics may reflect altered stability or synthesis rates

  • Co-localization changes with other storage proteins indicate disrupted sorting mechanisms

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2024 Thebiotek. All Rights Reserved.