GST mouse antibodies are immunoglobulin proteins produced by hybridomas formed from mouse myeloma cells and splenocytes immunized with recombinant GST . They bind to GST tags in fusion proteins, enabling:
Detection of recombinant protein expression via Western blot (WB), immunofluorescence (IF), or ELISA .
Affinity purification validation by confirming GST binding to glutathione matrices .
The antibodies exhibit high specificity for GST across N-terminal, internal, and C-terminal fusion configurations, as demonstrated by Western blot analyses .
In HeLa cells expressing COXFA4-GST fusions, anti-GST antibody (1:1,000 dilution) confirmed successful protein expression via WB, with clear bands at expected molecular weights (~45–50 kDa) .
After thrombin-mediated GST tag removal, loss of antibody signal on WB confirmed complete cleavage .
Species specificity: Most antibodies target S. japonicum GST and may not detect human/murine GST isoforms .
Batch variability: Affinity ranges from 10^6–10^9 M^-1 across vendors; validate new lots for critical assays .
Alternatives: Recombinant chimeric antibodies (e.g., BiCell’s BCRA02) offer species flexibility but cost 2–3× more .
The solution contains 1mg/ml of the antibody in a buffer consisting of PBS at pH 7.4 and 0.1% Sodium Azide.
GST (Glutathione S-transferase) is a 26kDa protein present in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, where it catalyzes various reactions. In research settings, GST is widely used in gene fusion systems to create tagged proteins that can be readily purified through their high affinity for glutathione . GST Mouse Antibodies are monoclonal antibodies raised in mice that specifically recognize the GST protein or GST-tagged fusion proteins.
These antibodies are particularly valuable because they:
Allow for detection of fusion proteins during purification processes
Help monitor cleavage of GST from proteins of interest
Enable tracking of GST-tagged proteins in various experimental contexts
Support protein-protein interaction studies using GST-fusion systems
The GST-fusion protein system has become a fundamental tool in molecular biology as proteins can be purified to homogeneity in a single step, as the GST portion binds tightly to immobilized glutathione .
Selecting the optimal GST Mouse Antibody depends on several key considerations:
Specificity requirements:
Determine whether you need an antibody that recognizes Schistosoma japonicum GST specifically or one with broader reactivity
Some antibodies, like the #21 clone, specifically react with S. japonicum GST protein and GST-fused proteins
Others, such as GST.B6 clone, can recognize both native and denatured forms of purified GST or GST fusion proteins
Experimental application:
For each application, consider these recommended dilution ranges:
Antibody format:
Consider whether you need a conjugated or unconjugated antibody
Most GST Mouse Antibodies are available in unconjugated form and require appropriate secondary antibodies
To maintain optimal activity of GST Mouse Antibodies, follow these evidence-based storage guidelines:
For long-term storage, aliquot the antibody and store at -20°C
Avoid repeated freeze/thaw cycles as they can compromise antibody function
Most GST Mouse Antibodies are supplied in stabilizing buffers containing preservatives:
When working with the antibody, thaw aliquots completely before use and keep on ice during experimental procedures. Return unused antibody to appropriate storage conditions immediately after use.
Based on validated protocols from multiple sources, here is a comprehensive Western blot methodology using GST Mouse Antibody:
Sample preparation:
Load 2-5 μg of purified GST fusion protein or cell lysate containing GST-tagged proteins per lane
Use appropriate positive controls (purified GST protein) and negative controls
Electrophoresis and transfer:
Separate proteins using standard SDS-PAGE (10-12% gels are typically suitable for GST fusion proteins)
Transfer to nitrocellulose or PVDF membrane using standard protocols
Blocking and antibody incubation:
Block membrane with 3-5% nonfat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Dilute primary GST Mouse Antibody according to manufacturer's recommendations:
Wash membrane 3-5 times with TBST (5 minutes each)
Incubate with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody:
Wash membrane 3-5 times with TBST (5 minutes each)
Detection:
The figure from ABclonal shows successful Western blot detection of overexpressed GST protein using their Mouse anti GST-Tag mAb (AE001) with clear bands at approximately 27 kDa .
For successful immunoprecipitation of GST-tagged proteins, follow this optimized protocol:
Pre-clearing (optional but recommended):
Mix cell lysate with protein A/G beads for 1 hour at 4°C
Centrifuge and collect supernatant
Antibody-antigen binding:
For most effective results, use 2-5 μg antibody per 500 μg of total protein
Incubate with pre-cleared lysate overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation
Immunoprecipitation:
Add 30-50 μl of protein A/G beads to the lysate-antibody mixture
Incubate for 2-4 hours at 4°C with gentle rotation
Centrifuge at 2500-3000 rpm for 2-3 minutes at 4°C
Carefully remove supernatant
Washing and elution:
Wash beads 3-5 times with cold IP buffer
Elute bound proteins by adding SDS-PAGE sample buffer and heating at 95°C for 5 minutes
Analyze by Western blotting using standard protocols
When troubleshooting IP experiments, consider:
Increasing antibody concentration for low-abundance targets
Adjusting salt concentration in wash buffers to reduce non-specific binding
Using crosslinking methods if the interaction is transient or weak
Proper experimental controls are critical for valid interpretation of results with GST Mouse Antibody:
Positive controls:
Purified GST protein or GST-tagged fusion protein with known expression
Lysates from cells transfected with GST-expressing vectors
Commercial GST protein standards
Negative controls:
Non-transfected cell lysates (for recombinant expression systems)
Isotype control: Mouse IgG of the same isotype (e.g., IgG1 or IgG2a depending on the antibody)
For IP experiments: beads-only control and irrelevant antibody control
Validation controls:
When evaluating antibody specificity, test against N-terminal, C-terminal, and internal GST-tagged fusion proteins as shown in Figure 1 of GenScript data
For quantitative assays, include calibration standards with known amounts of GST protein
Inclusion of appropriate controls allows for accurate interpretation of results and troubleshooting of potential issues with specificity or sensitivity.
GST Mouse Antibody can be used in conjunction with subcellular fractionation techniques to identify and characterize GST isoforms in different cellular compartments. This approach has been validated in research examining mitochondrial GST isoforms:
Methodology:
Perform subcellular fractionation to isolate mitochondria and other cellular compartments
Enrich GST proteins using GSH affinity chromatography from isolated fractions
Separate proteins using 2D electrophoresis or SDS-PAGE
Identify GST isoforms using mass spectrometry (MALDI TOF/TOF MS or ESI MS/MS)
Confirm findings using Western blotting with GST Mouse Antibody
This comprehensive approach has successfully identified five GST isoforms (alpha3, mu1, pi1, kappa1, and zeta1) in mouse liver mitochondria, with GST kappa1 being specifically localized to mitochondria .
Distribution of GST isoforms across tissues:
Research has demonstrated that GST isoforms are distributed differently across tissues:
GST Isoform | Liver | Kidney | Heart | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
GST kappa1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Similar abundance across tissues, specific to mitochondria |
GST pi1 | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | Highest abundance in liver mitochondria |
GST alpha3 | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Variable distribution |
GST mu1 | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Variable distribution |
GST zeta1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Variable distribution |
Note: Relative abundance indicated by number of check marks (✓)
This approach can be applied to study GST distribution in various disease models, as demonstrated by the comparison between normal and diabetic mice .
Quantitative assessment of GST-tagged proteins requires careful calibration and standardization:
Calibration method:
Prepare a dilution series of purified recombinant GST protein at known concentrations
Perform Western blotting with GST Mouse Antibody using identical conditions for standards and samples
Generate calibration curves correlating protein concentrations with immunoblot signal intensities
Quantify unknown samples against this standard curve
This approach has been successfully applied in research studying GST isoforms in normal and diabetic mice .
Statistical considerations:
Run at least three biological replicates for statistical validity
Normalize signal intensities to appropriate loading controls
Use image analysis software (e.g., ImageQuant TL) to quantify band intensities
Apply appropriate statistical tests (e.g., Student's t-test) with significance threshold of p < 0.05
Example calculation:
For comparing GST expression between experimental conditions:
Calculate the relative intensity of GST signals in each sample
Normalize to control samples
Derive mean ± SD from replicate experiments
Perform statistical analysis to determine significant differences
This quantitative approach provides robust data on changes in GST expression under different experimental conditions.
GST tags can be positioned at the N-terminus, C-terminus, or internally within fusion proteins, which may affect antibody recognition. Based on experimental evidence, consider these strategies:
Optimization approaches:
Test antibody recognition against different GST tag positions as demonstrated in Figure 1 from GenScript data, which shows successful detection of N-terminal, internal, and C-terminal GST-tagged fusion proteins
Adjust antibody concentration based on tag position and accessibility
Consider protein conformation effects on epitope accessibility
Recommended antibodies:
Some GST Mouse Antibodies have been specifically validated for detection of differentially positioned tags:
THETM GST Antibody (GenScript, A00865) has demonstrated affinity for all three positions (N-terminal, internal, C-terminal)
When selecting antibodies, prioritize those with validation data showing detection at multiple positions
Application-specific considerations:
For detecting GST-tagged proteins in complex samples:
Western blotting: Denaturing conditions may reduce position-dependent recognition differences
Immunoprecipitation: Tag position may significantly affect antibody accessibility in native conditions
Immunofluorescence: Consider whether tag position affects subcellular localization signals
Problem: Weak or no signal in Western blot
Potential causes and solutions:
Insufficient antibody concentration: Increase primary antibody concentration (try 1:1000 instead of 1:3000)
Inadequate protein loading: Increase sample concentration to 2-5 μg per lane
Poor transfer: Optimize transfer conditions or validate with Ponceau S staining
Protein degradation: Add protease inhibitors during sample preparation
Secondary antibody mismatch: Ensure secondary antibody recognizes mouse IgG (host species)
Problem: High background in Western blot
Potential causes and solutions:
Insufficient blocking: Increase blocking time or concentration (try 5% instead of 3% milk)
Excessive antibody concentration: Reduce primary antibody concentration
Inadequate washing: Increase number or duration of wash steps
Non-specific binding: Add 0.1-0.5% Tween-20 to antibody dilution buffer
Problem: Multiple bands in Western blot
Potential causes and solutions:
Protein degradation: Add protease inhibitors and keep samples cold
Antibody cross-reactivity: Validate antibody specificity with positive and negative controls
Post-translational modifications: Consider phosphatase treatment if modification is suspected
GST isoforms: Confirm if multiple bands represent different GST isoforms as multiple isoforms have been identified in tissues
Problem: Poor immunoprecipitation efficiency
Potential causes and solutions:
Insufficient antibody: Increase antibody amount (use closer to 1:50 dilution)
Weak antibody-protein interaction: Optimize binding conditions (buffer composition, incubation time)
Poor bead binding: Pre-clear lysate or increase bead amount
Detergent interference: Adjust detergent concentration in lysis and wash buffers
When working with low-abundance GST-tagged proteins, consider these evidence-based modifications:
Sample preparation enhancements:
Increase starting material (2-3x standard amount)
Use GSH-based enrichment prior to analysis
Consider using proteasome inhibitors during cell lysis to prevent protein degradation
Detection optimization:
Use more sensitive detection methods (e.g., chemiluminescent substrates with femtogram sensitivity)
Increase exposure time during imaging (but monitor background)
Consider signal amplification systems like biotinylated secondary antibodies with streptavidin-HRP
Immunoprecipitation modifications:
Increase antibody:lysate ratio (use 1:50 instead of 1:200 dilution)
Extend antibody-antigen incubation time to overnight at 4°C
Reduce wash stringency to preserve weak interactions
Elute with reduced sample volume to concentrate protein
Western blot adaptations:
Load maximum protein amount per lane (up to 50-100 μg total protein)
Use higher percentage acrylamide gels (12-15%) to better resolve and concentrate small proteins
Extend transfer time for complete protein transfer
Use PVDF membranes (higher protein binding capacity than nitrocellulose)
GST Mouse Antibody can be leveraged in sophisticated proteomic workflows to characterize GST isoforms across tissues and disease states:
Multi-stage proteomic approach:
Affinity enrichment using GSH chromatography to isolate GST proteins
Protein separation using 2DE or SDS-PAGE
Mass spectrometry identification (MALDI TOF/TOF MS or ESI MS/MS)
This comprehensive workflow has been successfully used to identify five GST isoforms in mouse liver mitochondria .
Quantitative proteomic applications:
Create calibration curves using recombinant GST proteins of known concentration
Compare GST isoform expression between normal and disease states (e.g., diabetes)
Normalize signal intensity against appropriate controls
Perform statistical analysis to identify significant differences
Comparative tissue analysis:
GST Mouse Antibody can be used to evaluate tissue-specific distribution of GST isoforms:
Different tissues (e.g., liver, kidney, heart) show variable GST isoform profiles
GST kappa1 shows consistent presence across tissues as a mitochondria-specific isoform
GST pi1 demonstrates notably higher abundance in liver mitochondria compared to other tissues
This approach provides deeper insights into the biological significance of GST distribution and expression changes in various physiological and pathological conditions.
GST pulldown assays are valuable for studying protein-protein interactions. When designing these experiments with GST Mouse Antibody, consider these critical factors:
Assay design optimization:
Express GST-tagged bait protein in appropriate expression system
Include proper controls:
GST-only control to identify non-specific binding partners
Empty vector control
Irrelevant GST-fusion protein control
Pre-clear lysates to reduce background
Optimize salt and detergent concentrations to balance specificity and sensitivity
Antibody selection and validation:
Confirm antibody specificity for your particular GST fusion construct
Validate using Western blotting before pulldown experiments
Technical recommendations:
For binding reactions:
Use freshly prepared GST-fusion proteins where possible
Maintain physiologically relevant buffer conditions
Include protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors if studying phosphorylation-dependent interactions
For washing:
Optimize wash stringency to preserve specific interactions while removing non-specific binding
Consider using decreasing salt gradients in sequential washes
Detection strategies:
Western blotting with antibodies against interacting partners
Mass spectrometry for unbiased identification of novel interacting proteins
Complementary techniques (e.g., reciprocal co-IP) to confirm interactions
Different GST Mouse Antibody clones have distinct characteristics that can significantly impact experimental results:
Clone-specific properties comparison:
Application-specific considerations:
Western blotting: Antibodies recognizing denatured epitopes perform better
Immunoprecipitation: Antibodies with high affinity for native conformation are preferred
Immunofluorescence: Accessibility of epitope in fixed/permeabilized cells is crucial
Validation approaches:
Compare multiple clones side-by-side with standardized conditions
Test recognition of different GST fusion constructs (N-terminal, internal, C-terminal)
Evaluate performance across different applications before committing to large-scale experiments
Selecting the optimal clone for specific experimental needs can significantly improve sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of results.
Glutathione-S-Transferases (GSTs) are a diverse family of enzymes that play a crucial role in cellular detoxification processes. These enzymes catalyze the conjugation of the tripeptide glutathione (GSH) to a variety of endogenous and exogenous electrophilic compounds. This reaction is essential for the detoxification of harmful substances, including carcinogens, environmental toxins, and products of oxidative stress .
GSTs are found in virtually all eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms. They are classified into several classes based on their sequence homology and substrate specificity, including Alpha, Mu, Pi, Theta, and Omega classes . Each class has distinct structural features and catalytic properties:
GSTs have a conserved structure with two distinct domains: a smaller N-terminal domain that binds GSH and a larger C-terminal domain that binds the electrophilic substrate. The active site of GSTs contains a serine or cysteine residue that plays a critical role in the catalytic mechanism .
GSTs have been extensively studied for their applications in biotechnology and medicine. They are used as fusion tags in protein expression systems to facilitate the purification of recombinant proteins. The GST tag allows for easy purification using glutathione-affinity chromatography .
In medicine, GSTs are explored as potential biomarkers for various diseases, including cancer. The overexpression of GST Pi (GSTP1) in tumors is associated with resistance to chemotherapy, making it a target for cancer therapy .
Antibodies against GST are valuable tools in research and diagnostics. These antibodies can be used to detect and quantify GST-tagged proteins in various applications, including Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence . GST antibodies are typically generated by immunizing animals with purified GST protein or GST fusion proteins. The resulting polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies are then purified and characterized for their specificity and affinity .