B4GALNT1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
The antibody is supplied in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 50% glycerol, 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.02% sodium azide.
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
We typically dispatch orders within 1-3 business days of receipt. Delivery time may vary depending on the shipping method and destination. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery times.
Synonyms
(N acetylneuraminyl) galactosylglucosylceramide antibody; (N-acetylneuraminyl)-galactosylglucosylceramide antibody; 4 N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 antibody; 4933429D13Rik antibody; B4GALNT1 antibody; B4GN1_HUMAN antibody; Beta 1 4 N acetyl galactosaminyl transferase 1 antibody; Beta 1 4 N acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 antibody; Beta-1 antibody; BETA-1,4-N-ACETYLGALACTOSAMINYLTRANSFERASE 1 antibody; BETA-1,4-N-ACETYLGALACTOSAMINYLTRANSFERASE antibody; Beta1 4GalNAc T antibody; Gal-NAc-T antibody; GALGT antibody; Galgt1 antibody; GalNAc T antibody; GalNAc-T antibody; GALNACT antibody; GD2 synthase antibody; Ggm-2 antibody; Ggm2 antibody; GM2 synthase antibody; GM2/GD2 synthase antibody; SIAT 2 antibody; SIAT2 antibody; UDP Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1 4 N acetylgalactosaminyltransferase transferase 1 antibody; UDP N acetyl alpha D galactosamine:(N acetylneuraminyl) galactosylglucosylceramide N acetylgalactosaminyltransferase antibody
Target Names
B4GALNT1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
B4GALNT1 antibody is involved in the biosynthesis of gangliosides GM2, GD2, GT2, and GA2 from GM3, GD3, GT3, and GA3, respectively.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Studies suggest that ganglioside glycosyltransferases ST3GAL5, ST8SIA1, and B4GALNT1 undergo S-acylation at conserved cysteine residues located near the cytoplasmic boundary of their transmembrane domains. ST3Gal-II is acylated at a conserved cysteine residue in the N-terminal cytoplasmic tail. For B4GALNT1 and ST3Gal-II, dimer formation regulates their S-acylation status. PMID: 28698248
  2. Novel B4GALNT1 mutations have been reported in two families with hereditary spastic paraplegia. PMID: 24283893
  3. Research findings have identified mutations in B4GALNT1 (GM2 synthase), the enzyme responsible for the second step in complex ganglioside biosynthesis, as the underlying cause of this neurodegenerative phenotype. PMID: 24103911
  4. Minimally disseminated disease in high-risk retinoblastoma patients was detected using reverse transcriptase PCR for GD2 synthase mRNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). PMID: 23721779
  5. Molecular upstaging of GalNAc-T using real-time PCR was correlated with prognosis in melanoma patients. PMID: 21135695
  6. GD2/GM2 is not a reliable biomarker in small cell lung carcinoma. PMID: 19457569
  7. The expression of three messengers encoding SAT-1, SAT-2, and GalNAcT-1 in human samples of intestinal cancer and certain cell lines (breast cancer and melanomas) was assessed. PMID: 17119850
  8. Transmission disequilibrium test and case-control analysis did not reveal an association between the B4GALNT1 gene and type 1 diabetes. PMID: 19318031

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 4117

OMIM: 601873

KEGG: hsa:2583

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000341562

UniGene: Hs.159481

Involvement In Disease
Spastic paraplegia 26, autosomal recessive (SPG26)
Protein Families
Glycosyltransferase 2 family
Subcellular Location
Golgi apparatus membrane; Single-pass type II membrane protein.

Q&A

What is B4GALNT1 and what cellular functions does it mediate?

B4GALNT1 (beta-1,4-N-acetyl-galactosaminyltransferase 1) encodes ganglioside GM2/GD2 synthase (GM2S), a critical enzyme that catalyzes the transfer of N-acetylgalactosamine to multiple substrates including lactosylceramide, GM3, and GD3 to generate GA2, GM2, and GD2 gangliosides, respectively . This 532 amino acid protein (observed at approximately 67.5 kDa on Western blots) plays crucial roles in ganglioside metabolism, which impacts neurological function, T-cell activation, and potentially carcinogenesis . The enzyme primarily localizes to the Golgi apparatus in normal cells, and its dysfunction through mutations has been linked to hereditary spastic paraplegia 26 (HSP26), demonstrating its significance in neurological health .

What types of B4GALNT1 antibodies are available for research applications?

Current research applications utilize both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies targeting B4GALNT1. Significant options include mouse monoclonal antibodies derived from S. frugiperda insect ovarian cell line (Sf 21) using recombinant human GM2/GD2 Synthase/B4GALNT1 (Ser26-Gln533, Accession #Q00973) , and rabbit polyclonal antibodies generated against B4GALNT1 fusion proteins . These antibodies have been validated against human samples, with some showing cross-reactivity with rat tissues. Both N-terminal and C-terminal targeting strategies are employed in different antibody designs, which can be critical depending on the experimental context and protein conformation being studied .

What are the primary applications for B4GALNT1 antibodies in research?

B4GALNT1 antibodies have been validated for multiple research applications including:

ApplicationValidated Use CasesTypical Dilution
Western Blot (WB)Detection in COLO 320 cells, A375 cells1:500-1:2000
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)Tissue sectionsSee specific antibody data
Immunofluorescence (IF)U-251 MG human glioblastoma cell line8 μg/mL (3 hours, RT)
Immunoprecipitation (IP)Protein complex studiesApplication-specific
ELISAQuantitative detectionApplication-specific

Each application requires optimization based on the specific antibody used, sample type, and experimental conditions .

How can I optimize Western blot protocols for B4GALNT1 detection?

For optimal Western blot detection of B4GALNT1, sample preparation is critical. Cellular lysates should be prepared with protease inhibitors to prevent degradation of the target protein. The observed molecular weight of B4GALNT1 is approximately 67.5 kDa, slightly higher than the calculated 58 kDa, likely due to post-translational modifications . Recommended dilutions for polyclonal antibodies range from 1:500-1:2000, but this should be empirically determined for each experimental system. When analyzing functional variants, expression levels can be normalized by Western blotting to accurately compare enzymatic activities between wild-type and mutant proteins . Secondary antibody selection should match the host species of the primary antibody, with appropriate detection systems based on experimental sensitivity requirements.

What methods are effective for analyzing B4GALNT1 enzymatic activity in cells?

GM2S enzyme activity assays provide direct functional assessments of B4GALNT1 variants. A validated approach involves:

  • Generating B4GALNT1-knockout cell lines using CRISPR/Cas9 technology (e.g., with guide RNAs targeting conserved regions)

  • Transfecting these cells with wild-type or variant B4GALNT1 constructs (either N-terminal or C-terminal tagged)

  • Preparing microsomal membranes from transfected cells

  • Conducting in vitro enzyme assays with appropriate substrates

  • Normalizing enzymatic activity to protein expression levels determined by Western blotting

This methodology has successfully identified loss-of-function variants, with some showing complete absence of activity while others retain partial function (<10% of wild-type activity) .

How can flow cytometry be used to assess B4GALNT1 function in immune cells?

Flow cytometry provides a powerful approach to assess B4GALNT1 function in immune cells, particularly T lymphocytes. The protocol involves:

  • Isolating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from subjects

  • Culturing PBMCs with or without T cell activators (anti-CD3 and anti-CD28) for 48 hours

  • Staining T cells with lineage markers (CD4-FITC, CD8-PE-Cy7), activation markers (CD69-APC), and ganglioside detection reagents (cholera toxin B subunit, CTX-CF640R)

  • Analyzing by flow cytometry to assess activation-induced ganglioside expression

This approach has been validated to detect B4GALNT1 dysfunction in patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia, as T cell activation normally upregulates B4GALNT1 expression and increases surface GM1 ganglioside levels .

How can B4GALNT1 antibodies be used to investigate subcellular localization of protein variants?

Subcellular localization studies are crucial for understanding how mutations affect B4GALNT1 trafficking and function. A systematic approach includes:

  • Generating stable cell lines expressing C-terminal FLAG-tagged wild-type or variant B4GALNT1 in knockout backgrounds

  • Performing indirect immunofluorescence with anti-FLAG antibodies

  • Co-staining with Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) markers

  • Analyzing localization patterns using confocal microscopy

Research has demonstrated that many pathogenic variants show altered localization patterns, with increased ER retention compared to the normal Golgi localization . This altered trafficking correlates with decreased enzymatic activity and provides mechanistic insights into disease pathogenesis.

What approaches can be used to assess the impact of B4GALNT1 variants on protein function?

A comprehensive functional evaluation of B4GALNT1 variants requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Structural predictions: Computational analysis to predict how amino acid substitutions might affect substrate binding or catalytic activity

  • Subcellular localization: Determining if variants affect proper protein trafficking to the Golgi apparatus

  • Protein stability assessment: Western blot analysis of expression levels in comparable transfection conditions

  • Direct enzyme activity measurements: In vitro assays with appropriate substrates

  • Cellular phenotype restoration: Testing if variant proteins can restore normal ganglioside profiles in knockout cells

This multi-faceted approach has successfully characterized novel variants, such as the p.Asp313Asn substitution that impairs binding to the donor substrate UDP-GalNAc, resulting in loss of enzyme activity .

How can CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing be used alongside B4GALNT1 antibodies for functional studies?

CRISPR/Cas9 technology provides powerful tools for B4GALNT1 functional studies:

  • Design gene-specific guide RNAs targeting conserved exons (e.g., 5′-CACCGACAAGCCAGAGCGCGTTAG-3′)

  • Clone into appropriate vectors (e.g., pSpCas9(BB)-2A-GFP)

  • Transfect target cells and select clones using reporter expression

  • Validate knockout efficiency by ganglioside profiling using thin-layer chromatography

  • Use knockout cells as a "clean" background for reintroducing wild-type or variant constructs

  • Assess protein expression and localization using B4GALNT1 antibodies

  • Measure functional restoration using activity assays

This approach eliminates interference from endogenous enzyme, allowing precise assessment of variant functionality and can reveal subtle differences in activity levels that might be masked in overexpression systems .

How can I address non-specific binding when using B4GALNT1 antibodies in immunofluorescence?

Non-specific binding in immunofluorescence experiments can be addressed through several optimization strategies:

  • Titrate antibody concentrations to determine optimal working dilutions (e.g., 8 μg/mL has been validated for some monoclonal antibodies)

  • Extend blocking times using 3-5% BSA or serum from the secondary antibody host species

  • Include 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 in antibody diluents to reduce hydrophobic interactions

  • Increase washing steps duration and volume (at least 3 washes of 5 minutes each)

  • Include a negative control using B4GALNT1-knockout cells to establish background signal levels

  • Consider using directly conjugated primary antibodies to eliminate secondary antibody cross-reactivity

When specific subcellular localization is critical, co-staining with established organelle markers (e.g., GM130 for Golgi, calnexin for ER) can help validate authentic staining patterns versus background .

What are the key considerations when designing experiments to compare wild-type and variant B4GALNT1 proteins?

When comparing wild-type and variant B4GALNT1 proteins, several experimental design factors are critical:

  • Expression system consistency: Use identical vectors, promoters, and tags for all constructs

  • Normalization strategies: Account for differences in expression levels by quantitative Western blotting

  • Temporal considerations: Assess protein stability over time through chase experiments

  • Cellular background: Ideally use B4GALNT1-knockout cells to eliminate endogenous activity

  • Functional readouts: Employ multiple assays (enzymatic activity, localization, ganglioside profiles)

  • Statistical approach: Perform at least three independent experiments with technical replicates

  • Controls: Include known pathogenic variants (e.g., p.Asp433Ala) alongside novel variants

These considerations ensure that observed functional differences are attributable to the specific variant rather than experimental variables .

How should B4GALNT1 antibodies be validated for specificity before use in critical experiments?

Thorough validation of B4GALNT1 antibodies is essential before use in critical experiments:

  • Knockout validation: Test antibodies in B4GALNT1-knockout cell lines or tissues to confirm signal absence

  • Overexpression validation: Compare signal in cells with endogenous versus overexpressed protein levels

  • Peptide competition: Pre-incubate antibodies with immunizing peptides to block specific binding

  • Multiple detection methods: Confirm findings using orthogonal techniques (e.g., mass spectrometry)

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test on closely related family members if available

  • Multi-antibody validation: Use antibodies targeting different epitopes and compare staining patterns

  • Lot-to-lot testing: Verify consistency between different antibody lots

Proper validation prevents misinterpretation of experimental results and ensures reproducibility across studies .

How can B4GALNT1 antibodies be used to investigate disease-associated variants in patient samples?

B4GALNT1 antibodies offer valuable tools for investigating disease-associated variants in patient samples:

  • Diagnostic applications: Assess protein expression in patient-derived cells or tissues

  • Carrier screening: Evaluate activation-induced ganglioside expression in peripheral blood T cells

  • Functional classification: Categorize variants based on protein expression, localization, and activity

  • Genotype-phenotype correlations: Link specific molecular defects to clinical manifestations

  • Therapeutic monitoring: Assess the impact of potential treatments on protein function

For example, peripheral blood T cells from patients with biallelic pathogenic B4GALNT1 mutations show impaired activation-induced ganglioside expression that can be detected using cholera toxin binding and flow cytometry, providing a minimally invasive functional diagnostic approach .

What are the best approaches for quantifying B4GALNT1 expression across different experimental conditions?

Accurate quantification of B4GALNT1 expression requires careful methodological considerations:

  • Western blot quantification: Use chemiluminescence or fluorescence-based detection with standard curves of recombinant protein

  • qRT-PCR: Measure transcript levels with validated reference genes for normalization

  • Flow cytometry: Assess protein expression in intact cells using permeabilization protocols

  • Mass spectrometry: Employ targeted proteomics with isotope-labeled peptide standards

  • Image analysis: Quantify immunofluorescence intensity with appropriate background subtraction

When comparing expression across conditions, internal loading controls such as calnexin (for Western blot) or housekeeping genes (for qRT-PCR) are essential, and statistical analysis should account for experiment-to-experiment variation .

How do B4GALNT1 mutations impact T cell activation and what methods best detect these alterations?

B4GALNT1 mutations that impair enzyme function have significant impacts on T cell activation that can be detected through several methodological approaches:

  • Flow cytometry: Assess ganglioside expression using cholera toxin B subunit binding before and after activation

  • Activation marker analysis: Measure conventional T cell activation markers (CD69, CD25) alongside ganglioside changes

  • Functional assays: Evaluate cytokine production and proliferative responses

  • Calcium flux measurements: Determine if altered ganglioside composition affects TCR-mediated signaling

  • Gene expression analysis: Compare activation-induced transcriptional changes between normal and mutant cells

Research has established that T cell activation normally induces B4GALNT1 expression, increasing GM2S activity and surface ganglioside levels. In patients with pathogenic B4GALNT1 mutations, this activation-induced ganglioside expression is impaired. This cellular phenotype can serve as a functional diagnostic marker for hereditary spastic paraplegia 26 and could potentially identify carriers of pathogenic variants .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.