FITC-conjugated GNA12 antibodies target the GNA12 protein, specifically binding to epitopes within amino acids 112–270 of the human protein . This region is conserved across species but primarily validated for human samples.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Immunogen | Recombinant Human GNA12 (AA 112–270) |
| Epitope | Middle region of GNA12 (not Ser67-specific) |
| Host/Clonality | Rabbit Polyclonal |
| Conjugate | FITC (Fluorescein Isothiocyanate) |
FITC-conjugated GNA12 antibodies are optimized for fluorescence-based assays, with the following features:
FITC-conjugated GNA12 antibodies are primarily employed in:
Immunofluorescence (IF): Localization of GNA12 in fixed or live cells.
Flow Cytometry: Quantitative analysis of GNA12 expression in cell populations.
Western Blot (WB): Validation of protein expression, though unconjugated versions are preferred for WB .
| Application | Dilution | Fixation | Detection |
|---|---|---|---|
| IF | 1:50–1:200 | 4% Paraformaldehyde | Fluorescence microscopy (488 nm excitation) |
| IHC | 1:200–1:500 | Paraffin-embedded sections | FITC signal visualization |
| WB | Not recommended | – | – |
While FITC-conjugated antibodies are tools for detection, studies on GNA12’s role in disease highlight their utility:
Cancer Progression: GNA12 activates RhoA/ROCK signaling, promoting metastasis and therapy resistance .
Cell Adhesion: GNA12 inhibits E-cadherin-mediated adhesion, facilitating tumor invasion .
Renal Cystogenesis: GNA12 knockdown reduces cyst formation in Pkd1-deficient models, linking it to polycystic kidney disease .
FITC-labeled GNA12 antibodies enable visualization of protein localization during signaling events, such as:
Membrane Recruitment: GNA12 translocates to the plasma membrane upon activation by GPCRs or LPA receptors .
Nuclear Signaling: GNA12 may interact with transcription factors like AP-1 to regulate gene expression .
For experimental validation, refer to the cited sources for methodological details.
Guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins), such as GNA12, function as modulators or transducers in various transmembrane signaling pathways. GNA12 activates the effector molecule RhoA by binding and activating RhoGEFs (ARHGEF12/LARG). Subsequently, GNA12-dependent Rho signaling regulates the transcription factor AP-1 (activating protein-1). This signaling pathway also regulates protein phosphatase 2A activation, leading to the dephosphorylation of its target proteins. GNA12 promotes tumor cell invasion and metastasis by activating the RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway and upregulating proinflammatory cytokine production. Furthermore, it inhibits CDH1-mediated cell adhesion through a mechanism independent of Rho activation. In collaboration with NAPA, GNA12 facilitates CDH5 localization to the plasma membrane. GNA12 may also play a role in controlling cell migration via the TOR signaling cascade.
The following studies highlight the diverse roles of GNA12:
GNA12 (Guanine Nucleotide Binding Protein Alpha 12) functions as a modulator or transducer in various transmembrane signaling systems. It plays critical roles in:
Regulation of biological processes associated with cancer progression
Transmembrane signal transduction as part of G protein complexes
G proteins, including GNA12, are heterotrimeric complexes composed of three units (alpha, beta, and gamma), with the alpha chain containing the guanine nucleotide binding site responsible for GTP hydrolysis . GNA12 is primarily localized near the cell surface membrane, consistent with its role in transmitting signals from membrane-bound receptors .
For maximum stability and performance of FITC-conjugated GNA12 antibodies:
Store at -20°C in buffer containing 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol (pH 7.3)
Aliquoting is unnecessary for -20°C storage of small volume (20μl) sizes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles to prevent denaturation and loss of fluorescence activity
Protect from light exposure to prevent photobleaching of the FITC fluorophore
Based on validated experimental protocols, the following application-specific dilutions are recommended:
Note: It is essential to conduct titration experiments for each application and sample type to determine optimal antibody concentration and minimize background signal .
When encountering weak fluorescence signals in immunofluorescence experiments with FITC-conjugated GNA12 antibody, consider the following methodological improvements:
Antigen retrieval optimization: If using fixed tissues or cells, ensure appropriate antigen retrieval (heat-induced or enzymatic) to expose epitopes masked during fixation
Dilution adjustment: Test a more concentrated antibody dilution (1:50 instead of 1:200)
Permeabilization enhancement: Optimize detergent concentration and incubation time to improve antibody access to intracellular GNA12
Signal amplification: Consider implementing tyramide signal amplification (TSA) system for low-abundance targets
Photobleaching prevention: Minimize exposure to light during processing and incorporate anti-fade mounting media
Microscopy parameters: Adjust exposure time, gain, and detector sensitivity while avoiding autofluorescence
If GNA12 expression is expected to be low in your experimental system, consider using higher antibody concentrations or switching to a more sensitive detection method.
Rigorous validation of antibody specificity is crucial for reliable results. Implement these methodological approaches:
Positive controls: Include cell lines with confirmed GNA12 expression (e.g., HeLa or HepG2)
Negative controls:
Isotype control antibody (FITC-conjugated rabbit IgG)
Secondary antibody-only control
Use of cells with GNA12 knockdown/knockout
Epitope blocking: Pre-incubate antibody with immunogenic peptide (recombinant GNA12 AA 112-270)
Orthogonal validation: Confirm findings using different GNA12 antibodies targeting distinct epitopes
Western blot confirmation: Verify detection of the expected 37-39 kDa band in parallel with immunofluorescence experiments
Subcellular localization assessment: Confirm membrane-proximal localization consistent with GNA12's known cellular distribution
When designing multiplex immunofluorescence experiments incorporating FITC-conjugated GNA12 antibody:
Spectral compatibility: Select additional fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap with FITC (excitation ~495nm, emission ~520nm)
| Recommended Compatible Fluorophores | Excitation Peak | Emission Peak |
|---|---|---|
| Cy3 | ~550 nm | ~570 nm |
| Alexa Fluor 647 | ~650 nm | ~665 nm |
| Pacific Blue | ~410 nm | ~455 nm |
Signal intensity balancing: Adjust individual antibody concentrations to achieve comparable signal intensities
Sequential staining: Consider sequential rather than simultaneous antibody incubation if cross-reactivity occurs
Appropriate controls: Include single-color controls for spectral compensation during analysis
Antibody host species: Select primary antibodies from different host species to prevent cross-reactivity of secondary antibodies
GNA12 colocalization studies: Prioritize membrane/subcellular markers that provide biological context for GNA12 function
The LPA/LPAR/GNA12 signaling pathway plays a significant role in cancer progression, particularly in ovarian cancer . Methodological approaches include:
Proximity ligation assays: Combine GNA12-FITC antibody with LPA receptor antibodies to detect in situ protein interactions
Flow cytometry: Quantify GNA12 expression levels across patient-derived samples with varying degrees of LPA receptor expression
Live-cell imaging: Track dynamic changes in GNA12 localization following LPA stimulation using the direct FITC visualization
GNA12 silencing experiments: Compare pathway activation before and after GNA12 knockdown using techniques described in :
Transcriptomic profiling revealed that GNA12 silencing altered expression of genes involved in:
PI3K/AKT signaling pathway
VEGF signaling
Chemotherapy resistance mechanisms
FoxO signaling
Hub protein analysis: Investigate interactions between GNA12 and identified hub proteins in pro-tumorigenic networks:
Experimental design should include controls for confirming pathway activation status and appropriate inhibitors to establish causal relationships.
When encountering inconsistent cross-reactivity data across species (as observed in the information sources):
Epitope sequence analysis: Compare the conservation of the target epitope (AA 112-270) across species:
Perform BLAST alignment of human, mouse, and rat GNA12 sequences focusing on this region
Identify potential species-specific post-translational modifications
Validation across multiple cell lines:
Western blot analysis with protein loading controls:
Load equal protein amounts from different species
Confirm molecular weight differences (if any) between species
Compare signal intensity normalized to loading controls
Absorption controls:
Pre-absorb antibody with recombinant GNA12 proteins from different species
Assess remaining reactivity to determine specificity
Alternative detection methods:
Compare results using different anti-GNA12 antibodies with distinct epitopes
Consider RNA-level validation (RT-PCR) to correlate with protein detection
Different antibody lots or clones may exhibit variable cross-reactivity. Document batch information and standardize protocols when comparing studies across different laboratories.
Recent research has revealed GNA12's involvement in suppressing proteasomal pathways , presenting an intriguing area for investigation:
Co-localization studies with proteasome components:
Use GNA12-FITC antibody alongside antibodies against PSM subunits (PSMA6, PSMC5, etc.)
Analyze spatial relationships in response to proteasome inhibitors (e.g., bortezomib)
Temporal dynamics analysis:
Track GNA12 localization changes during cell cycle progression
Correlate with activity of APC/C (anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome)
Ubiquitination pathway interaction:
Investigate GNA12 relationship with UBE2E1 (E2-ubiquitin conjugating enzyme)
Analyze impact on PRC1-mediated silencing of tumor suppressor genes
Functional assays:
Compare proteasome activity in cells with normal vs. silenced GNA12 expression
Assess impact on programmed cell death pathways
Therapeutic intervention assessment:
Monitor GNA12 expression/localization changes following treatment with:
Proteasome inhibitors
Ubiquitin-proteasome system modulators
Cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors
Research indicates GNA12 silencing upregulates components of the proteasomal machinery including PSMA6, PSMC5, ANAPC1, and UBE2E1 , suggesting a regulatory role worth exploring through these methodological approaches.
When analyzing flow cytometry data generated with FITC-conjugated GNA12 antibody:
Gating strategy optimization:
Gate on viable cells using appropriate viability dye
Remove doublets using FSC-H vs. FSC-A
Include unstained, isotype, and FMO (fluorescence minus one) controls
Signal intensity quantification:
Report median fluorescence intensity (MFI) rather than mean when distribution is non-Gaussian
Calculate signal-to-noise ratio compared to controls
Population heterogeneity analysis:
Determine if GNA12 expression is uniform or reveals distinct subpopulations
Correlate with functional parameters or other markers
Intracellular vs. surface staining interpretation:
GNA12 is predominantly membrane-associated but may have intracellular pools
Permeabilization protocol efficiency affects intracellular detection
Compensation considerations:
FITC spillover into PE channel requires appropriate compensation
Include single-color controls for each fluorophore
Data normalization for comparison:
Express results as fold change over control or reference population
Consider ratios to housekeeping proteins for relative quantification
When exploring GNA12's involvement in cancer signaling using FITC-conjugated antibodies:
Cell model selection:
Pathway activation triggers:
Downstream signaling assessment:
Inhibitor controls:
Include G protein signaling inhibitors (e.g., pertussis toxin as negative control)
Use pathway-specific inhibitors (PI3K/AKT, VEGF) to establish causality
Gene silencing approaches:
Design appropriate siRNA/shRNA controls
Rescue experiments to confirm specificity
CRISPR/Cas9 for complete GNA12 knockout
Temporal considerations:
Acute vs. chronic effects of GNA12 modulation
Time-course experiments to capture signaling dynamics
Research has established that GNA12 drives ovarian cancer progression by upregulating a pro-tumorigenic network while downregulating growth-suppressive networks , highlighting the importance of examining both positive and negative regulatory mechanisms.
When addressing discrepancies in the observed molecular weight of GNA12:
Expected vs. observed molecular weight:
Sources of variation:
Post-translational modifications (phosphorylation, ubiquitination)
Proteolytic processing or alternative splicing
SDS-PAGE running conditions (reducing vs. non-reducing)
Gel percentage and buffer system
Technical validation approaches:
Methodological considerations:
Sample preparation (lysis buffer, protease inhibitors)
Protein denaturation conditions (temperature, time)
Gel running conditions (voltage, time)
Alternative confirmation methods:
Mass spectrometry identification of the detected band
Immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting
Overexpression of tagged GNA12 as size reference
Careful documentation of experimental conditions and standardized protocols are essential for reproducible molecular weight determination and meaningful comparisons across studies.
Based on research linking GNA12 to therapy resistance , these methodological approaches can be employed:
Ex vivo patient sample analysis:
Compare GNA12 expression levels in responsive vs. resistant tumors
Correlate with expression of drug resistance proteins
Cell line models of acquired resistance:
Monitor GNA12 expression changes during resistance development
Assess reversibility upon GNA12 silencing
Flow cytometric approaches:
Use GNA12-FITC antibody to sort cell populations based on expression levels
Evaluate chemosensitivity of GNA12-high vs. GNA12-low populations
Co-expression analysis:
Signaling pathway intervention:
Test combination of chemotherapeutics with GNA12 pathway inhibitors
Evaluate restoration of chemosensitivity
Biomarker development:
Assess GNA12 as predictive biomarker for therapy response
Develop standardized quantification protocols
Research has demonstrated that GNA12 silencing affects multiple pathways associated with chemotherapy resistance , suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target to overcome resistance mechanisms.
For robust high-content imaging using FITC-conjugated GNA12 antibody:
Sample preparation optimization:
Cell density considerations to prevent overlapping
Fixation protocol optimization to preserve epitope accessibility
Permeabilization conditions for intracellular access
Image acquisition parameters:
Exposure time standardization to prevent photobleaching
Z-stack collection for 3D distribution analysis
Pixel resolution appropriate for subcellular localization
Quantification approaches:
Integrated intensity measurement
Object-based analysis for subcellular structures
Colocalization coefficient calculation with other markers
Data normalization strategies:
Cell size/shape considerations
Background subtraction methodology
Reference channel inclusion
Advanced analytical techniques:
Machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition
Population heterogeneity assessment
Temporal dynamics tracking in live cell experiments
Reproducibility considerations:
Technical replicate incorporation
Positive/negative controls on each plate
Regular microscope calibration verification
When analyzing GNA12 distribution, focus on membrane localization patterns consistent with its role in transmembrane signaling , and consider analysis of redistribution following receptor activation.