GNAL Antibody, FITC conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Conjugation Process and FITC Properties

FITC conjugation involves covalent bonding of the fluorophore to the antibody’s lysine residues via isothiocyanate groups. Key aspects include:

  • Fluorophore:Protein (F:P) Ratio: Higher F:P ratios increase fluorescence intensity but risk antibody inactivation. Studies show a linear decrease in antibody avidity with increased FITC labeling, particularly affecting antigen-binding kinetics .

  • Spectral Properties: FITC exhibits absorption maxima at 492 nm and emission maxima at 520 nm, enabling detection via fluorescence microscopy or flow cytometry .

  • Buffer Compatibility: FITC-conjugated antibodies are stabilized in sodium azide-containing buffers to prevent microbial growth .

Research Applications

The GNAL Antibody, FITC conjugated, is primarily validated for ELISA but may be adaptable to other techniques such as:

  • Immunofluorescence (IF): Enables visualization of GNAL localization in cells or tissues.

  • Flow Cytometry (FC): Quantifies GNAL expression in cell populations.

  • Western Blot (WB): Detects GNAL in denatured protein samples (requires optimization) .

Note: The antibody’s polyclonal nature ensures broader epitope recognition compared to monoclonal alternatives .

Impact of FITC Conjugation on Antibody Functionality

Studies on similar FITC-labeled antibodies (e.g., anti-HA) reveal:

  • Avidity Reduction: Higher F:P ratios correlate with reduced antibody concentration (α) and binding affinity (β) .

  • Poisson Statistics: Optimal labeling balances fluorescence intensity and antibody activity, with F:P ratios ~3–5 often recommended to minimize inactivation .

Technical Considerations

ParameterRecommendationSource
DilutionOptimize titers for each assay; typical ranges: 1:20–1:100 (IF/FC), 1:1000–1:5000 (WB)
StabilityAliquot to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
InterferenceSodium azide in buffers may inhibit enzymatic reactions; dialyze if necessary

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we are able to ship products within 1-3 business days after receiving your order. Delivery times may vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery timeframes.
Synonyms
Adenylate cyclase stimulating G alpha protein; olfactory type antibody; Adenylate cyclase-stimulating G alpha protein antibody; DYT25 antibody; G alpha olf antibody; Gnal antibody; GNAL_HUMAN antibody; Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein); alpha activating activity polypeptide; olfactory type antibody; Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein); alpha stimulating activity polypeptide; olfactory type antibody; Guanine nucleotide binding protein G(olf) subunit alpha antibody; Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(olf) subunit alpha antibody; olfactory type antibody
Target Names
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) play a crucial role as modulators or transducers in various transmembrane signaling systems. G(olf) alpha mediates signal transduction within the olfactory neuroepithelium and the basal ganglia. It may also participate in aspects of visual transduction and in mediating the effects of certain hormones and neurotransmitters.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. GNAL mutations may represent one of the rare genetic factors contributing to isolated laryngeal dystonia. PMID: 27093447
  2. GNAL mutations are not a prevalent cause of dystonia within the Brazilian population. PMID: 26810727
  3. A novel GNAL mutation was identified in an Italian family exhibiting adult-onset, dominantly inherited dystonia. PMID: 26725140
  4. Mutations in the GNAL gene are not a common cause of isolated dystonia in the Chinese population. PMID: 26365774
  5. This study demonstrated that mutations in GNAL can cause Dystonia. PMID: 25847575
  6. Two novel GNAL mutations were identified: one heterozygous missense variant in GNAL exon 4, c.289A>G. PMID: 25382112
  7. The findings of this study further support GNAL as a causative gene in adult-onset isolated dystonia. PMID: 24408567
  8. This study identified a novel likely disease-causing GNAL mutation in a Serbian patient with cervical dystonia and a classical DYT25 phenotype. PMID: 24729450
  9. Primary dystonia in the Amish-Mennonites exhibits genetic diversity, encompassing not only the THAP1 indel founder mutation but also various mutations in THAP1 and GNAL, as well as the TOR1A GAG deletion. PMID: 24500857
  10. GNAL variants appear to be an uncommon cause of primary torsion dystonia in the primarily sporadic German sample. PMID: 24151159
  11. Our data suggest that GNAL mutations are not a common cause of dystonia in the U.K. population. PMID: 24222099
  12. The GNAL dystonia gene is central to striatal responses to dopamine (DA) and is a component of a molecular pathway previously implicated in DOPA-responsive dystonia (DRD). PMID: 24144882
  13. GNAL mutations have the potential to increase ethnic susceptibility to movement disorders induced by dopamine antagonists. PMID: 24535567
  14. Mutations in the GNAL gene can lead to adult-onset primary dystonia in Chinese patients. PMID: 23759320
  15. Familial adult-onset primary dystonia can be caused by mutations in GNAL. PMID: 23449625
  16. Mutations in GNAL are associated with primary torsion dystonia. PMID: 23222958
  17. These findings provide crucial insights into the physiological functions of XLGalpha(olf). PMID: 22120635
  18. An investigation examined whether polymorphisms in the alpha subunit of the Golf gene (A-->G in intron 3, and T-->G in intron 10) are associated with major depression. Additionally, a parent-of-origin effect was tested in separated gender groups. PMID: 11901355
  19. This research promotes cellular invasion, survival, and neuroendocrine differentiation in colon, kidney, and prostate epithelial cells. PMID: 12037684
  20. There is no support for the hypothesis that the olfactory G-protein gene is a major susceptibility factor for bipolar disorders. PMID: 12782961
  21. A transcriptional variant of the GNAL gene in chromosome 18p11.2 was identified in relation to susceptibility to bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. PMID: 16044173
  22. The Galpha(olf) variant XLGalpha(olf) interacts with the human adenosine A2A receptor. PMID: 16818375
  23. It was hypothesized that the G(s)-like subunit Galpha(olf), expressed in D1-rich areas of the brain, contributes to the genetic susceptibility of ADHD. The inheritance pattern of 12 GNAL polymorphisms was examined in 258 nuclear families. PMID: 17166517
  24. This study provides valuable insights into the physiological functions of XLGalpha(olf). PMID: 19245791

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 4388

OMIM: 139312

KEGG: hsa:2774

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000334051

UniGene: Hs.136295

Involvement In Disease
Dystonia 25 (DYT25)
Protein Families
G-alpha family, G(s) subfamily
Tissue Specificity
Detected in olfactory neuroepithelium, brain, testis, and to a lower extent in retina, lung alveoli, spleen. Trace amounts where seen in kidney, adrenal gland and liver. Found to be expressed in all the insulinomas examined.

Q&A

What is FITC conjugation and how does it enhance antibody functionality in immunological techniques?

FITC (Fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate) is a reactive derivative of fluorescein that covalently binds to primary amine groups on proteins, including antibodies. When conjugated to antibodies, FITC functions as a fluorescent tag with an absorption maximum at 492nm and emission maximum at 520nm, enabling visualization of target antigens in fluorescence-based applications . FITC conjugation allows for direct detection of antigens without requiring secondary antibodies, streamlining experimental workflows in techniques such as immunofluorescence (IF), flow cytometry (FC), and certain Western blot (WB) applications . The conjugation process typically achieves a specific ratio of fluorophore to antibody—for optimal performance, the standard is approximately 3-4 moles of FITC per mole of IgG, similar to the 3.1 moles FITC per mole IgG reported for commercial preparations .

What are the primary research applications for GNAL Antibody, FITC conjugated?

FITC-conjugated antibodies, including those targeting GNAL, are versatile tools applicable across multiple research techniques:

ApplicationRecommended Dilution RangeKey Considerations
Immunofluorescence1:20-1:100Higher concentrations may be needed for tissue sections versus cell cultures
Flow Cytometry1:20-1:100Optimal for single-cell analysis of suspension cells or disaggregated tissues
Western Blot1:1000-1:5000Less common for FITC conjugates but viable with appropriate imaging systems

These applications leverage the specificity of the GNAL antibody combined with the fluorescent properties of FITC for detection of guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(olf) subunit alpha in various experimental contexts . When working with GNAL antibodies, researchers should consider the tissue or cell type of interest, as expression patterns may vary across different biological samples.

How should FITC-conjugated antibodies be stored to maintain optimal activity?

Proper storage is critical for maintaining the functionality of FITC-conjugated antibodies. These reagents should be stored at -20°C for long-term preservation, where they typically remain stable for up to one year from the date of receipt . Once reconstituted, FITC-conjugated antibodies can be stored at 2-8°C under sterile conditions for approximately one month . For extended storage after reconstitution, aliquoting the antibody and returning it to -20°C to -70°C is recommended, where it can remain viable for up to six months .

To preserve both antibody integrity and fluorophore activity, it is essential to:

  • Use a manual defrost freezer and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

  • Protect the antibody from prolonged exposure to light, as FITC is susceptible to photobleaching

  • Store in appropriate buffer conditions (typically containing stabilizers such as BSA at 5 mg/ml)

  • Maintain sterility to prevent microbial contamination

What controls are essential when working with FITC-conjugated antibodies in research applications?

Implementing comprehensive controls is critical for generating reliable data with FITC-conjugated antibodies:

Control TypePurposeImplementation
Unstained ControlEstablishes autofluorescence baselineSample processed identically but without any antibody
Isotype ControlAssesses non-specific bindingFITC-conjugated antibody of same isotype but irrelevant specificity
Secondary Antibody-Only ControlEvaluates secondary antibody specificity (if used)Sample incubated with secondary but no primary antibody
Fluorescence Minus One (FMO)Identifies boundary between positive and negative signals in multicolor panelsAll fluorophores except FITC included
Compensation ControlsCorrects for spectral overlapSingle-color staining for each fluorophore in panel
Biological Negative/PositiveValidates antibody specificitySamples known to lack/express GNAL

For flow cytometry applications, single-stained compensation controls should be prepared using the unconjugated primary antibody and the associated secondary antibody, or alternatively using compensation beads if the target antigen expression is low .

How can I design a multicolor flow cytometry panel that includes a FITC-conjugated GNAL antibody?

Designing a multicolor panel incorporating a FITC-conjugated GNAL antibody requires careful consideration of fluorophore compatibility to minimize spectral overlap. Since FITC has excitation/emission maxima at 492nm/520nm, it presents significant spectral overlap with enhanced GFP (eGFP), making these fluorophores mutually exclusive in the same panel .

When incorporating FITC-conjugated antibodies:

  • Select compatible fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap with FITC

  • Assign brighter fluorophores to targets with lower expression levels

  • Account for the relative brightness of FITC (moderate brightness) when balancing the panel

  • Consider instrument configuration and available lasers/filters

If your experimental design involves GFP-expressing cells, alternative strategies include:

  • Replacing the FITC-conjugated antibody with one conjugated to a different fluorophore

  • Using antibody conjugation kits to attach a different fluorophore to the GNAL antibody

  • Implementing spectral unmixing if your flow cytometer supports this functionality

For optimal panel design, fluorophore brightness hierarchy should be considered, with FITC positioned in the middle of the brightness spectrum .

How can I address high background issues when using FITC-conjugated antibodies?

High background fluorescence when using FITC-conjugated antibodies can stem from multiple sources and requires systematic troubleshooting:

  • Non-specific binding: Implement blocking with appropriate serum (matching the species of cells being analyzed) before antibody incubation. Importantly, never use blocking serum from the same species as the host of the primary antibody as this will lead to recognition by the secondary antibody if one is used .

  • Fc receptor binding: For immune tissues with abundant Fc receptors, consider:

    • Using F(ab) fragment secondary antibodies

    • Adding Fc receptor blocking reagents

    • Including 10% serum from the species being analyzed

  • Insufficient washing: Increase the number and duration of washing steps, particularly for intracellular staining protocols, to remove excess unbound antibody .

  • Autofluorescence: Sample-derived autofluorescence can be addressed through:

    • Using autofluorescence quenching reagents

    • Implementing spectral unmixing

    • Adjusting acquisition settings to minimize autofluorescence contribution

  • Fixation-induced fluorescence: If using aldehyde-based fixatives, consider reducing fixation time or concentration, or switch to alcohol-based fixatives which typically produce less autofluorescence.

What strategies can be employed when dealing with FITC signal overlap with GFP in transgenic models?

The spectral overlap between FITC and GFP presents a significant challenge in experimental designs involving GFP-expressing cells or tissues. Their excitation/emission profiles are so similar that they effectively read in the same channel, making simultaneous use problematic .

Strategies to address this challenge include:

How can signal amplification be achieved when working with FITC-conjugated antibodies detecting low-abundance targets?

When investigating low-abundance targets such as GNAL in certain tissues, signal amplification strategies can enhance detection sensitivity:

  • Indirect detection methods: Although FITC-conjugated primary antibodies enable direct detection, implementing a multi-layer approach can amplify signals:

    • Use unconjugated primary anti-GNAL antibody

    • Apply a biotinylated secondary antibody

    • Detect with streptavidin-FITC, leveraging the multiple biotin binding sites on streptavidin

  • Tyramide signal amplification (TSA): This enzymatic amplification method can increase sensitivity by 10-100 fold:

    • Use unconjugated anti-GNAL primary antibody

    • Apply HRP-conjugated secondary antibody

    • React with FITC-tyramide substrate

    • HRP catalyzes deposition of multiple FITC-tyramide molecules, significantly amplifying signal

  • Anti-FITC antibodies: Employ anti-FITC antibodies conjugated to the same or different fluorophores to enhance the original FITC signal through additional binding events .

  • Photomultiplier tube (PMT) adjustment: For flow cytometry applications, increase the voltage on the appropriate PMT to amplify the FITC signal, though this must be balanced against increased background.

How can FITC-conjugated GNAL antibodies be utilized in combination with indirect staining approaches?

Integrating FITC-conjugated antibodies with indirect staining methods requires careful planning to prevent cross-reactivity between detection systems. This approach can be particularly valuable when working with multiple targets requiring different detection strategies.

For successful implementation:

  • Species and isotype selection: Choose primary antibodies raised in different species or of different isotypes/classes to enable specific detection .

  • Sequential staining: When combining direct and indirect approaches:

    • First incubate with unconjugated primary antibodies

    • Apply fluorescently-labeled secondary antibodies specific to these primaries

    • Block any remaining secondary antibody binding sites

    • Finally add directly conjugated FITC-antibodies

  • Cross-adsorbed secondaries: Use highly cross-adsorbed or isotype-specific secondary antibodies to eliminate unwanted cross-reactivity when multiple primary antibodies from the same species are used .

A practical approach for multiplexing with both direct and indirect detection:

StepProcedurePurpose
1Incubate with unconjugated anti-target X antibody (e.g., mouse IgG1)Primary detection of first target
2Wash thoroughlyRemove unbound primary antibody
3Apply fluorophore-conjugated anti-mouse IgG1 secondaryDetect first primary antibody
4Block with excess mouse serumPrevent secondary from binding subsequent mouse antibodies
5Add FITC-conjugated anti-GNAL antibodyDirect detection of GNAL
6Final wash and analysisComplete procedure

This approach maximizes flexibility while maintaining specificity in complex experimental designs .

What fixation and permeabilization considerations are important when using FITC-conjugated antibodies for intracellular targets?

When detecting intracellular targets with FITC-conjugated antibodies, fixation and permeabilization protocols must balance target epitope preservation, cellular architecture maintenance, and fluorophore integrity:

  • Fixation optimization:

    • Paraformaldehyde (1-4%): Preserves structure but may mask some epitopes

    • Methanol/acetone: Better for some intracellular epitopes but can extract lipids

    • Hybrid protocols: Initial PFA fixation followed by methanol permeabilization

    FITC fluorescence is generally stable in aldehyde-fixed samples but can be affected by excessive fixation times.

  • Permeabilization considerations:

    • Saponin (0.1-0.5%): Gentle, reversible permeabilization suitable for most applications

    • Triton X-100 (0.1-0.5%): Stronger permeabilization, may affect some membrane proteins

    • Digitonin (0.01-0.1%): Selective permeabilization of plasma membrane while leaving nuclear membrane intact

  • Buffer composition:

    • Maintain physiological pH (7.2-7.4) to preserve FITC fluorescence

    • Include protein (e.g., BSA) to reduce nonspecific binding

    • Consider adding glycerol (10-50%) for long-term sample storage to protect fluorescence

  • Extended washing:

    • Intracellular staining typically requires more extensive washing than surface staining

    • Multiple washes (3-5 times) with permeabilization buffer ensure removal of unbound antibody

    • Longer wash incubations (5-10 minutes per wash) may be necessary

Different fixation methods may affect the conformation of the GNAL protein differently, potentially impacting antibody recognition. Preliminary testing with different fixation/permeabilization combinations is recommended for optimal results.

How should compensation be performed when including FITC-conjugated antibodies in multicolor flow cytometry?

Proper compensation is critical when using FITC-conjugated antibodies in multicolor panels due to its spectral characteristics. FITC emission spans a relatively broad range, potentially creating spillover into adjacent channels:

  • Single-color compensation controls: For accurate compensation with FITC-conjugated antibodies, prepare single-stained samples using:

    • The same FITC-conjugated antibody used in the experiment

    • Cells or compensation beads with similar fluorescence intensity as the experimental samples

    • The same instrument settings as will be used for experimental acquisition

  • Implementation approaches:

    • Automatic compensation: Most modern flow cytometry software can calculate a compensation matrix based on single-stained controls

    • Manual adjustment: Fine-tuning may be necessary when automatic compensation is insufficient

    • Offline compensation: Record uncompensated data and apply compensation during analysis

  • Special considerations for FITC:

    • FITC fluorescence intensity can vary with pH, which may affect compensation settings

    • When using tandem dyes alongside FITC, prepare fresh compensation controls for each experiment due to lot-to-lot variability

    • For compensation using beads, ensure the beads can bind your specific FITC-conjugated antibody

  • Alternative approach:

    • If using a FITC-conjugated secondary antibody, compensation can be performed using a primary antibody plus the FITC-secondary, or alternatively using a primary antibody directly conjugated to FITC if available

What are the key considerations for quantitative analysis of FITC signal intensity in imaging applications?

Quantitative analysis of FITC signal in imaging applications requires attention to several technical factors to ensure accurate and reproducible measurements:

  • Photobleaching management:

    • FITC is moderately susceptible to photobleaching

    • Minimize exposure time and intensity during image acquisition

    • Consider using anti-fade mounting media containing radical scavengers

    • For time-course experiments, apply bleaching correction algorithms

  • Signal calibration:

    • Include calibration standards with known fluorophore densities

    • Standardize exposure settings across all samples

    • Account for background autofluorescence using unstained controls

  • Quantification approaches:

    • Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI): Suitable for homogeneous distributions

    • Integrated density: Better for variable expression within regions of interest

    • Object counting: Appropriate for punctate structures or individual cells

  • Technical normalization:

    • Correct for flat-field illumination variations

    • Apply background subtraction based on negative controls

    • Consider using reference fluorophores for normalization between experiments

  • Biological normalization:

    • Normalize to cell number, tissue area, or housekeeping protein expression

    • Include biological reference standards across experiments

    • Consider ratiometric analysis with a second, differently labeled antibody

When publishing quantitative FITC-based imaging data, detailed reporting of acquisition parameters, processing steps, and analysis methods is essential for reproducibility.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.