GNLY Human

Granulysin Human Recombinant
Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to GNLY Human (Granulysin)

Granulysin (GNLY) is a cytolytic protein expressed by human cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer (NK) cells. It belongs to the saposin-like protein family and plays critical roles in antimicrobial defense, tumor surveillance, and immune regulation. GNLY exists in two isoforms: a 15-kDa precursor and a 9-kDa mature form, which differ in function and cellular localization. This article synthesizes structural, functional, and clinical data to provide a comprehensive overview of GNLY human.

Antimicrobial Activity

The 9-kDa form disrupts microbial membranes via pore formation, particularly targeting cholesterol-deficient pathogens (e.g., Mycobacterium tuberculosis) . Its efficacy is 1,000x higher against microbial vs. human membranes due to cholesterol inhibition in host cells .

Tumor Suppression

GNLY induces apoptosis in tumor cells through mitochondrial membrane disruption (via cardiolipin binding) and cytochrome c release. Elevated serum GNLY correlates with improved cancer outcomes .

Immunomodulation

The 15-kDa form acts as an alarmin, recruiting immune cells (NK cells, T cells, dendritic cells) and activating Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-mediated responses .

Disease Associations

DiseaseRole of GNLYEvidence
LeprosyPrevents infection spread by killing Mycobacterium lepraeIncreased GNLY+ CTLs in infected tissues
Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN)Directly lyses keratinocytes via pore formation; primary driver of skin damageHigh GNLY levels in TEN blister fluid
CancerSlows tumor progression; correlates with favorable prognosisGNLY-expressing humanized mice show reduced tumor growth

Autoimmune Pathology

Excessive GNLY release in autoimmune diseases (e.g., psoriasis) may exacerbate tissue damage by lysing host cells .

Humanized Mouse Models

Transgenic mice expressing human GNLY exhibit enhanced tumor rejection, particularly mediated by CD8⁺ T cells. NK cell-dependent tumor lysis requires IL-15 activation .

In Vitro and In Vivo Data

ModelKey FindingsSource
Humanized MiceGNLY serum levels inversely correlate with tumor proliferation
Transgenic MiceGNLY+ mice survive longer post-tumor challenge (C6VL lymphoma model)
TLR4 KnockoutsGNLY-induced APC recruitment/activation is TLR4-dependent

ELISA Kits

Proteintech’s human GNLY ELISA kit (KE00200) provides:

ParameterSpecification
Sensitivity0.6 pg/mL
Range7.8–500 pg/mL
ReactivityHuman serum, plasma, cell culture supernatants
ApplicationsSandwich ELISA for clinical/immunological studies

Recombinant Protein

Prospec Bio offers recombinant human GNLY (PRO-852), a 159-amino acid polypeptide with dual His tags, suitable for functional assays .

Therapeutic Potential

GNLY’s dual roles in antimicrobial defense and tumor suppression position it as a candidate for:

  • Cancer Immunotherapy: Enhancing CTL/NK cell activity against metastatic tumors.

  • Infectious Diseases: Targeting pathogens resistant to conventional antibiotics.

  • Autoimmune Diseases: Inhibiting GNLY activity to reduce tissue damage.

Product Specs

Introduction
Granulysin (GNLY) is a member of the saposin-like protein (SAPLIP) family found within the cytotoxic granules of T cells. Upon antigen stimulation, GNLY is released along with other cytotoxic molecules. It is primarily located in the cytotoxic granules of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and natural killer cells, exhibiting antimicrobial activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other microorganisms. GNLY acts as an antimicrobial protein, effectively eliminating intracellular pathogens. Its broad-spectrum activity targets various microbes, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and parasites, and it is known to kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Description
Recombinant human GNLY, produced in E. coli, is a single, non-glycosylated polypeptide chain. It consists of 159 amino acids, fused with a double His Tag at both the N- and C-termini, resulting in a total molecular mass of 18.1 kDa. The purification process of GNLY involves proprietary chromatographic techniques.
Physical Appearance
Sterile Filtered White Lyophilized (Freeze-Dried) Powder
Formulation
The Granulysin protein was lyophilized from a concentrated (1 mg/ml) solution without any additional additives.
Solubility
To reconstitute the lyophilized Granulysin, it is recommended to dissolve it in sterile 18 MΩ-cm H2O at a concentration of at least 100 µg/ml. This solution can then be further diluted in other aqueous solutions as needed.
Stability
Lyophilized Granulysin remains stable at room temperature for up to 3 weeks; however, it is recommended to store it desiccated below -18°C for long-term storage. Once reconstituted, Granulysin should be stored at 4°C for 2-7 days. For extended storage, it is advisable to freeze it below -18°C. To ensure optimal stability during long-term storage, adding a carrier protein (0.1% HSA or BSA) is recommended. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Purity
The purity of Granulysin is determined to be greater than 95.0% by SDS-PAGE analysis.
Synonyms
LAG2, Lymphokine LAG-2, TLA519, NKG5, LAG2, D2S69E, Granulysin, T-cell activation protein 519, GNLY, D2S69E.
Source
Escherichia Coli.
Amino Acid Sequence
MGSSHHHHHHSSGLVPRGSHMMEGLVFSRLSPEYYD
LARAHLRDEEKSCPCLAQEGPQGDLLTKTQELGRDYR
TCLTIVQKLKKMVDKPTQRSVSNAATRVCRTGRSRWR
DVCRNFMRRYQSRVTQGLVAGETAQQICEDLRLCIPS
TGPLGSHHHHHH.

Q&A

What is GNLY (Granulysin) and what is its fundamental role in human immune function?

Granulysin (GNLY) is a cationic antimicrobial protein primarily found in the granules of human cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer (NK) cells. It exists in two main isoforms: a 15 kDa precursor form and a proteolytically processed 9 kDa form. The 9 kDa form possesses potent antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, and parasites.

In human immune function, GNLY serves as an effector molecule that contributes to host defense through multiple mechanisms:

  • Direct microbial killing through membrane disruption

  • Induction of apoptosis in target cells

  • Contribution to inflammatory processes

  • Potential role in tumor surveillance

Methodologically, researchers interested in GNLY's basic functions should employ a combination of recombinant protein expression systems, immunological assays, and cellular models to characterize its activities in different contexts .

How is GNLY expressed in different human tissues and cell types?

GNLY expression follows a specific pattern across human tissues and cell populations:

Primary Expression Sites:

  • CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes

  • NK cells

  • γδ T cells

  • NKT cells

  • Some CD4+ T cell subsets (particularly Th1)

Tissue Distribution:

Tissue/OrganGNLY Expression LevelPrimary Cell Types
Peripheral bloodHighNK cells, CTLs
Lymph nodesModerateMemory CTLs, NK cells
SkinVariableResident T cells, NK cells
Mucosal surfacesModerateIntraepithelial lymphocytes
LiverLow-ModerateNK cells, NKT cells
BrainVery low/AbsentLimited immune cells

Methodologically, researchers should employ tissue-specific RNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry to accurately quantify expression patterns. Single-cell technologies have revolutionized our understanding of GNLY expression heterogeneity within immune cell populations .

What are the structural characteristics of human GNLY that contribute to its function?

Human GNLY possesses several distinctive structural features that enable its antimicrobial and cytotoxic functions:

Key Structural Elements:

  • Five α-helices arranged in a saposin-like fold

  • Highly basic surface (pI ~10.8) that facilitates interaction with negatively charged microbial membranes

  • Hydrophobic core that aids in membrane insertion and disruption

  • Disulfide bonds that stabilize the tertiary structure

  • Glycosylation sites that influence stability and activity

The unique structural arrangement allows GNLY to:

  • Selectively target microbial membranes based on their distinctive composition compared to mammalian cells

  • Create pores that lead to osmotic lysis

  • Interact with intracellular targets including lipids and mitochondrial membranes

Methodologically, researchers investigating GNLY structure should consider X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations to fully characterize structure-function relationships .

What are the optimal methods for isolating and purifying native human GNLY for functional studies?

Isolating native human GNLY presents substantial technical challenges due to its localization in cytotoxic granules and relatively low abundance. The following methodological approach has proven most effective:

Recommended Isolation Protocol:

  • Obtain activated human NK cells or CTLs (primary cultures or established cell lines like YT, NKL)

  • Stimulate cells with IL-2/IL-15 to enhance GNLY expression

  • Isolate cytotoxic granules through subcellular fractionation (differential centrifugation)

  • Extract proteins using mild detergents (CHAPS or NP-40)

  • Perform immunoaffinity chromatography with anti-GNLY monoclonal antibodies

  • Further purify by ion-exchange and size-exclusion chromatography

Critical Considerations:

  • Maintain physiological pH (7.2-7.4) during purification to preserve function

  • Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

  • Validate purity by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting

  • Confirm activity using bacterial killing assays

Alternatively, recombinant expression systems can be employed, though these may not fully recapitulate post-translational modifications present in native GNLY .

How can researchers effectively design experiments to study GNLY function in human immune responses against pathogens?

Designing robust experiments to investigate GNLY's role in immunity requires multi-layered approaches:

Experimental Design Framework:

  • In vitro models:

    • Co-culture systems with isolated human immune cells and target pathogens

    • Time-course experiments capturing GNLY release kinetics

    • Selective GNLY neutralization using specific antibodies

    • GNLY gene knockout/knockdown in immune cell lines using CRISPR-Cas9

  • Ex vivo approaches:

    • Human tissue explants challenged with pathogens

    • Imaging to visualize GNLY localization during immune responses

    • Cytotoxicity assays with GNLY-depleted vs. control immune cells

  • Controls and validation:

    • Include isotype control antibodies for neutralization studies

    • Compare effects with other granule components (perforin, granzymes)

    • Validate findings across multiple donor samples to account for genetic variability

Methodologically, researchers must consider the temporal dynamics of GNLY expression and release, which typically peaks 3-5 days after T cell activation, unlike the more rapid release of perforin and granzymes .

What approaches can resolve contradictory findings about GNLY function in different human disease contexts?

Contradictory findings regarding GNLY function across disease contexts often stem from methodological differences, contextual factors, and complex biology. A systematic approach to resolve these contradictions includes:

Resolution Strategies:

  • Meta-analysis of methodologies:

    • Create comprehensive tables comparing experimental approaches across studies

    • Identify variables in sample processing, timing, and measurement techniques

    • Analyze statistical methods used for potential biases

  • Unified experimental framework:

    • Develop standardized protocols for GNLY functional assays

    • Test hypotheses across multiple human donor samples and disease models

    • Control for genetic variations in GNLY and related pathways

  • Systems biology approaches:

    • Integrate transcriptomic, proteomic, and functional data

    • Model context-dependent GNLY activities based on microenvironment

    • Consider temporal dynamics and concentration-dependent effects

Example Contradiction Resolution Table:

Contradictory FindingPotential Methodological ExplanationResolution Approach
GNLY protective vs. pathological in skin diseasesDifferences in disease stage samplingTime-course studies with consistent markers
Variable antimicrobial activitypH differences in experimental conditionsStandardized pH controls across experiments
Conflicting clinical correlationsPatient population heterogeneityGenetic analysis and stratification

This systematic approach aligns with best practices in human subjects research, ensuring that apparent contradictions are addressed through rigorous methodology rather than dismissed .

What are the optimal cell culture systems for studying GNLY expression and function in human immune cells?

Selecting appropriate cell culture systems is critical for studying human GNLY. The following systems have proven most valuable for different research questions:

Primary Cell Systems:

  • Freshly isolated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)

  • Purified NK cells from peripheral blood

  • Expanded CTLs from human donors

  • Tissue-resident lymphocyte cultures

Cell Lines:

Cell LineOriginGNLY ExpressionBest Applications
YTNK leukemiaConstitutiveMechanism studies
NKLNK leukemiaInducibleRegulation studies
TALL-104T cell leukemiaHighCytotoxicity assays
JurkatT cell leukemiaLow/InducibleGenetic manipulation

3D Culture Systems:

  • Organoid cultures incorporating immune components

  • Tissue explant systems maintaining native architecture

  • Microfluidic "organ-on-chip" platforms

Methodologically, researchers should consider the limitations of each system. Primary cells maintain physiological relevance but have donor variability, while cell lines offer consistency but may not recapitulate all aspects of normal GNLY biology. The choice should align with specific research questions .

How can researchers effectively measure GNLY-mediated cytotoxicity in experimental systems?

Measuring GNLY-mediated cytotoxicity requires specialized approaches due to its unique mechanisms distinct from perforin/granzyme pathways:

Recommended Assays:

  • Direct microbial killing assays:

    • Colony-forming unit (CFU) reduction assays with purified GNLY

    • Live/dead bacterial staining with membrane permeability indicators

    • Time-lapse microscopy capturing microbial membrane disruption

  • Target cell cytotoxicity:

    • Flow cytometry-based assays with Annexin V/PI staining

    • LDH release assays for membrane permeabilization

    • Caspase activation assays to distinguish apoptotic mechanisms

    • Calcium flux measurements for early membrane effects

  • Selective GNLY contribution assessment:

    • GNLY neutralization with specific antibodies

    • Comparison with perforin-deficient systems

    • Dose-response studies with recombinant GNLY

Critical Controls:

  • Heat-inactivated GNLY (56°C for 30 minutes)

  • Isotype control antibodies for neutralization studies

  • Target cells resistant to GNLY (modified membrane composition)

Methodologically, researchers should recognize that GNLY effects may be synergistic with other cytotoxic molecules, necessitating careful experimental design to isolate its specific contribution .

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing GNLY expression data across human populations?

GNLY expression exhibits significant variability across human populations, requiring robust statistical approaches:

Recommended Statistical Methods:

  • For population-level studies:

    • Mixed-effects models to account for both fixed and random effects

    • Bayesian hierarchical models for nested data structures

    • Meta-analysis techniques for combining multiple dataset findings

  • For expression correlation studies:

    • Multivariate regression models controlling for covariates

    • Principal component analysis to identify expression patterns

    • Network analysis for gene-gene interaction effects

  • For disease association studies:

    • Survival analysis (Cox proportional hazards) for outcome predictions

    • ROC curve analysis for biomarker potential assessment

    • Classification algorithms for patient stratification

Sample Size Considerations:
Based on observed variability in GNLY expression, power analyses typically indicate requirements of:

  • 50-100 samples for basic expression comparisons

  • 200+ samples for genetic association studies

  • 500+ samples for robust biomarker validation

When analyzing GNLY data, researchers should account for age, sex, ethnicity, and underlying inflammatory status as potential confounding variables .

How does GNLY expression correlate with outcomes in human inflammatory and infectious diseases?

GNLY has emerged as a significant biomarker across multiple human disease contexts, with complex correlations to clinical outcomes:

Disease Correlations:

Disease CategoryGNLY Expression PatternOutcome CorrelationEvidence Quality
TuberculosisIncreased in peripheral bloodPositive (protective)Strong
Viral hepatitisElevated in liver-infiltrating lymphocytesMixed (protective/pathological)Moderate
PsoriasisHighly expressed in skin lesionsNegative (pathological)Strong
Graft-vs-host diseaseElevated in affected tissuesNegative (severity marker)Strong
Cancer (various)Reduced in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytesPositive (higher expression = better outcomes)Moderate

Methodologically, researchers studying GNLY in disease contexts should:

  • Define precise tissue compartments for measurement

  • Establish standardized quantification methods

  • Integrate with other immune markers for comprehensive profiling

  • Account for treatment effects on expression patterns

The correlation patterns suggest GNLY functions in a context-dependent manner, requiring nuanced interpretation in different disease settings .

What approaches have been validated for targeting GNLY therapeutically in human disease models?

Therapeutic approaches targeting GNLY are in early developmental stages, with several strategies showing promise:

Current Therapeutic Strategies:

  • Augmentation approaches (for infectious diseases):

    • Recombinant GNLY administration

    • GNLY expression-enhancing cytokine treatments (IL-15, IL-21)

    • Modified cell therapies with enhanced GNLY expression

  • Inhibition approaches (for inflammatory conditions):

    • Anti-GNLY neutralizing antibodies

    • Small molecule inhibitors of GNLY membrane interaction

    • Targeted reduction of GNLY-expressing cells

  • Biomarker utilization:

    • GNLY levels for patient stratification

    • Monitoring GNLY as treatment response indicator

    • Combination with other immune markers for personalized approaches

Methodological Considerations:

  • In vitro validation should precede complex disease models

  • Humanized mouse models provide valuable translational insights

  • Ex vivo human tissue systems offer physiologically relevant testing platforms

  • Dosing and delivery must account for GNLY's primarily intracellular localization

These therapeutic approaches respect ethical considerations in human subjects research while focusing on mechanism-based interventions rather than empirical approaches .

How can researchers reconcile the dual role of GNLY in protection versus pathology in human diseases?

GNLY exhibits a dichotomous role across different disease contexts, functioning as both protective and pathological. Reconciling these seemingly contradictory functions requires sophisticated interpretation frameworks:

Mechanistic Basis for Dual Roles:

  • Concentration-dependent effects:

    • Low concentrations: Targeted antimicrobial activity

    • High concentrations: Broader cytotoxicity affecting host cells

  • Cellular context variations:

    • Direct antimicrobial activity (protective)

    • Pro-inflammatory signaling (potentially pathological)

    • Lipid interaction effects varying by tissue

  • Temporal dynamics:

    • Early response benefits (pathogen clearance)

    • Chronic response detriments (tissue damage)

Reconciliation Framework:

  • Map GNLY function across a spectrum of concentrations and contexts

  • Create integrated models incorporating temporal dynamics

  • Develop tissue-specific paradigms for GNLY function

  • Consider evolutionary perspectives on maintained dual functionality

This balanced approach allows researchers to develop more nuanced hypotheses that account for GNLY's complex biology rather than forcing reductionist interpretations .

What methodological differences might explain disparate results in human GNLY functional studies?

Disparate findings in GNLY research often stem from specific methodological variables that researchers should systematically consider:

Critical Methodological Variables:

Variable CategorySpecific FactorsImpact on Results
Sample processingTime from collection to analysisAltered GNLY stability/function
Freeze-thaw cyclesProtein degradation
Fixation methodsEpitope masking
Experimental conditionspH of assay systemsDramatic changes in activity
Calcium concentrationAffects membrane interactions
Presence of serum proteinsInhibition of activity
Measurement approachesAntibody clone selectionEpitope-specific detection bias
Recombinant vs. native proteinStructural/functional differences
Single-cell vs. bulk analysisPopulation heterogeneity masking

Standardization Recommendations:

  • Develop consensus protocols for GNLY functional assays

  • Report detailed methodological parameters in publications

  • Include cross-validation using multiple methodological approaches

  • Consider multi-laboratory validation for key findings

By addressing these methodological variables, researchers can better interpret seemingly contradictory results and build a more coherent understanding of GNLY biology .

What emerging technologies will advance our understanding of GNLY biology in human health and disease?

Several cutting-edge technologies are poised to transform GNLY research in the coming years:

Emerging Methodological Approaches:

  • Single-cell multi-omics:

    • Integrated analysis of GNLY at transcriptomic, proteomic, and functional levels

    • Spatial transcriptomics to map GNLY expression in tissue context

    • Single-cell proteomics for accurate protein quantification

  • Advanced imaging techniques:

    • Super-resolution microscopy for visualizing GNLY trafficking

    • Intravital imaging to capture real-time GNLY function in tissues

    • Correlative light-electron microscopy for structural-functional relationships

  • Systems biology approaches:

    • Network analysis of GNLY interactions

    • Computational modeling of concentration-dependent effects

    • Machine learning for pattern identification across datasets

  • Humanized model systems:

    • Improved humanized mouse models expressing human GNLY

    • Organoid systems incorporating immune components

    • Microfluidic "disease-on-chip" platforms

These technologies will collectively enable researchers to address key knowledge gaps, including the precise mechanisms of GNLY's selective toxicity, its role in maintaining immune homeostasis, and its potential as a therapeutic target .

How should researchers design studies to evaluate GNLY as a biomarker in personalized medicine approaches?

Development of GNLY as a clinically relevant biomarker requires rigorous methodological approaches:

Biomarker Validation Framework:

  • Discovery phase:

    • Cross-sectional studies establishing baseline variations

    • Correlation with existing disease markers

    • Initial outcome association in retrospective cohorts

  • Validation phase:

    • Prospective longitudinal cohort studies

    • Determination of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values

    • Establishment of clinically meaningful cutoff values

  • Implementation considerations:

    • Standardization of measurement methods

    • Development of point-of-care testing

    • Integration with other biomarkers into algorithmic approaches

Study Design Requirements:

  • Adequate sample size based on power calculations

  • Careful phenotyping of study populations

  • Consideration of genetic and environmental variables

  • Appropriate temporal sampling to capture disease dynamics

These methodologically rigorous approaches ensure that GNLY biomarker development adheres to the highest standards of human subjects research while generating clinically actionable data .

Product Science Overview

Introduction

Granulysin, also known as NKG5 or Lymphokine LAG-2, is a member of the saposin-like protein (SAPLIP) family of membrane-disrupting proteins . It is expressed in the granules of natural killer (NK) cells and activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) . Granulysin exhibits cytolytic activity against a variety of intracellular microbes and tumors, either alone or in synergy with perforin .

Structure and Forms

Granulysin is initially synthesized as a 15 kDa protein, which is subsequently processed to an active 9 kDa form . The protein is characterized by its ability to disrupt microbial membranes, leading to cell lysis . The recombinant form of granulysin is produced in various expression systems, including bacterial and mammalian cells, to ensure proper folding and post-translational modifications .

Expression and Regulation

The expression of granulysin is tightly regulated at multiple levels, including transcription, alternative splicing, and post-translational processing . In activated lymphocytes, granulysin expression is upregulated in response to cytokines such as interleukin-2 (IL-2) and bacterial antigens . The gene encoding granulysin undergoes extensive alternative splicing, resulting in multiple transcripts, although only a single protein product is typically observed .

Biological Functions

Granulysin plays a crucial role in the immune response by targeting and destroying tumor cells, virus-infected cells, and intracellular pathogens . It is known to induce apoptosis in target cells through the activation of various intracellular pathways . Additionally, granulysin has antimicrobial properties, making it effective against a wide range of bacteria, fungi, and parasites .

Applications in Research and Medicine

Recombinant granulysin is widely used in research to study its role in immune responses and its potential therapeutic applications . It has been investigated for its ability to enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies and as a potential treatment for infectious diseases . The recombinant protein is also used in various assays to evaluate its cytolytic activity and to identify potential inhibitors or enhancers of its function .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2024 Thebiotek. All Rights Reserved.