GRIA2 encodes the GluR2 subunit of AMPA receptors, which mediate fast excitatory neurotransmission in the brain . These receptors are calcium-impermeable when edited post-transcriptionally, a process vital for neuroprotection . GRIA2 antibodies target specific epitopes of this subunit, facilitating its detection in tissues and cells.
Below is a comparative table of widely used GRIA2 antibodies:
L21/32: Targets the cytoplasmic C-terminus (amino acids 834–883) and shows no cross-reactivity with other AMPA receptor subunits .
CAB11316: Validated for studying GluR2 dysregulation in neurological disorders .
PB9205: A premium antibody with high specificity, validated in paraffin-embedded and frozen tissues .
A 2012 study analyzed GRIA2 expression in 48 advanced ovarian serous adenocarcinoma specimens :
| Parameter | GRIA2-Positive (n=6) | GRIA2-Negative (n=42) | Significance (P-value) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-Year Survival Rate | 83% | 24% | <0.001 |
| Progression-Free Survival | 28 months | 12 months | 0.026 |
Mechanistic Insight: siRNA-mediated GRIA2 knockdown in ovarian cancer cells (SKOV3, HeyA8) increased cell survival by 10–13% .
Clinical Relevance: GRIA2 expression correlated with improved survival, independent of age, stage, or residual tumor .
Synaptic Plasticity: GRIA2 overexpression enhances dendritic spine density in hippocampal neurons .
Antibody Validation: Boster Bio’s PB9205 antibody demonstrated strong membranous staining in brain tissues (Figure 2–7) .
GRIA2 antibodies are indispensable for elucidating the subunit’s role in both normal physiology and disease:
Cancer Research: GRIA2’s inverse correlation with chemoresistance highlights its potential as a prognostic biomarker .
Neuroscience: Antibodies like PB9205 enable precise localization of GRIA2 in brain tissues, aiding studies on excitotoxicity and synaptic remodeling .
GRIA2 (Glutamate Receptor, Ionotropic, AMPA 2) is a critical subunit of AMPA-type glutamate receptors that functions as a ligand-gated ion channel in the central nervous system. In humans, the canonical protein has 883 amino acid residues with a molecular weight of approximately 98.8 kDa, though it is typically observed at around 110 kDa in Western blot applications . GRIA2 plays a crucial role in determining the calcium permeability of AMPA receptors through RNA editing at the Q/R site, which occurs with ~99% efficiency in the healthy brain .
The importance of GRIA2 in neuroscience stems from several key factors:
It undergoes RNA editing that dramatically alters channel properties
Its overexpression increases dendritic spine size and density in hippocampal neurons, and remarkably, can induce spine formation in GABA-releasing interneurons that normally lack spines
It plays a major role in depression at synapses where glutamate remains in the synaptic cleft for prolonged periods
Dysregulation of GRIA2 has been implicated in various neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's disease
GRIA2 is predominantly expressed in the hippocampus, cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and caudate, making it an essential target for studying various brain functions and pathologies .
Selecting the appropriate GRIA2 antibody requires consideration of multiple factors depending on your experimental objectives:
Application compatibility:
Different antibodies are optimized for specific applications. For example, the Boster Bio Anti-GRIA2 Antibody (PB9205) is validated for Flow Cytometry, IF, IHC, IHC-F, ICC, and WB applications , while other antibodies may have more limited validated applications.
Target specificity and epitope:
Consider which region of GRIA2 you need to target. Antibodies are available that recognize:
Host species and clonality:
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies often provide stronger signals across multiple applications
Mouse monoclonal antibodies offer higher specificity for particular epitopes
Reactivity with species of interest:
Confirm that the antibody reacts with your experimental species. Many GRIA2 antibodies react with human, mouse, and rat samples , but some also cross-react with other species like zebrafish, cow, guinea pig, and horse .
Experimental validation:
Review validation images for your intended application. High-quality antibodies should provide clear evidence of specificity in multiple applications, as demonstrated in the validation gallery for antibodies like PB9205 .
For optimal Western blot detection of GRIA2, follow these methodological guidelines based on validated protocols:
Sample preparation:
Use appropriate tissue sources: rat or mouse brain tissue lysates show strong GRIA2 expression
Load approximately 50μg of protein per lane under reducing conditions
Gel electrophoresis parameters:
Use 5-20% SDS-PAGE gradient gels for optimal separation
Run at 70V (stacking gel) followed by 90V (resolving gel) for 2-3 hours
Transfer conditions:
Transfer proteins to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150mA for 50-90 minutes
Block with 5% non-fat milk in TBS for 1.5 hours at room temperature
Antibody incubation:
Primary antibody: Incubate with rabbit anti-GRIA2 antibody at 0.5 μg/mL overnight at 4°C
Washing: TBS-0.1% Tween, 3 times, 5 minutes each
Secondary antibody: Use goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (1:10,000 dilution) for 1.5 hours at room temperature
Detection and expected results:
Develop using an enhanced chemiluminescent detection (ECL) kit
Expect to visualize GRIA2 at approximately 110 kDa, though the calculated molecular weight is approximately 98.8 kDa
A specific band should be detected for GRIA2, with minimal background when using high-quality antibodies
Recommended positive controls for GRIA2 antibody validation vary by application:
For Western blot:
For Immunohistochemistry:
For Immunocytochemistry/Immunofluorescence:
For Flow Cytometry:
When conducting validation experiments, include appropriate negative controls such as isotype-matched control antibodies. For example, in flow cytometry analysis of U-87MG cells, rabbit IgG can serve as an isotype control, and unlabelled samples without primary or secondary antibody incubation should be included as blank controls .
Non-specific binding and weak signals are common challenges when working with GRIA2 antibodies. Here are methodological approaches to address these issues:
For weak signals:
Increase antibody concentration incrementally (e.g., from 0.1μg/ml to 0.5μg/ml for Western blot)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C is often optimal)
Optimize antigen retrieval methods for IHC applications (heat-mediated antigen retrieval in citrate buffer, pH6, for 20 minutes is effective for many GRIA2 antibodies)
Ensure sample preparation preserves protein integrity by using fresh tissues and appropriate protease inhibitors
For non-specific binding:
Increase blocking time or concentration (5% non-fat milk in TBS for 1.5 hours has been validated)
Implement more stringent washing procedures (e.g., increase number of washes or duration)
Pre-absorb antibody with recombinant protein if cross-reactivity is suspected
For immunofluorescence, use appropriate filters and counterstains (DAPI for nuclei) to distinguish true signal from background
Application-specific troubleshooting:
For flow cytometry: Ensure proper cell fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde and effective permeabilization before antibody incubation
For IHC: Block endogenous peroxidase activity and use species-appropriate blocking sera (e.g., 10% goat serum)
For Western blot: Verify transfer efficiency with reversible protein stains before antibody incubation
Distinguishing between edited (R) and unedited (Q) forms of GRIA2 requires combined immunological and molecular approaches, as standard antibodies cannot differentiate these forms based on a single amino acid change.
Molecular approaches:
RT-PCR followed by restriction enzyme digestion with BbvI can effectively distinguish between edited and unedited transcripts
Design PCR primers around the Q/R site (position 607 of the Gria2 gene where the CAG codon is edited to CGG)
Genetic approaches:
Engineered mouse models with the 'edited' arginine codon (CGG) replacing the unedited glutamine codon (CAG) at position 607 serve as valuable controls
These models can be crossbred with disease models (e.g., J20 mouse model of AD) to study the impact of eliminating unedited GluA2(Q) expression on pathology
Combined immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry:
Use standard GRIA2 antibodies to immunoprecipitate the protein
Analyze the Q/R site by mass spectrometry to quantify edited versus unedited forms
Experimental design considerations:
RNA editing at the Q/R site occurs with ~99% efficiency in the healthy brain, making detection of unedited forms challenging without highly sensitive methods
In disease states, editing efficiency may decrease, potentially allowing detection of the unedited form
Always include appropriate controls to validate your detection method
Studying GRIA2 trafficking and surface expression requires specialized techniques that can differentiate between intracellular pools and surface-expressed receptors:
Surface biotinylation assays:
Label surface proteins with membrane-impermeable biotin reagents
Isolate biotinylated proteins with streptavidin pulldown
Detect GRIA2 in biotinylated fractions (surface) versus total lysates by Western blot
Quantify the surface/total ratio to assess trafficking changes
Differential immunostaining approaches:
Surface staining: Perform live-cell immunolabeling using antibodies against extracellular GRIA2 domains
After fixation and permeabilization, stain for total GRIA2 with a different fluorophore
Use confocal microscopy to quantify surface/total ratios and receptor distribution
Subcellular fractionation:
Isolate different membrane fractions (e.g., plasma membrane, endosomes, ER)
Analyze GRIA2 distribution across these fractions by Western blot
For precise localization, combine with immuno-electron microscopy
Flow cytometry for quantitative assessment:
Use non-permeabilized cells to detect surface GRIA2
After permeabilization, detect total GRIA2 population
This approach allows quantification across large cell populations
Immunofluorescence microscopy optimization:
Use antibodies validated for immunofluorescence (e.g., antibodies that show clear membrane localization in validated images)
Counterstain with markers for specific subcellular compartments
Apply super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization studies
Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) with GRIA2 antibodies requires careful optimization to study protein-protein interactions:
Antibody selection:
Choose antibodies validated for immunoprecipitation applications
Consider epitope location: antibodies targeting exposed regions (like N-terminal domains) often perform better in co-IP
Both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies can work, but monoclonals often provide cleaner results
Sample preparation:
Use mild lysis conditions (non-ionic detergents like NP-40 or Triton X-100 at 0.5-1%)
Include protease and phosphatase inhibitors to preserve protein complexes
Pre-clear lysates with appropriate control beads to reduce non-specific binding
IP protocol optimization:
Antibody amount: Typically 2-5μg per mg of total protein
Incubation time: Overnight at 4°C for optimal antigen capture
Bead selection: Protein A beads work well for rabbit antibodies
Washing stringency: Balance between removing non-specific binding and preserving interactions
Controls to include:
Input control (pre-IP lysate)
Negative control IP (isotype-matched irrelevant antibody)
IgG-only control (no primary antibody)
Reverse co-IP when possible (IP with antibodies against the interacting partner)
Detection strategies:
Western blot for known or suspected interaction partners
Mass spectrometry for unbiased discovery of novel interactions
Consider using cross-linking approaches for transient interactions
Developmental studies of GRIA2 require special considerations due to the changing expression and editing patterns of GRIA2 throughout development:
Developmental RNA editing profiles:
The Q/R site of GRIA2 is efficiently edited even at early embryonic stages (unlike other glutamate receptors like GRIK1 and GRIK2)
In contrast, editing at the Q/R sites of GRIK1 and GRIK2 increases from embryonic day 15 (E15) to postnatal day 21 (P21)
These developmental changes should be considered when interpreting antibody-based studies
Antibody selection for developmental studies:
Choose antibodies that recognize conserved regions of GRIA2 that aren't affected by developmental modifications
Verify antibody performance across developmental stages with appropriate controls
Consider whether the antibody recognizes precursor or mature forms of the protein
Tissue-specific considerations:
GRIA2 expression shows different developmental trajectories in different brain regions
Document exact ages and regions when reporting developmental studies
Include age-matched controls when comparing disease models
Methodological adaptations:
Adjust protein loading amounts as GRIA2 expression levels change during development
Optimize fixation protocols for developmental tissue (embryonic tissue often requires gentler fixation)
Consider using fluorescent labeling approaches that allow for quantitative analysis of expression changes
GRIA2 antibodies are valuable tools for investigating the role of this receptor in neurological disorders through multiple methodological approaches:
Expression and localization studies:
Compare GRIA2 levels and distribution in brain regions relevant to specific disorders using validated antibodies for IHC and Western blot
Analyze post-mortem tissue from patients with neurological disorders compared to age-matched controls
Examine potential alterations in subcellular localization (synaptic vs. extrasynaptic)
Disease model investigations:
Use GRIA2 antibodies to assess receptor alterations in transgenic models of neurological disorders
Example: Crossbreed mice expressing only edited GRIA2(R) with J20 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease to study the impact on disease progression
Combine antibody-based detection with behavioral, electrophysiological, and molecular studies
RNA editing analysis in disease states:
Investigate potential alterations in Q/R site editing efficiency in disease models
Correlate editing changes with receptor protein levels and distribution
Combine immunodetection with molecular analyses of editing status
Methodological workflow:
Initial screening via Western blot to quantify total GRIA2 levels in disease models
Immunohistochemistry to map regional and cellular distribution changes
Co-localization studies with disease-specific markers (e.g., amyloid plaques, phosphorylated tau)
Functional correlation through electrophysiology and behavioral testing
Intervention studies to determine if normalizing GRIA2 function affects disease progression
Therapeutic target validation:
Monitor GRIA2 changes following experimental therapeutic interventions
Use antibodies to track receptor trafficking, phosphorylation, or expression changes in response to treatment
Correlate molecular changes with functional outcomes