The GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin Conjugated, is a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against the recombinant human GTPBP1 protein (amino acids 562–669). Key features include:
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Host/Isotype | Rabbit / IgG (polyclonal) |
| Immunogen | Recombinant human GTPBP1 (562–669 AA) |
| Purification Method | Protein G affinity chromatography |
| Conjugate | Biotin |
| Reactivity | Human-specific |
| Form | Liquid |
| Storage Buffer | 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4, 0.03% Proclin 300 |
This antibody is optimized for ELISA applications, leveraging biotin-streptavidin interactions to amplify signal detection.
| Application | Details |
|---|---|
| ELISA | Validated for immunoassays requiring high sensitivity and specificity. |
| Research Use | Investigates GTPBP1’s role in ribosome dynamics, neuronal survival, and translation fidelity. |
GTPBP1 resolves ribosome stalling at AGA codons during translation elongation, particularly under arginine tRNA deficiency. This function is critical for maintaining neuronal protein synthesis and preventing neurodegeneration .
Ribosome Pausing:
Neuronal Survival:
Tissue-Specific Expression:
The biotin-conjugated variant is tailored for ELISA, while unconjugated antibodies offer broader utility in western blot and immunoprecipitation.
Optimization:
Dilution and blocking conditions must be titrated to minimize nonspecific binding.
Cross-Reactivity:
Human-specific reactivity ensures reduced interference in xenograft models or interspecies studies.
Complementary Tools:
Pair with streptavidin-HRP or streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase for ELISA signal amplification.
GTPBP1 (GTP binding protein 1) is a translational GTPase that plays a crucial role in resolving paused ribosomes during translation, particularly when tRNA deficiency occurs. It functions as a specialized ribosome rescue factor that prevents stalling at specific codons, such as AGA codons. GTPBP1 is essential for maintaining neuronal homeostasis and survival, as loss of GTPBP1 during tRNA deficiency leads to codon-specific ribosome pausing, which can trigger neurodegeneration . GTPBP1 is widely expressed throughout the brain and in many other tissues, and its expression pattern overlaps with GTPBP2, a structurally related trGTPase, suggesting possible functional redundancy between these proteins in some cell types .
The GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated is a polyclonal antibody raised in rabbits against recombinant human GTP-binding protein 1 (specifically amino acids 562-669) . Its specifications include:
| Property | Specification |
|---|---|
| Host Species | Rabbit |
| Clonality | Polyclonal |
| Isotype | IgG |
| Conjugate | Biotin |
| Species Reactivity | Human |
| Applications | ELISA |
| Immunogen | Recombinant Human GTP-binding protein 1 protein (562-669AA) |
| Buffer | 0.03% Proclin 300, 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4 |
| Form | Liquid |
| Purification Method | Protein G purified, >95% purity |
| Storage Conditions | Store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles |
This antibody is particularly useful for research in signal transduction pathways involving GTPBP1 .
GTPBP1 functions as a specialized rescue factor for ribosomes that have paused during translation, particularly at specific codons such as AGA. When tRNA availability is limited, ribosomes can stall at these codons, leading to translational arrest. GTPBP1 resolves these paused ribosomes, allowing translation to continue efficiently.
Ribosome profiling studies have demonstrated that in GTPBP1-deficient mice (B6J.Gtpbp1-/-), there is a dramatic increase in ribosome occupancy specifically at AGA codons when they are in the A-site of the ribosome . This indicates that GTPBP1 normally functions to prevent or resolve ribosome stalling at these sites. Similar pausing patterns are observed in GTPBP2-deficient mice, and approximately 50% of the pausing genes are shared between these two models, suggesting overlapping but distinct functions for these related GTPases .
For ELISA applications using the GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated, researchers should follow these methodological guidelines:
Sample Preparation:
Prepare protein samples from human tissues or cell lines.
Use appropriate lysis buffers that maintain protein integrity while ensuring antigen accessibility.
ELISA Protocol:
Coat plates with capture antibody or antigen depending on the ELISA format.
When using as a detection antibody, apply the biotin-conjugated GTPBP1 antibody at an optimized dilution.
Use streptavidin-HRP for detection of the biotin conjugate.
Perform appropriate washing steps between each stage.
Develop with a suitable substrate and measure absorbance.
Optimization Considerations:
The antibody's specific binding characteristics may require titration in each testing system to obtain optimal results .
Starting dilution range should be determined empirically, but typical ranges for biotin-conjugated antibodies in ELISA are 1:500-1:5000.
Include appropriate positive and negative controls to validate results.
While this antibody is specifically validated for ELISA, researchers interested in other applications should perform validation studies before proceeding with full-scale experiments.
To validate the specificity of the GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated in your experimental system, consider implementing the following methodological approaches:
Positive Control Validation:
Negative Control Validation:
Use GTPBP1 knockout or knockdown samples as negative controls.
Test on species not expected to cross-react based on sequence homology analysis.
Antigen Competition Assay:
Pre-incubate the antibody with recombinant GTPBP1 protein (preferably the immunogen fragment 562-669AA) before application.
A reduction in signal indicates specific binding to the target protein.
Molecular Weight Verification:
Epitope Mapping:
Consider testing the antibody against truncated versions of GTPBP1 to confirm the specific epitope recognition.
Cross-Reactivity Assessment:
Test against closely related proteins like GTPBP2 to ensure specificity.
Validation is particularly important when applying this antibody to novel experimental systems or when adapting it for applications beyond ELISA.
Optimizing signal-to-noise ratio when using biotinylated antibodies requires attention to several methodological aspects:
Blocking Optimization:
Use appropriate blocking reagents that minimize non-specific binding while preserving specific interactions.
Consider testing different blocking agents (BSA, milk, commercial blockers) to identify the optimal solution for your system.
Be aware that some samples may contain endogenous biotin, which could interfere with detection. In such cases, employ avidin/biotin blocking kits before applying the biotinylated antibody.
Antibody Dilution Optimization:
Perform titration experiments to determine the optimal concentration of GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated.
The optimal dilution will provide maximum specific signal with minimal background.
Remember that "it is recommended that this reagent should be titrated in each testing system to obtain optimal results" .
Washing Protocol Refinement:
Implement stringent washing steps to remove unbound antibody.
Consider using detergents like Tween-20 at appropriate concentrations in wash buffers.
Optimize wash duration and number of washes based on empirical testing.
Detection System Optimization:
Select high-quality streptavidin-conjugated detection reagents.
Consider using enhanced sensitivity detection systems for low-abundance targets.
For fluorescent applications, choose fluorophores with spectral properties that minimize autofluorescence interference.
Sample Preparation Considerations:
Ensure complete solubilization and denaturation of proteins if required.
Remove potential interfering compounds through appropriate purification methods.
For cell or tissue samples, optimize fixation conditions to maintain antigen integrity while allowing antibody access.
These strategies should be systematically evaluated to determine the optimal conditions for your specific experimental system.
The GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated can be a valuable tool for investigating ribosome pausing mechanisms through several advanced methodological approaches:
Immunoprecipitation-Based Ribosome Isolation:
Use the biotinylated antibody to selectively capture GTPBP1-associated ribosome complexes.
Analyze the captured complexes to identify paused ribosomes and associated factors.
This approach can help elucidate the molecular interactions occurring at paused ribosomes.
Integration with Ribosome Profiling Studies:
Correlate GTPBP1 binding sites (identified using the antibody) with ribosome pause sites (identified through ribosome profiling).
Research has shown that loss of GTPBP1 leads to dramatic increases in ribosome occupancy specifically at AGA codons in the A-site of the ribosome .
Analysis can identify whether GTPBP1 preferentially associates with specific types of paused ribosomes.
Investigation of Stress Response Activation:
Tissue-Specific Analysis:
Given that GTPBP1 expression occurs in both neurons that degenerate in GTPBP2-deficient mice and those that do not , use the antibody to investigate tissue-specific differences in GTPBP1 function.
Combine with tissue-specific markers to correlate GTPBP1 levels with cellular vulnerability to translational stress.
Functional Recovery Experiments:
In GTPBP1-deficient models, use the antibody to confirm successful reintroduction of GTPBP1 in rescue experiments.
Monitor changes in ribosome pausing patterns following GTPBP1 restoration.
These advanced applications leverage the specificity of the GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated to study the complex mechanisms of ribosome pausing and rescue in various experimental contexts.
Investigating the functional relationship between GTPBP1 and GTPBP2 requires sophisticated methodological approaches that can leverage antibody-based techniques:
Co-Immunoprecipitation Studies:
Use biotinylated GTPBP1 antibody to pull down GTPBP1 complexes.
Analyze these complexes for the presence of GTPBP2 to determine if they interact directly or exist in the same protein complexes.
This is particularly relevant given the potential functional redundancy suggested by their overlapping expression patterns in neurons .
Sequential Immunoprecipitation:
Perform a first immunoprecipitation with anti-GTPBP1.
Release the complexes and perform a second immunoprecipitation with anti-GTPBP2.
This approach can identify complexes containing both proteins.
Comparative Target Analysis:
Use the GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated to identify GTPBP1-associated mRNAs or ribosomes.
Compare these with GTPBP2-associated targets identified using similar approaches.
Analyze the overlap to understand shared and distinct functions.
Research has shown that approximately 50% of pausing genes are shared between GTPBP1 and GTPBP2 deficient mice , suggesting both common and distinct targets.
Spatial-Temporal Expression Analysis:
Conditional Knockout Compensation Studies:
In conditional knockout systems, use the antibody to quantify GTPBP1 expression changes in GTPBP2-deficient tissues, and vice versa.
This can reveal compensatory expression mechanisms that may explain the functional redundancy in some neuronal populations.
These methodologies can provide comprehensive insights into how these two related trGTPases function together and independently in ribosome rescue mechanisms.
Investigating GTPBP1's role in the Integrated Stress Response (ISR) pathway using the GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated requires several sophisticated methodological approaches:
Stress-Induced Translocation Studies:
Track GTPBP1 localization changes following ISR activation using cellular fractionation followed by immunoprecipitation with the biotinylated antibody.
Compare GTPBP1 distribution in normal versus stress conditions (e.g., tRNA deficiency, oxidative stress).
Research has shown that loss of GTPBP1 activates the ISR, as evidenced by increased phosphorylated eIF2α (p-eIF2α S51) levels .
Co-Immunoprecipitation with ISR Components:
Use the biotinylated GTPBP1 antibody to pull down GTPBP1 protein complexes.
Analyze these complexes for the presence of key ISR components such as:
Phosphorylated eIF2α
eIF2B subunits
ATF4
Other stress-response factors
Temporal Analysis During Stress Response:
Cell-Type Specific ISR Activation Analysis:
Pharmacological Modulation Studies:
Ribosome Association During Stress:
Examine GTPBP1 association with stalled ribosomes during stress conditions.
Compare the profile of GTPBP1-associated mRNAs during normal versus stress conditions.
These methodological approaches can help elucidate the mechanistic relationship between GTPBP1 function and the activation of the Integrated Stress Response pathway in various cellular contexts.
When working with GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated, researchers may encounter several technical challenges that require specific troubleshooting approaches:
High Background Signal Issues:
Challenge: Excessive non-specific binding leading to high background.
Solution: Optimize blocking conditions by testing different blocking agents (BSA, milk, commercial blockers) at various concentrations. For tissues or cells with high endogenous biotin, use an avidin/biotin blocking kit before antibody application.
Methodological Approach: Implement a stepwise optimization of your blocking protocol, systematically testing each variable while keeping others constant.
Antibody Degradation and Loss of Activity:
Challenge: Diminished signal over time due to antibody degradation.
Solution: Store the antibody as recommended at -20°C or -80°C and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles . Consider aliquoting the stock solution upon receipt.
Methodological Approach: Monitor antibody performance over time using a standardized positive control to detect any loss of activity.
Interference from Endogenous Biotin:
Challenge: False positive signals due to endogenous biotin in samples.
Solution: Implement an avidin/biotin blocking step prior to antibody application.
Methodological Approach: Compare signal from samples with and without avidin/biotin blocking to quantify the contribution of endogenous biotin to your signal.
Cross-Reactivity with Related Proteins:
Challenge: Signal may represent detection of the related protein GTPBP2 due to structural similarities.
Solution: Include appropriate controls such as GTPBP1-knockout samples or recombinant GTPBP1 competition assays.
Methodological Approach: Compare staining patterns with those obtained using a GTPBP2-specific antibody to identify potential cross-reactivity.
Buffer Compatibility Issues:
Challenge: The antibody's storage buffer (PBS with 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol, pH 7.3) may be incompatible with certain applications.
Solution: Consider buffer exchange if necessary, using methods that preserve antibody activity.
Methodological Approach: Test antibody performance after buffer exchange against the original formulation to ensure maintained activity.
Sample Preparation Variability:
Challenge: Inconsistent results across experiments due to sample preparation differences.
Solution: Standardize sample preparation protocols, including protein extraction methods, fixation procedures, and handling conditions.
Methodological Approach: Develop detailed SOPs for sample preparation and validate them using consistent positive controls.
These troubleshooting strategies should be implemented systematically, changing one variable at a time to identify the optimal conditions for your specific experimental system.
Proper storage and handling of GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated is crucial for maintaining its activity throughout the duration of research projects. Here are detailed methodological approaches for optimizing antibody stability:
Optimal Storage Temperature:
Store the antibody at the recommended temperature of -20°C or -80°C for long-term storage .
For short-term storage (1-2 weeks), 4°C may be acceptable but should be validated empirically.
Experimental Validation: Compare antibody activity after storage at different temperatures using a standardized ELISA protocol with consistent positive controls.
Aliquoting Strategy:
Upon receipt, prepare small single-use aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Recommended Protocol:
Use sterile microcentrifuge tubes for aliquoting
Work in a clean environment to avoid contamination
Prepare aliquot volumes based on typical experimental needs
Label tubes with antibody name, concentration, date, and lot number
Validation Method: Compare the activity of freshly thawed aliquots over time to assess the effectiveness of your aliquoting strategy.
Freeze-Thaw Management:
According to product specifications, "avoid repeated freeze" .
When thawing, do so rapidly at room temperature or in a 37°C water bath, but transfer to ice immediately after thawing.
Quantitative Assessment: Measure antibody activity after 0, 1, 3, and 5 freeze-thaw cycles to determine the impact on performance.
Temperature Transition Handling:
Allow the antibody to equilibrate to room temperature before opening to prevent condensation that could promote microbial growth or protein degradation.
Return to cold storage promptly after use.
Protocol Enhancement: Consider using cold blocks or ice baths during experimental setup to minimize time at room temperature.
Contamination Prevention:
Use sterile technique when handling the antibody.
Consider adding sterile-filtered preservatives if preparing working solutions for extended use.
The antibody contains 0.02% sodium azide , which helps prevent microbial growth, but additional precautions may be necessary for diluted solutions.
Monitoring Method: Periodically check for visible signs of contamination and validate antibody performance against fresh stocks.
Stability Enhancement for Working Solutions:
If preparing diluted working solutions, consider adding carrier proteins (e.g., BSA, 0.1-1%) to enhance stability.
For biotinylated antibodies, minimize exposure to strong light, which can affect the biotin conjugate.
Comparative Analysis: Test the stability of working solutions with and without carrier proteins at 4°C over defined time periods.
Quality Control Timeline:
Implement a regular testing schedule for antibody performance.
The manufacturer indicates stability for "one year after shipment" , but activity should be monitored periodically.
Systematic Approach: Develop a standardized quality control protocol and schedule for testing antibody activity throughout your research project.
By implementing these methodological approaches, researchers can maximize the longevity and consistent performance of GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated throughout their studies.
Designing experiments to investigate the relationship between GTPBP1 and neuronal survival using the GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated requires careful methodological planning:
Model System Selection and Validation:
Consideration: Choose appropriate neuronal models based on known GTPBP1 expression patterns.
Methodological Approach: Validate GTPBP1 expression in your model using the antibody before proceeding with functional studies. GTPBP1 is widely expressed throughout the brain, including in cerebellar granule cells, dentate gyrus granule cells, hippocampal pyramidal cells, and cortical neurons .
Validation Protocol: Perform immunostaining or protein expression analysis across different brain regions and neuronal subtypes to establish baseline expression patterns.
Stress Condition Optimization:
Consideration: GTPBP1 becomes critical for neuronal survival under conditions of tRNA deficiency .
Methodological Approach: Design experiments with appropriate stress conditions that induce ribosome pausing.
Implementation Strategy:
Induce tRNA deficiency using genetic models or inhibitors
Monitor AGA codon-specific ribosome pausing using ribosome profiling
Track GTPBP1 recruitment to stalled ribosomes using the biotinylated antibody
Integrated Stress Response (ISR) Monitoring:
Consideration: Loss of GTPBP1 activates the ISR in neurons .
Methodological Approach: Include markers of ISR activation when studying GTPBP1 function.
Recommended Protocol:
Monitor phosphorylated eIF2α (p-eIF2α S51) levels
Track expression of ATF4 target genes (Sesn2, Slc7a1, Chac1, and Ddr2)
Correlate these markers with GTPBP1 levels detected using the antibody
Cell-Type Specific Analysis:
Consideration: Different neuronal populations show varying sensitivity to GTPBP1 deficiency .
Methodological Approach: Design experiments that can distinguish cell-type specific responses.
Technical Implementation:
Combine the GTPBP1 antibody with markers for specific neuronal subtypes
Use single-cell approaches to correlate GTPBP1 levels with cellular stress responses
Consider selecting specific neuronal populations (e.g., cerebellar granule cells vs. hippocampal pyramidal cells) for comparative studies
Temporal Analysis of Neurodegeneration:
Consideration: Neurodegeneration in GTPBP1-deficient models follows specific temporal patterns.
Methodological Approach: Design time-course experiments to track changes in GTPBP1 levels, ISR activation, and neuronal viability.
Experimental Design:
Collect samples at multiple time points (e.g., P14, P21, P28, P42)
Track changes in GTPBP1 expression, localization, and associated protein complexes
Correlate these changes with markers of neuronal stress and degeneration
Functional Recovery Experiments:
Consideration: Rescue experiments can provide causative evidence for GTPBP1's role in neuronal survival.
Methodological Approach: Design experiments to restore GTPBP1 function in deficient models.
Potential Strategies:
GTPBP1-GTPBP2 Functional Redundancy Assessment:
Consideration: GTPBP1 and GTPBP2 show overlapping expression and may have redundant functions in some neuronal populations .
Methodological Approach: Design experiments to investigate compensation mechanisms.
Experimental Strategy:
Compare single and double knockout models
Use the antibody to assess whether GTPBP1 levels change in GTPBP2-deficient neurons
Identify neuronal populations where both proteins are expressed but only one is functionally critical
These methodological considerations provide a framework for designing robust experiments to investigate the critical relationship between GTPBP1 function and neuronal survival using the GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated.
Integrating GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated with nucleotide-affinity profiling techniques represents an innovative methodological approach for investigating GTPBP1's nucleotide-binding properties and functions:
Complementary Protein Identification Strategy:
Sequential Affinity Purification:
Methodological Approach: Combine nucleotide affinity profiling with immunoprecipitation.
Technical Implementation:
First, enrich for GTP-binding proteins using GTP affinity probes.
Then, perform immunoprecipitation with the GTPBP1 antibody on this enriched fraction.
Alternatively, perform the immunoprecipitation first, followed by nucleotide affinity profiling.
This approach can identify GTPBP1-specific binding partners that are also GTP-binding proteins.
Nucleotide-Binding Site Characterization:
Methodological Approach: Use the antibody to investigate how specific mutations affect GTPBP1's nucleotide-binding properties.
Experimental Strategy:
Generate GTPBP1 variants with mutations in potential nucleotide-binding motifs.
Use the antibody to immunoprecipitate these variants.
Compare their ability to bind GTP using nucleotide affinity profiling techniques.
This approach can help validate the "unique nucleotide-binding motifs" identified for GTP-binding proteins .
ATP/GTP Binding Selectivity Analysis:
Methodological Approach: Investigate GTPBP1's nucleotide binding preferences.
Protocol Design:
Use the antibody to purify native GTPBP1 from various tissues or cell types.
Apply quantitative nucleotide affinity profiling to assess its binding to ATP, GTP, and other nucleotides.
Compare binding selectivity under different cellular conditions.
This builds on the approach used to "assess the ATP/GTP binding selectivities of nucleotide-binding proteins at the global proteome scale" .
Stress-Induced Changes in Nucleotide Binding:
Methodological Approach: Investigate how cellular stress affects GTPBP1's nucleotide-binding properties.
Experimental Design:
Induce various stress conditions (e.g., tRNA deficiency, oxidative stress).
Use the antibody to immunoprecipitate GTPBP1 from stressed and unstressed cells.
Compare nucleotide binding properties using affinity profiling techniques.
Correlate changes in binding with GTPBP1's role in resolving paused ribosomes.
Proteome-Wide Interactions Mapping:
Methodological Approach: Identify the complete interaction network of GTPBP1 under various conditions.
Implementation Strategy:
Use the antibody for immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry.
Compare GTPBP1 interaction partners with the broader nucleotide-binding proteome identified through affinity profiling.
This approach can leverage the "affinity profiling strategy to comprehensively characterize ATP-protein interactions at the entire proteome scale" .
These integrated methodological approaches represent cutting-edge strategies for elucidating GTPBP1's function in the context of nucleotide binding and cellular stress responses.
Studying GTPBP1 in neurological disease models using the GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated requires careful methodological planning to generate meaningful insights:
Disease Model Selection Based on Ribosome Pausing Mechanisms:
Methodological Consideration: Select neurological disease models where ribosome pausing might contribute to pathology.
Implementation Strategy:
Focus on neurodegenerative disorders associated with protein synthesis defects.
Consider models where tRNA availability might be compromised.
Investigate diseases where ribosome-associated quality control mechanisms are implicated.
Rationale: GTPBP1 resolves paused ribosomes particularly during tRNA deficiency and is necessary for neuronal survival .
Spatiotemporal Expression Analysis in Disease Progression:
Methodological Consideration: Map changes in GTPBP1 expression throughout disease development.
Experimental Design:
Use the biotinylated antibody to track GTPBP1 levels and localization in disease-affected and unaffected brain regions.
Perform sequential sampling at defined disease stages.
Correlate GTPBP1 expression with markers of neurodegeneration and ribosome pausing.
Analytical Approach: Compare findings with normal expression patterns where "GTPBP1 is widely expressed throughout the brain" .
Integrated Stress Response (ISR) Activation Assessment:
Methodological Consideration: Determine whether ISR activation in disease models correlates with GTPBP1 dysfunction.
Protocol Development:
Simultaneously analyze GTPBP1 levels (using the antibody) and ISR markers (phosphorylated eIF2α, ATF4 targets).
Compare patterns across multiple brain regions and disease stages.
Correlate findings with neuronal vulnerability patterns.
Validation Approach: This builds on the discovery that "loss of GTPBP1 activates the ISR" with increased phosphorylated eIF2α levels .
Therapeutic Intervention Evaluation:
Methodological Consideration: Assess whether restoring or modulating GTPBP1 function offers therapeutic benefit.
Experimental Strategy:
Develop interventions to enhance GTPBP1 expression or function.
Use the antibody to confirm target engagement.
Evaluate neurological outcomes following intervention.
Mechanistic Validation: Consider rapamycin treatment, which has been studied in GTPBP1-deficient mice , as a potential comparative intervention.
Cell Type-Specific Vulnerability Analysis:
Methodological Consideration: Determine why certain neuronal populations show differential vulnerability to GTPBP1 deficiency.
Technical Implementation:
Combine the GTPBP1 antibody with cell-type specific markers.
Assess GTPBP1 levels in vulnerable versus resistant neuronal populations in disease models.
Correlate with expression of other rescue factors like GTPBP2.
Analytical Framework: Build on observations that "induction of ATF4 targets varies in different types of neurons" in GTPBP1-deficient mice .
Codon-Specific Translation Analysis in Disease Context:
Methodological Consideration: Determine whether disease-associated mutations create contexts for increased ribosome pausing.
Experimental Approach:
Validation Strategy: Compare findings with known patterns where "ribosome occupancy dramatically increased in the B6J.Gtpbp1-/- cerebellum when AGA codons were in the A-site of the ribosome" .
GTPBP1-GTPBP2 Compensation Analysis in Disease:
Methodological Consideration: Investigate whether compensatory mechanisms between GTPBP1 and GTPBP2 are altered in disease states.
Study Design:
Analyze expression patterns of both proteins in disease models.
Determine whether disease conditions affect their functional redundancy.
Assess whether both proteins are recruited to the same paused ribosomes.
Interpretive Framework: This extends the observation of "possible functional redundancy between these genes in some cell types" .
These methodological considerations provide a comprehensive framework for investigating GTPBP1's role in neurological diseases, leveraging the specificity of the GTPBP1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated.