GUCY1A1 (also known as GUCY1A3, GCS-alpha-1, GCS-alpha-3) is the alpha-1 subunit of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC), a key enzyme in the nitric oxide (NO)/cGMP signaling pathway . This protein interacts with a beta subunit (GUCY1B1) to form the functional guanylate cyclase enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of GTP to 3',5'-cyclic GMP and diphosphate . The NO-sGC-cGMP signaling pathway plays critical roles in cardiovascular physiology, and variants in GUCY1A1 have been genome-wide significantly associated with coronary artery disease risk .
GUCY1A1 antibodies are used in multiple experimental applications including:
Research shows these applications have been successfully employed to study GUCY1A1 expression patterns, protein interactions, and signaling mechanisms in various experimental models .
Selection should be based on:
Target epitope: Consider antibodies targeting different regions (N-terminal, C-terminal, or specific internal domains) based on your research question. For example, some studies have used antibodies targeting amino acids 22-214 , 269-300 , or 374-423 .
Host species and clonality: Available options include:
Validated applications: Confirm the antibody has been validated for your specific application. For instance, if performing co-immunoprecipitation studies of protein interactions as in Hochheiser et al. (2016), select antibodies validated for IP .
Species reactivity: Ensure cross-reactivity with your experimental model (human, mouse, rat) .
Published validation data: Review literature citations and validation images before selection .
A comprehensive validation should include:
Positive and negative controls: Test on tissues known to express and not express GUCY1A1. Hepatic stellate cells express GUCY1A1, while hepatocytes, LSECs, and Kupffer cells do not .
Western blot validation: Confirm detection of the expected 77.5 kDa band . Compare with recombinant protein controls and/or cell lines with known expression levels.
Knockdown/knockout controls: Test antibody specificity using siRNA knockdown or genetic knockout samples. This approach was used to validate GUCY1A1 antibodies in multiple studies .
Antibody comparison: Test multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes to verify consistent results.
Reporter validation: Consider using genetic reporter systems like the Gucy1a1-EGFP reporter mice to validate antibody specificity, as demonstrated in research where GUCY1A1 antibody staining colocalized with EGFP signal .
Common issues and solutions include:
Low expression levels: GUCY1A1 expression varies across tissues and can be regulated by factors like Notch signaling . For tissues with low expression:
Increase protein loading amount
Use more sensitive detection methods
Consider concentrating your protein sample
Use enrichment techniques like immunoprecipitation before blotting
Nonspecific binding: To reduce background:
Protein degradation: GUCY1A1 (77.5 kDa) may degrade during sample preparation:
Heterodimer detection issues: Since functional sGC requires both α and β subunits, consider detecting both GUCY1A1 and GUCY1B1 to confirm the presence of the complete enzyme complex .
Research has revealed significant variations in GUCY1A1 expression:
Cell type variations:
Disease associations:
Regulatory factors:
Notch signaling regulates GUCY1A1 expression; N1ICD overexpression upregulates GUCY1A1
Age affects expression levels; significantly higher expression in juvenile mesenteric arteries compared to aged vessels
Genetic variants (rs7692387) affect expression levels in blood and correlate with disease risk
Experimental conditions to consider:
Advanced research applications include:
Genetic risk assessment: GUCY1A1 antibodies can help validate the functional impact of genetic variants associated with disease risk. For instance, researchers found that individuals homozygous for the rs7692387 risk variant had lower GUCY1A1 expression levels, which correlated with altered platelet function and atherosclerosis risk .
Mechanistic disease studies: In cancer research, GUCY1A1 antibodies have been used to demonstrate that sGC upregulation is a mechanism of acquired chemoresistance in small cell lung cancer . By combining antibody-based detection with functional assays, researchers established connections between expression levels and drug resistance.
Cell-specific pathway analysis: Using co-immunofluorescence techniques with GUCY1A1 antibodies and other pathway markers (like HES1 for Notch signaling), researchers have identified cell-specific regulation mechanisms . This approach revealed that Non-NE cells show upregulation of both Notch signaling and GUCY1A1 expression.
ChIP-qPCR experiments: GUCY1A1 antibodies have been used in chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments to demonstrate direct binding of transcription factors (like N1ICD) to the GUCY1A1 promoter, establishing it as a direct Notch target gene .
Prognostic marker evaluation: In tumor microarray studies, GUCY1A1 antibodies helped assess whether expression levels correlate with disease stage and clinical outcomes, though in some cancer types no significant associations were found .
Important methodological considerations include:
Subunit co-detection: Since functional sGC requires both α and β subunits (GUCY1A1 and GUCY1B1), it's critical to detect both subunits to assess functional enzyme presence. Research shows that these subunits may be differentially regulated; for example, in prostate cancer progression, GUCY1A1 was consistently downregulated in metastatic disease while GUCY1B1 showed variable patterns .
Heterodimer isolation techniques: Consider using:
Co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies against either subunit
Size-exclusion chromatography to isolate the intact complex
Native PAGE conditions to preserve protein-protein interactions
Activity correlation: Combine antibody detection with functional assays measuring cGMP production to establish correlations between protein expression and enzymatic activity. For example, ex vivo platelet studies showed that genetic variants affecting GUCY1A1 expression also impacted platelet aggregation inhibition by NO donors and phosphodiesterase inhibitors .
Regulatory mechanisms: Consider that the α and β subunits can be differentially regulated. For instance, overexpression of N1ICD led to upregulation of GUCY1A1 without changing GUCY1B1 levels in certain cell types , suggesting distinct regulatory mechanisms for each subunit.
Subcellular localization: Use fractionation techniques combined with immunoblotting or immunofluorescence microscopy to assess whether the subunits properly colocalize, as mislocalization could impact signaling efficiency even when both subunits are expressed .
When facing contradictory data:
Consider cell-type specificity: Expression patterns may differ dramatically between cell types. For example, GUCY1A1 expression was exclusively detected in hepatic stellate cells but not in other hepatic cell populations .
Analyze temporal dynamics: GUCY1A1 upregulation may be associated with acquired (rather than inherent) disease mechanisms, as seen in chemoresistance development . The timing of sample collection could therefore greatly impact results.
Assess genetic variants: Genetic polymorphisms affect GUCY1A1 expression and function. The rs7692387 variant is associated with lower GUCY1A1 mRNA levels , which could explain contradictory results if genotypes aren't controlled for.
Evaluate experimental technique differences: Different antibodies target distinct epitopes, which may be differentially accessible in certain protein conformations or interactions. Compare antibody target regions when integrating data from multiple sources.
Consider disease stage heterogeneity: In prostate cancer research, GUCY1A1 levels differed between primary and metastatic samples, suggesting disease progression affects expression . Similar stage-dependent differences might explain contradictions in other disease models.
Examine age-related influences: Research shows age significantly affects GUCY1A1 expression, with juvenile tissues showing higher levels than aged tissues . Age differences in experimental models could contribute to contradictory findings.
Optimized IHC protocols should consider:
Tissue fixation and processing:
For paraffin sections: 10% neutral buffered formalin fixation for 24 hours
For frozen sections: OCT embedding after brief fixation (4% PFA for 1-2 hours)
Antigen retrieval methods: Heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) is typically effective
Antibody selection and dilution:
Detection systems:
For low expression tissues: Use amplification systems like tyramide signal amplification
For co-localization studies: Use fluorescent secondary antibodies for multiplexing
Controls to include:
Tissue-specific considerations:
In vascular tissue: GUCY1A1 detection may require special attention to elastic tissue autofluorescence
In cancer samples: Consider tumor heterogeneity and include adjacent normal tissue
Comprehensive approaches include:
Genotype-expression correlation:
Reporter gene assays:
Chromatin immunoprecipitation:
Functional assays:
Animal models:
Recent advances include:
Pharmacological sGC stimulation studies:
GUCY1A1 antibodies help monitor target engagement in studies evaluating sGC stimulators
Research demonstrated that pharmacological sGC stimulation increased platelet angiopoietin-1 release in vitro and reduced leukocyte recruitment and atherosclerotic plaque formation in atherosclerosis-prone Ldlr−/− mice
Age-related vascular dysfunction:
Cancer resistance mechanisms:
Notch pathway interactions:
Precision medicine applications:
Recent technical improvements include:
Monoclonal antibody development:
Conjugated antibody formats:
Single-cell analysis techniques:
Genetic reporter validation systems:
Combined protein-RNA detection methods:
Integrated research strategies include:
Proteogenomic correlation:
Transcriptomics validation:
Epigenetic regulation studies:
Signaling pathway mapping:
Use phospho-specific antibodies alongside GUCY1A1 detection to map pathway activation
Correlate NO-sGC-cGMP pathway components with downstream effects using multi-antibody approaches
Protein-metabolite correlations:
Key cross-species considerations include:
Epitope conservation assessment:
Validation requirements:
Perform separate validation for each species rather than assuming cross-reactivity
Include appropriate positive and negative controls from each species
Application-specific optimization:
Dilution requirements may differ between species even for cross-reactive antibodies
Tissue processing protocols may need species-specific modifications
Result interpretation differences:
Genetic model considerations: