The At5g02560 Antibody is a recombinant antibody designed to target the protein product encoded by the At5g02560 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana (mouse-ear cress). This antibody is primarily used in plant biology research to study gene expression, protein localization, and functional interactions. Its development leverages advanced recombinant antibody production technologies to ensure high specificity and scalability .
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Gene Target | At5g02560 (Arabidopsis thaliana) |
| UniProt ID | Q9LZ46 |
| Antibody Code | CSB-PA862939XA01DOA |
| Species | Arabidopsis thaliana |
| Concentration/Volume | 2ml or 0.1ml |
| Supplier | Cusabio |
Source: Cusabio Custom Antibodies Catalog .
Recombinant antibody production for At5g02560 involves:
Cloning: Antibody-encoding genes are inserted into expression vectors.
Host Systems: Bacterial or mammalian cells (e.g., E. coli, CHO cells) are transfected to produce the antibody .
Purification: Affinity chromatography or other methods isolate the antibody for downstream applications.
This approach enables large-scale production of homogeneous antibodies with optimized specificity and reduced immunogenicity .
| Application | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Western Blotting | Detect At5g02560 protein expression in plant tissues. |
| Immunolocalization | Determine subcellular localization (e.g., cytoplasm, nucleus). |
| ELISA | Quantify protein levels in response to environmental stressors. |
| Protein Interaction Studies | Identify binding partners using co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP). |
Cross-reactivity Testing: Ensure no binding to non-target proteins.
Concentration Optimization: Use low/high concentrations to assess affinity and saturation .
Epitope Mapping: Confirm binding to the intended region of At5g02560.
Antibodies targeting conserved domains may show cross-reactivity with homologs .
Proper controls (e.g., isotype-matched antibodies) are essential to avoid false positives .
| Target Gene | Function (Inferred) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| At5g02560 | Unknown (requires further study) | Creative Biolabs |
| GWD2 | Starch metabolism regulation | Cusabio |
| HDA14 | Histone deacetylation | Cusabio |
Note: At5g02560’s specific biological role remains uncharacterized in publicly available datasets.
Functional Studies: Determine At5g02560’s role in Arabidopsis development or stress responses.
Phosphorylation/PTM Analysis: Use phosphorylation-specific antibodies to study post-translational modifications.
Multi-Omics Integration: Combine antibody-based assays with proteomics/metabolomics for systems-level insights.
KEGG: ath:AT5G02560
UniGene: At.26889
At5g02560 refers to a specific protein in Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress), a model organism widely used in plant molecular biology research. The antibody is specifically raised against recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana At5g02560 protein and has been validated for reactivity with this species. The polyclonal antibody is produced in rabbits and purified using antigen affinity methods to ensure specificity . When considering experimental systems, this antibody has been validated for ELISA and Western Blot applications, making it suitable for quantitative and qualitative protein detection approaches in plant molecular biology research .
For optimal antibody performance and stability, At5g02560 antibody should be stored at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt. Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be strictly avoided as they can lead to protein denaturation and loss of antibody function. The antibody is supplied in liquid form containing 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4), and 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative . This formulation enhances stability during storage. When working with the antibody, it's recommended to aliquot it into smaller volumes before freezing to minimize freeze-thaw cycles. For short-term use during experiments, the antibody can be kept at 4°C for up to one week, but prolonged storage at this temperature is not recommended.
Antibody validation is a critical step to ensure experimental reproducibility and reliability. For At5g02560 antibody, a multi-step validation process is recommended:
Western Blot with positive and negative controls: Use tissue samples known to express At5g02560 protein as positive controls and samples from knockout mutants as negative controls. The antibody should detect a band at the expected molecular weight .
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubating the antibody with excess immunizing peptide should abolish the specific signal in Western blot or immunostaining experiments, confirming specificity.
Cross-validation with orthogonal methods: Compare protein expression pattern detected by the antibody with mRNA expression data from transcriptomics studies of At5g02560.
Cross-species validation: If exploring related species, test reactivity on proteins from those species with high sequence homology to At5g02560.
Similar validation approaches have been proven effective with other plant antibodies, as demonstrated in studies of chromomethylase domains in Arabidopsis, where antibody specificity was confirmed through multiple techniques including mass spectrometry .
For optimal Western blot results using At5g02560 antibody, follow this methodological approach:
Sample preparation:
Extract total protein from plant tissue using a buffer containing protease inhibitors
Quantify protein concentration using Bradford or BCA assay
Denature samples in Laemmli buffer at 95°C for 5 minutes
Gel electrophoresis and transfer:
Separate 10-30 μg protein on 10-12% SDS-PAGE
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membrane (0.45 μm)
Antibody incubation:
Block membrane with 5% non-fat milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Incubate with At5g02560 antibody at 1:500-1:2000 dilution overnight at 4°C
Wash 3× with TBST, 10 minutes each
Incubate with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:5000)
Wash 3× with TBST, 10 minutes each
Detection:
Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate
Expose to X-ray film or image using a digital imager
This protocol is based on standard procedures for plant proteins and should be optimized for specific experimental conditions. Similar approaches have been effective in studies of protein-histone interactions in Arabidopsis .
While At5g02560 antibody hasn't been specifically validated for ChIP applications, researchers working with plant nuclear proteins can adapt protocols based on successful ChIP studies with other plant antibodies. The following methodological approach is recommended:
Cross-linking:
Cross-link plant tissue with 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes under vacuum
Quench with 0.125 M glycine for 5 minutes
Wash thoroughly with ice-cold PBS
Chromatin preparation:
Isolate nuclei using a sucrose gradient
Sonicate chromatin to fragments of 200-500 bp
Verify fragmentation by agarose gel electrophoresis
Immunoprecipitation:
Pre-clear chromatin with protein A/G beads
Incubate cleared chromatin with At5g02560 antibody (5-10 μg) overnight at 4°C
Add protein A/G beads and incubate for 3 hours
Wash extensively with increasingly stringent buffers
DNA recovery and analysis:
Reverse cross-links at 65°C overnight
Treat with RNase A and Proteinase K
Purify DNA using phenol-chloroform extraction or commercial kits
Analyze by qPCR or sequencing
This approach draws from successful ChIP protocols used for other plant chromatin-associated proteins, such as those described for chromomethylase studies in Arabidopsis .
When encountering weak or non-specific signals with At5g02560 antibody, implement these methodological solutions:
For weak signals:
Increase antibody concentration (try 1:250-1:500 dilution)
Extend primary antibody incubation time to overnight at 4°C
Use high-sensitivity detection systems (e.g., enhanced chemiluminescence plus)
Increase protein loading (30-50 μg per lane)
Try different extraction buffers to improve protein solubilization
For non-specific signals:
Increase blocking time and concentration (5-10% blocking agent)
Add 0.1-0.5% Tween-20 to antibody dilution buffer
Increase washing steps (5× washes, 10 minutes each)
Use highly purified BSA instead of milk for blocking
Pre-adsorb antibody with plant extract from knockout mutants
Optimization matrix:
| Parameter | Initial Condition | Optimization Options |
|---|---|---|
| Blocking | 5% milk, 1 hour | 5% BSA, 3% milk+2% BSA, overnight block |
| Ab Dilution | 1:1000 | 1:500, 1:2000, 1:5000 |
| Incubation | RT, 2 hours | 4°C overnight, 1 hour with constant agitation |
| Washes | 3× TBST, 5 min | 5× TBST, 10 min each, add 0.2% SDS to first wash |
Similar optimization approaches have been successfully employed for antibodies in challenging experimental systems, as demonstrated in studies of antibody-antigen binding characterization .
Cross-reactivity assessment is crucial for experimental interpretation. Implement this systematic approach:
Bioinformatic analysis:
Identify proteins with sequence homology to At5g02560 using BLAST
Analyze the immunogen sequence for regions of similarity with other proteins
Predict potential cross-reactive epitopes using epitope prediction algorithms
Experimental validation:
Test the antibody on tissues from At5g02560 knockout plants
Perform Western blots on recombinant related proteins
Use mass spectrometry to identify all proteins immunoprecipitated by the antibody
Competition assays:
Pre-incubate antibody with excess target protein or immunizing peptide
Compare immunoblot patterns before and after competition
Any remaining bands after competition likely represent cross-reactive proteins
Data analysis matrix:
| Technique | Purpose | Expected Result for Specific Antibody |
|---|---|---|
| KO tissue testing | Specificity validation | No signal in KO tissue |
| Competition assay | Epitope verification | Signal elimination with peptide competition |
| MS analysis | Identify all targets | >80% of identified peptides from target protein |
| Multi-tissue WB | Assess expression pattern | Band pattern matches known expression |
This comprehensive approach has proven effective in characterizing antibody specificity in complex systems, as demonstrated in antibody recognition studies against viral antigens .
Investigating protein-protein interactions involving At5g02560 requires specific methodological approaches. Consider these techniques:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Prepare plant lysates under non-denaturing conditions
Immunoprecipitate At5g02560 using the antibody coupled to protein A/G beads
Elute bound proteins and analyze by Western blot or mass spectrometry
Include appropriate controls (IgG, knockout tissue) to confirm specificity
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Fix and permeabilize plant cells or tissue sections
Incubate with At5g02560 antibody and antibody against potential interacting protein
Apply species-specific PLA probes with attached oligonucleotides
If proteins are in proximity (<40 nm), oligonucleotides can be ligated and amplified
Detect fluorescent signal indicating protein-protein proximity
FRET/FLIM analysis:
Use At5g02560 antibody labeled with donor fluorophore
Label antibody against potential interacting protein with acceptor fluorophore
Measure fluorescence resonance energy transfer or fluorescence lifetime imaging
Energy transfer indicates close proximity of proteins
This methodological approach draws from successful studies of protein-protein interactions in plant systems, similar to those used in studying chromatin-associated proteins like CMT3 .
For reliable immunolocalization experiments with At5g02560 antibody, include these methodological controls:
Essential negative controls:
Primary antibody omission (secondary antibody only)
Isotype control (non-specific IgG from same species)
Tissue from At5g02560 knockout or knockdown plants
Primary antibody pre-absorbed with immunizing peptide
Positive controls:
Tissues known to express At5g02560 at high levels
Co-staining with established markers of the expected subcellular compartment
Comparison with GFP-tagged At5g02560 localization pattern
Methodological controls:
Fixation control (multiple fixation methods to confirm pattern)
Autofluorescence control (untreated samples to assess background)
Antibody dilution series to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Control assessment matrix:
| Control Type | Purpose | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| KO tissue | Specificity | No signal in KO indicates specificity |
| Peptide competition | Epitope verification | Signal reduction confirms specificity |
| Multiple fixation | Method validation | Consistent pattern across methods confirms localization |
| Autofluorescence | Background assessment | Distinguishes true signal from tissue autofluorescence |
Similar control strategies have been employed in immunolocalization studies of replication-associated proteins in Arabidopsis, as demonstrated in chromomethylase localization research .
Integrating mass spectrometry with At5g02560 antibody immunoprecipitation provides powerful insights into protein function and interactions. Follow this methodological workflow:
Immunoprecipitation optimization:
Scale up protein extraction (start with 1-5g plant tissue)
Use chemical crosslinking (optional: 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes)
Perform immunoprecipitation with At5g02560 antibody coupled to protein A/G beads
Include parallel control IP with non-specific IgG
Sample preparation for MS:
Elute bound proteins with gentle elution buffer or by boiling in SDS sample buffer
Separate proteins by SDS-PAGE (short run into the resolving gel)
Cut gel into 1mm slices or process entire lane
Perform in-gel trypsin digestion
MS analysis approach:
Use LC-MS/MS for peptide identification
Implement data-dependent acquisition for discovery
Consider parallel reaction monitoring for targeted analysis
Use label-free quantification to compare specific IP vs. control
Data analysis:
Filter proteins identified in experimental IP vs. control IP
Apply statistical thresholds (fold change >2, p-value <0.05)
Classify interactors using GO term enrichment
Validate key interactions by reciprocal IP or other methods
This approach has been successfully applied in plant chromatin studies, as demonstrated by the identification of histone interactions with chromomethylase proteins in Arabidopsis, where mass spectrometry identified core histones and other associated proteins with high confidence .
| Protein Component | Relative Abundance (NSAFe5) | % of Target Protein |
|---|---|---|
| Target protein | 7240 | 100 |
| Core interactors | 1000-3000 | 14-42 |
| Weak interactors | 400-1000 | 5.5-14 |
| Background | <400 | <5.5 |
This quantitative approach to interactor classification is based on the normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAFe5) measurements similar to those reported in studies of chromatin-associated proteins .
Recent advances in active learning methodologies can significantly enhance our understanding of antibody-antigen interactions for At5g02560 antibody. Implementing these computational approaches involves:
Predicting binding epitopes:
Build a computational model of At5g02560 protein structure
Use protein surface analysis to identify potential epitopes
Apply machine learning algorithms to predict antibody binding sites
Validate predictions with experimental epitope mapping
Active learning methodology:
Start with limited experimental binding data
Use computational models to predict high-information-value experiments
Iteratively expand the labeled dataset by testing predicted interactions
Refine models with new experimental data
Research has shown that active learning strategies can reduce the number of required antigen variants by up to 35% and accelerate the learning process compared to random testing approaches . This methodological efficiency is particularly valuable when working with complex plant proteins like At5g02560, where experimental validation is resource-intensive.
When working with complex plant samples, distinguishing specific At5g02560 antibody binding from non-specific interactions requires sophisticated methodological approaches:
Quantitative specificity assessment:
Perform titration experiments with increasing antibody concentrations
Plot signal-to-noise ratio against antibody concentration
Specific binding shows saturation, while non-specific binding often increases linearly
Determine optimal antibody concentration at maximum signal-to-noise ratio
Competitive binding analysis:
Pre-incubate samples with unlabeled antibody at increasing concentrations
Follow with fixed concentration of labeled At5g02560 antibody
Specific binding sites show competitive displacement
Non-specific binding sites typically show additive binding
Cross-validation matrix:
| Technique | Specific Binding Pattern | Non-Specific Binding Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Titration | Saturable curve | Linear increase |
| Competition | Dose-dependent inhibition | Minimal inhibition |
| KO tissue | No signal | Persistent signal |
| Temperature | Stable at 4-37°C | Often reduced at higher temperatures |
These methodological approaches draw from established antibody validation techniques similar to those used in characterizing antibodies against viral antigens, where distinguishing specific from non-specific binding is critical for accurate interpretation .
Emerging antibody technologies offer new opportunities for studying At5g02560 protein with enhanced specificity and functionality:
Recombinant antibody development:
Isolate B cells from immunized animals
Sequence antibody variable regions
Express as recombinant fragments (scFv, Fab)
Engineer for improved affinity or reduced cross-reactivity
Add fusion tags for detection or purification
AI-assisted antibody design:
Analyze At5g02560 protein sequence with machine learning algorithms
Predict optimal epitopes for antibody generation
Design paired heavy-light chain sequences for optimal binding
Generate diverse antibody candidates with specific binding properties
Recent advances in monoclonal antibody generation using protein Large Language Models (such as MAGE - Monoclonal Antibody GEnerator) demonstrate the potential to create highly specific antibodies against defined targets with experimentally validated binding specificity . Such approaches could be adapted to generate improved At5g02560-specific antibodies with enhanced properties.
Investigating post-translational modifications (PTMs) of At5g02560 requires specialized approaches:
Modification-specific antibody strategies:
Generate antibodies against predicted modification sites
Use peptides with specific modifications (phosphorylation, acetylation, etc.) as immunogens
Validate specificity using modified vs. unmodified peptide competition
Integrated PTM analysis workflow:
Immunoprecipitate At5g02560 using the general antibody
Analyze by Western blot with modification-specific antibodies
Perform mass spectrometry to identify and map modifications
Validate functional significance through mutagenesis of modified residues
Contextual PTM investigation:
Study modifications under different cellular conditions (stress, development)
Compare PTM patterns across tissue types and developmental stages
Investigate enzymes responsible for adding/removing modifications
Connect modifications to protein function through targeted experiments