HA Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (12-14 weeks)
Synonyms
HA; A56R; Protein A56; Hemagglutinin
Target Names
HA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody prevents cell-to-cell fusion by interacting with and directing the viral K2 protein on the host plasma membrane. The A56-K2 complex interacts with components of the entry fusion complex (EFC), likely to prevent superinfection and syncytium formation. Through its interaction with the C3/VCP protein, this antibody protects the infected cell, and potentially the extracellular enveloped virus, from complement attack.
Subcellular Location
Virion membrane; Single-pass type I membrane protein. Host membrane; Single-pass type I membrane protein. Note=Component of extracellular enveloped virus (EEV) but not intracellular mature virus (IMV). Component of the outermost membrane of EEV.

Q&A

What exactly is an HA tag antibody and how does it differ from antibodies against hyaluronic acid?

HA tag antibodies are monoclonal antibodies designed to recognize the hemagglutinin epitope tag, which is derived from the influenza virus hemagglutinin protein. Specifically, these antibodies recognize the nonapeptide sequence YPYDVPDYA (amino acids 98-106 of the human influenza virus hemagglutinin protein) .

It's critical to distinguish between HA tag antibodies and antibodies against hyaluronic acid. While both share the "HA" abbreviation, they target completely different molecules:

  • HA tag antibodies: Recognize the specific peptide sequence from hemagglutinin protein used as an epitope tag on recombinant proteins

  • Anti-hyaluronic acid antibodies: Attempt to recognize hyaluronic acid, a glycosaminoglycan component of the extracellular matrix

Importantly, recent research has demonstrated that antibodies marketed as anti-hyaluronic acid antibodies do not actually detect hyaluronan with sufficient specificity. This is consistent with hyaluronic acid's known lack of immunogenicity, which prevents the production of specific anti-HA antibodies .

What is the significance of different HA tag antibody clones in research applications?

Different antibody clones have distinct characteristics that make them suitable for specific applications:

CloneAffinityOptimal ApplicationsSpecial Considerations
12CA5Ka = 1×10^8/MWestern blot, ImmunoprecipitationLess sensitive, requires higher concentrations (0.1-1.0 μg/ml)
3F10 (High Affinity)Higher than 12CA5Western blot at 10-fold lower concentrationsPreferred for applications requiring higher sensitivity
912426Not specifiedImmunocytochemistry/ImmunofluorescenceEffective at 8 μg/mL for ICC on fixed cells

The choice of clone should be guided by your specific application. For instance, the high-affinity 3F10 clone is recommended when sensitivity is crucial, while 12CA5 may be sufficient for standard applications where sensitivity is less critical .

How should I optimize HA tag antibody protocols for Western blotting applications?

For optimal Western blotting using HA tag antibodies, follow these methodological guidelines:

  • Membrane selection: PVDF membranes generally provide maximum signal compared to nitrocellulose

  • Blocking conditions:

    • Use a 1:10 dilution of Western Blocking Reagent in PBST (PBS with 0.05-2% Tween 20, pH 7.5)

    • Block for 1 hour at room temperature or overnight at 2-8°C

  • Antibody dilution:

    • Primary antibody: Start with 0.1-1.0 μg/ml in a 1:20 dilution of Western Blocking Reagent in PBST

    • Secondary antibody: Typically 1:10,000 dilution of POD-conjugated anti-mouse antibody

  • Troubleshooting weak signals:

    • Increase antibody concentration (double as needed)

    • Extend incubation times (beyond 1 hour)

    • Ensure adequate protein transfer (optimize current and transfer time)

    • Check for air bubbles between membrane and gel during transfer

    • Add more protein to gel if expression is low

  • Detection: For chemiluminescent detection, start with 1-5 minute exposures and adjust based on signal intensity

What are the best practices for immunoprecipitation using HA tag antibodies?

Effective immunoprecipitation (IP) of HA-tagged proteins requires careful consideration of several factors:

  • Antibody selection: For direct IP, high-affinity antibodies like clone 3F10 covalently coupled to agarose beads are recommended, as they:

    • Enable rapid isolation of low-abundance HA-tagged proteins

    • Minimize interference from heavy and light antibody chains during subsequent analysis

  • Cell lysis optimization: If isolation of tagged protein is poor, consider alternative cell lysis procedures

  • Competitive elution: Use HA synthetic peptide (e.g., YPYDVPDYA) for competitive elution of HA-tagged proteins from immunoaffinity matrices, which preserves protein functionality

  • Associated protein identification: When studying protein complexes, optimize cross-linking conditions if appropriate, and consider native elution conditions to maintain complex integrity

  • Controls: Always include negative controls (non-HA-tagged proteins) to identify non-specific binding

Why are anti-HA antibodies unsuitable for detecting hyaluronic acid in tissue samples?

Recent research has definitively established that anti-HA antibodies lack sufficient specificity for detecting hyaluronic acid in tissue samples, despite their continued use in some published studies. Here's why they should be avoided for this purpose:

How do I optimize immunofluorescence protocols using HA tag antibodies?

For successful immunofluorescence detection of HA-tagged proteins:

  • Recommended starting concentrations:

    • For mammalian cells: 1-10 μg/ml of anti-HA antibody

    • For specific applications like HEK293 cells: 8 μg/mL has been validated

  • Cell-type specific protocols:

    • For yeast: Begin with the method described by Berkower et al.

    • For mammalian cells: Start with the method of Canfield and Levenson

  • Secondary antibody selection:

    • For indirect detection: Anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies conjugated to appropriate fluorophores (e.g., NorthernLights 557 for red fluorescence)

    • For direct detection: Consider anti-HA-Biotin, High Affinity (3F10) FITC for single-step labeling

  • Counterstaining: DAPI is commonly used for nuclear counterstaining to provide cellular context

  • Fixation optimization: Different fixation methods (paraformaldehyde, methanol, etc.) may affect epitope accessibility; optimize for your specific protein and cell type

What are the critical factors for successful epitope tagging with HA tag?

When designing experiments involving HA-tagged proteins, consider these critical factors:

  • Incorporation methods: The 27-base DNA sequence encoding the HA epitope can be incorporated into your gene of interest through:

    • Cloning into suitable expression vectors

    • Oligonucleotide linkers encoding the HA tag

    • Site-directed mutagenesis

  • Tag position considerations:

    • N-terminal tagging: Generally less likely to interfere with protein function, but may affect signal peptide processing

    • C-terminal tagging: May interfere with proteins requiring free C-termini for function

    • Internal tagging: Requires careful selection of insertion sites to avoid disrupting functional domains

  • Expression system compatibility:

    • HA tag has been successfully used in various systems including mammalian cells (e.g., HEK293, HUVEC) and yeast

    • Consider codon optimization for your expression system

  • Validation of tagged protein:

    • Verify that tagging doesn't alter protein localization, function, or interaction partners

    • Include untagged controls for comparison

Why might my HA-tagged protein show weak or no detection signal?

Several factors can contribute to weak or absent signals when detecting HA-tagged proteins:

  • Expression level issues:

    • Low expression of the tagged protein may require loading more total protein

    • Consider using stronger promoters or optimizing transfection efficiency

  • Tag accessibility problems:

    • The HA tag may be buried within the protein structure

    • Try alternative positions for the tag (N-terminal, C-terminal, or internal locations)

    • Inserting a flexible linker sequence between the protein and tag may improve accessibility

  • Technical factors in Western blotting:

    • Insufficient protein transfer: Increase current and/or transfer time

    • Air bubbles during transfer: Ensure no air bubbles between membrane and gel

    • Wrong membrane type: PVDF membranes typically provide maximum signal

  • Antibody-related issues:

    • Too dilute antibody: Double the concentration of primary and/or secondary antibody

    • Incubation time too short: Extend incubation beyond standard protocols

    • Possible degradation of antibody: Ensure proper storage; avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

  • Cell lysis problems: Different proteins may require different lysis conditions; try alternative lysis buffers or methods

How can HA tag antibodies be used to study protein-protein interactions?

HA tag antibodies are valuable tools for studying protein-protein interactions through several approaches:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Express HA-tagged protein in appropriate cell system

    • Lyse cells under conditions that preserve protein-protein interactions

    • Perform immunoprecipitation with anti-HA antibodies

    • Analyze precipitated material for interacting partners by Western blot or mass spectrometry

    • Consider using high-affinity HA antibody covalently coupled to agarose beads to minimize interference from antibody chains

  • Proximity labeling:

    • Fuse HA tag with proximity labeling enzymes (BioID, APEX)

    • Use anti-HA antibodies to verify expression and localization

    • Identify interaction partners through biotinylation of proximal proteins

  • Pull-down assays:

    • Use synthetic HA peptide for competitive elution to maintain complex integrity

    • Optimize elution conditions to preserve weak interactions

  • Controls and validation:

    • Include non-tagged controls to identify non-specific interactions

    • Validate key interactions through reciprocal tagging experiments

    • Consider orthogonal methods (yeast two-hybrid, FRET) for confirmation

What are the latest advancements in HA tag antibody technology for challenging research applications?

Recent technological developments have enhanced HA tag antibody capabilities:

  • Single-domain antibodies (nanobodies):

    • Smaller size improves penetration in tissues and cells

    • Reduced steric hindrance allows access to partially obscured epitopes

    • Enhanced performance in super-resolution microscopy applications

  • Recombinant antibody fragments:

    • Fab and scFv formats eliminate Fc-mediated background

    • Improved consistency between batches compared to traditional monoclonal antibodies

    • Engineered for specific applications (high-temperature stability, resistance to detergents)

  • Multifunctional HA tag detection systems:

    • Antibodies coupled with specialty tags for orthogonal detection

    • Systems combining direct visualization with affinity purification capabilities

    • Enhanced sensitivity through signal amplification technologies

  • Application-specific optimization:

    • Development of specialized antibodies for challenging applications like cryo-EM

    • HA tag detection under native, non-denaturing conditions

    • Systems compatible with live-cell imaging at physiological temperatures

How can researchers address the challenge of distinguishing between hyaluronic acid and HA-tagged proteins in complex samples?

Given the demonstrated lack of specificity of anti-HA antibodies for hyaluronic acid , researchers studying systems where both hyaluronic acid and HA-tagged proteins might be present should:

  • Use orthogonal detection methods:

    • Employ biotinylated HA binding protein (bHABP) specifically for hyaluronic acid detection

    • Reserve anti-HA tag antibodies exclusively for detecting HA-tagged proteins

  • Implement proper controls:

    • Include hyaluronidase-treated samples to identify genuine hyaluronic acid signals

    • Verify specificity through competitive binding assays with HA oligosaccharides

    • Use cells/tissues not expressing HA-tagged proteins as negative controls

  • Consider alternative tagging strategies:

    • When working in hyaluronic acid-rich environments, consider alternative tags (FLAG, Myc, His) to avoid potential confusion

    • If HA tag must be used, validate findings with complementary approaches

  • Data interpretation considerations:

    • Exercise caution when interpreting co-localization studies in extracellular matrix-rich regions

    • Cross-validate findings using multiple detection methods

    • Consider the implications of the study by Šínová et al. when reviewing earlier literature

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.