HDT1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
HDT1 antibody; HD2a antibody; Histone deacetylase HDT1 antibody; Histone deacetylase 2a antibody; HD2a antibody; Nucleolar histone deacetylase HD2-p39 antibody; Zm-HD2a antibody
Target Names
HDT1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody mediates the deacetylation of lysine residues on the N-terminal part of the core histones (H2A, H2B, H3 and H4). Histone deacetylation serves as an epigenetic repression tag and plays a crucial role in transcriptional regulation, cell cycle progression, and developmental events. This antibody is capable of deacetylating all four core histones.
Database Links

UniGene: Zm.856

Protein Families
Histone deacetylase HD2 family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus, nucleolus.

Q&A

What is HDT1 and what is its significance in plant development?

HDT1 is a plant-specific histone deacetylase that plays a crucial role in regulating root meristem (RM) development in plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana. It works alongside its paralog HDT2 to control the transition from cell division to expansion in root development. HDT1/2 function by negatively regulating the acetylation level of specific loci, including the C19-GIBBERELLIN 2-OXIDASE2 (GA2ox2) gene, thereby repressing its expression in the root meristem and elongation zone . This regulation is essential for maintaining proper root growth, as knockdown of HDT1/2 results in reduced root meristem cell numbers and subsequently impaired root growth. Research has demonstrated that complete loss of function of both HDT1 and HDT2 is lethal, highlighting their essential role in plant development . The significance of HDT1 extends beyond root development, as HDTs have also been implicated in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses.

How can researchers validate the specificity of an HDT1 antibody?

Validating antibody specificity is critical for reliable experimental results when studying HDT1. Researchers should implement multiple validation approaches:

  • Knockout/Knockdown Controls: Test the antibody against samples from HDT1 null mutants (such as the hdt1 T-DNA insertion mutant described in the literature) to confirm absence of signal . The search results indicate that hdt1 is a confirmed null mutant as transcript was not detectable by RT-PCR.

  • Cross-reactivity Assessment: Since HDT1 belongs to a family with four members (HDT1-4) that may share sequence similarity, examine potential cross-reactivity with other HDT family members, particularly HDT2. This is especially important as HDT1 and HDT2 have overlapping functions in root development.

  • Western Blot Analysis: Perform western blots with recombinant HDT1 protein as a positive control alongside plant extracts to verify antibody binding to a protein of the expected molecular weight.

  • Immunoprecipitation Followed by Mass Spectrometry: Confirm that the antibody pulls down HDT1 specifically by analyzing immunoprecipitated proteins using mass spectrometry.

  • Immunolocalization Pattern Comparison: Compare immunolocalization patterns with the expression patterns observed using reporter constructs such as pHDT1:GUS or pHDT1:HDT1-GFP, which have been shown to display a patchy expression pattern in the root meristem .

What experimental approaches can be used to study HDT1 localization in plant tissues?

To effectively study HDT1 localization in plant tissues, researchers can employ several complementary approaches:

  • Immunohistochemistry with HDT1 Antibodies: Use specific antibodies to detect endogenous HDT1 protein in fixed plant tissues. This approach provides direct visualization of the native protein without potential artifacts from overexpression.

  • Transgenic Reporter Lines: Utilize translational fusion constructs such as pHDT1:HDT1-GFP, which have been shown to be functional by their ability to complement the hdt1 hdt2 lethal phenotype . These constructs allow real-time visualization of HDT1 localization in living tissues.

  • Promoter Activity Analysis: Implement promoter-reporter fusions like pHDT1:GUS to study the transcriptional activity of HDT1. As noted in the research, HDT1 displays a patchy expression pattern in the root meristem, suggesting cell cycle-dependent expression .

  • Cell Fractionation followed by Western Blotting: Separate nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions and use HDT1 antibodies to detect the protein in different cellular compartments, confirming its nuclear localization as expected for a histone-modifying enzyme.

  • Co-localization Studies: Perform dual immunolabeling with HDT1 antibodies and markers for specific nuclear structures to determine precise subnuclear localization patterns.

When interpreting localization data, researchers should note that HDT1 and HDT2 show overlapping expression patterns in the root meristem, which is consistent with their partially redundant functions in root development .

What is known about the expression patterns of HDT1 in plant development?

HDT1 exhibits distinct spatial and temporal expression patterns during plant development, particularly in roots:

  • Root Meristem Expression: HDT1 is highly expressed in the root meristem (RM), as demonstrated by both transcriptome data and promoter-reporter studies (pHDT1:GUS) . This expression pattern supports its role in regulating the switch from cell division to expansion in root development.

  • Cell Cycle-Dependent Expression: HDT1 shows a patchy expression pattern in the root meristem, suggesting that its expression may be cell cycle phase-dependent . This characteristic is important when designing experiments to detect HDT1 at specific developmental stages.

  • Developmental Regulation: Expression analysis reveals that HDT1 expression is developmentally regulated, with highest levels in actively dividing tissues. This pattern aligns with its function in controlling meristematic activity.

  • Stress Response Modulation: Research indicates that HDTs, including HDT1, are involved in responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, suggesting that HDT1 expression may be modulated under stress conditions .

  • Overlapping Expression with HDT2: HDT1 shares overlapping expression patterns with HDT2 in the root meristem, consistent with their functional redundancy. This is evidenced by the fact that single hdt1 mutants show no root phenotype, while hdt2 knockdown mutants display a mild root growth reduction (12% reduced root length) .

When studying HDT1 expression patterns, researchers should consider using multiple detection methods to account for potential post-transcriptional regulation that might not be captured by promoter-reporter constructs alone.

How do HDT1 and HDT2 functionally interact in plant development?

The functional interaction between HDT1 and HDT2 in plant development is complex and characterized by both redundancy and specificity:

When designing experiments to study the individual functions of HDT1 versus HDT2, researchers should consider using tissue-specific or inducible knockdown/knockout strategies to circumvent the lethality of complete double mutants. Additionally, ChIP experiments using antibodies specific to each protein could help identify unique versus shared genomic targets.

How can HDT1 antibodies be effectively used in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments?

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using HDT1 antibodies requires careful optimization to generate reliable and reproducible results. Based on the known functions of HDT1 as a histone deacetylase that regulates specific gene loci such as GA2ox2 , researchers should consider the following methodological approaches:

  • Antibody Selection and Validation: Select antibodies with high specificity for HDT1 that have been validated for ChIP applications. Validation should include testing on chromatin from HDT1 knockout plants as a negative control and comparison with ChIP data from HDT1-GFP fusion proteins using anti-GFP antibodies.

  • Crosslinking Optimization: Since HDT1 is a chromatin-modifying enzyme rather than a direct DNA-binding protein, optimize formaldehyde crosslinking conditions (typically 1-3% formaldehyde for 10-15 minutes) to efficiently capture both direct and indirect DNA-protein interactions.

  • Chromatin Shearing Parameters: Determine optimal sonication conditions to generate chromatin fragments of 200-500 bp. Over-sonication may disrupt protein complexes containing HDT1, while under-sonication results in poor resolution.

  • Control Selection:

    • Input chromatin control: Essential for normalization

    • IgG negative control: To assess non-specific binding

    • Positive control: ChIP for a known HDT1 target such as GA2ox2

    • Biological replicates: Minimum of three independent experiments

  • Sequential ChIP Approach: To study co-occupancy of HDT1 with other chromatin modifiers or transcription factors, implement sequential ChIP (re-ChIP) protocols where chromatin is first immunoprecipitated with HDT1 antibodies, then with antibodies against potential interacting partners.

  • Analysis of Histone Modifications: Perform parallel ChIP experiments for histone acetylation marks (e.g., H3K9ac, H3K14ac) at HDT1-bound regions to correlate HDT1 occupancy with histone deacetylation activity. Research has shown that HDT1/2 negatively regulate acetylation levels at target loci .

  • Data Analysis Considerations: When analyzing ChIP-seq data for HDT1, consider the patchy expression pattern observed in the root meristem , which suggests cell cycle-dependent binding that may dilute signals in bulk tissue samples.

A sample experimental workflow for HDT1 ChIP:

  • Harvest plant material (preferably enriched for root meristem where HDT1 is highly expressed )

  • Crosslink with formaldehyde

  • Extract and shear chromatin

  • Immunoprecipitate with HDT1 antibody

  • Reverse crosslinks and purify DNA

  • Analyze by qPCR or sequencing

  • Validate findings with orthogonal approaches such as ATAC-seq to assess chromatin accessibility

What approaches should be used to differentiate between HDT1 and HDT2 functions in research?

Differentiating between the specific functions of HDT1 and HDT2 presents a significant challenge due to their partial redundancy and overlapping expression patterns . Researchers can employ the following methodological approaches:

  • Genetic Approaches:

    • Single Mutant Analysis: Compare phenotypes of hdt1 null mutants versus hdt2 knockdown mutants. While hdt1 shows no root phenotype, hdt2 exhibits a 12% reduction in root length , suggesting some unique functions for HDT2.

    • Tissue-Specific Knockdown: Use tissue-specific promoters (like RCH1 used in the research ) to drive RNAi-mediated knockdown in specific cell types, potentially revealing tissue-specific functions.

    • Inducible Systems: Employ chemically-inducible knockdown/knockout systems to bypass the lethality of combined HDT1/HDT2 loss and study temporal aspects of their functions.

    • CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing: Generate precise mutations in specific domains to dissect structure-function relationships unique to each protein.

  • Biochemical Approaches:

    • Specific Antibodies: Develop and rigorously validate antibodies that can distinguish between HDT1 and HDT2 proteins, focusing on unique epitopes.

    • Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry: Identify unique interaction partners for each protein that might explain their partially distinct functions.

    • In Vitro Enzyme Assays: Compare substrate preferences and enzymatic activities of purified HDT1 versus HDT2 proteins.

  • Genomic Approaches:

    • ChIP-seq with Specific Antibodies: Map genome-wide binding sites for each protein to identify unique and shared target genes.

    • RNA-seq in Single Mutants: Compare transcriptome changes in hdt1 versus hdt2 mutants to identify differentially regulated genes.

    • Cut&Run or CUT&Tag: These techniques may offer higher resolution for distinguishing binding sites of closely related proteins.

  • Protein Domain Swap Experiments:

    • Generate chimeric proteins by swapping domains between HDT1 and HDT2, then test for complementation of respective mutants to identify functional domains responsible for their unique activities.

  • Developmental and Cell-Specific Analysis:

    • Cell Type-Specific Transcriptomics: Analyze expression in specific cell types to detect subtle differences in expression patterns.

    • Live Imaging: Use differentially tagged HDT1-FP and HDT2-FP fusion proteins to monitor potential differences in subcellular localization or dynamics during development.

When interpreting results from these approaches, researchers should consider that the partial redundancy observed in the hdt1 and hdt2 mutants suggests that these proteins may have evolved to ensure robustness in critical developmental processes rather than to perform entirely distinct functions.

How can HDT1 antibodies be used to investigate epigenetic regulation during plant stress responses?

HDT1 and other plant-specific histone deacetylases are involved in responses to biotic and abiotic stresses , making HDT1 antibodies valuable tools for investigating stress-induced epigenetic changes. Researchers can implement the following methodological approaches:

  • Stress-Specific ChIP-seq Analysis:

    • Perform ChIP-seq with HDT1 antibodies on plants exposed to different stress conditions (e.g., drought, salt, pathogen infection).

    • Compare HDT1 binding profiles between stressed and non-stressed plants to identify stress-responsive target genes.

    • Correlate changes in HDT1 binding with alterations in histone acetylation patterns and gene expression.

  • Time-Course Experiments:

    • Conduct time-resolved ChIP experiments to track dynamic changes in HDT1 recruitment to specific loci during stress exposure and recovery.

    • Create a temporal map of histone deacetylation events mediated by HDT1 during stress responses.

    • Sample collection times: 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-stress treatment.

  • Stress Memory Studies:

    • Investigate whether HDT1-mediated histone deacetylation contributes to stress memory or priming.

    • Use HDT1 antibodies to monitor retained or altered binding patterns after recovery from stress.

    • Integrate with transcriptome analysis to correlate with long-term gene expression changes.

  • Co-IP Coupled with Mass Spectrometry:

    • Use HDT1 antibodies to immunoprecipitate protein complexes under different stress conditions.

    • Identify stress-specific interaction partners that may direct HDT1 to specific genomic regions.

    • Compare interaction networks between normal and stress conditions.

  • Phosphorylation-Specific Antibodies:

    • Develop and use phospho-specific HDT1 antibodies to investigate potential stress-induced post-translational modifications.

    • Map how phosphorylation or other modifications alter HDT1 activity or localization during stress.

  • Cell Type-Specific Analysis:

    • Combine HDT1 ChIP with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) or INTACT (isolation of nuclei tagged in specific cell types) methods.

    • Investigate cell type-specific epigenetic responses to stress mediated by HDT1.

  • Integration with Chromatin Accessibility Data:

    • Correlate HDT1 binding with ATAC-seq or DNase-seq data to understand how HDT1-mediated histone deacetylation affects chromatin accessibility during stress.

Stress TypeSample Collection Timepoints (hours)Recommended ControlsKey Analytical Comparisons
Drought0, 1, 6, 24, 48, 72Well-watered plants, ABA treatmentHDT1 binding vs. H3K9ac levels vs. gene expression
Salt0, 0.5, 3, 12, 24, 48Standard growth mediaCorrelation with known salt-responsive genes
Cold0, 1, 3, 24, 48, 7 daysStandard temperatureCell type-specific responses
Pathogen0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48Mock inoculationSA/JA pathway gene regulation
Heat0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 24Standard temperatureHeat shock protein gene regulation

Since research has shown that HDTs can repress the expression of defense-related genes by altering their chromatin acetylation status , particularly focus on pathogen-responsive genes when studying biotic stress responses.

What methodological approaches can resolve contradictory data when using HDT1 antibodies?

When researchers encounter contradictory results using HDT1 antibodies, systematic troubleshooting approaches can help resolve discrepancies:

  • Antibody Validation and Benchmarking:

    • Cross-Validation with Multiple Antibodies: Use different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of HDT1.

    • Epitope Masking Assessment: Test whether post-translational modifications or protein interactions might mask epitopes under certain experimental conditions.

    • Validation in Genetic Backgrounds: Confirm antibody specificity using hdt1 null mutants as negative controls .

    • Comparative Analysis with Tagged Versions: Compare results with ChIP using anti-GFP antibodies in HDT1-GFP transgenic lines .

  • Technical Parameter Optimization:

    • Fixation Conditions: Test different crosslinking protocols (formaldehyde concentration and duration).

    • Extraction Buffers: Modify buffer compositions to optimize nuclear extraction and maintain protein interactions.

    • Antibody Concentration Titration: Perform dilution series to identify optimal antibody concentrations.

    • Incubation Conditions: Vary temperature, time, and buffer conditions for antibody binding.

  • Sample Preparation Considerations:

    • Developmental Stage Standardization: Given HDT1's patchy expression pattern in the root meristem , strictly standardize developmental stages.

    • Tissue-Specific Analysis: Isolate specific tissues where HDT1 is highly expressed, particularly the root meristem.

    • Cell Cycle Synchronization: Since HDT1 expression appears cell-cycle dependent , synchronize cell populations before analysis.

  • Data Analysis Approaches:

    • Statistical Robustness: Increase biological replicates (minimum n=5) and apply appropriate statistical tests.

    • Batch Effect Correction: Implement computational methods to correct for batch effects across experiments.

    • Signal-to-Noise Optimization: Adjust data processing parameters to improve signal detection while minimizing background.

  • Orthogonal Method Validation:

    • Alternative Technologies: Complement antibody-based methods with CRISPR-based approaches (e.g., CUT&Tag, CUT&Run).

    • Functional Validations: Validate findings with genetic approaches (e.g., targeted mutations of HDT1 binding sites).

    • In Vivo Imaging: Use fluorescently tagged HDT1 for live cell imaging to confirm localization patterns.

  • Experimental Design Table for Resolving Contradictory ChIP-seq Data:

Variable to TestExperimental ApproachControl/Reference Point
Antibody specificityWestern blot against recombinant HDT1, HDT2, HDT3, HDT4 proteinsSignal detection only for HDT1
Fixation protocolTest 4 different crosslinking conditionsCompare to optimized protocols for other HDACs
Cell type heterogeneityFACS-sorted cell populations vs. whole tissuesCell-type specific markers
Cell cycle effectsSynchronize cells in different phasesCell cycle markers (e.g., CYCB1;1)
Technical varianceMultiple operators performing identical protocolsStatistical analysis of variance
Biological variabilityIncrease to 5+ biological replicatesPower analysis for sample size determination

By systematically addressing these variables, researchers can identify the source of contradictory results and establish reliable protocols for HDT1 antibody applications.

How can HDT1 antibodies be applied to study the crosstalk between histone deacetylation and other epigenetic modifications?

Histone deacetylases like HDT1 function within complex epigenetic regulatory networks. HDT1 antibodies can be leveraged to investigate the interplay between histone deacetylation and other epigenetic modifications through the following methodological approaches:

  • Sequential ChIP (Re-ChIP) Analysis:

    • First immunoprecipitate with HDT1 antibodies, then perform a second IP with antibodies against other epigenetic marks or modifiers.

    • This approach identifies genomic regions where HDT1 co-occurs with specific histone modifications or chromatin regulators.

    • Example workflow: HDT1 antibody → reverse crosslinks → IP with H3K9me2 antibody → sequencing.

  • Integrative Multi-Omics Approaches:

    • Combine HDT1 ChIP-seq with:

      • RNA-seq to correlate binding with transcriptional outcomes

      • ATAC-seq to assess chromatin accessibility changes

      • Bisulfite sequencing to examine DNA methylation patterns

      • ChIP-seq for histone modifications (e.g., H3K9me, H3K27me3)

    • Computational integration of these datasets reveals multi-layered epigenetic regulation.

  • Proximity Ligation Assays (PLA):

    • Use HDT1 antibodies in combination with antibodies against other epigenetic regulators to detect protein-protein interactions in situ.

    • This method provides spatial information about interaction networks in different cell types or developmental stages.

  • Mass Spectrometry of HDT1 Complexes:

    • Immunoprecipitate HDT1 and analyze associated proteins by mass spectrometry.

    • Identify interactions with readers, writers, or erasers of other epigenetic marks.

    • Perform under different conditions (e.g., developmental stages, stress) to detect context-specific interactions.

  • Genetic Interaction Studies:

    • Combine hdt1 mutations with mutations in genes encoding other epigenetic regulators.

    • Analyze phenotypic and molecular outcomes to identify synergistic or antagonistic interactions.

    • Focus on root development phenotypes where HDT1 function is well-established .

  • Chromatin Conformation Capture:

    • Combine HDT1 ChIP with Hi-C or 4C-seq to investigate how histone deacetylation influences three-dimensional chromatin organization.

    • Focus on genomic regions like GA2ox2 where HDT1/2 are known to regulate histone acetylation .

  • Epigenetic Inhibitor Studies:

    • Treat plants with specific inhibitors of various epigenetic pathways.

    • Monitor changes in HDT1 binding patterns and the consequences for target gene expression.

    • Example: Treatment with DNA methyltransferase inhibitors followed by HDT1 ChIP-seq.

Epigenetic Cross-talkExperimental ApproachExpected OutcomeKey Controls
HDT1 and DNA methylationHDT1 ChIP-seq in DNA methylation mutants (met1, cmt3)Altered HDT1 binding patternsWild-type comparison
HDT1 and H3K9 methylationSequential ChIP: HDT1→H3K9me2Co-occurrence at heterochromatic regionsSingle IP controls
HDT1 and PolycombHDT1 ChIP-seq in PRC2 mutants (clf, swn)Changed distribution at developmental genesChIP for H3K27me3
HDT1 and chromatin remodelersCo-IP with SWI/SNF components followed by MSIdentification of physical interactionsIgG control IP
HDT1 and histone variantsHDT1 ChIP followed by histone variant antibody ChIPAssociation with specific variantsInput chromatin

By integrating these approaches, researchers can build a comprehensive understanding of how HDT1-mediated histone deacetylation coordinates with other epigenetic mechanisms to regulate gene expression during plant development and stress responses.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.