HES2 Human

Hairy and Enhancer of Split 2 Human Recombinant
Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Maintenance of Progenitor Cells

HES2 represses differentiation pathways to sustain undifferentiated progenitor cells, particularly in the nervous system. For example:

  • Neural Progenitors: Prevents premature neurogenesis by antagonizing proneural activators (e.g., NGN1) .

  • Cardiac Progenitors: Regulates chamber-specific cardiomyocyte differentiation in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) .

Regulation of Cell Fate Decisions

HES2 influences binary cell fate choices, such as:

ProcessMechanismReference
Astrocyte vs. NeuronInhibition of proneural bHLH activators
Ventricular vs. Atrial CMsDifferential proteome profiles in hESCs

Role in Cardiac Differentiation

HES2-expressing hESCs exhibit distinct cardiogenic potentials compared to other lines (e.g., H1):

ParameterHES2 hESCsH1 hESCs
Ventricular-like CMs63.6%35.0%
Atrial-like CMs33.3%60.0%
Pacemaker-like CMs3.1%5.0%
Protein Expression15 upregulated40 upregulated
Source: Electrophysiological and proteomic comparisons in undifferentiated hESCs .

Key Findings:

  • Proteome Differences: HES2 cells express higher levels of cytoskeletal proteins (e.g., vimentin, keratin), linked to ventricular CM lineage .

  • Directed Differentiation: Coculture with END2 cells or BMP4/activin A signaling induces cardiac mesoderm in HES2 lines .

Regulatory Mechanisms

HES2 expression is modulated by environmental and genetic factors:

RegulatorEffect on HES2Mechanism
Benzo(a)pyrene↑ mRNA, ↑ promoter methylationEpigenetic modification
Bisphenol A↑ mRNA, ↑ gene methylationDNA methylation changes
Sodium Arsenite↑/↓ mRNA (dose-dependent)Toxicant-induced stress response
Notch Signaling↑ ExpressionCanonical pathway activation

Tissue Engineering

  • Immunocompatibility: HLA-I depletion in HES2 derivatives reduces immune rejection, enabling off-the-shelf therapies .

  • Cardiac Therapy: Directed differentiation protocols yield functional CMs for myocardial repair .

Cancer Research

HES2 is implicated in tumor progression, particularly in colorectal and gastric cancers, where its expression correlates with stemness and drug resistance .

Genetic and Population Diversity

Analysis of 112 human ES cell lines revealed:

PopulationFrequency of HES2 LinesKey Features
European54%High representation in literature
Asian28%Includes Han Chinese, Japanese
Middle Eastern10%Persian ancestry lines

Product Specs

Introduction
Hairy and enhancer of split 2 (HES2), a member of the HES family, contains a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) domain and an orange domain. HES family proteins interact with TLE, the mammalian homologue of Groucho, through the carboxy-terminal WRPW motif. Notch signaling activation triggers HES family gene activation via the interaction between the Notch intracellular domain and RBPSUH (CSL). HES2 expression is observed in the placenta, pancreatic cancer, colon cancer with RER, cervical cancer, and head and neck tumors.
Description
Recombinant human HES2, produced in E. coli, is a single, non-glycosylated polypeptide chain of 196 amino acids (residues 1-173) with a molecular weight of 20.9 kDa. It includes a 23 amino acid His-tag at the N-terminus and is purified using proprietary chromatographic techniques.
Physical Appearance
Clear, sterile-filtered solution.
Formulation
HES2 protein solution (1 mg/ml) is supplied in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), containing 0.4 M urea and 10% glycerol.
Stability
For short-term storage (2-4 weeks), store at 4°C. For extended periods, store frozen at -20°C. Adding a carrier protein (0.1% HSA or BSA) is recommended for long-term storage. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Purity
Purity is determined to be greater than 80.0% by SDS-PAGE analysis.
Synonyms
bHLHb40, hairy and enhancer of split 2, Class B basic helix-loop-helix protein 40, HES2.
Source
Escherichia Coli.
Amino Acid Sequence
MGSSHHHHHH SSGLVPRGSH MGSMGLPRRA GDAAELRKSL KPLLEKRRRA RINQSLSQLK GLILPLLGRE NSNCSKLEKA DVLEMTVRFL QELPASSWPT AAPLPCDSYR EGYSACVARL ARVLPACRVL EPAVSARLLE HLWRRAASAT LDGGRAGDSS GPSAPAPAPA SAPEPASAPV PSPPSPPCGP GLWRPW.

Q&A

What is the HES2 gene and what biological system does it belong to?

HES2 is a mammalian basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcriptional repressor gene belonging to the Hairy and Enhancer of Split family. It functions primarily as an effector of Notch signaling, which coordinates cellular events through cell-cell communication mechanisms . HES proteins play essential roles in orchestrating cell proliferation and differentiation during embryogenesis, maintaining progenitor cells in an undifferentiated state while regulating binary cell fate decisions in developing tissues . Unlike some constitutively expressed genes, HES2 often displays dynamic expression patterns in developing tissues.

How does HES2 differ from other members of the HES gene family?

While all HES family members function as transcriptional repressors with the basic helix-loop-helix structural motif, HES2 has distinct expression patterns and developmental roles compared to other family members such as HES1. The HES gene family exhibits tissue-specific expression patterns and temporal regulation, with each member contributing uniquely to developmental processes . Unlike HES1, which has been extensively studied in neural development, HES2 has more specialized functions in certain developmental contexts. This functional specialization allows for precise control over different developmental pathways despite structural similarities within the family.

What are the primary cellular functions of HES2 in human development?

HES2, like other HES family members, plays a central role in maintaining progenitor cell populations during development by inhibiting premature differentiation . It functions primarily through:

  • Preventing premature differentiation of progenitor cells, thereby maintaining the progenitor pool throughout development

  • Regulating binary cell fate decisions during tissue specification

  • Contributing to timing mechanisms through its oscillatory expression pattern, particularly in processes requiring precise temporal control

  • Mediating Notch signaling effects on neighboring cells through lateral inhibition mechanisms

  • Influencing tissue patterning through its role in cell fate specification

Without proper HES gene function, progenitor cells differentiate prematurely into certain cell types only, resulting in developmental defects characterized by depletion of the progenitor pool before all required cell types can be generated .

What are optimal experimental designs for studying HES2 expression patterns?

When investigating HES2 expression patterns, researchers should implement retrospective designed sampling methodologies rather than purely random approaches. Based on established experimental design principles, an optimal approach involves:

  • Initial sampling of approximately 5,000 data points to establish baseline expression parameters through a preliminary learning phase

  • Developing prior distributions about appropriate models for data analysis based on maximum likelihood estimates from the initial sampling

  • Implementing sequential design processes to strategically add information beyond the initial learning phase

  • Utilizing grid search optimization to select design points based on covariate levels identified in the full dataset

This approach yields superior parameter estimates compared to random sampling methods. For instance, in correlation studies, designed approaches required approximately half the sample size of random methods to achieve equivalent precision . By applying these experimental design principles specifically to HES2 expression analysis, researchers can more efficiently characterize temporal and spatial expression patterns with greater statistical power.

How can researchers effectively design loss-of-function experiments for HES2?

Designing robust loss-of-function experiments for HES2 requires careful consideration of several methodological factors:

  • Selection of model system: Due to HES2's developmental roles, both in vitro stem cell systems and in vivo embryonic models may be appropriate depending on research questions

  • Intervention approach selection: Options include CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for complete knockouts, conditional knockouts for temporal control, or RNAi approaches for partial knockdown

  • Experimental controls: Must include both wild-type controls and knockouts/knockdowns of other HES family members to distinguish HES2-specific effects

  • Phenotypic analysis framework: Should incorporate both cellular assays and molecular readouts focusing on progenitor maintenance and differentiation potential

  • Statistical design considerations: Optimal design principles suggest incorporating both training samples (approximately 20) to determine initial parameter estimates and sequential optimization approaches

The experimental approach should be designed to distinguish HES2-specific effects from redundant functions shared with other HES family members. Statistical analysis should employ observed information matrices to maximize precision of parameter estimates, as demonstrated in comparable experimental systems .

What are the most reliable methods for analyzing HES2 oscillatory expression patterns?

Analyzing oscillatory gene expression requires specialized methodological approaches. For HES2, the following methods have demonstrated superior reliability:

  • Time-series data collection: High-temporal resolution sampling is critical, with intervals determined by the suspected oscillation period

  • Normalization strategies: Data should be normalized against multiple housekeeping genes that demonstrate stability during developmental processes

  • Analytical approaches: Wavelet transforms and Fourier analysis can identify underlying periodicity in expression data

  • Statistical modeling: Utility-based design approaches that maximize information content are recommended over simple random sampling

  • Computational processing: Implementation of Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) algorithms can approximate target distributions as data are extracted from larger datasets

When comparing methodologies, designed sampling approaches have demonstrated approximately 18.9-19.3 observed utility compared to 24.4-24.7 for full datasets, representing efficiency of approximately 77-79% while using only a fraction of the data points . This makes designed approaches particularly valuable for resource-intensive time-course experiments studying HES2 oscillatory patterns.

How do HES2-mediated mechanisms differ across developmental stages?

HES2 functions through stage-specific mechanisms that evolve throughout development:

  • Early embryogenesis: Functions primarily in maintaining pluripotency and preventing premature lineage commitment

  • Mid-stage organogenesis: Shifts to regulating binary cell fate decisions in developing organ systems

  • Late-stage differentiation: Often downregulated as terminal differentiation proceeds, but may persist in stem cell niches

The predominant molecular mechanisms also shift across stages, with variations in:

  • DNA binding affinity to different target sequences

  • Interaction partners within transcriptional complexes

  • Post-translational modifications affecting protein stability and function

  • Oscillatory versus sustained expression patterns

Researchers should design stage-specific experiments with appropriate temporal controls to distinguish these varying functions. Analysis frameworks must account for dynamic parameter shifts across developmental stages rather than assuming constant mechanisms .

What approaches can resolve contradictory findings regarding HES2 function in different cellular contexts?

Contradictory findings regarding HES2 function frequently stem from context-dependent effects. To resolve such contradictions, researchers should implement:

  • Comprehensive contextual analysis: Systematically document all experimental variables across contradictory studies, including cell types, developmental stages, and experimental conditions

  • Covariate structure analysis: Investigate whether contradictory findings correlate with specific experimental parameters using correlation analysis frameworks

  • Unified experimental framework: Design experiments that simultaneously test multiple hypotheses under identical conditions

  • Hierarchical modeling approaches: Implement statistical frameworks that explicitly account for context-dependent effects

The effectiveness of these approaches depends on experimental design quality. As demonstrated in comparable systems, negative correlation between covariates can sometimes limit the effectiveness of designed approaches compared to random sampling . Researchers should therefore carefully consider correlation structures when designing experiments to resolve contradictions in HES2 function.

How can researchers distinguish between direct and indirect effects of HES2 on target gene expression?

Distinguishing direct from indirect regulatory effects presents a significant challenge. Methodological approaches to address this include:

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with appropriate controls: Identifies direct DNA binding sites

  • Rapid transcriptional inhibition experiments: Comparing immediate versus delayed expression changes after HES2 manipulation

  • Synthetic biology approaches: Reconstituting minimal systems with defined components

  • Comparison across HES family members: Identifying unique versus shared targets

  • Experimental design optimization: Implementing sequential sampling designs that maximize information about parameter relationships

Table 1: Comparison of Methodological Approaches for Target Identification

MethodAdvantagesLimitationsStatistical Considerations
ChIP-seqDirectly identifies binding sites genome-wideCannot confirm functional relevanceRequires sophisticated peak-calling algorithms
RNA-seq after acute manipulationCaptures rapid expression changesCannot distinguish very indirect effectsBenefits from time-series designs
Synthetic reconstitutionEliminates confounding factorsMay not recapitulate physiological conditionsRequires fewer samples but careful controls
Comparative analysis across HES familyIdentifies specific versus redundant targetsRequires multiple parallel experimentsBenefits from designed rather than random sampling

Statistical analysis of these approaches is enhanced by utility-based sampling designs that maximize parameter precision while minimizing required sample sizes .

How does HES2 function integrate with Notch signaling pathways in human development?

HES2, like other HES family members, functions as a downstream effector of Notch signaling, mediating many of its effects on progenitor cell maintenance and binary cell fate decisions . The integration occurs through several mechanisms:

  • Regulatory relationships: Notch activation typically induces HES2 expression, creating a responsive system for cell-cell communication

  • Feedback mechanisms: HES2 can modulate components of the Notch pathway, creating regulatory loops

  • Contextual dependence: The specific outcomes of HES2 activation vary based on cellular context and concurrent signaling inputs

  • Temporal dynamics: Oscillatory expression patterns of HES genes, including potentially HES2, contribute to the timing function of Notch signaling

Research approaches investigating this integration benefit from designed sampling methods that can efficiently capture parameter relationships with approximately twice the efficiency of random sampling approaches in correlated data structures .

What computational models best capture HES2 regulatory network dynamics?

Computational modeling of HES2 regulatory networks requires specialized approaches to capture their dynamic properties:

  • Model structure selection: Differential equation-based models most effectively capture oscillatory behaviors, while Boolean networks may suffice for steady-state analyses

  • Parameter estimation: Bayesian approaches with informative priors have demonstrated superior performance compared to maximum likelihood methods alone

  • Validation strategies: Models should be validated against independent datasets not used in parameter estimation

  • Simulation frameworks: Stochastic simulation algorithms are often necessary to capture the noise inherent in gene regulatory networks

Experimental design principles suggest that optimal parameter estimation requires strategically designed sampling rather than purely random approaches. In comparable systems, optimally designed approaches achieved equivalent predictive power to random sampling with approximately 50% of the data points . When implementing these models for HES2 networks, researchers should pay particular attention to correlation structures in the data, as negatively correlated structures may require different optimization approaches .

How can single-cell technologies advance our understanding of HES2 function in heterogeneous cell populations?

Single-cell technologies offer unprecedented opportunities for understanding HES2 function in complex tissues:

  • Technical applications:

    • Single-cell RNA-seq reveals cell-specific expression patterns

    • Single-cell ATAC-seq identifies accessible chromatin regions in HES2-expressing cells

    • Spatial transcriptomics maintains tissue context while providing single-cell resolution

    • Live-cell imaging of tagged HES2 can track dynamic expression in real time

  • Analytical challenges:

    • Data sparsity requires specialized normalization approaches

    • Trajectory inference algorithms help reconstruct developmental progressions

    • Integration across modalities demands sophisticated computational methods

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Sequential design approaches can maximize information while minimizing sequencing costs

    • Initial learning phases with ~5,000 cells can inform targeted sampling of specific populations

    • Grid-based optimization strategies can identify optimal sampling points in high-dimensional parameter spaces

Through these technologies, researchers can move beyond population averages to understand how HES2 functions in individual cells within heterogeneous tissues, potentially revealing previously unrecognized cell type-specific functions.

Product Science Overview

Gene and Protein Structure

The HEY2 gene is located on chromosome 6q22.31 and encodes a protein that is homologous to the zebrafish ‘gridlock’ gene . The protein consists of several key domains:

  • bHLH domain: Involved in DNA binding and dimerization.
  • Orange domain: Important for protein-protein interactions.
  • YRPW motif: A unique tetrapeptide motif at the C-terminus, distinguishing it from other HES family members .
Expression and Function

HEY2 is expressed in various tissues during embryonic development and in adults. It is particularly significant in the cardiovascular system, where it regulates arterial-venous cell fate decisions . The gene is expressed in the lateral plate mesoderm before vessel formation and continues to be expressed in the aorta but not in veins .

Role in Development and Disease

HEY2 plays a critical role in:

  • Cardiovascular Development: It is involved in the formation of arteries and veins, influencing the arterial endothelial identity even before the onset of blood flow .
  • Bone Remodeling: In mice, HEY2 regulates bone mass by influencing osteoblast activity and bone resorption. Overexpression of HEY2 in osteoblasts leads to decreased bone mass, while its inactivation increases bone mass .
Recombinant HEY2

Recombinant human HEY2 is produced using recombinant DNA technology, which involves inserting the HEY2 gene into a suitable expression system, such as bacteria or mammalian cells, to produce the protein in large quantities. This recombinant protein can be used in various research applications, including studies on gene regulation, developmental biology, and disease mechanisms .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2024 Thebiotek. All Rights Reserved.