The HRP-conjugated HIC1 antibody is optimized for:
Western Blotting: Detects HIC1 protein in lysates, with observed molecular weights of 65–70 kDa .
ELISA: Quantifies HIC1 levels in serum or lysates, leveraging HRP’s enzymatic activity for colorimetric detection .
Immunohistochemistry:
Tumor Suppression: HIC1 hypermethylation silences its expression in cancers (e.g., leukemia, prostate cancer), promoting tumor progression. Restoring HIC1 inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion in prostate cancer models .
Transcriptional Repression: HIC1 interacts with corepressors like MTA1 (NuRD complex) and CtBP to regulate genes such as Cyclin D1, p57KIP2, and SIRT1. Post-translational modifications (SUMOylation vs. acetylation) modulate these interactions .
p53 Regulation: HIC1 represses SIRT1, indirectly stabilizing p53. Loss of HIC1 disrupts this feedback loop, impairing tumor suppression .
While the HRP-conjugated antibody is specialized for enzymatic detection, other unconjugated HIC1 antibodies (e.g., Proteintech’s 24949-1-AP, Abcam’s ab235037) are used in complementary workflows:
HRP-conjugated antibodies are ideal for direct detection in ELISA and IHC, eliminating secondary antibody steps.
Unconjugated antibodies (e.g., Proteintech, Abcam) require HRP-labeled secondary antibodies for signal amplification .
Cross-Reactivity: Predicted reactivity with non-human species (e.g., rat, dog) requires validation in specific models .
Antigen Retrieval: IHC-P protocols often require citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or TE buffer (pH 9.0) for optimal staining .
Post-Translational Modifications: HIC1’s function is regulated by SUMOylation and acetylation, which may influence antibody performance in modified samples .
HIC1 (Hypermethylated in Cancer 1) was originally identified as a target of p53-induced gene expression and functions as a putative tumor suppressor protein that mediates transcriptional repression. The significance of HIC1 in cancer research stems from its frequent suppression in leukemia and various cancers due to hypermethylation of specific DNA regions, resulting in transcriptional silencing . HIC1 is also deleted in the genetic disorder Miller-Dieker syndrome (MDS), further highlighting its biological importance . Structurally, HIC1 is defined by five zinc fingers and an N-terminal broad complex POZ (or BTB) domain, which interacts with the SMRT/N-CoR-mSin3A HDAC complex to repress gene transcription .
The HIC1 polyclonal antibody with HRP conjugation (such as bs-15485R-HRP) is designed with the following specifications:
| Specification | Details |
|---|---|
| Applications | WB, ELISA, IHC-P, IHC-F |
| Reactivity | Mouse (confirmed) |
| Predicted Reactivity | Human, Rat, Dog, Cow, Pig, Horse, Chicken |
| Host | Rabbit |
| Source | KLH conjugated synthetic peptide derived from human HIC1 |
| Immunogen Range | 501-650/733 |
| Clonality | Polyclonal |
| Isotype | IgG |
| Concentration | 1μg/μl |
| Purification | Purified by Protein A |
| Storage Buffer | Aqueous buffered solution containing 0.01M TBS (pH 7.4) with 1% BSA, 0.03% Proclin300 and 50% Glycerol |
| Storage Condition | Store at -20°C with aliquoting recommended to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles |
These specifications ensure optimal performance in multiple experimental applications while maintaining antibody stability .
HIC1 primarily localizes to the nucleus where it functions as a transcriptional repressor . When visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy, endogenous HIC1 proteins appear in punctate nuclear structures, characteristic of proteins containing a BTB/POZ domain . This distinct nuclear localization pattern necessitates careful antibody selection and experimental design considerations:
Nuclear extraction protocols should be optimized to efficiently isolate HIC1 for Western blot analysis
For immunohistochemistry, appropriate antigen retrieval methods are critical - both TE buffer (pH 9.0) and citrate buffer (pH 6.0) have been successfully employed
When selecting controls for specificity, siRNA knockdown approaches can confirm antibody specificity, as demonstrated in studies where HIC1-positive nuclear dots were not detectable in cells transfected with HIC1-specific siRNA
For co-localization studies, nuclear markers should be incorporated to confirm proper detection of HIC1's punctate nuclear pattern
Understanding this subcellular localization is essential for accurate interpretation of experimental results with HIC1 antibodies .
Based on validated experimental protocols, the following dilution ranges are recommended for HIC1 antibodies in various applications:
| Application | Dilution Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:500-1:2000 | Sample-dependent; titration recommended |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:500-1:2000 | Antigen retrieval with TE buffer pH 9.0 or citrate buffer pH 6.0 |
| ELISA | Depends on specific protocol | Titration required for each testing system |
It is strongly recommended that researchers titrate the antibody in their specific testing systems to determine optimal concentrations for their particular experimental conditions . The observed molecular weight of HIC1 is typically 65-70 kDa, which is slightly lower than the calculated molecular weight of 75 kDa (714 amino acids) . This discrepancy should be considered when interpreting Western blot results.
Rigorous validation of HIC1 antibody specificity requires several types of controls:
Positive controls: Jurkat cells and NIH/3T3 cells have been validated for Western blot applications . For tissue sections, rat lung and rat stomach tissues have shown positive IHC detection .
Negative controls:
Expression validation controls:
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Implementation of these controls ensures reliable and reproducible results when working with HIC1 antibodies .
To maintain optimal HIC1 antibody activity, adhere to these storage and handling guidelines:
Storage temperature: Store at -20°C for long-term preservation
Aliquoting strategy:
Buffer composition:
Stability period:
Working solution handling:
Prepare fresh dilutions on the day of the experiment
Keep diluted antibody cold and protected from light, especially HRP-conjugated versions
Avoid contamination by using clean pipette tips and sterile containers
Following these guidelines will help ensure consistent and reliable results across experiments .
HIC1 functions as a transcriptional repressor involved in regulatory loops modulating P53-dependent and E2F1-dependent cell survival, growth control, and stress responses . To investigate these complex networks:
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify protein interaction partners:
Cellular context-dependent analysis:
Integration with epigenetic regulation studies:
Combine with DNA methylation analysis to correlate HIC1 binding with promoter methylation status
Assess histone modifications at HIC1 binding sites to understand chromatin context
This multifaceted approach can reveal how HIC1 coordinates transcriptional repression within broader regulatory networks .
Accurate quantification of HIC1 expression across tissue types requires complementary approaches:
RT-qPCR optimization:
Design primers located in the large HIC1 coding exon 2 to amplify both major alternative HIC1 transcripts (HIC1 1a/variant 1 and HIC1 1b/variant 2)
Use appropriate reference genes validated for the specific tissue types being compared
Include appropriate controls (e.g., normal prostate from young healthy donors has served as a control in prostate cancer studies)
Immunohistochemical quantification approaches:
Use recommended dilutions (1:500-1:2000) with optimized antigen retrieval (TE buffer pH 9.0 or citrate buffer pH 6.0)
Employ digital image analysis with standardized scoring systems
Account for cell-type specific expression (e.g., in prostate, HIC1 shows stronger expression in stromal compared to epithelial compartments)
Cell sorting for lineage-specific analysis:
FACS-sorting of specific cell populations prior to expression analysis can reveal lineage-specific patterns
Single-cell RNA-sequencing can identify HIC1 expression in distinct cell clusters within heterogeneous tissues
In prostate tissue, this approach revealed enrichment of HIC1 expressing cells in stromal compartments (fibroblasts, smooth muscle, endothelia, and leukocytes)
Western blot quantification:
This multi-method approach provides robust quantification of HIC1 expression patterns across diverse tissue types .
Resolving inconsistent HIC1 antibody results in cancer tissues requires systematic troubleshooting:
Tissue heterogeneity considerations:
Stromal content significantly affects HIC1 expression measurements in tumors
Some prostate tumors with high stromal content show elevated HIC1 expression compared to adjacent normal tissue, contrary to the typically observed downregulation
Microdissection or cell-type specific analysis may be necessary to account for this heterogeneity
Technical optimization approaches:
Antigen retrieval method validation: Compare TE buffer (pH 9.0) versus citrate buffer (pH 6.0) to determine optimal conditions
Antibody concentration titration: Test multiple dilutions within the recommended range (1:500-1:2000)
Blocking optimization: Adjust blocking conditions to reduce background while preserving specific signal
Multiple detection method validation:
Cancer stage and subtype stratification:
This comprehensive approach can help reconcile apparently contradictory results and provide more accurate interpretation of HIC1 expression patterns in cancer tissues .
HIC1 expression dynamics across cancer progression exhibit complex patterns requiring careful methodological considerations:
This multifaceted approach enables accurate tracking of HIC1 expression changes throughout cancer progression while accounting for tumor heterogeneity .
Studying HIC1 interactions with regulatory proteins requires specific technical considerations:
Co-immunoprecipitation optimization:
Nuclear extraction protocols must be optimized to maintain protein-protein interactions
Crosslinking may be required to stabilize transient interactions
Salt concentration in washing buffers must be carefully titrated to preserve specific interactions while reducing background
Proximity ligation assays (PLA):
Cell state considerations:
HIC1 interactions vary with cellular context - quiescent versus proliferating cells show different interaction patterns
HIC1/MTA1 complexes bind target genes like Cyclin D1 and p57KIP2 in quiescent WI38 cells but not in growing cells
Synchronize cells appropriately to study context-dependent interactions
Domain-specific interaction analysis:
Interaction verification strategies:
Reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies against interaction partners
siRNA-mediated knockdown of HIC1 or partner proteins to confirm specificity
Mass spectrometry to identify novel interaction partners in an unbiased manner
These technical considerations enable robust analysis of HIC1's interactions with its regulatory partners in different cellular contexts .
HIC1 shows distinct expression patterns in stromal versus epithelial compartments, making it valuable for studying stromal-epithelial interactions in cancer:
Dual immunofluorescence approaches:
Combine HIC1 antibody with epithelial markers (e.g., E-cadherin, cytokeratins) and stromal markers (e.g., α-SMA, vimentin)
This approach revealed HIC1 enrichment in stromal compartments of prostate tissue (fibroblasts, smooth muscle, endothelia, and leukocytes)
Quantitative analysis of co-localization can reveal spatial relationships between cell types
Cell culture model systems:
Compare HIC1 expression in paired cell lines representing epithelial and stromal components of the same tissue (e.g., RWPE1 epithelial cells versus WPMY-1 myofibroblasts from prostate)
Co-culture systems can assess how stromal HIC1 expression influences epithelial cell behavior
Conditioned media experiments can identify secreted factors regulated by HIC1
Laser capture microdissection with immunostaining:
Precision isolation of stromal and epithelial compartments following HIC1 immunostaining
RNA-seq or proteomics analysis of isolated compartments can reveal distinct gene expression profiles
Correlation of HIC1 expression with stromal markers in microdissected samples can confirm cell-type specific patterns
Single-cell analysis integration:
These approaches leverage HIC1 antibodies to investigate the complex interplay between stromal and epithelial compartments in cancer development and progression .
Multiplex imaging with HIC1 antibodies offers powerful insights into tumor microenvironment dynamics:
Cyclic immunofluorescence (CyCIF) integration:
HIC1 antibodies can be incorporated into CyCIF panels to visualize its expression alongside multiple cell type markers and signaling molecules
This approach can reveal spatial relationships between HIC1-expressing stromal cells and other components of the tumor microenvironment
HRP-conjugated antibodies would require tyramide signal amplification protocols optimized for multiplexing
Mass cytometry imaging approaches:
Metal-tagged HIC1 antibodies enable highly multiplexed imaging via Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC) or MIBI-TOF
These platforms allow simultaneous visualization of 40+ markers, enabling comprehensive characterization of HIC1-expressing cells within the complex tumor microenvironment
Antibody metal conjugation protocols must be optimized to preserve epitope recognition
Spatial context quantification strategies:
Nearest neighbor analysis can quantify spatial relationships between HIC1+ cells and specific tumor or immune cell populations
Cell clustering algorithms can identify higher-order organizational patterns
These approaches can reveal whether HIC1+ stromal cells form specific niches within the tumor microenvironment
Combined functional state assessment:
Multiplex panels can combine HIC1 with markers of cell proliferation, senescence, or activation
This can reveal functional heterogeneity within HIC1-expressing stromal populations
Integration with hypoxia markers can determine whether microenvironmental stress affects HIC1 expression patterns
These advanced multiplex imaging approaches provide unprecedented insights into the complex role of HIC1 in the tumor microenvironment .
ChIP-seq with HIC1 antibodies requires specific methodological considerations to generate reliable results:
Antibody selection and validation:
Antibodies must be validated for ChIP applications specifically
Polyclonal antibodies may provide better coverage of epitopes that remain accessible in cross-linked chromatin
Pre-clearing steps may be necessary to reduce background with certain antibody preparations
Chromatin preparation optimization:
Crosslinking conditions must be carefully optimized for nuclear transcription factors like HIC1
Sonication parameters should be adjusted to generate optimal fragment sizes (200-300bp)
Nuclear extraction protocols should be optimized to efficiently release chromatin-bound HIC1
Context-dependent binding considerations:
Cell state significantly affects HIC1 binding patterns - quiescent versus proliferating cells show different target gene binding profiles
HIC1/MTA1 complexes bind targets like Cyclin D1 and p57KIP2 in quiescent but not growing cells
Synchronize cells appropriately to study context-dependent binding events
Sequencing and analysis recommendations:
Include appropriate input controls for normalization
Consider the punctate nuclear distribution pattern of HIC1 when analyzing peak shapes
Motif analysis should account for both direct HIC1 binding sites and potential co-factor binding regions
Integration with transcriptome data can confirm functional significance of binding events
Co-factor binding strategies:
These methodological considerations enable robust ChIP-seq analysis of HIC1 binding sites and target genes under different cellular conditions .
Assessing HIC1 phosphorylation status requires specialized immunodetection protocols:
Phosphatase inhibitor optimization:
Standard lysis buffers must be supplemented with phosphatase inhibitor cocktails optimized for nuclear proteins
Include sodium fluoride, sodium orthovanadate, sodium pyrophosphate, and β-glycerophosphate
Sample processing should be performed at 4°C to minimize dephosphorylation
Phospho-specific antibody approaches:
While generic HIC1 antibodies detect total protein, phospho-specific antibodies would be required for direct phosphorylation assessment
In the absence of commercial phospho-specific antibodies, alternatives include:
Phospho-tag gel electrophoresis to separate phosphorylated from non-phosphorylated forms
Lambda phosphatase treatment of parallel samples to confirm phosphorylation-dependent mobility shifts
Immunoprecipitation-based strategies:
Immunoprecipitate HIC1 using validated antibodies, then probe with anti-phosphoserine, anti-phosphothreonine, or anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies
Mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitated HIC1 can identify specific phosphorylation sites
Compare phosphorylation patterns across different cellular conditions (quiescent vs. proliferating, normal vs. stressed)
Functional correlation approaches:
These specialized approaches enable comprehensive assessment of HIC1 phosphorylation status and its functional implications.
To ensure reproducible results with HIC1 antibodies across research groups, implement these critical quality control steps:
Antibody validation documentation:
Standardized experimental protocols:
Consistent positive and negative controls:
Data sharing and analysis standardization:
Share raw unprocessed images alongside analyzed data
Document image acquisition settings (exposure times, gain settings)
Use consistent quantification approaches and statistical methods
Consider automated analysis workflows to reduce subjective interpretation
Multicenter validation studies:
Periodically conduct round-robin testing of the same samples across multiple laboratories
Share antibody aliquots from the same lot for critical comparative studies
Document environmental variables that might affect results (temperature, humidity)
Implementing these quality control measures will significantly enhance reproducibility of HIC1 antibody-based research across different laboratories.
Comprehensive understanding of HIC1 biology requires integrated approaches combining antibody detection with complementary molecular techniques:
Multi-omics integration strategies:
Combine HIC1 ChIP-seq with RNA-seq to correlate binding with transcriptional outcomes
Integrate DNA methylation profiling to assess epigenetic regulation of HIC1 and its target genes
Include proteomics analysis of HIC1 interactome under different cellular conditions
These approaches revealed complex regulation of targets like Cyclin D1 and p57KIP2 in quiescent versus growing cells
Single-cell multi-parameter analysis:
Correlate single-cell RNA-seq with protein-level detection using imaging mass cytometry or similar platforms
This approach confirmed HIC1 enrichment in stromal cell clusters (fibroblasts, smooth muscle, endothelia, leukocytes) in prostate tissue
Extend to spatial transcriptomics to preserve tissue architecture context
Functional genomics integration:
Combine CRISPR-Cas9 editing of HIC1 or its regulatory elements with antibody-based protein detection
Correlate phenotypic outcomes with molecular changes at protein and RNA levels
Include rescue experiments with wild-type and mutant HIC1 constructs to establish causality
Structural biology connections:
Clinical-molecular correlations:
These integrated approaches provide a systems-level understanding of HIC1 biology across different cellular contexts and disease states .
Resolving contradictory findings regarding HIC1 expression and function requires systematic analytical approaches:
This systematic approach can reconcile apparently contradictory findings and advance understanding of context-dependent HIC1 functions .