HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody is a polyclonal rabbit-derived immunoglobulin designed to target the HIST1H2BC protein, a core histone variant involved in chromatin structure and gene regulation. This antibody specifically recognizes the Ab-57 epitope, though the exact amino acid sequence or region is not explicitly detailed in available sources. It is primarily utilized in research applications such as ELISA and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to study HIST1H2BC’s expression and function in human tissues .
ELISA: Used to quantify HIST1H2BC levels in solution-based samples, such as lysates or sera.
IHC: Employed to localize HIST1H2BC within tissue sections, enabling spatial analysis of protein distribution .
While the Ab-57 epitope is not explicitly defined, a related antibody (ABIN2844377) targets the AA 57–86 region of HIST1H2BC, suggesting that Ab-57 may recognize a similar domain . This region is critical for histone-DNA interactions and chromatin remodeling.
HIST1H2BC is a histone H2B variant that replaces canonical H2B in nucleosomes, influencing chromatin accessibility and gene expression. Studies using tagged H2B variants (e.g., HA-HIST1H2BC) have shown that its incorporation alters chromatin structure and promotes oncogenic pathways in breast cancer models .
In MCF10A epithelial cells, stable expression of HIST1H2BC led to:
Upregulation of breast cancer-associated genes (e.g., CFH, COL8A1) linked to aggressive phenotypes.
Enrichment of inflammatory and oncogenic signatures, overlapping with cytokine-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) .
ATAC-seq data revealed that HIST1H2BC expression increases chromatin accessibility at loci associated with oncogenic pathways, facilitating transcriptional activation .
The table below contrasts HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) with other histone H2B antibodies, highlighting its specificity and utility:
Antibody | Target | Epitope | Applications | Host |
---|---|---|---|---|
HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) | HIST1H2BC | Ab-57 (likely AA 57–86) | ELISA, IHC | Rabbit |
Anti-Histone H2B [ab52484] | Pan-H2B | Full-length protein | ChIP, WB, ICC | Mouse |
ABIN2844377 | HIST1H2BC | AA 57–86 | WB, IHC, Flow | Rabbit |
HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody is a polyclonal antibody raised in rabbit that specifically targets the human histone H2B variant encoded by the HIST1H2BC gene (UniProt ID: P62807). This antibody recognizes epitopes within the histone H2B protein, which is one of the core components of the nucleosome, the fundamental repeating unit of chromatin. Histone H2B plays critical roles in DNA packaging, chromatin structure regulation, and epigenetic control of gene expression .
Unlike monoclonal antibodies that recognize single epitopes, this polyclonal antibody binds multiple epitopes on the target protein, which may provide stronger signal detection but requires careful validation to ensure specificity. When planning experiments, researchers should note that histone H2B proteins typically appear at approximately 14-17 kDa on Western blots, though the observed band size may vary slightly depending on post-translational modifications and experimental conditions .
The HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) antibody has been specifically validated for Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) applications according to manufacturer specifications . When considering this antibody for research, it's important to understand that each application requires specific optimization:
For applications not explicitly validated by the manufacturer, preliminary testing is essential. Researchers should perform their own validation studies before proceeding with critical experiments, especially when considering chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) or other specialized techniques .
Proper storage and handling of HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody is critical for maintaining its reactivity and extending its useful life. The manufacturer recommends storing this antibody at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt . Importantly, repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided as they can lead to protein denaturation and loss of antibody function.
For optimal antibody performance:
Aliquot the antibody into smaller volumes upon first thaw to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Store working dilutions at 4°C for short-term use (typically 1-2 weeks)
Avoid contamination by using sterile technique when handling
Check for signs of precipitation or microbial contamination before use
Document lot numbers and maintain a record of antibody performance
Validating antibody specificity is crucial for generating reliable and reproducible data. For HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody, a comprehensive validation strategy should include multiple approaches:
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with excess purified HIST1H2BC peptide before application to samples. Signal reduction indicates specificity.
Genetic models: Test antibody reactivity in systems with HIST1H2BC knockdown, knockout, or overexpression. This is particularly important since some histone antibodies can demonstrate cross-reactivity with related histone variants or modifications .
Peptide microarray analysis: Consider using peptide microarray platforms to characterize antibody specificity and potential cross-reactivity with other histone variants or modifications. These platforms allow for robust and comprehensive characterization of histone antibody behavior .
Western blot validation: When performing Western blots, include positive controls (human cell lysates known to express HIST1H2BC) and negative controls. For histone H2B, the expected molecular weight is approximately 14 kDa, though the observed band often appears at ~17 kDa .
Multi-antibody comparison: When possible, compare results using alternative antibodies against the same target to confirm staining patterns or immunoprecipitation results.
Research has shown that some histone antibodies exhibit unexpected cross-reactivity. For example, certain H3K27me3 antibodies have been documented to cross-react with H3K4me3-marked histones, which could lead to misinterpretation of results in epigenetic studies . Such findings emphasize the importance of rigorous antibody validation.
While HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody is validated for IHC , optimizing protocols for specific tissue types and experimental questions is essential. The following methodological approach is recommended:
Sample Preparation and Fixation:
For FFPE (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded) sections, standard 10% neutral buffered formalin fixation for 24-48 hours is typically suitable
Section thickness of 4-6 μm is generally appropriate for histone staining
Mount sections on positively charged slides to prevent tissue loss during antigen retrieval
Antigen Retrieval:
Heat-mediated antigen retrieval is typically necessary for histone epitopes in FFPE tissues:
Citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) - test both to determine optimal conditions
Heat in pressure cooker or microwave for 15-20 minutes
Allow sections to cool slowly to room temperature (approximately 20 minutes)
Blocking and Antibody Incubation:
Block with 5-10% normal serum (matching the species of the secondary antibody) with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature
Apply optimized dilution of HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody
Incubate at 4°C overnight in a humidified chamber
Wash thoroughly with PBS (3 x 5 minutes)
Detection and Visualization:
Apply appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (anti-rabbit)
Develop with DAB substrate
Counterstain nuclei with hematoxylin
Mount with appropriate mounting medium
Essential Controls:
Positive control (tissue known to express HIST1H2BC)
Negative control (primary antibody omitted)
Isotype control (non-specific rabbit IgG at the same concentration)
Similar histone H2B antibodies have shown successful IHC results with this general approach, including detection in breast carcinoma FFPE sections using heat-mediated antigen retrieval with sodium citrate buffer (pH6) .
While HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody has not been explicitly validated for ChIP applications by the manufacturer , researchers may consider testing it for this purpose based on the success of other histone H2B antibodies in chromatin studies . If pursuing ChIP applications, consider these methodological approaches:
Cross-linking Considerations:
The choice between native ChIP and cross-linked ChIP can significantly impact results with histone antibodies:
Formaldehyde cross-linking (typically 1% for 10 minutes) preserves protein-DNA interactions but may mask some epitopes
Native ChIP (without cross-linking) may provide better access to histone epitopes but can lose transient interactions
Research has shown that some histone antibodies perform differently under native versus cross-linked conditions
Chromatin Preparation:
Sonicate chromatin to generate fragments of 200-500 bp
Verify fragmentation by agarose gel electrophoresis
Use approximately 25 μg of chromatin per immunoprecipitation
Include input controls (10% of chromatin used for IP)
Immunoprecipitation Protocol:
Pre-clear chromatin with Protein A/G beads
Incubate 2-5 μg of antibody with chromatin overnight at 4°C
Add Protein A/G beads and incubate for 2-3 hours
Perform stringent washes to reduce background
Elute DNA and reverse cross-links if applicable
Purify DNA for downstream analysis
Essential Controls:
IgG control (non-specific rabbit IgG)
Input DNA (non-immunoprecipitated chromatin)
Positive control loci (regions known to contain H2B)
Negative control loci (regions without H2B enrichment)
Experimental validation of ChIP-grade antibodies can be performed using semi-synthetic nucleosomes marked with specific histone modifications, which has proven valuable for histone antibody characterization in ChIP experiments .
When encountering weak or inconsistent signals with HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody, a systematic troubleshooting approach is recommended. The following table outlines common issues and their potential solutions:
For Western blot applications specifically, non-specific bands have been observed with similar histone H2B antibodies, including a 26 kDa band of unknown identity . When troubleshooting, include appropriate molecular weight markers and positive controls to accurately identify the target band.
For immunofluorescence applications, background reduction can be achieved by including 10% normal serum from the same species as the secondary antibody, combined with 0.3M glycine in the blocking buffer, as demonstrated with other histone H2B antibodies .
The polyclonal nature of HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody introduces specific considerations for experimental design and data interpretation that researchers should account for:
Epitope Recognition and Signal Strength:
Polyclonal antibodies recognize multiple epitopes on the target protein, which can provide:
Stronger signal detection compared to monoclonals, as multiple antibody molecules can bind a single target protein
Greater tolerance to minor changes in epitope structure due to fixation or denaturation
Potential for detecting the target across multiple species if epitopes are conserved
Lot-to-Lot Variability:
Unlike monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal preparations can vary between production lots due to:
Different animal immune responses in antibody production
Variations in the specific epitopes recognized by each antibody lot
Potential differences in the proportion of specific vs. non-specific antibodies
To account for this variability:
Test each new lot against a reference standard
Maintain detailed records of antibody performance by lot number
Consider creating a standard curve for quantitative applications with each new lot
When performing longitudinal studies, secure sufficient antibody from a single lot
Cross-Reactivity Considerations:
Polyclonal antibodies may recognize related proteins with similar epitopes:
Validate specificity against related histone variants
Test for cross-reactivity with modified histones (acetylated, methylated, etc.)
Consider the potential for recognizing histone variants across species
Recent research with histone antibodies has demonstrated that even well-characterized antibodies can exhibit unexpected cross-reactivity, such as H3K27me3 antibodies recognizing H3K4me3-marked histones . These findings underscore the importance of rigorous specificity testing, particularly when studying complex chromatin modifications or when using antibodies for quantitative analyses.
Quantitative analysis of data generated using HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody requires careful consideration of the assay type, potential sources of variability, and appropriate normalization strategies:
For Western Blot Quantification:
Use digital image capture with a linear dynamic range
Normalize H2B signals to established loading controls (e.g., total protein by Ponceau staining or housekeeping proteins)
Include a standard curve of recombinant H2B or serial dilutions of a positive control lysate
Apply appropriate statistical analyses for replicate experiments
For IHC Quantification:
Consider both staining intensity and percentage of positive cells
Use digital image analysis software for unbiased quantification when possible
Develop a scoring system appropriate to the research question:
H-score (0-300): intensity score (0-3) × percentage of positive cells (0-100%)
Allred score (0-8): intensity (0-3) + proportion score (0-5)
Ensure blinded scoring by multiple observers for subjective assessments
For ELISA Quantification:
Include a standard curve with known concentrations of recombinant H2B
Perform technical replicates (minimum triplicate)
Calculate coefficient of variation (%CV) to assess precision
Consider the linear range of detection for accurate quantification
For ChIP Quantification:
If adapting this antibody for ChIP applications:
Normalize to input DNA
Compare enrichment to IgG control
For ChIP-qPCR: calculate percent input or fold enrichment over control regions
For ChIP-seq: use appropriate peak calling algorithms and normalize to sequencing depth
For all quantitative applications, proper statistical analysis is essential. Consider biological replicates (n ≥ 3) and appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution. Report not only p-values but also effect sizes and confidence intervals for more complete interpretation of results.
Confirming specificity for HIST1H2BC versus related histone variants requires a multi-faceted validation approach:
Genetic Validation:
Use CRISPR/Cas9 to generate HIST1H2BC knockouts or knockdowns
Perform complementation studies with tagged HIST1H2BC
Analyze antibody reactivity in the absence or presence of the target gene
Biochemical Validation:
Conduct peptide competition assays with:
HIST1H2BC-specific peptides
Peptides from other H2B variants (HIST1H2BB, HIST1H2BD, etc.)
Test reactivity against recombinant histone proteins:
Purified recombinant HIST1H2BC
Other H2B family members
Other core histones (H2A, H3, H4)
Peptide Array Technology:
Advanced peptide microarray technology can provide comprehensive specificity profiles:
Test antibody binding against hundreds of histone peptides simultaneously
Assess the influence of post-translational modifications on epitope recognition
Identify potential cross-reactivity with modified histones or other histone variants
Research has demonstrated that peptide microarray platforms allow for robust and comprehensive characterization of histone antibody behavior, including specificity for particular modification states and the influence of neighboring histone post-translational modifications on epitope recognition .
Mass Spectrometry Validation:
For definitive validation:
Perform immunoprecipitation with HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody
Analyze precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Confirm the presence of HIST1H2BC-specific peptides
Identify any co-precipitating proteins or cross-reactive targets
This comprehensive approach to validation ensures that experimental results can be confidently attributed to HIST1H2BC rather than to cross-reactivity with related histone proteins.
When comparing results obtained using HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody with those from other H2B antibodies, researchers should consider several factors that might influence data interpretation:
Epitope Differences:
HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) targets specific epitopes that may differ from those recognized by other H2B antibodies
Map the specific epitope regions for each antibody when possible
Compare antibodies raised against similar epitope regions separately from those targeting different regions
Antibody Format Differences:
Application-Specific Differences:
Different antibodies may perform optimally in different applications:
Some antibodies work well in Western blot but poorly in IHC or ChIP
Fixation conditions may affect epitope accessibility differently for each antibody
Buffer conditions may influence antibody performance
Standard Protocol Development:
To make valid comparisons:
Standardize protocols across antibodies being compared
Include internal controls consistently across experiments
Test all antibodies simultaneously on the same samples when possible
Document lot numbers and dilutions for reproducibility
Research with histone antibodies has shown that seemingly similar antibodies can exhibit different behaviors in various assays. For example, in ChIP applications, some antibodies perform well under both native and cross-linking conditions, while others are effective only under specific conditions . These differences underscore the importance of comprehensive validation when comparing results across different antibodies.
While HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody is primarily validated for ELISA and IHC applications , researchers interested in chromatin biology might consider adapting it for studies of chromatin dynamics and epigenetic regulation, following appropriate validation. Potential methodological approaches include:
Chromatin Accessibility Studies:
Combine with DNase sensitivity assays to correlate H2B presence with chromatin accessibility
Integrate with ATAC-seq data to map relationships between H2B distribution and open chromatin regions
Analyze H2B occupancy in relation to chromatin remodeling complexes
Histone Variant Exchange Dynamics:
Use pulse-chase experiments with labeled histones to track HIST1H2BC incorporation into chromatin
Combine with live-cell imaging techniques to visualize histone dynamics
Analyze HIST1H2BC distribution during cell cycle progression and differentiation
Histone Modification Interplay:
Perform sequential ChIP (re-ChIP) to identify genomic regions where HIST1H2BC co-occurs with specific histone modifications
Correlate HIST1H2BC distribution with maps of histone modifications like H3K4me3, H3K27me3, or H3K9ac
Investigate how HIST1H2BC is affected by histone modification enzymes
Multi-omics Integration:
Correlate HIST1H2BC occupancy with RNA-seq data to assess relationships with gene expression
Integrate with DNA methylation profiles to understand epigenetic state associations
Combine with proteomics data to identify HIST1H2BC-interacting proteins
When adapting this antibody for chromatin studies, researchers should be aware of potential cross-reactivity issues observed with other histone antibodies. For example, studies have demonstrated that some H3K27me3 antibodies cross-react with H3K4me3-marked histones, which could confound interpretation of bivalent chromatin domains . Similar rigorous specificity testing should be applied to HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody when used in chromatin research contexts.
Histone H2B undergoes various post-translational modifications (PTMs) that are critical for chromatin regulation. When designing experiments to detect these modifications in HIST1H2BC specifically, researchers should consider the following methodological approaches:
Antibody Selection and Validation:
HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody likely recognizes the protein regardless of modification state
For specific PTMs, use modification-specific antibodies (e.g., anti-H2BK120ub, anti-H2BS14ph)
Validate PTM-specific antibodies using:
Synthetic modified peptides
In vitro modified recombinant histones
Cells treated with inhibitors of specific modifying enzymes
Sample Preparation Considerations:
Preserve labile PTMs through specific extraction protocols:
Add deacetylase inhibitors (e.g., sodium butyrate, TSA) for acetylation studies
Include phosphatase inhibitors for phosphorylation studies
Add proteasome inhibitors for ubiquitination studies
Consider the impact of fixation methods on PTM detection:
Some fixatives may mask or alter PTM epitopes
Test multiple fixation protocols for optimal PTM preservation
Technical Approaches for PTM Analysis:
Western blotting with PTM-specific antibodies
Include PTM-inducing treatments as positive controls
Use PTM-blocking treatments as negative controls
Mass spectrometry-based approaches:
Bottom-up proteomics after histone enrichment
Middle-down or top-down proteomics for combinatorial PTM analysis
Peptide microarray analysis to assess antibody specificity for modified vs. unmodified epitopes
Biological Context Considerations:
Analyze PTMs across different cell cycle stages
Compare PTM patterns across cell types and differentiation states
Assess changes in PTMs following experimental perturbations:
Drug treatments
Stress conditions
Genetic modifications of modifying enzymes
Research has shown that histone PTMs can significantly affect antibody epitope recognition . The complex interplay between neighboring modifications may enhance or inhibit antibody binding, necessitating careful validation of PTM-specific antibodies using peptide arrays or other comprehensive approaches.
While HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody provides a valuable tool for protein detection , researchers should be aware of emerging antibody-independent technologies that may complement or provide alternatives to traditional antibody-based approaches:
Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches:
Advantages over antibody methods:
Can distinguish highly similar histone variants with single amino acid resolution
Detects multiple PTMs simultaneously without epitope occlusion concerns
Enables discovery of novel modifications without pre-existing antibodies
Methodological considerations:
Requires specialized equipment and expertise
May need enrichment strategies for low-abundance histones
Quantification requires careful normalization and controls
CRISPR-Based Tagging:
Endogenous tagging of HIST1H2BC with:
Fluorescent proteins for live imaging
Epitope tags (FLAG, HA, V5) for detection with validated tag antibodies
Proximity labeling tags (BioID, APEX) for interaction studies
Advantages:
Avoids reliance on HIST1H2BC antibody specificity
Enables live-cell tracking of the endogenous protein
Can be combined with degradation systems for functional studies
Aptamer Development:
DNA/RNA aptamers as alternative affinity reagents:
Can be developed with high specificity for HIST1H2BC
Production doesn't require animals
Often exhibit less batch-to-batch variation than polyclonal antibodies
Current limitations:
Development process is resource-intensive
May have different sensitivity profiles compared to antibodies
Less established for chromatin applications
Computational Approaches:
In silico prediction of HIST1H2BC distribution:
Chromatin structure prediction algorithms
Machine learning approaches trained on existing ChIP-seq datasets
Integration of multi-omics data to infer histone variant localization
Strengths and limitations:
Provides genome-wide predictions without experimental limitations
Requires validation with experimental approaches
Accuracy depends on training data quality and algorithm design
Recent advances in antibody design using computational approaches, such as RFdiffusion for de novo design, suggest that next-generation antibodies may offer improved specificity and reduced cross-reactivity compared to traditional antibodies . These developments may eventually impact how researchers select and utilize antibodies for histone research.
Understanding the limitations of current HIST1H2BC (Ab-57) Antibody technology is essential for accurate data interpretation and for driving methodological improvements. Current limitations and potential future directions include:
Specificity Limitations:
Current challenges:
Potential cross-reactivity with other H2B variants due to high sequence homology
Limited validation across multiple experimental systems
Possible influence of neighboring PTMs on epitope recognition
Future directions:
Technical Limitations:
Current challenges:
Future directions:
Expanded validation for additional applications (ChIP, IF, Flow Cytometry)
Development of recombinant antibodies to reduce variability
Optimization of fixation and antigen retrieval protocols for various applications
Quantification Limitations:
Current challenges:
Nonlinear relationship between signal intensity and target abundance
Limited dynamic range in some applications
Challenges in absolute quantification
Future directions:
Development of calibrated quantification systems using recombinant standards
Single-molecule detection technologies for more precise counting
Multiplexed detection systems for simultaneous quantification of multiple targets
Future Technology Integration:
Computational antibody design:
Advanced detection systems:
Integration with super-resolution microscopy for nanoscale localization
Development of split-reporter systems for studying protein interactions
Creation of biosensors to detect HIST1H2BC modifications in living cells
Synthetic biology approaches:
Engineering orthogonal histone-antibody pairs for specific detection
Development of genetically encoded intrabodies for live-cell applications
Creation of synthetic chromatin systems with defined histone composition
As antibody technology continues to advance, new approaches like computational de novo design of antibodies may revolutionize specificity and reduce cross-reactivity issues that have challenged histone research . These technological developments promise to address current limitations and expand the applications of histone variant-specific antibodies in chromatin biology.