Target: HIST1H3A (UniProt ID: P68431), a replication-dependent histone H3 variant encoded by the HIST1H3A gene .
Immunogen: Synthetic peptide sequence around serine 10 (Ser10) in human histone H3.1 .
Host Species: Rabbit
Clonality: Polyclonal
Reactivity: Human (cross-reactivity with mouse and rat reported in other variants) .
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP): Successfully immunoprecipitated histone H3.1 from HeLa cells treated with micrococcal nuclease, demonstrating utility in epigenetic mapping .
Cell Cycle Analysis: Detected H3.1 in synchronized HeLa cells, confirming stable expression across cell cycle phases .
Cancer Biomarker Profiling:
Western Blot: Detected a 17 kDa band in acid-extracted proteins from Jurkat, HEK293, and HepG2 cells .
Immunofluorescence: Localized H3.1 to mitotic chromosomes in HeLa cells .
While HIST1H3A (Ab-10) is designed for total H3.1 detection, studies highlight critical considerations for histone PTM antibodies:
HIST1H3A encodes histone H3.1, one of the canonical histone H3 variants essential for nucleosome structure. Two molecules of each of the four core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) form an octamer, around which approximately 146 bp of DNA is wrapped in repeating units called nucleosomes . Histone H3.1 is expressed during S-phase, distinguishing it from the constitutively expressed H3.3 variant . As a core component of chromatin, HIST1H3A is crucial for understanding DNA packaging, gene expression regulation, and epigenetic modifications that influence cellular identity and function.
HIST1H3A antibodies are primarily used in Western Blot (WB), Immunohistochemistry (IHC), and ELISA applications . For Western Blot applications, recommended dilutions typically range from 1:5000 to 1:50000, while for IHC applications, dilutions of 1:500 to 1:2000 are commonly used . These antibodies are valuable tools for studying histone modifications, chromatin dynamics, and epigenetic regulation in various experimental contexts. Researchers should optimize antibody dilutions for each specific application and sample type to achieve optimal signal-to-noise ratios.
Antibody specificity can be verified through multiple approaches:
Positive controls: Use cell lines known to express HIST1H3A, such as LNCaP, HEK-293, HeLa, Jurkat, HSC-T6, or NIH/3T3 cells .
Western blot analysis: Look for a band at approximately 15 kDa, which is the observed molecular weight of histone H3 .
Comparison across species: Test antibody reactivity across species if your research involves cross-species comparisons, as some antibodies show cross-reactivity with human, mouse, rat, chicken, zebrafish, and wheat samples .
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunogen peptide to confirm binding specificity.
Knockout/knockdown validation: Compare signals between wild-type and HIST1H3A-depleted samples.
The major histone H3 variants include H3.1, H3.2, and H3.3, which differ in their expression patterns and functions:
H3.1 and H3.2 (canonical): Expressed only during S-phase of the cell cycle .
H3.3 (replacement): Expressed constitutively throughout the cell cycle .
Tissue-specific variants: Some variants are expressed in a tissue-restricted fashion (H3.5, H3.X, H3.Y) .
A unique feature of H3.1 compared to other H3 variants is that it contains an oxidizable cysteine residue at position 96 (Cys96), which makes it susceptible to redox regulation . This feature is absent in H3.2 and H3.3, making H3.1 more sensitive to oxidation compared to these variants .
Recent research has revealed that histone H3.1 serves as a chromatin-embedded redox sensor that responds to mitochondrial H₂O₂ in cancer cells . The mechanism involves:
Cysteine oxidation: H3.1 contains Cys96, which can be oxidized by H₂O₂ to form sulfenic acid (Cys-SOH) .
H3.1 depletion: Oxidation promotes the exchange of H3.1 for the variant H3.3 .
Chromatin remodeling: This exchange leads to chromatin decompaction and increased accessibility at promoter regions .
Gene activation: The resulting chromatin changes activate plasticity genes associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) .
Experimental evidence supporting this model includes:
Treatment with H₂O₂ leads to DCP-Bio1 adduct formation with H3.1 but not with H3.2 or H3.3, indicating specific oxidation of H3.1 .
Expression of oxidation-resistant H3.1(C96S) mutant prevents H₂O₂-induced histone exchange and EMT gene activation .
ChIP-seq experiments demonstrate significant loss of H3.1/H3.2 histones near transcription start sites after nH₂O₂ induction, mirrored by increased H3.3 deposition .
These findings suggest that targeting H3.1 oxidation could potentially inhibit cancer cell plasticity and metastasis.
Histone H3 mutations have been identified in various cancers and exert dominant effects on chromatin regulation . Two major classes of H3 mutations with significant impacts include:
"K to M" mutations: Lysine residues normally subject to methylation or acetylation are mutated to methionine (e.g., H3K27M) .
Glycine 34 mutations: Mutations at G34 impact the modification of the nearby K36 residue .
The H3K27M mutation, for example, exerts dominant effects by:
Stabilizing the binding of PRC2 to the mutant histone
Sequestering the methyltransferase
Preventing further deposition of H3K27me
Researchers can study these mutations using:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): To detect enhanced co-purification of mutant H3 with PRC2 complexes .
ChIP-seq: To assess genome-wide changes in histone variant distribution and modifications .
Specific antibodies: That recognize either the mutant histones or their modification states.
Transmission electron microscopy: To visualize changes in chromatin structure .
H1 linker histones play crucial roles in regulating H3 modifications and chromatin structure . Research has shown that:
H1 depletion leads to decreased H3K27 methylation and increased H3K36 methylation .
These effects are mediated by H1's promotion of physical compaction of chromatin substrate .
Methodologies to study H1-H3 interactions include:
Quantitative mass spectrometry: To detect global changes in histone modifications upon H1 depletion .
Immunoblotting: To compare specific histone modifications across different tissues .
ChIP-seq: To map genome-wide distribution of H3K27me3 and H3K36me2 in wild-type versus H1-depleted cells .
In vitro reconstitution assays: To directly test the effects of H1 on histone-modifying enzymes like PRC2 and NSD2 .
When designing Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments with HIST1H3A antibodies, consider the following methodological aspects:
Fixation conditions: Optimize crosslinking time and formaldehyde concentration to preserve protein-DNA interactions without overextending crosslinks.
Sonication parameters: Adjust sonication conditions to generate DNA fragments of 200-500 bp for optimal resolution.
Antibody selection: Choose antibodies that specifically recognize the C-terminal region of H3.1 to distinguish it from other H3 variants .
Controls:
Validation: Verify ChIP efficiency using qPCR of known H3.1-enriched regions before proceeding to sequencing.
Bioinformatic analysis: Apply appropriate normalization methods to account for differences in antibody efficiency and H3.1 abundance.
ChIP-qPCR experiments have demonstrated that after oxidative stress, wild-type H3.1-FLAG shows decreased association with promoter regions of key EMT genes (SOX9, fibronectin, ZEB1), whereas oxidation-resistant H3.1(C96S)-FLAG maintains stable promoter occupancy .
Antigen retrieval is critical for successful IHC staining with HIST1H3A antibodies. Based on experimental data:
Primary recommendation: Use TE buffer at pH 9.0 for antigen retrieval .
Alternative method: Citrate buffer at pH 6.0 may also be used if TE buffer doesn't provide optimal results .
Protocol optimization:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) is generally preferred over enzymatic methods
Optimize heating time (typically 10-20 minutes)
Ensure consistent temperature throughout the tissue section
Allow gradual cooling to room temperature after heating
Tissue-specific considerations: Mouse testis tissue has been validated for positive IHC detection , but optimization may be required for other tissue types.
Blocking optimization: Increase blocking time or blocking agent concentration if high background is observed.
Testing multiple antigen retrieval conditions in parallel using the same tissue sample can help identify optimal conditions for your specific experimental setup.
Several factors can affect the reproducibility and quality of Western blot results when using HIST1H3A antibodies:
Sample preparation:
Histone extraction methods (acid extraction vs. whole cell lysates)
Presence of protein phosphatases and deacetylase inhibitors
Storage conditions of samples
Gel electrophoresis:
Gel percentage (15-18% gels recommended for histones)
Running conditions (voltage and time)
Transfer efficiency (wet transfer typically preferred for small proteins)
Antibody factors:
Detection method:
Chemiluminescence vs. fluorescence detection
Exposure time optimization
Histone modifications:
To minimize variability, include positive controls from validated cell lines such as LNCaP, HEK-293, HeLa, Jurkat, HSC-T6, or NIH/3T3 , and maintain consistent sample preparation and experimental conditions across experiments.
Distinguishing between highly similar histone H3 variants presents a significant challenge. Consider these methodological approaches:
Variant-specific antibodies:
Mass spectrometry:
Use MS/MS to detect variant-specific peptides
Analyze post-translational modification patterns characteristic of each variant
Genetic approaches:
ChIP-seq analysis:
Compare binding patterns of different H3 variants across the genome
Analyze enrichment at specific genomic features (promoters, enhancers, etc.)
Biochemical properties:
Research has shown that H3.1 and H3.3 have distinct genomic distributions, with H3.3 being enriched at transcriptionally active regions and associated with chromatin decompaction .
Recent studies have revealed that histone H3.1 oxidation and subsequent replacement by H3.3 plays a critical role in cancer progression . Researchers can leverage HIST1H3A antibodies to:
Track EMT progression:
Study redox-sensitive chromatin changes:
Investigate therapeutic vulnerabilities:
Identify cancer subtypes with altered H3.1/H3.3 ratios
Screen for compounds that target H3.1 oxidation or exchange mechanisms
Evaluate combination therapies targeting both histone dynamics and oncogenic signaling
Monitor chromatin structure:
Experimental data shows that H3.1 oxidation at Cys96 promotes its replacement by H3.3, leading to increased accessibility of EMT gene promoters and upregulation of EMT markers like SOX9 and ZEB1 .
Histone H3 mutations, particularly H3K27M, affect the activity of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) . To study these interactions, researchers can employ:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Binding affinity measurements:
Enzyme kinetics assays:
Measure PRC2 methyltransferase activity in the presence of wild-type vs. mutant H3
Determine inhibitory mechanisms (competitive, non-competitive, uncompetitive)
ChIP-seq analysis:
Map genome-wide distribution of H3K27me3 in cells expressing wild-type vs. mutant H3
Identify loci with altered PRC2 recruitment or activity
Functional genomics:
Employ CRISPR screens to identify synthetic lethal interactions with H3 mutations
Test combination therapies targeting both the mutation and compensatory pathways
These approaches have revealed that H3K27M mutation exerts dominant effects by stabilizing PRC2 binding, sequestering the methyltransferase, and preventing further deposition of H3K27me, leading to a global decrease in H3K27me3 .
| Application | Recommended Dilution | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:5000-1:50000 | Sample-dependent, optimize for each system |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:500-1:2000 | TE buffer pH 9.0 for antigen retrieval |
| ELISA | Variable | Titrate for optimal results |
Data sourced from product information sheet
| Sample Type | Validated Materials for Western Blot | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Human cell lines | LNCaP, HEK-293, HeLa, Jurkat | Observed molecular weight: 15 kDa |
| Rodent cell lines | HSC-T6, NIH/3T3 | |
| Animal tissues | Chicken brain tissue | |
| Other organisms | Zebrafish, wheat whole plant | Demonstrates cross-species reactivity |
| IHC validation | Mouse testis tissue | Requires appropriate antigen retrieval |
Data sourced from product validation information
| Property | H3.1 (HIST1H3A) | H3.2 | H3.3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expression pattern | S-phase specific | S-phase specific | Constitutive |
| Deposition | Replication-dependent | Replication-dependent | Replication-independent |
| Oxidizable cysteine | Yes (Cys96) | No | No |
| H2O2 sensitivity | High | Low | Low |
| Association with | Heterochromatin | Mixed | Euchromatin, active genes |
| Role in EMT | Regulates accessibility of EMT genes through oxidation-dependent exchange | Limited direct evidence | Replaces H3.1 at EMT gene promoters upon oxidative stress |
| Effect on chromatin | Compaction | Mixed | Decompaction |