The HIST1H3A (Ab-27) antibody is a polyclonal antibody generated in rabbits that specifically recognizes the dimethylated lysine 27 (H3K27me2) on histone H3. The immunogen used for generating this antibody is a synthetic peptide sequence around the di-methylation site of lysine 27 (A-R-K(di-methyl)-S-A) derived from Human Histone H3 . This antibody is particularly valuable for studying epigenetic modifications as H3K27me2 represents an important repressive chromatin mark that regulates gene expression during development and cellular differentiation. The antibody has been purified by affinity chromatography using epitope-specific phosphopeptides, with non-phospho specific antibodies removed through chromatography to ensure high specificity .
The HIST1H3A (Ab-27) antibody has been validated for multiple research applications, enabling comprehensive epigenetic studies:
| Application | Validation Status | Recommended Dilution |
|---|---|---|
| ELISA | Validated | 1:1000 - 1:5000 |
| Western Blotting (WB) | Validated | 1:500 - 1:2000 |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | Validated | 1:100 - 1:500 |
| Immunofluorescence (IF) | Validated | 1:50 - 1:200 |
The antibody is supplied in an unconjugated form, making it versatile for various detection methods depending on the experimental setup . For specialized applications like ChIP (Chromatin Immunoprecipitation), preliminary optimization is recommended as conditions may vary based on target cell type and experimental conditions.
The HIST1H3A (Ab-27) antibody exhibits cross-reactivity across multiple species, making it valuable for comparative studies:
| Species | Reactivity | Applications Validated |
|---|---|---|
| Human | Strong | ELISA, WB, IHC, IF |
| Mouse | Confirmed | WB, IHC |
| Rat | Confirmed | WB, IHC |
This multi-species reactivity is particularly useful for evolutionary studies of epigenetic modifications and allows researchers to maintain consistent reagents across different model systems . When using this antibody in untested species or cell types, proper validation controls should be included to confirm specific binding to H3K27me2.
When designing ChIP experiments with the HIST1H3A (Ab-27) antibody, researchers should follow these methodological guidelines for optimal results:
Crosslinking and Chromatin Preparation:
Use 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature for protein-DNA crosslinking
Sonicate chromatin to generate fragments of 200-500 bp (verify fragment size by gel electrophoresis)
Pre-clear chromatin with protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding
Immunoprecipitation:
Use 3-5 μg of HIST1H3A (Ab-27) antibody per 25-50 μg of chromatin
Include appropriate controls: IgG negative control, input sample (10% of starting material), and a positive control antibody (total H3)
Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation
Washing and Elution:
Perform stringent washes with increasing salt concentrations to reduce background
Elute immunoprecipitated material with SDS-containing buffer at 65°C
Reverse crosslinks (65°C overnight) and treat with proteinase K
Analysis Considerations:
H3K27me2 often shows broader distribution patterns compared to H3K27me3
Include known H3K27me2-enriched regions as positive controls in qPCR validation
For genome-wide analysis, H3K27me2 ChIP-seq typically requires deeper sequencing compared to H3K27me3 ChIP-seq
Understanding the relationship between H3K27me2 and gene regulation requires careful experimental design, as H3K27me2 can serve as an intermediate state between active chromatin and the more repressive H3K27me3 modification .
Interpreting the relationship between H3K27me2 patterns and gene expression requires understanding several key principles:
Regulatory Context:
H3K27me2 generally correlates with transcriptional repression but shows more nuanced patterns than H3K27me3
H3K27me2 often marks gene bodies and intergenic regions, while H3K27me3 is concentrated at promoters
The relationship between H3K27me2 and expression varies by genomic context and cell type
Developmental Transitions:
H3K27me2 can represent an intermediate state in gene silencing or activation
During differentiation, genes may transition through different H3K27 methylation states (unmodified → me1 → me2 → me3 or in reverse)
Time-course experiments during development reveal dynamic relationships between methylation states and gene activation
Co-occurrence with Other Modifications:
H3K27me2 effects are modulated by co-occurring modifications
H3K27ac is antagonistic to methylation and marks active enhancers
Regional analysis of multiple modifications provides better predictive power for gene expression
Data Integration Approach:
| Data Type | Analysis Method | Interpretation Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| H3K27me2 ChIP-seq | Peak calling with broad domain settings | Identify domains rather than sharp peaks |
| RNA-seq | Differential expression analysis | Correlate with H3K27me2 changes |
| Other histone marks | Co-occurrence analysis | Identify combinatorial patterns |
| Developmental time points | Trajectory analysis | Track dynamic transitions |
Studies in both plant and animal models have shown that H3K27 modifications play critical roles in developmental gene regulation, with mutations at this residue causing severe developmental phenotypes .
Rigorous validation of the HIST1H3A (Ab-27) antibody is crucial for reliable research outcomes:
Specificity Controls:
Peptide competition assays using H3K27me2 peptides to confirm specific binding
Parallel testing with other validated H3K27me2 antibodies to compare signal patterns
Testing on modified peptide arrays to assess cross-reactivity with other methylation states (H3K27me1/me3)
Biological Validation:
Use of EZH1/2 inhibitors or knockdowns to reduce H3K27me2 levels as negative controls
Testing in cell lines with known H3K27me2 patterns as positive controls
Include isotype control antibodies to assess non-specific binding
Technical Validation:
Titration experiments to determine optimal antibody concentration
Inclusion of recombinant histone standards with defined modification states
Western blot validation showing single band at approximately 17 kDa
Application-Specific Validation:
For IHC/IF: Include tissues with known H3K27me2 patterns and test multiple fixation methods
For ChIP: Validate enrichment at known H3K27me2-positive regions by qPCR before sequencing
For mass spectrometry studies: Confirm pull-down specificity by analyzing modification state of immunoprecipitated histones
Proper validation is particularly important as H3K27me2 patterns can vary significantly between normal and disease states, as seen in studies of DICER1-associated tumors which show characteristic losses of H3K27me3 immunostaining .
The HIST1H3A (Ab-27) antibody enables sophisticated studies of H3K27 methylation dynamics:
Sequential ChIP (Re-ChIP) Approaches:
First IP with HIST1H3A (Ab-27) antibody followed by second IP with anti-H3K27me3 antibody
Reveals regions undergoing transition between methylation states
Identifies genomic loci with heterogeneous nucleosome populations
Time-Course Analysis During Cell Differentiation:
Track H3K27me2 levels at key developmental genes during differentiation
Correlate changes in methylation state with transcriptional activation/repression
Map the temporal order of epigenetic changes preceding gene expression changes
Enzyme Inhibitor Studies:
Monitor H3K27me2 redistribution after treatment with EZH2 inhibitors
Study the conversion between methylation states during drug treatment
Correlate with changes in gene expression for therapeutic target identification
Integrated Multi-Omic Profiling:
Combined analysis of H3K27me2, H3K27me3, and H3K27ac distributions
Integration with chromatin accessibility data (ATAC-seq)
Creation of comprehensive epigenetic landscapes during development or disease progression
Research has demonstrated that specific H3K27 methylation states on histone variant H3.3 play distinct roles in regulating lineage-specific genes and terminal differentiation programs , highlighting the importance of studying specific histone variants and their modifications.
The HIST1H3A (Ab-27) antibody recognizes H3K27me2 across different H3 variants, enabling comparative studies:
Histone Variant-Specific Functions:
Technical Considerations for Variant-Specific Analysis:
ChIP-seq with variant-specific antibodies reveals distinct genomic distributions
Mass spectrometry approaches can quantify modification levels on specific variants
Genetic approaches using K27 mutations in H3.3 genes reveal variant-specific functions
Research Findings on Variant-Specific Roles:
In Arabidopsis, H3.3K27A variants cause severe developmental defects, demonstrating crucial roles in plant cell fates and metabolic pathways
H3.3K27me3 shows unique enrichment at lineage-specific genes in mouse embryonic stem cells
H3.3K27 modifications regulate distinct terminal differentiation genes compared to canonical H3K27 modifications
Experimental Approaches:
Research has demonstrated that "while canonical H3K27me3 has been characterized to regulate the expression of transcription factors that play a general role in differentiation, H3.3K27me3 is essential for regulating distinct terminal differentiation genes" .
When using HIST1H3A (Ab-27) antibody, researchers should be aware of these potential artifacts:
Common Sources of False Positives:
Cross-reactivity with H3K27me1 or H3K27me3 modifications
Non-specific binding to other methylated lysine residues
Inadequate blocking leading to high background in immunostaining
Fixation artifacts in tissue samples causing epitope masking
Common Sources of False Negatives:
Over-fixation leading to epitope masking
Insufficient antigen retrieval in formalin-fixed tissues
Degradation of modifications during sample preparation
Competitive binding from other proteins in the nuclear environment
Troubleshooting Strategies:
| Issue | Potential Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| High background | Insufficient blocking | Optimize blocking (BSA, serum, commercial blockers) |
| No signal in IHC | Poor antigen retrieval | Test multiple retrieval methods (heat, pH, enzymatic) |
| Multiple bands in WB | Cross-reactivity | Use peptide competition controls, optimize antibody dilution |
| Poor ChIP enrichment | Inefficient IP | Increase antibody amount, optimize IP conditions |
| Inconsistent results | Lot variability | Use consistent lot numbers for critical experiments |
Validation Approaches:
Include parallel staining with total H3 antibody as control for histone accessibility
Use competing peptides to confirm signal specificity
Include biological controls with known H3K27me2 status
Confirm key findings with orthogonal methods (e.g., mass spectrometry)
Proper experimental design and controls are especially important when studying diseases with altered H3K27 methylation patterns, such as DICER1-associated tumors which show characteristic loss of H3K27me3 .
Integrative analysis approaches for H3K27me2 data include:
Multi-Mark Chromatin State Modeling:
Combine H3K27me2 with other histone modifications in computational frameworks
Employ machine learning algorithms to define chromatin states
Integrate with DNA methylation and chromatin accessibility data
Hierarchical Analysis Framework:
| Analysis Level | Methods | Insights Gained |
|---|---|---|
| Individual mark analysis | Peak calling, signal quantification | H3K27me2 distribution patterns |
| Pairwise correlations | Co-occurrence analysis | Relationships between marks |
| Chromatin state definition | Hidden Markov models, clustering | Functional chromatin domains |
| Gene regulatory networks | Integration with TF binding data | Regulatory mechanisms |
Biological Context Integration:
Correlate H3K27me2 patterns with developmental trajectories
Map changes during cell fate transitions
Compare normal versus disease states to identify pathological alterations
Visualization and Analysis Tools:
Genome browsers for multi-track visualization
Heatmaps showing mark co-occurrence at genomic features
Metaplot analysis around transcription start sites and enhancers
Studies in Arabidopsis have shown how integrating H3K27 methylation data with transcriptomics and metabolomics can reveal novel roles in plant development and lignin biosynthesis , demonstrating the power of multi-omic approaches.
For diagnostic and clinical applications, researchers should consider:
Standardization Requirements:
Establish standardized protocols for sample processing
Use automated staining platforms when possible
Develop quantitative scoring systems for H3K27me2 levels
Tissue-Specific Considerations:
Optimize fixation protocols for each tissue type
Determine appropriate antigen retrieval methods
Establish tissue-specific positive and negative controls
Diagnostic Value Assessment:
Compare H3K27me2 patterns with established diagnostic markers
Correlate patterns with clinical outcomes in retrospective studies
Evaluate sensitivity and specificity for specific disease detection
Clinical Sample Challenges:
| Challenge | Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Fixation variability | Inconsistent staining | Standardize fixation protocols |
| Limited material | Insufficient for multiple tests | Optimize antibody dilution, use multiplexing |
| Tumor heterogeneity | Variable staining patterns | Analyze multiple regions, quantify heterogeneity |
| Interpretation guidelines | Subjective assessment | Develop scoring systems, use digital pathology |
Emerging Applications:
Detection of H3K27me2/me3 loss in specific tumor types
Monitoring epigenetic changes during treatment
Identifying patients likely to respond to epigenetic therapies
Research has established that H3K27me3 loss can serve as a helpful diagnostic marker for certain tumors like DICER1-associated primary intracranial sarcomas and PPB types II and III , suggesting potential diagnostic applications for H3K27 methylation profiling.
Future research on H3K27me2 will benefit from these emerging technologies:
Single-Cell Epigenomic Approaches:
Single-cell CUT&Tag for H3K27me2 profiling with cellular resolution
Integrated single-cell multi-omic methods (scNOMe-seq, scCUT&Tag)
Computational methods for trajectory analysis of epigenetic states
Advanced Imaging Techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy of H3K27me2 distribution
Live-cell imaging using engineered readers for H3K27me2
Multiplexed imaging of multiple histone modifications
Direct Modification Detection Methods:
Third-generation sequencing for direct detection of modifications
Mass spectrometry approaches with improved sensitivity
Antibody-free detection using engineered readers or chemical approaches
Variant-Specific Analysis:
Techniques to distinguish modifications on specific H3 variants
Custom antibodies for variant-specific H3K27me2 detection
Computational methods to resolve variant-specific signals from sequencing data
This continues to be an evolving field, with recent studies demonstrating unique roles for H3.3K27 methylation in regulating lineage-specific genes and terminal differentiation programs .
Critical questions in H3K27me2 research include:
Regulatory Mechanisms:
How is the balance between H3K27me2 and other methylation states dynamically regulated?
What determines the specificity of H3K27 methyltransferases for me1, me2, or me3 states?
What are the specific readers of H3K27me2 distinct from H3K27me3 readers?
Functional Roles:
What is the distinct function of H3K27me2 compared to H3K27me3?
How does H3K27me2 on histone variants like H3.3 differ functionally from canonical H3?
What role does H3K27me2 play in enhancer regulation and 3D genome organization?
Disease Relevance:
How are H3K27me2 patterns specifically altered in different disease contexts?
Can H3K27me2 patterns serve as prognostic or predictive biomarkers?
How do mutations in epigenetic regulators specifically impact H3K27me2 vs. H3K27me3?
Developmental Biology:
What is the role of H3K27me2 in cell fate decisions during development?
How do H3K27me2 patterns evolve during cellular differentiation?
What is the evolutionary conservation of H3K27me2 functions across species?
Recent research in Arabidopsis and Drosophila has begun addressing some of these questions, revealing critical roles for H3K27 modifications in development and gene regulation .
Computational advances for H3K27me2 research include:
Advanced Peak Calling Algorithms:
Methods optimized for broad domains characteristic of H3K27me2
Differential binding analysis accounting for variability in broad marks
Integration of multiple data types for improved signal detection
Machine Learning Applications:
Classification of chromatin states incorporating H3K27me2
Predictive models for gene expression based on histone modification patterns
Transfer learning approaches leveraging data across cell types and conditions
Network-Based Analyses:
Construction of epigenetic regulatory networks
Integration of epigenetic data with transcription factor binding networks
Systems biology approaches to model modification dynamics
Multi-Omics Integration:
Methods to correlate H3K27me2 patterns with transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome
Causal inference approaches to determine regulatory relationships
Multi-modal data visualization and exploration tools
Integrative computational approaches have already revealed important insights, such as the role of H3.3K27me3 in regulating distinct terminal differentiation genes compared to canonical H3K27me3 .