Histone H3R8me2s antibody (ab130740) is a rabbit polyclonal reagent designed to detect symmetric dimethylation at arginine 8 on histone H3. This modification is enzymatically deposited by protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) and is associated with transcriptional regulation and chromatin remodeling .
Target Band: 15 kDa (observed at 18 kDa in calf thymus histone lysate) .
Positive Control: Calf thymus histone preparation shows a single band, confirming specificity .
Negative Control: No signal in IP experiments without primary antibody .
Human Tissues: Strong nuclear staining in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded skin and kidney tissues .
Protocol: Antigen retrieval with sodium citrate buffer (pH 6) and detection via HRP-conjugated polymer system .
Specific Binding: Strong interaction with H3R8me2s peptide (ab154299) .
No Cross-Reactivity: No binding to asymmetric dimethylarginine (H3R8me2a) or unmodified H3 peptides .
Cancer Research: Used to investigate HDAC inhibition’s role in reversing EBV-induced dedifferentiation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, highlighting H3R8me2s’s involvement in cancer cell plasticity .
Chromatin Dynamics: Identifies symmetric dimethylation patterns in mitotic chromatin, suggesting roles in cell cycle regulation .
High Sensitivity: Effective at 1 μg/mL in IHC and 1:500–1:2000 dilutions in WB .
Reproducibility: Validated across multiple lots via peptide microarrays and immunoprecipitation .
| Feature | H3R8me2s Antibody (ab130740) | H3R8me2a Antibody (Active Motif 39651) |
|---|---|---|
| Modification Type | Symmetric dimethylation | Asymmetric dimethylation |
| Enzymatic Source | PRMT5/7 | PRMT1/2/3 |
| Biological Role | Gene silencing | Transcriptional activation |
| Cross-Reactivity | None with H3R8me2a | None with H3R8me2s |
Histone H3 arginine 8 dimethylation represents an important epigenetic mark involved in transcriptional regulation. As part of the core component of nucleosomes, histone H3 is subject to various chemical modifications that play major roles in regulating gene expression . Specifically, arginine methylation on H3R8 is executed by protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) and is associated with nuclear-receptor-mediated transcriptional activation . This modification occurs within the histone H3 tail region, which contains multiple sites for modifications including the adjacent R8, K9, and S10 residues, all of which can be methylated, acetylated, or phosphorylated in various combinations .
The modification state of histones constitutes a major chromatin indexing mechanism, making proper characterization of modifications like H3R8me2 of highest biological importance for understanding gene regulation .
Arginine methylation can occur in different forms: monomethylation (me1), symmetric dimethylation (me2s), and asymmetric dimethylation (me2a). The H3R8me2a antibody specifically recognizes the asymmetric dimethylation of arginine 8 on histone H3, which has distinct functional implications compared to symmetric dimethylation or monomethylation states.
The asymmetric dimethylation of H3R8 is catalyzed by a specific subset of PRMT enzymes and is involved in nuclear-receptor-mediated transcriptional activation . The specificity of detection is critical as arginine methylation represents a distinct signaling mechanism from lysine methylation, which occurs at nearby residues like K9 on the H3 tail.
H3R8me2 exists within a hypermodified region of the histone H3 tail. Research shows that secondary modifications in close proximity can significantly affect antibody recognition of the target modification . For example, similar to what has been observed with H3K9me3 detection, phosphorylation of adjacent residues (like S10 or T11) might interfere with antibody binding despite the presence of H3R8me2 .
When designing experiments to study H3R8me2, researchers should consider the potential cross-talk between this modification and other nearby PTMs, such as H3K4 methylation, H3K9 methylation, or H3S10 phosphorylation, as these combinatorial patterns may have distinct functional consequences in chromatin regulation.
Based on the available research data, H3R8me2a antibodies have been validated for several key applications:
| Application | Recommended Dilution/Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ChIP | 10 μl per ChIP | For chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify genomic binding sites |
| ChIP-Seq | 10 μl each | For genome-wide mapping of the modification |
| Western Blot | 1:500 dilution | For detecting the modification in protein extracts |
ChIP-Seq validation has been performed by epigenetics services, with complete data sets available in genome browsers . These applications allow researchers to study the genomic distribution, context, and functional relevance of H3R8me2a in chromatin regulation.
When working with histone modification antibodies, proper controls are essential for result validation:
Positive controls: Use nuclear extracts from cell lines known to contain the modification. For H3R8me2a, 293 nuclear extract can serve as a positive control .
Negative controls:
Use recombinant histones (which lack PTMs) as a negative binding control
Include cells treated with inhibitors of the corresponding histone-modifying enzymes (PRMT inhibitors)
Use cells with genetic knockdown/knockout of the relevant PRMT enzymes
Peptide competition assays: Pre-incubate the antibody with peptides containing the H3R8me2a modification to verify specificity.
Specificity controls: Test the antibody against peptide arrays containing various histone modifications to ensure it does not cross-react with similar modifications (such as H3R8me1, H3R8me2s, or methylations at other arginine residues).
For optimal ChIP and ChIP-Seq results with H3R8me2a antibodies:
Sample preparation:
Crosslink cells with 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature
Prepare chromatin by sonication to obtain fragments of 200-500 bp
Immunoprecipitation:
Washing and elution:
Use increasingly stringent washing buffers to reduce background
Elute chromatin and reverse crosslinks at 65°C overnight
Library preparation for ChIP-Seq:
Purify DNA and prepare sequencing libraries following standard protocols
Include input controls and spike-in controls for normalization
Data analysis:
Align reads to reference genome
Identify enriched regions (peaks) compared to input
Analyze genomic distribution and correlation with other histone marks
Integrate with transcriptomic data to identify regulated genes
For optimal results, magnetic bead-based ChIP-IT Express Kits or ChIP-IT High Sensitivity Kits have been validated with these antibodies .
Validating antibody specificity is critical, especially for histone PTMs that often occur in similar amino acid sequence contexts. According to established guidelines , antibodies should:
Specifically detect modified histones in Western blots
The antibody should recognize the modified histone but not unmodified histones
Signal should diminish upon treatment with relevant PRMT inhibitors
Additionally satisfy one or more secondary criteria:
Specific binding to modified peptides in dot blot assays
Mass spectrometric detection of the modification in precipitated chromatin
Loss of signal upon knockdown of the corresponding histone-modifying enzyme
Reproducibility of ChIP-seq results
Similarity of results from two different antibodies against the same modification
Peptide array binding assays are particularly useful for assessing cross-reactivity with other histone modifications, especially those occurring at similar sequence motifs.
Several factors can impact the specificity and sensitivity of H3R8me2a antibodies:
Antibody batch variation: Different lots of the same antibody can show variations in specificity and binding affinity . Always validate new antibody lots before use in critical experiments.
Adjacent modifications: Secondary modifications in close proximity to H3R8 can prevent antibody binding despite the presence of the target modification, potentially yielding false negative results . This is particularly important as the H3 tail is hypermodified, with modifications often occurring on adjacent residues.
Epitope masking: Protein interactions or chromatin compaction might obscure the epitope and interfere with antibody access.
Fixation conditions: In techniques requiring fixation (like ChIP), crosslinking conditions can affect epitope accessibility.
Antibody format: Different formats (monoclonal vs. polyclonal) may have different specificities and applications.
To manage these factors, always include appropriate controls and consider using alternative detection methods, such as histone modification interacting domains (HMIDs), to complement antibody-based approaches .
Recent research has explored using naturally occurring and engineered histone modification interacting domains (HMIDs) as alternatives to antibodies . While this approach has been primarily validated for H3K9me3 detection, the principles may be applicable to studying H3R8me2:
| Feature | Traditional Antibodies | HMIDs |
|---|---|---|
| Production | Animal immunization; variable batches | Recombinant production in E. coli; consistent quality |
| Cost | Higher, especially for monoclonals | Lower production costs |
| Specificity | Lot-to-lot variability | Highly specific, consistent between batches |
| Controls | Limited negative controls | Can engineer binding pocket mutants as negative controls |
| Customization | Limited | Can add affinity tags, engineer novel specificities |
| Applications | WB, ChIP, IF, ELISA | Demonstrated for WB, CIDOP (ChIP-like applications) |
HMIDs offer several advantages for research applications, including: (1) recombinant production at low cost and constant quality; (2) ability to design reading domains with novel specificities; (3) addition of affinity tags; and (4) preparation of binding pocket variants as matching negative controls .
Integrating H3R8me2 ChIP-seq with other epigenomic datasets provides comprehensive insights into chromatin regulation:
Correlation analysis with other histone marks:
Compare H3R8me2 distribution with active marks (H3K4me3, H3K27ac)
Analyze relationship with repressive marks (H3K9me3, H3K27me3)
Examine co-occurrence patterns at different genomic features
Integration with DNA methylation data:
Transcriptome correlation:
Integrate with RNA-seq data to correlate modification presence with gene expression
Analyze H3R8me2 enrichment at promoters, gene bodies, and enhancers relative to expression levels
Chromatin state analysis:
Use computational tools to define chromatin states based on combinations of histone marks
Determine specific states where H3R8me2 is predominantly found
Visualization and analysis:
Use genome browsers to visualize multiple datasets simultaneously
Apply computational tools like ChromHMM or EpiCSeg for chromatin state segmentation
Perform statistical analyses to identify significant correlations and patterns
The relationship between histone modifications like H3R8me2 and histone variants such as H3.3 adds another layer of complexity to chromatin regulation:
Deposition patterns: Unlike canonical histones, H3.3 is incorporated into chromatin in a replication-independent manner . This affects when and where modifications like H3R8me2 might be established.
Enrichment in active chromatin: H3.3 accumulates predominantly at sites of active transcription , suggesting potential co-occurrence with active chromatin marks. Research has shown that H3.3 is enriched in chromatin domains marked by histone modifications of active or potentially active genes .
Bivalent domains: Some H3.3-enriched promoters are co-enriched in H3K4me3 alone or together with H3K27me3, whereas H3K9me3 is generally excluded . This pattern may influence the distribution of H3R8me2.
Experimental considerations: When studying H3R8me2, researchers should consider whether the modification occurs on canonical H3 or histone variants like H3.3, as this may affect functional outcomes and genomic distribution patterns.
To study the relationship between H3R8me2 and histone variants, researchers can use sequential ChIP (re-ChIP) or develop antibodies specific for the modification on particular histone variants.
Variations in antibody performance can stem from multiple factors:
To address these variations:
Include consistent positive and negative controls in each experiment
Consider using alternative approaches like HMIDs as complementary detection methods
Standardize experimental protocols, especially chromatin preparation and washing conditions
Validate results using orthogonal techniques (e.g., mass spectrometry)
To optimize ChIP-seq for H3R8me2a antibodies:
Chromatin preparation:
Test different crosslinking conditions (0.5-2% formaldehyde, 5-15 minutes)
Optimize sonication to achieve consistent fragment size (200-500 bp)
Consider native ChIP for some applications to avoid crosslinking artifacts
Antibody conditions:
Washing optimization:
Test increasingly stringent washing conditions
Balance between reducing background and maintaining specific signal
Include detergents like Triton X-100 or SDS at appropriate concentrations
Controls and normalization:
Include spike-in controls for quantitative comparisons
Perform parallel ChIPs with IgG and input controls
Consider technical replicates to assess reproducibility
Sequencing considerations:
Ensure sufficient sequencing depth (20-40 million reads recommended)
Use paired-end sequencing for improved mapping
Include appropriate sequencing controls
When analyzing H3R8me2 ChIP-seq data, researchers should be aware of these common pitfalls:
Background signal interpretation: Distinguishing true low-level enrichment from background noise requires careful normalization and controls.
Antibody cross-reactivity: Even well-validated antibodies may have some cross-reactivity with similar modifications. Always consider alternative validations for key findings.
Cellular heterogeneity: Bulk ChIP-seq represents an average signal across potentially diverse cell populations. Consider single-cell approaches for heterogeneous samples.
Peak calling parameters: Different algorithms and parameters can significantly affect results. Test multiple approaches and validate key findings.
Biological context: Avoid over-interpreting correlation as causation. Integrate multiple datasets and functional studies to establish biological significance.
Technical biases: Be aware of biases in chromatin accessibility, GC content, and mappability that can affect signal distribution.
Quantitative comparisons: Direct quantitative comparisons between different histone marks should be approached with caution due to differences in antibody efficiencies and epitope accessibility.