HIV-2 gp160 is a 160-kDa glycoprotein synthesized as a polyprotein precursor. It undergoes furin-mediated proteolytic cleavage in the trans-Golgi network to generate mature surface glycoprotein gp120 and transmembrane glycoprotein gp41 .
HIV-2 gp160 facilitates viral entry through sequential interactions:
CD4 Binding: gp120 binds CD4 with lower affinity ( M) compared to HIV-1 gp160 ( M) .
Coreceptor Engagement: Preferentially uses CCR5, similar to HIV-1, but exhibits partial CD4 independence in some strains .
Membrane Fusion: gp41 undergoes conformational changes to form a six-helix bundle, enabling fusion .
Enhanced immune control and structural divergence in Env glycoproteins (~40% amino acid identity with HIV-1) .
Studies show that gp41-targeted antibodies (e.g., MAb 1.7A) deliver immunotoxins more effectively than gp120-targeted ones, despite weaker neutralization . Carbohydrate chains on gp160 do not significantly contribute to CD4 binding but modulate antibody accessibility .
Subtype/Source | Application | Reference |
---|---|---|
HIV-2 gp140 (SOSIP) | Structural studies and diagnostics | |
HIV-2 gp140 (E. coli) | Lateral flow assays and ELISA |
Clinical Trials: A phase II trial testing HIV-1 rgp160 as a therapeutic vaccine showed no efficacy in slowing disease progression or CD4 decline .
Method | Yield | Purity | Challenges |
---|---|---|---|
Recombinant (E. coli) | 42 kDa monomer >90% purity | Limited glycosylation | |
Native (HUT78 cells) | Full-length gp160 | Requires serum-free culture |
Immunotoxin Efficacy: Anti-gp41 antibodies (e.g., targeting HR/loop regions) demonstrate superior cytotoxicity compared to gp120 antibodies .
Cross-Reactivity: HIV-1 and HIV-2 Env share conserved epitopes in MPER but show minimal cross-neutralization .
Viral Release Regulation: HIV-2 gp160 enhances virion release in vitro, mimicking HIV-1 Vpu activity .
Glycan Shield: Dense glycosylation complicates antibody access .
Structural Dynamics: Conformational flexibility impedes stable trimer design for vaccines .
Diagnostic Gaps: Limited commercial availability of HIV-2-specific assays .
Figure 2: Comparison of HIV-1 and HIV-2 gp160 affinities for CD4 .
HIV-1 and HIV-2 exhibit differences in their RNA packaging mechanisms. While HIV-1 can bind to various RNA molecules, HIV-2 demonstrates a preference for binding to the mRNA responsible for encoding its Gag protein. This selective binding in HIV-2 contributes to its lower mutation rate compared to HIV-1. Both HIV-1 and HIV-2 share common transmission routes, primarily through contact with infected bodily fluids such as blood, semen, vaginal secretions, and tears. However, HIV-2 infection is characterized by a slower progression to immunodeficiency compared to HIV-1. In the initial stages of infection, HIV-2 exhibits lower infectivity than HIV-1; however, its infectivity increases as the disease progresses. Notable distinctions between the two viruses include the reduced pathogenicity of HIV-2, enhanced immune system control over HIV-2 infection, and a degree of independence from CD4 cells in some cases. Despite significant differences in their genetic sequences and phenotypic characteristics, the envelope proteins of HIV-1 and HIV-2 share structural similarities. Both viruses possess membrane-anchored proteins that assemble into six-helix bundles within their ectodomain regions, a common feature observed in various viral and cellular fusion proteins, which is believed to be a driving force behind membrane fusion.
The HIV2 gp160 protein encompasses the HIV2 Subtype A sequence, spanning regions C4, V5, and C5 of the HIV2 gp120 protein and extending to the HIV2 gp36 protein.
The HIV-2 gp160 protein, with a molecular weight of 42 kDa, is produced using E. coli as the expression system.
Sterile Filtered clear solution.
The HIV-2 gp160 solution is formulated to contain 25mM K2CO3, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and 8M urea.
For short-term storage (up to 2-4 weeks), the solution should be stored at 4°C. For extended storage, it is recommended to freeze the solution at -20°C. The addition of a carrier protein, such as 0.1% HSA or BSA, is advisable for long-term storage to enhance protein stability. Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided to maintain protein integrity.
The purity of the HIV-2 gp160 protein is determined to be greater than 90% based on analysis using 10% SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie blue staining.
This HIV-2 gp160 protein is suitable for use in lateral flow immunoassays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).
Escherichia Coli.
HIV-2 gp160 is an envelope glycoprotein precursor that is cleaved into gp105 (surface) and gp36 (transmembrane) components, analogous to HIV-1's gp120 and gp41. Despite sharing only approximately 40% sequence identity with HIV-1 gp160, both proteins perform similar functions in viral entry - binding to CD4 receptors and co-receptors (CCR5 or CXCR4) to facilitate membrane fusion .
The key structural differences include:
HIV-2 gp140 demonstrates greater stability than HIV-1 gp160, making it potentially more suitable for structural studies
Both envelope proteins form similar 6-helix bundles from N-terminal and C-terminal regions of the ectodomain, a structural feature common to many viral fusion proteins
HIV-2 gp160 shows evidence of CD4-independence in some contexts, unlike HIV-1
HIV-2 subtype A sequence contains specific regions covering C4, V5, and C5 from HIV-2 gp120 and extends to HIV-2 gp36
Functionally, HIV-2 gp160 is associated with reduced pathogenicity compared to HIV-1 gp160, resulting in slower progression to immunodeficiency and lower infectious potential during early stages of infection .
HIV-2 gp160 plays a central role in the notably different infection profile of HIV-2 compared to HIV-1. Though transmitted through identical routes (exposure to bodily fluids including blood, semen, tears, and vaginal fluids), HIV-2 demonstrates distinct characteristics in disease progression .
The envelope glycoprotein contributes to these differences in several ways:
HIV-2 shows reduced pathogenicity relative to HIV-1, with immunodeficiency developing more slowly
HIV-2 demonstrates enhanced immune control of infection, possibly related to envelope characteristics
HIV-2 is less infectious in early stages of viral infection, though infectiousness increases as the virus progresses
HIV-2 exhibits a degree of CD4-independence not typically seen with HIV-1, potentially influencing transmission dynamics and cellular tropism
These characteristics have important epidemiological implications, explaining in part why HIV-2 has remained largely confined to West Africa while HIV-1 has spread globally. The reduced early-stage infectiousness of HIV-2, to which gp160 properties contribute, creates a narrower window for transmission.
Several experimental approaches have been developed to study HIV-2 gp160 interactions with cell surface receptors:
ELISA-based binding assays: Partially purified HIV-2 gp120 can be assessed for human CD4-binding in ELISA-based assays. These systems allow quantification of binding affinities and can demonstrate that expressed proteins maintain native conformations and functional activity .
Mammalian cell expression systems: HIV-2 env-gene constructs have been generated that allow expression of soluble gp120 (gp105 with truncated gp36) in mammalian cells, including Human Embryonic Kidney 293T cells for transient expression and Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO K1) cells for stable expression lines .
Antibody recognition panels: Expressed HIV-2 gp120 can be tested against panels of mapped anti-gp105 monoclonal antibodies to verify correct conformational folding and epitope presentation .
Viral entry inhibition assays: Similar to approaches used with HIV-1, inhibition of viral entry can be assessed using soluble CD4 preparations or antibodies that target either the gp160 or CD4 molecules .
For successful experimental design, it's essential to consider that HIV-2 gp140 shows greater stability than HIV-1 gp160, which may affect experimental conditions including buffer composition, temperature ranges, and storage considerations .
Based on documented approaches, optimal methods for producing HIV-2 gp160 constructs involve:
Construct design modifications: Several strategic modifications improve expression and stability:
Truncation at specific positions in the gp36 coding region upstream of the membrane anchor
Removal of the gp105/36 processing site to maintain the complex
Introduction of a trimer-stabilizing motif from Bacteriophage T4 fibritin (GYIPEAPRDGQAYVRKDGEVWLLSTFL) at the C-terminus of gp15
Addition of C-terminal hexa-His tags to facilitate purification
Expression system selection: While E. coli systems can produce HIV-2 gp160 (42kDa), mammalian expression systems more reliably generate properly folded and glycosylated proteins:
Purification strategy: Multi-step purification yields properly folded, oligomeric proteins:
Quality control: Several approaches verify structural integrity:
This approach has successfully generated HIV-2 gp160 proteins suitable for crystallization trials and functional studies.
While direct data on HIV-2 gp160 polymorphisms affecting attachment inhibitor susceptibility is limited in the provided search results, we can extrapolate from HIV-1 data to understand potential parallel mechanisms.
For HIV-1, specific polymorphisms in gp160 are known to reduce susceptibility to attachment inhibitors like temsavir. These occur at discrete positions in gp160: S375H/I/M/N/T, M426L/P, M434I/K and M475I . Analysis of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) HIV Sequence Database revealed a generally low prevalence of these polymorphisms across most common HIV-1 subtypes .
For HIV-2 gp160, several considerations apply:
Given the ~40% sequence identity between HIV-1 and HIV-2 envelope proteins, analogous resistance-conferring positions likely exist but may not map identically .
HIV-2's different RNA packaging strategy (preferential binding to mRNA that creates the Gag protein) compared to HIV-1 (binds to any appropriate RNA) results in lower mutation rates, potentially leading to slower development of resistance-associated polymorphisms .
The distinct structural features of HIV-2 gp160, including enhanced stability and partial CD4-independence, suggest that polymorphisms affecting inhibitor binding might occur at different frequencies or positions compared to HIV-1 .
Research gaps remain in systematically mapping HIV-2 gp160 polymorphisms affecting attachment inhibitor susceptibility, representing an important area for future investigation.
The documented enhanced stability of HIV-2 gp140 compared to HIV-1 gp160 presents several promising implications for vaccine design strategies:
Improved antigen preservation: Greater stability likely translates to better retention of native conformational epitopes during vaccine production, storage, and delivery, potentially eliciting more relevant neutralizing antibodies .
Extended shelf-life potential: Enhanced thermal stability (as demonstrated by circular dichroism studies up to 85°C) suggests vaccines based on HIV-2 gp160 might maintain immunogenicity longer under field conditions .
Structural studies advantage: The superior stability facilitates more successful structural characterization through methods like X-ray crystallography, providing detailed atomic models to guide rational immunogen design .
Natural trimeric presentation: HIV-2 gp140's tendency to form stable trimers without extensive modification mimics the native viral spike configuration, potentially eliciting antibodies that better recognize authentic viral targets .
Cross-reactivity possibilities: Despite sequence differences, structural similarities between HIV-1 and HIV-2 envelope proteins suggest that stabilized HIV-2 gp160-based immunogens might elicit antibodies with cross-reactive neutralizing potential .
These characteristics make HIV-2 gp160 not only valuable for HIV-2-specific vaccine approaches but also as a potential alternative platform for developing broader HIV immunogens.
Recombinant HIV-2 gp160 offers potential advantages for diagnostic assay development, particularly for detecting HIV-2 infections and for creating more specific HIV testing algorithms. Based on parallel experiences with HIV-1 gp160 in diagnostic contexts and the specific properties of HIV-2 gp160, the following approaches are indicated:
Enzyme Immunoassay Development: Native or recombinant HIV-2 gp160 can serve as a specific capture antigen for detecting HIV-2 antibodies. In HIV-1, similar approaches using purified native gp160 demonstrated 100% specificity and sensitivity, with superior performance in detecting early seroconversion compared to virus lysate-based assays .
Improved Specificity for HIV-2 Detection: Given the structural differences between HIV-1 and HIV-2 envelope proteins despite functional similarities, HIV-2 gp160-based assays could reduce cross-reactivity issues that sometimes occur with whole virus lysate assays .
Applications in Research and Clinical Settings:
Production Considerations: Expression in E. coli systems yields HIV-2 gp160 (42kDa) suitable for lateral flow immunoassay and ELISA applications, though mammalian cell expression systems may provide better conformational epitope presentation for certain applications .
The enhanced stability of HIV-2 gp160 compared to HIV-1 gp160 suggests potential benefits for assay shelf-life and performance consistency across varied storage conditions .
Several protein engineering approaches have been documented to optimize HIV-2 gp160 for structural and functional studies:
These engineering approaches have successfully generated HIV-2 gp160 constructs that maintain proper folding, CD4 binding capability, and recognition by conformational antibodies while providing sufficient stability for structural studies .
A multi-faceted analytical approach is necessary to comprehensively characterize HIV-2 gp160:
Biochemical Characterization:
Biophysical Analyses:
Dynamic light scattering to evaluate sample homogeneity and oligomeric state (polydispersity ~23.3% indicating well-formed trimers)
Circular dichroism up to 85°C to assess thermal stability and secondary structure characteristics
Differential scanning calorimetry to determine precise melting temperatures and stability parameters
Functional Assessments:
Structural Studies:
These complementary approaches provide a comprehensive profile of protein quality, confirming both structural integrity and functional activity before proceeding to more resource-intensive studies like crystallization trials or immunization experiments.
HIV-2 gp160 offers unique advantages for comparative studies that could inform broader HIV vaccine development:
Structural Comparison Approaches:
Despite sequence divergence, HIV-1 and HIV-2 envelope proteins share conserved structural elements, particularly in the CD4 binding site and fusion machinery
Parallel crystallization and structural analysis of both proteins can identify conserved epitopes potentially vulnerable to cross-neutralizing antibodies
Enhanced stability of HIV-2 gp140 versus HIV-1 gp160 may facilitate structural determination that has been challenging with HIV-1 alone
Immunological Cross-Reactivity Assessment:
Testing sera from HIV-1 and HIV-2 infected individuals against both antigens to identify antibodies targeting conserved epitopes
Immunization studies comparing responses to homologous regions of both proteins to identify universally immunogenic elements
Evaluating the potential for a single immunogen to protect against both viruses
Fusion Mechanism Studies:
Chimeric Construct Approaches:
Previous vaccine efforts, such as the ALVAC-HIV strategy tested in combination with gp120 or gp160 protein boosts, provide precedent for combining vectors and envelope proteins in prime-boost strategies, an approach that could be extended to include HIV-2 components .
Despite advances in HIV-2 gp160 research, several critical knowledge gaps remain that warrant focused investigation:
Structural Determination: While HIV-2 gp140 demonstrates enhanced stability compared to HIV-1 gp160, complete high-resolution structural data is still lacking. Determining the atomic structure would provide crucial insights for vaccine design and understanding neutralization mechanisms .
Neutralization Epitope Mapping: Comprehensive mapping of neutralizing epitopes on HIV-2 gp160 and their comparison with HIV-1 counterparts would identify conserved vulnerabilities potentially targetable by broad-spectrum interventions .
CD4-Independence Mechanisms: The documented "some degree of CD4-independence" of HIV-2 requires deeper mechanistic understanding, as this property impacts cell tropism, transmission dynamics, and potential escape from antibody neutralization .
Polymorphism Impact Analysis: While polymorphisms affecting HIV-1 susceptibility to attachment inhibitors have been characterized, parallel comprehensive analysis for HIV-2 gp160 is needed to guide therapeutic development specific to HIV-2 infections .
Cross-Protective Potential: Systematic evaluation of whether HIV-2 gp160-based immunogens can elicit antibodies neutralizing both HIV-2 and HIV-1 would advance universal vaccine approaches .
These research priorities would advance both fundamental understanding of HIV-2 biology and accelerate translational applications in diagnostics, therapeutics, and preventive strategies.
Advanced computational methodologies offer promising avenues to accelerate HIV-2 gp160 research across multiple domains:
Structure Prediction and Molecular Dynamics:
Sequence-Structure-Function Relationships:
Immunogen Design:
Evolutionary Analysis:
These computational approaches, integrated with experimental validation, can significantly accelerate progress in understanding HIV-2 gp160 and developing interventions against HIV-2 infection.
Based on the current state of knowledge, several research applications for HIV-2 gp160 show particular promise:
Structural biology platform: The enhanced stability of HIV-2 gp140 compared to HIV-1 gp160 makes it an attractive target for high-resolution structural studies that have proven challenging with HIV-1 envelope proteins. Success here could provide templates for understanding both viruses .
Comparative virology model: HIV-2's reduced pathogenicity despite using similar entry mechanisms offers a valuable comparative model for understanding HIV-1 pathogenesis. The envelope proteins play central roles in these differences .
Diagnostic development: HIV-2 gp160-based assays could improve specific detection of HIV-2 infections, addressing limitations in current testing algorithms that sometimes miss or misclassify HIV-2 cases .
Cross-protective vaccine exploration: Given structural similarities despite sequence divergence, HIV-2 gp160 could serve as an alternative immunogen potentially capable of eliciting antibodies with cross-neutralizing activity against conserved epitopes .
Novel inhibitor discovery: The CD4-binding region and fusion machinery of HIV-2 gp160 represent targets for inhibitor development, potentially leading to therapeutics effective against both HIV types .
These applications leverage HIV-2 gp160's unique properties while addressing important gaps in HIV research and intervention development.
Researchers initiating work with HIV-2 gp160 should consider several critical methodological factors:
Expression system selection: While E. coli systems can produce HIV-2 gp160 (42kDa) useful for certain applications, mammalian expression systems (particularly CHO K1 stable cell lines) better preserve conformational epitopes critical for structural and immunological studies .
Storage and stability: HIV-2 gp160 preparations demonstrate optimal stability when:
Purification strategy: Multi-step purification yields best results:
Functional validation: Confirming biological activity through:
Collaborative approach: Given the specialized nature of HIV-2 research, new investigators benefit from collaborations with established HIV-2 research groups and accessing standardized reagents from repositories like the NIH AIDS Reagent Program.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 2 (HIV-2) is a less common and less pathogenic strain of HIV compared to HIV-1. The envelope glycoprotein gp160 is a precursor protein that plays a crucial role in the virus’s ability to infect host cells. Recombinant gp160 (rgp160) is a synthetically produced version of this protein, often used in research and diagnostic applications.
The gp160 protein is synthesized as a polyprotein and undergoes glycosylation and proteolytic cleavage to form two subunits: gp120 and gp41 . These subunits are essential for the virus’s ability to bind to and enter host cells. The gp120 subunit is responsible for binding to the CD4 receptor on host cells, while gp41 facilitates the fusion of the viral and cellular membranes .
Producing recombinant gp160 involves expressing the protein in a host system, such as Escherichia coli, insect cells, or mammalian cells. Each system has its advantages and challenges. For instance, expressing gp160 in E. coli can be cost-effective but may require modifications to overcome issues related to hydrophobic regions and glycosylation . In contrast, insect and mammalian cells can produce more authentic versions of the protein but at a higher cost .
Recombinant gp160 is used in various applications, including:
One of the main challenges in producing recombinant gp160 is its complex structure, which includes strong hydrophobic regions and heavy glycosylation . Advances in biotechnology are continually improving the methods for producing and purifying this protein, making it more accessible for research and diagnostic purposes.
In the future, recombinant gp160 could play a significant role in the development of new diagnostic tools and vaccines, contributing to the global effort to combat HIV/AIDS.