HMF1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Clarification on Terminology

The term "HMF1" does not correspond to any known antibody, antigen, or biological target in current scientific literature. Possible scenarios include:

  • Typographical error: Potential confusion with HMGB1 (High Mobility Group Box 1), a well-characterized protein targeted by antibodies in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases .

  • Influenza antibodies: Antibodies like 1F1 (a human monoclonal antibody targeting H1 influenza hemagglutinin) or KPF1 (a broadly neutralizing H1 influenza antibody) are discussed in the context of viral immunity .

HMGB1 Antibodies

HMGB1 is a nuclear protein involved in DNA repair and inflammatory responses. Anti-HMGB1 antibodies are associated with autoimmune diseases like Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) . Key findings include:

  • Role in disease: Elevated serum HMGB1 and anti-HMGB1 antibodies correlate with SS severity .

  • Diagnostic utility: The ratio of HMGB1 to anti-HMGB1 antibodies aids in differentiating fever of unknown origin (FUO) subtypes, with an optimal cutoff of 0.75 (AUC = 0.8) .

ParameterInfectious DiseaseAutoimmune DiseaseMalignant Tumor
HMGB1 (ng/mL)12.5 ± 3.210.8 ± 2.75.1 ± 1.4
Anti-HMGB1 (U/mL)8.2 ± 2.115.6 ± 3.97.3 ± 1.8

Influenza Antibodies (1F1 and KPF1)

  • 1F1: Isolated from a 1918 influenza survivor, this monoclonal antibody neutralizes H1 strains (1918, 1943, 1947, 1977) by targeting conserved residues in the hemagglutinin receptor-binding site .

  • KPF1: A broadly neutralizing H1 antibody with 83% coverage of H1 isolates, including the 1918 pandemic strain .

AntibodyTargetNeutralization BreadthTherapeutic Efficacy
1F1H1 HA head domain1918, 1943, 1947, 1977 isolatesBlocks receptor binding
KPF1H1 HA globular head83% of H1 isolates100% survival in murine models

Recommendations for Further Research

  1. Verify nomenclature: Confirm whether "HMF1" refers to a novel antibody or a typographical error.

  2. Explore related targets: Investigate HMGB1 or influenza HA-targeting antibodies for overlapping functionalities.

  3. Consult additional databases: Use platforms like PubMed, UniProt, or the Antibody Registry for unreferenced antibodies.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
HMF1 antibody; HIG1 antibody; YER057C antibody; Protein HMF1 antibody; High dosage growth inhibitor antibody; Homologous mitochondrial matrix factor 1 antibody
Target Names
HMF1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: sce:YER057C

STRING: 4932.YER057C

Protein Families
RutC family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Nucleus. Mitochondrion intermembrane space.

Q&A

What is HMGB1 and how do anti-HMGB1 antibodies function in immune responses?

HMGB1 functions as a critical immunomodulatory protein that maintains immune homeostasis through alterations in its redox state. In its oxidized form, HMGB1 inhibits inflammatory reactions and promotes apoptosis, while in its reduced form, it promotes inflammatory reactions and can trigger autoimmune responses . Anti-HMGB1 antibodies are autoantibodies produced against HMGB1 and have been found at significantly elevated levels in patients with autoimmune conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) .

Research has demonstrated that HMGB1 plays a key role in maintaining immune balance; when this balance is disrupted, it can lead to elevated levels of either HMGB1 protein or anti-HMGB1 antibodies in the bloodstream . These components act as biomarkers and potential mediators of various disease processes, particularly in inflammatory and autoimmune contexts.

How can researchers measure antibody binding affinity accurately?

Accurate measurement of antibody binding affinity is essential for characterizing novel antibodies. Researchers commonly employ Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI) for kinetic experiments. The methodology involves:

  • Preparation of a capture sensor-chip by covalently immobilizing capture antibodies (e.g., goat anti-human IgG) onto chips using standard amine-coupling procedures

  • Sequential injection of purified recombinant antigens at varying concentrations (typically a serial dilution ranging from picomolar to nanomolar)

  • Monitoring association for approximately 5 minutes followed by dissociation for 10 minutes

  • Processing and analyzing results using specialized software to determine association (ka) and dissociation (kd) kinetic rate constants

  • Deriving the KD value (equilibrium dissociation constant) from the ratio kd/ka

This approach allows researchers to quantitatively assess binding strength and characterize the kinetic properties of antibody-antigen interactions with high precision and reproducibility.

What are broadly neutralizing antibodies and how are they identified?

Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) are antibodies capable of neutralizing multiple variants or strains of a pathogen by targeting conserved epitopes. For example, KPF1 is a human monoclonal antibody with broad and potent neutralizing activity against H1 influenza viruses, recognizing 83% of all H1 isolates tested, including the pandemic 1918 H1 strain .

The identification process typically involves:

  • Isolating plasmablasts from subjects immunized with relevant antigens or vaccines

  • Screening antibody candidates against diverse pathogen isolates

  • Characterizing neutralization breadth through panel testing

  • Determining the epitope recognition pattern

  • Assessing neutralization potency through functional assays

Modern approaches like the Nanovial workflow can enhance this process by capturing single plasma cells and analyzing their secreted antibodies in high-throughput screening systems .

How can the HMGB1/anti-HMGB1 antibody ratio be utilized as a diagnostic biomarker?

The HMGB1/anti-HMGB1 antibody ratio has emerged as a valuable biomarker for differential diagnosis, particularly in fever of unknown origin (FUO) cases. Research has demonstrated this ratio's utility in distinguishing between different FUO subtypes:

  • Diagnostic value: The ratio serves as an ideal clinical indicator for differential diagnosis with a best cut-off value of 0.75, demonstrating 66.67% sensitivity, 87.32% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8 .

  • Subtype differentiation:

    • Infectious disease and autoimmune disease subgroups show higher HMGB1 concentrations compared to malignant tumor subgroups, undetermined subgroups, and healthy controls

    • Autoimmune disease subtypes demonstrate significantly elevated anti-HMGB1 antibody concentrations compared to other subgroups and healthy controls

  • Correlation with established markers:

    • Serum HMGB1 concentration moderately correlates with C-reactive protein (CRP) in infectious diseases

    • Serum anti-HMGB1 antibody concentration strongly correlates with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in autoimmune diseases

This ratio analysis can help clinicians identify FUO subtypes efficiently, potentially reducing unnecessary examinations and expediting appropriate treatment.

What advantages do function-first antibody discovery approaches offer over traditional methods?

Function-first antibody discovery approaches, such as the hydrogel Nanovial system, provide several significant advantages over traditional antibody discovery methods:

  • Target flexibility: These approaches overcome limitations of standard display and B-cell sequencing-based technologies that require targets to be produced in soluble form. Function-first approaches allow screening against targets expressed on cell membranes in their physiological structure, including challenging targets like G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) .

  • Physiological relevance: By enabling screening against membrane-expressed targets in their native conformation, these methods identify antibodies with higher translational potential for therapeutic applications .

  • High-throughput capability: The two-cell screening workflow localizes antibody-secreting cells and target-expressing cells in a microenvironment, enabling screening of hundreds of thousands of cells per experiment using standard fluorescence-activated cell sorters .

  • Quality enrichment: Since secreted antibodies that aggregate or lack stability would not create strong signals in the screening process, this method inherently selects for antibodies with favorable developability characteristics .

  • Correlation with function: The intensity of detection signals observed during screening correlates well with the binding properties of discovered antibodies, allowing for effective prioritization of hits .

Research has demonstrated that these approaches can yield diverse antibodies with picomolar binding affinities, targeting multiple non-overlapping epitopes, and possessing high developability scores .

How do researchers characterize epitope binding patterns of novel antibodies?

Epitope characterization is crucial for understanding antibody function and therapeutic potential. High-throughput epitope binning using real-time label-free biosensors provides a systematic approach:

  • Pairwise epitope binning:

    • An antigen and a second antibody (analyte antibody) are sequentially applied to a sensor chip pre-loaded with a first antibody (ligand antibody)

    • Response increase indicates non-competition between antibodies (different epitopes)

    • Lack of signal change indicates competition (same or overlapping epitopes)

  • Data visualization:

    • Heat maps display competition profiles

    • Community network plots explore clustering of antibodies with similar competition profiles

    • Hierarchical clustering generates dendrograms that progressively group antibodies

  • Complementary techniques:

    • Structural analysis through X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM for atomic-level epitope mapping

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) for identifying interaction regions

    • Alanine scanning mutagenesis to identify critical binding residues

This multi-faceted approach allows researchers to comprehensively map epitope landscapes, identify novel binding sites, and understand the molecular basis for functional properties like neutralization or receptor blockade.

What novel methods are available for antibody discovery against membrane proteins?

Discovering antibodies against membrane proteins presents unique challenges due to the difficulty of maintaining native conformations in vitro. A cutting-edge approach involves hydrogel Nanovials in a two-cell assay format:

  • Nanovial system components:

    • Functionalized with anti-CD138 antibody to capture plasma cells

    • Contains target-expressing cells displaying membrane proteins in native conformation

    • Captures secreted IgG and enables detection with fluorescent anti-IgG secondary antibody

  • Workflow implementation:

    • Co-loading antibody-secreting cells and antigen-expressing cells in Nanovials

    • Creation of a microenvironment where secreted antibodies can interact with membrane targets

    • Detection and isolation using standard flow cytometry cell sorters

    • Single-cell sequencing to obtain matched heavy and light chain sequences

  • Validation and outcomes:

    • Successfully discovered antibodies against PD-1 (immune checkpoint membrane protein) with EC₅₀ values similar to clinically used Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab

    • Signal intensity on Nanovials correlated strongly with binding affinity of re-expressed monoclonal antibodies

    • Identified antibodies targeting different epitopes with substantial sequence diversity

This approach enables significantly higher throughput than traditional methods, allowing screening of hundreds of thousands of cells per experiment with rapid turnaround time using standard equipment available in most research institutions .

How can thermal stability of antibodies be assessed for developability screening?

Thermal stability assessment is a critical aspect of antibody developability screening, helping researchers identify candidates with favorable biophysical properties. Nano differential scanning fluorimetry (nanoDSF) offers a robust methodology:

  • Experimental procedure:

    • Sample preparation with duplicate measurements

    • Linear thermal ramping (typically 0.5°C/min from 25-95°C)

    • Monitoring changes in intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence at 350 and 330 nm

  • Data analysis:

    • Determination of unfolding transition points from changes in emission wavelengths

    • Calculation of melting temperatures (Tm) for different domains

    • Assessment of cooperative unfolding behavior

    • Comparison of stability profiles across multiple candidates

  • Interpretation:

    • Higher Tm values generally indicate greater thermal stability

    • Multiple transition temperatures may reflect unfolding of different domains

    • Comparison to benchmark antibodies provides context for development potential

Thermal stability data, when combined with other developability assessments like aggregation propensity and expression yield, allows researchers to prioritize antibody candidates with the greatest likelihood of successful development into research reagents or therapeutic candidates.

What cell-based assays are recommended for validating antibody binding?

Cell binding assays are essential for confirming that antibodies recognize their targets in a cellular context. A systematic approach includes:

  • Experimental design:

    • Preparation of cells expressing the target antigen of interest

    • Testing antibodies across a wide concentration range (e.g., 100 nM to 0.6 pM using serial 3-fold dilutions)

    • Incubation with cells (typically 45 minutes on ice to prevent internalization)

    • Detection using fluorescently-labeled secondary antibodies (e.g., R-Phycoerythrin AffiniPure Goat Anti-Human IgG)

  • Data acquisition and analysis:

    • Flow cytometry to measure cell-associated fluorescence

    • Plotting median fluorescence intensity (MFI) against antibody concentration

    • Fitting data to 4-parameter dose-response curves

    • Determining EC₅₀ values to quantify binding potency

  • Controls and validation:

    • Including negative control cells (not expressing the target)

    • Using reference antibodies with known binding properties

    • Testing specificity through competitive binding experiments

    • Evaluating cross-reactivity with related targets or species orthologs

This comprehensive approach ensures that discovered antibodies not only bind to recombinant or purified antigens but also recognize their targets in the physiologically relevant context of cell surface expression.

How should researchers interpret correlations between antibody biomarkers and clinical parameters?

Interpreting correlations between antibody biomarkers and clinical parameters requires a systematic analytical approach:

  • Statistical analysis:

    • Employ bivariate correlation analysis to assess relationships between antibody concentrations and disease activity indicators

    • Consider both the correlation coefficient (strength of relationship) and p-value (statistical significance)

    • Differentiate between weak (r<0.3), moderate (r=0.3-0.7), and strong (r>0.7) correlations

  • Disease-specific considerations:

    • In infectious diseases, serum HMGB1 concentration moderately correlates with CRP concentration

    • In autoimmune diseases, serum anti-HMGB1 antibodies strongly correlate with ESR

    • These patterns reflect underlying pathophysiological processes specific to each disease category

  • Clinical application:

    • Use correlation data to guide clinical decision-making

    • Integrate multiple biomarkers for improved diagnostic accuracy

    • Consider temporal changes in biomarker levels relative to disease progression or treatment response

Researchers should recognize that correlation strength varies by disease context and biomarker type. For example, the study of HMGB1 and anti-HMGB1 antibodies revealed different correlation patterns across disease subtypes, highlighting the importance of context-specific interpretation .

What strategies can optimize plasma cell screening for antibody discovery?

Optimizing plasma cell screening requires careful attention to several methodological aspects:

  • Cell isolation and enrichment:

    • Functionalizing Nanovials with anti-CD138 antibody specifically captures plasma cells

    • Implementing proper gating strategies is crucial for identifying antibody-secreting cells of interest:

      • First, identify cell-loaded nanovial populations based on forward/side scatter properties

      • Exclude free cells using nanovial-specific stains

      • Select only plasma cell-loaded nanovials using plasma cell markers

      • Finally, gate based on IgG signal strength

  • Screening prioritization:

    • Signal intensity from captured antibodies strongly correlates with binding affinity

    • Prioritize sorted events corresponding with the highest signal bound to target cells on Nanovials

    • This correlation between screening signal and eventual binding properties enables more efficient candidate selection

  • Workflow optimization:

    • Complete process from cell collection to sorting can be accomplished in one day

    • Perform single-cell sequencing to obtain matched heavy and light chain sequences

    • Re-express discovered antibodies for validation and characterization

    • Compare results to benchmark antibodies (such as Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab for PD-1 targeting)

The plasma cell compartment may differ from the memory B cell compartment by predominantly containing affinity-matured antibodies, which explains the numerous high-affinity binders identified across multiple discovery campaigns, including picomolar binders .

How do oxidized versus reduced forms of HMGB1 affect immune responses and antibody production?

The redox state of HMGB1 significantly influences its immunomodulatory functions, with important implications for antibody production and immune responses:

  • Differential immune effects:

    • Oxidized HMGB1 inhibits inflammatory reactions and promotes apoptosis

    • Reduced HMGB1 promotes inflammatory reactions and can trigger autoimmune responses

    • These opposing functions allow HMGB1 to maintain immune homeostasis through redox state alterations

  • Autoantigen properties:

    • Regardless of its redox state (oxidized or reduced) or binding status (DNA-bound or free), HMGB1 functions as a highly sensitized autoantigen

    • This property enables HMGB1 to stimulate the production of corresponding autoantibodies

    • The presence of these autoantibodies is particularly elevated in autoimmune conditions

  • Pathogenic mechanisms:

    • Extracellular HMGB1 promotes secretion of inflammatory mediators and chemokines

    • Excessive inflammation can further lead to autoimmune responses and autoantibody production

    • Elevated levels of HMGB1 in serum and other body fluids (joint synovial fluid, urine, cerebrospinal fluid) are characteristic of chronic inflammatory diseases

Understanding these redox-dependent mechanisms provides insights into HMGB1's dual role in maintaining immune balance versus promoting pathological autoimmunity, with direct implications for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.