HOS3 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
HOS3 antibody; YPL116W antibody; LPH11WHistone deacetylase HOS3 antibody; EC 3.5.1.98 antibody
Target Names
HOS3
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
HOS3 Antibody is responsible for the deacetylation of lysine residues on the N-terminal part of the core histones (H2A, H2B, H3 and H4). Histone deacetylation serves as an epigenetic repression tag and plays a crucial role in transcriptional regulation, cell cycle progression, and developmental events. Histone deacetylases exert their function through the formation of large multiprotein complexes.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. HOS3 facilitates cross-talk between the morphogenesis checkpoint and the spindle position checkpoint. It acts as a component of the complex mechanism that monitors spindle orientation after mitotic entry and before commitment to mitotic exit. PMID: 25057019
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YPL116W

STRING: 4932.YPL116W

Protein Families
Histone deacetylase family, HD type 1 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is CDRH3 and why is it crucial for antibody specificity?

CDRH3 (Heavy Chain Complementarity-Determining Region 3) plays a vital role in the specificity and diversity of antibodies. This hypervariable region is the most diverse among all CDRs and serves as a major determinant of antigen binding affinity and specificity . The high variability of CDRH3 stems from V(D)J recombination during B cell development, creating an immense theoretical sequence space for binding diverse antigens.

From a structural perspective, CDRH3 forms a critical part of the antigen-binding site. The loop conformation of CDRH3 directly influences how antibodies interact with their target antigens. The central positioning of CDRH3 within the antigen-binding pocket allows it to make multiple contact points with antigens, often serving as the primary interface for recognition . This region's length, amino acid composition, and three-dimensional structure all contribute to its binding properties.

What is B7-H3 and why is it considered an attractive target for antibody-based immunotherapy?

B7-H3 (CD276) represents an exceptionally promising target for antibody-based immunotherapy due to its unique expression profile and biological functions. This member of the B7 ligand family is overexpressed in approximately 60% of tumor samples across numerous cancer types, appearing on both differentiated malignant cells and cancer-initiating cells with limited heterogeneity . Crucially, B7-H3 shows restricted distribution in normal tissues, creating a favorable therapeutic window for targeting cancer cells while minimizing off-target effects.

These characteristics position B7-H3 as an ideal target for multiple antibody-based therapeutic strategies. Its expression on tumor-associated vasculature and stroma means that B7-H3-targeted therapies could simultaneously disrupt the tumor microenvironment and inhibit neoangiogenesis . The association between B7-H3 expression and poor prognosis further validates its clinical relevance as a therapeutic target.

How are AI technologies like PALM-H3 transforming antibody design?

PALM-H3 (Pre-trained Antibody generative large Language Model) represents a significant advancement in antibody engineering by enabling de novo generation of antibody CDRH3 sequences with specific antigen-binding properties. This AI approach reduces reliance on natural antibody isolation, addressing a fundamental bottleneck in traditional antibody discovery workflows .

The architecture of PALM-H3 combines multiple sophisticated elements:

  • An encoder-decoder framework where the encoder is initialized with pre-trained weights from ESM2

  • A decoder with self-attention layers initialized with weights from an antibody heavy chain Roformer model

  • Cross-attention layers trained from scratch using paired antigen-CDRH3 data

This hybrid design effectively leverages large unlabeled antibody datasets while overcoming limitations in paired antigen-antibody training data. The model architecture consists of 12 antigen and antibody layers, with the final antigen layer passing key-value matrices to all antibody cross-attention sublayers, enabling the transformation from antigen to CDRH3 through attention mechanisms .

PALM-H3 demonstrates remarkable capability to generate antibodies that bind SARS-CoV-2 antigens, including emerging variants like XBB. The model correctly captures key contact sites between antibodies and antigens, providing valuable insights for optimizing antigen-antibody interactions. This approach represents a paradigm shift from traditional methods, offering faster, more efficient pathways to develop therapeutic antibodies against emerging threats .

What computational methods are currently used in antibody H3 loop redesign?

Current computational approaches for antibody H3 loop redesign employ sophisticated virtual screening methodologies combined with structural modeling. One effective approach involves virtual grafting of human germline-derived H3 sequences to expand diversity beyond crystallized H3 loop sequences . This methodology offers several advantages over traditional approaches:

  • Utilization of germline-derived V(D)J rearranged H3 sequences from IMGT/LIGM-DB provides access to naturally occurring sequence diversity

  • Strategic shortening of stem templates to include only the first two and last three residues of the H3 sequence allows for sampling structural variations at the inner ends

  • Multi-stage refinement protocols generate loop ensembles that can be evaluated for binding properties

The implementation typically follows a structured workflow:

  • Selection of H3 stem templates matching the target sequence

  • Grafting of matching templates into the parental antibody-antigen structure

  • Mutation of the loop to correct residue identities using tools like SCWRL

  • Generation of loop ensembles through refinement protocols

  • Scoring and ranking of candidate designs

This computational pipeline has demonstrated success in redesigning the H3 loop of antibodies against targets like human VEGF-A, where over 75% of tested designs showed favorable contributions to binding affinity compared to parental antibodies, while maintaining good developability attributes such as high thermal stability and resistance to aggregation .

What techniques are used for antibody-antigen binding analysis?

Researchers employ multiple complementary techniques for analyzing antibody-antigen interactions, each with distinct advantages:

Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC): This established method remains valuable for identifying high concentrations of antibodies to Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLAs). In this assay, recipient serum is incubated with HLA-typed lymphocytes, followed by rabbit complement addition. If antibodies against particular HLAs exist, cell death occurs, visualized through staining and microscopic examination. CDC detects both IgG and IgM isotypes, though IgM has less clinical significance . Multiple modifications enhance sensitivity:

  • Extended incubation periods

  • Additional washing steps

  • Secondary anti-human light kappa chain specific antibodies

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): As the first solid-phase analysis developed for antibody screening, ELISA uses HLA molecules bound to plastic plate wells. Positive reactions generate color signals via enzyme-conjugated anti-human antibodies after substrate addition. Purified pooled HLA molecules facilitate antibody screening, while individual HLA proteins enable specificity determination .

Flow Cytometry (FC) Solid Phase Assays: These utilize microspheres coated with soluble HLA proteins from single cell lines (for specificity) or mixed sources (for panel reactive antibody analysis). Fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies generate signals indicating positive binding. Like ELISA, FC can detect IgG and IgM isotypes depending on secondary antibody specificity .

Luminex-Based Technology: This highly sensitive methodology has revolutionized antibody analysis, resolving ambiguities from CDC and FC results. Luminex uses microparticles conjugated with varying amounts of two dyes, enabling identification of 100 bead sets. Secondary phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-human antibodies detect HLA-specific alloantibodies, with signal intensity (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI) proportional to antibody concentration .

How can researchers enhance antibody specificity through CDRH3 optimization?

Enhancing antibody specificity through CDRH3 optimization involves several sophisticated approaches that combine computational design with experimental validation:

Researchers can implement targeted sequence diversity by focusing on specific positions within the CDRH3 loop that make direct contact with the antigen. This requires structural knowledge of the antibody-antigen complex to identify critical interaction residues. By maintaining conserved framework positions while allowing variation at key contact sites, researchers can generate libraries with higher probabilities of producing improved binders .

Structure-guided optimization approaches utilize computational modeling to predict the effects of sequence modifications on binding affinity. This involves:

  • Generating structural models of CDRH3 variants

  • Evaluating energetic contributions to binding

  • Selecting candidates with favorable interaction profiles

  • Experimental validation of top-ranked designs

When designing optimization experiments, researchers should consider both sequence and structural aspects simultaneously. Virtual screening of germline-derived H3 sequences offers a particularly effective strategy, as demonstrated in studies where grafting human germline-derived H3 sequences led to the discovery of variants with similar or improved affinities compared to parental antibodies . This approach benefits from leveraging naturally occurring sequence diversity while maintaining structural compatibility with the antibody framework.

What are the major bottlenecks in traditional antibody discovery?

Traditional antibody discovery faces several critical bottlenecks that limit therapeutic development:

Resource Intensity and Time Consumption: Conventional approaches rely heavily on isolating antigen-specific antibodies from serum or other biological sources, requiring extensive screening of large libraries. This process demands significant resources, specialized equipment, and considerable time investment . The isolation and characterization of candidate antibodies can extend development timelines by months or years.

Inefficiency and High Costs: The traditional discovery pipeline suffers from inefficiency at multiple stages, from initial screening through optimization and production. These inefficiencies translate into high costs and significant fail rates, limiting the number of targets that can be practically pursued . The financial burden becomes particularly problematic when targeting novel or challenging antigens.

Logistical Hurdles: The experimental workflow for antibody discovery requires coordinating multiple complex processes including immunization, hybridoma development, phage display, or other display technologies. Each stage presents logistical challenges in terms of material transfer, quality control, and process management .

Limited Scalability: Traditional methods face fundamental constraints in scalability, making it difficult to rapidly address emerging therapeutic needs or to pursue multiple targets simultaneously. The reliance on biological systems introduces inherent variability that complicates standardization and scaling efforts .

Scarcity of Paired Data: A fundamental challenge in computational antibody design is the limited availability of paired antigen-antibody data, which restricts the development of accurate predictive models. This data scarcity particularly affects the generation of antibodies with high affinity to specific antigen epitopes .

How might AI-driven approaches address challenges in antibody development?

AI-driven approaches offer transformative solutions to longstanding challenges in antibody development through several innovative mechanisms:

Democratization of Antibody Discovery: Advanced AI tools like those being developed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center aim to make antibody discovery more accessible. These technologies could enable researchers to efficiently generate monoclonal antibody therapeutics against specified antigen targets without the extensive infrastructure traditionally required . This democratization could dramatically expand the range of research groups able to develop novel antibody therapies.

Overcoming Data Limitations: Pre-training strategies enable AI models to leverage large unlabeled antibody datasets while requiring relatively small amounts of paired antigen-antibody data for fine-tuning. PALM-H3 demonstrates this approach by initializing with pre-trained weights from ESM2 and Roformer models, then training cross-attention layers on limited paired data . This strategy effectively addresses the scarcity of paired datasets that has historically hampered computational antibody design.

Accelerated Development Timelines: AI models can rapidly generate and evaluate thousands of candidate antibody sequences in silico, dramatically reducing the time required for initial discovery. This computational pre-screening narrows wet-lab validation to the most promising candidates, potentially compressing development timelines from years to months .

Enhanced Affinity and Specificity: By systematically exploring the vast sequence space of antibody variable regions, particularly CDRH3, AI approaches can identify optimized sequences with improved binding properties. Models like PALM-H3 can generate antibodies with binding capabilities to emerging variants of pathogens, as demonstrated with SARS-CoV-2 variants including XBB .

Comprehensive Antibody-Antigen Atlas: Large-scale initiatives are building massive antibody-antigen atlases to serve as foundations for developing increasingly sophisticated AI algorithms. The ARPA-H funded project at Vanderbilt University Medical Center exemplifies this approach, creating comprehensive datasets to train next-generation AI models for engineering antigen-specific antibodies .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.