LYS21 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
LYS21 antibody; YDL131W antibody; D2195Homocitrate synthase antibody; mitochondrial antibody; HCS antibody; EC 2.3.3.14 antibody
Target Names
LYS21
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets Lys21, an enzyme that catalyzes the aldol-type condensation of 2-oxoglutarate with acetyl-CoA to produce homocitrate. This reaction represents the initial step in the alpha-aminoadipate (AAA) lysine biosynthesis pathway.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Research indicates that during growth on ethanol, homocitrate synthesis primarily relies on Lys21p. However, under fermentative metabolic conditions, Lys20p and Lys21p exhibit redundant roles in this process. PMID: 18524920
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YDL131W

STRING: 4932.YDL131W

Protein Families
Alpha-IPM synthase/homocitrate synthase family
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion.

Q&A

What is LYS21 and how does it relate to LYS2?

LYS21 is a paralogue gene in yeast (Saccharomyces) involved in lysine biosynthesis. LYS2, on the other hand, is a reported synonym of the AASDH gene in humans, which encodes aminoadipate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase. This protein functions in fatty acid metabolism and has a canonical amino acid length of 1098 residues with a protein mass of 122.6 kilodaltons. While they share nomenclature similarity, they represent distinct proteins in different organisms with separate functions and evolutionary histories .

How does LYS21 differ from its paralogue LYS20?

LYS21 and LYS20 are paralogues in yeast with functional specialization. The key differences include: (1) LYS21 appears to be more critical for lysine biosynthesis during respiratory growth, as lys21Δ mutants show diminished growth rates on ethanol media compared to lys20Δ mutants; (2) LYS21 is more sensitive to lysine-mediated feedback inhibition; (3) LYS20 expression is more strongly induced under respiratory conditions; and (4) LYS21 maintains more consistent protein levels across different growth conditions while LYS20 is subject to more stringent post-transcriptional control .

What experimental systems are best suited for studying LYS21 function?

Yeast models, particularly Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are ideal for studying LYS21 function. Experiments should be designed to compare growth and lysine production under different carbon sources (glucose vs. ethanol) to highlight functional differences between LYS21 and its paralogue. Complementation studies in lys21Δ mutants provide valuable insights into functional conservation. Additionally, static cultures with glucose as carbon source have been successfully employed for studying LYS21 under microaerophilic conditions, which can reveal important regulatory aspects of its expression .

What are the recommended antibody applications for detecting LYS21?

For detecting LYS21 in yeast samples, Western blot (immunoblot) analysis is the most validated application. When selecting antibodies for LYS21 detection, researchers should verify cross-reactivity with the specific yeast species being studied. Antibodies against homocitrate synthase have been successfully used for LYS21 detection. For optimal results, the linear range of detectability should be determined by analyzing various combinations of antigen and antibody concentrations. ELISA may also be applicable, though Western blot provides additional information about protein size and potential modifications .

How should I optimize protein extraction for LYS21 detection?

For optimal LYS21 detection in yeast samples, protein extraction should be performed under conditions that preserve enzymatic activity. The following protocol is recommended:

  • Harvest cells during mid-logarithmic phase (OD600 of 0.6-0.8)

  • Wash cell pellets with ice-cold extraction buffer containing protease inhibitors

  • Disrupt cells by glass bead lysis in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1× protease inhibitor cocktail

  • Clarify lysates by centrifugation at 12,000×g for 15 minutes at 4°C

  • Determine protein concentration using Bradford or BCA assay

This approach has been validated for detecting LYS21 in comparative studies between wild-type and mutant strains .

What loading controls are appropriate for LYS21 Western blots?

When performing Western blot analysis for LYS21, appropriate loading controls are essential for accurate quantification. For yeast samples, common loading controls include:

Loading ControlMolecular WeightStability Across Conditions
PGK1 (Phosphoglycerate kinase)44.7 kDaHigh across glucose/ethanol
TDH1/2/3 (GAPDH)35.8 kDaVariable in respiratory conditions
ACT1 (Actin)41.7 kDaModerate stability
TUB1 (α-tubulin)50.4 kDaGood stability

ACT1 or TUB1 are recommended when comparing LYS21 expression across different carbon sources or oxygen availability, as they show more consistent expression under these variable conditions .

How can I distinguish between LYS20 and LYS21 expression in experimental samples?

Distinguishing between LYS20 and LYS21 expression requires a combination of approaches:

  • Genetic approach: Utilize single mutant strains (lys20Δ or lys21Δ) as controls to validate antibody specificity

  • Western blot analysis: When using a non-specific antibody that recognizes both paralogues, the loading amount should be carefully calibrated - experiments have shown that approximately sixfold more total protein is needed to detect LYS20 compared to LYS21 under standard conditions

  • RNA analysis: Northern blotting or qRT-PCR with paralogue-specific primers can distinguish mRNA expression levels

  • Protein activity assay: Measure homocitrate synthase activity in the presence and absence of lysine inhibition (LYS21 shows greater sensitivity)

What growth conditions significantly affect LYS21 expression?

LYS21 expression is influenced by several growth conditions that should be controlled in experimental designs:

  • Carbon source: Expression patterns differ between glucose and ethanol media, with LYS21 maintaining more consistent expression levels than LYS20 across these conditions

  • Aeration: LYS21 expression varies between aerobic and microaerophilic (static culture) conditions

  • Growth phase: Collect samples at consistent growth phases, preferably mid-logarithmic

  • Lysine availability: Exogenous lysine can affect expression through feedback mechanisms

  • Plasmid copy number: When using plasmid-based expression, consider the effects of gene dosage (centromeric vs. multicopy plasmids)

How should I design controls for LYS21 antibody validation?

Proper validation of LYS21 antibodies requires several controls:

  • Genetic controls: Include wild-type, lys21Δ single mutant, and lys20Δ lys21Δ double mutant samples

  • Complementation controls: lys21Δ mutants complemented with either LYS21 or LYS20 on plasmids

  • Loading controls: Include a dilution series to establish the linear range of detection

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test the antibody against purified recombinant LYS21 and LYS20 proteins

  • Peptide competition: Pre-incubate antibody with the immunizing peptide to confirm specificity

How do post-transcriptional mechanisms regulate LYS21 expression?

Post-transcriptional regulation of LYS21 appears to be less stringent than that of LYS20, but several mechanisms may be involved:

  • Translational efficiency: Despite similar transcript levels in some conditions, protein levels may vary due to different translation rates

  • Protein stability: Evidence suggests different turnover rates between LYS21 and LYS20 proteins

  • Activity regulation: Post-translational modifications may affect enzyme activity without changing protein levels

  • Substrate availability: Differential access to substrates can regulate effective activity

Research has shown that when LYS21 is overexpressed on a multicopy plasmid, there is only a twofold increase in transcript content on glucose media, suggesting regulatory mechanisms prevent excessive expression. Further investigation using pulse-chase experiments and proteasome inhibitors could elucidate the specific mechanisms involved .

What are the implications of LYS21's role in lysine biosynthesis for metabolic studies?

LYS21's specialized role in lysine biosynthesis has several implications for metabolic studies:

  • Metabolic flux: LYS21 activity significantly influences the lysine pool, with lys21Δ mutants showing an almost threefold lower lysine pool compared to wild-type strains

  • Carbon source utilization: LYS21 appears more important during growth on non-fermentable carbon sources like ethanol

  • Cross-pathway regulation: Changes in lysine biosynthesis can affect other amino acid pathways through shared intermediates

  • Stress response: The lysine biosynthetic pathway may play roles beyond amino acid production in cellular stress responses

Researchers studying metabolic networks should consider these factors when designing experiments involving amino acid biosynthesis or using yeast as a metabolic model system .

How can deep learning approaches be applied to develop better LYS21 antibodies?

Recent advances in deep learning for antibody design could be applied to develop improved LYS21 antibodies:

  • Sequence optimization: Deep learning algorithms can generate variable region sequences with optimal physicochemical properties for detecting LYS21

  • Structural prediction: Computational models can predict antibody-antigen binding interfaces to design antibodies with higher specificity

  • Developability assessment: Machine learning models can identify sequences with favorable biophysical properties like high expression, thermal stability, and low non-specific binding

  • Cross-reactivity minimization: Computational approaches can help design antibodies that specifically recognize LYS21 without detecting LYS20

These approaches could generate antibody candidates with >90% humanness and medicine-likeness that exhibit high expression, monomer content, and thermal stability while minimizing hydrophobicity, self-association, and non-specific binding .

Why might I observe inconsistent results when detecting LYS21 across different samples?

Inconsistent LYS21 detection may result from several factors:

  • Growth condition variability: LYS21 expression is affected by carbon source, aeration, and growth phase

  • Extraction efficiency: Different lysis methods may yield variable protein recovery

  • Antibody specificity: Cross-reactivity with LYS20 can confound results

  • Post-translational modifications: Different growth conditions may alter the protein's modification state, affecting antibody recognition

  • Sample loading: As shown in published research, LYS21 detection requires careful calibration of loading amounts

To address these issues, standardize growth conditions, optimize protein extraction protocols, validate antibody specificity using appropriate controls, and establish a standard curve for quantification .

What factors affect lysine pool measurements in LYS21 studies?

Accurate lysine pool measurements are essential for understanding LYS21 function. Several factors that can affect these measurements include:

FactorImpactMitigation Strategy
Growth phaseLysine pools vary throughout growthCollect samples at consistent OD600
Extraction methodIncomplete extraction or degradationUse rapid quenching in cold methanol
Analysis techniqueDifferent sensitivities and specificitiesUse internal standards and method validation
Strain backgroundGenetic variation affects baseline levelsInclude isogenic control strains
Media compositionPre-existing lysine affects measurementsUse defined minimal media
Carbon sourceMetabolic state influences amino acid poolsAccount for carbon source in comparisons

For reliable results, researchers should adopt standardized protocols for metabolite extraction and analysis, preferably using techniques like HPLC or LC-MS/MS with appropriate internal standards .

How can I reconcile contradictory data between transcript and protein levels of LYS21?

Discrepancies between LYS21 transcript and protein levels are not uncommon and can be addressed methodologically:

  • Temporal considerations: Collect samples for RNA and protein analysis from the same culture at the same time point

  • Quantification methods: Use absolute quantification methods (like RT-qPCR with standard curves for RNA and quantitative Western blotting for protein)

  • Translation efficiency analysis: Perform polysome profiling to assess translational status of LYS21 mRNA

  • Protein turnover: Conduct pulse-chase experiments to determine protein half-life

  • Integrated analysis: Plot transcript vs. protein levels across multiple conditions to identify patterns of post-transcriptional regulation

Research has shown that increased expression of LYS21 doesn't always correlate with increased enzymatic activity, suggesting post-transcriptional control mechanisms that limit either translation or enzymatic activity .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.