HOX15 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
HOX15 antibody; Os10g0103700 antibody; LOC_Os10g01470 antibody; OsJ_029257 antibody; OSJNBa0071K19.5 antibody; OSJNBa0096E22.15 antibody; Homeobox-leucine zipper protein HOX15 antibody; HD-ZIP protein HOX15 antibody; Homeodomain transcription factor HOX15 antibody; OsHox15 antibody
Target Names
HOX15
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
HOX15 Antibody targets a protein with a probable function as a transcription factor.
Database Links

KEGG: osa:4347946

UniGene: Os.46742

Protein Families
HD-ZIP homeobox family, Class II subfamily
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in seedlings, stems, leaf blades and panicles.

Q&A

Basic Research Questions

  • What is HOX15 and why is it important in research?

HOX15 refers to two distinct homeobox proteins depending on the research context: a plant-specific transcription factor found in Oryza sativa (rice) belonging to the HD-ZIP homeobox family, and the 15th Hox gene (AmphiHox15) discovered in amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae) .

In plant research, HOX15 functions as a homeodomain transcription factor with tissue-specific expression in seedlings, stems, leaf blades, and panicles. The protein belongs to the HD-ZIP homeobox family, Class II subfamily, and has a probable role in transcriptional regulation during plant development.

In evolutionary and developmental biology, the discovery of AmphiHox15 in amphioxus was significant as it completed the amphioxus Hox gene cluster comprising 15 genes spanning 470 kb . This finding raised important evolutionary questions about whether any extant vertebrates possess a Hox15 gene, and whether the ancestral condition for deuterostomes was a Hox cluster with 15 genes adjacent to an Evx family gene .

  • How do I validate HOX15 antibody specificity?

Validating HOX15 antibody specificity requires multiple complementary approaches:

Western Blotting with Positive and Negative Controls:

  • Use known HOX15-expressing tissues (e.g., rice seedlings for plant HOX15)

  • Include knockout/knockdown samples as negative controls

  • Verify single band at expected molecular weight

Epitope Blocking Tests:

  • Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide before immunodetection

  • Signal should be significantly reduced compared to non-blocked antibody

Orthogonal Validation Methods:

  • Compare protein expression with mRNA expression (RT-PCR or RNA-seq)

  • Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of HOX15

  • Apply mass spectrometry to confirm the identity of the detected protein

Cross-Reactivity Assessment:

  • Test against closely related HOX proteins to ensure specificity

  • Perform siRNA knockdown of HOX15 to confirm signal reduction

This systematic approach is similar to antibody validation methods demonstrated for other targets, such as HO-1/HMOX1 antibodies where knockout cell lines were used to confirm specificity .

  • What are the optimal conditions for using HOX15 antibodies in Western blotting?

Optimal Western blotting conditions for HOX15 antibodies:

Sample Preparation:

  • Use freshly harvested tissue samples or cells

  • Extract proteins with RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors

  • Measure protein concentration using BCA or Bradford assays

  • Load 20-50 μg of total protein per lane

Electrophoresis and Transfer Parameters:

  • 10-12% SDS-PAGE for optimal resolution

  • Transfer to PVDF membrane at 100V for 1 hour or 30V overnight at 4°C

  • Verify transfer efficiency using reversible staining (Ponceau S)

Antibody Incubation:

  • Block membrane with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour

  • Incubate with primary HOX15 antibody at 1:500-1:1000 dilution overnight at 4°C

  • Wash 3×10 minutes with TBST

  • Incubate with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000) for 1 hour at room temperature

  • Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence detection

Controls and Optimization:

  • Include positive control samples (tissues with known HOX15 expression)

  • Optimize antibody concentration if high background or weak signal occurs

  • Consider extended blocking (2-3 hours) if non-specific binding persists

The approach follows standard protocols similar to those used for other HOX protein detection, though specific optimization may be required based on your experimental system .

  • How can I use HOX15 antibodies for immunohistochemistry?

Methodological approach for HOX15 antibody use in immunohistochemistry:

Tissue Preparation:

  • Fix tissues in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24-48 hours

  • Process through graded alcohols and xylene

  • Embed in paraffin and section at 4-6 μm thickness

  • Mount on positively charged slides

Antigen Retrieval Methods:

  • Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER): Citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) for 20 minutes at 95-98°C

  • Enzymatic retrieval: 0.1% trypsin at 37°C for 10-20 minutes (test both to determine optimal retrieval)

Staining Protocol:

  • Deparaffinize and rehydrate sections

  • Perform antigen retrieval

  • Block endogenous peroxidase with 3% H₂O₂ for 10 minutes

  • Block non-specific binding with 5-10% normal serum for 1 hour

  • Incubate with primary HOX15 antibody at 1:100-1:200 dilution overnight at 4°C

  • Wash 3×5 minutes in PBS

  • Apply appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 30-60 minutes

  • Develop with DAB or other chromogen

  • Counterstain with hematoxylin, dehydrate, and mount

Controls and Interpretation:

  • Include positive control tissues known to express HOX15

  • Include negative controls (primary antibody omitted)

  • Consider dual immunofluorescence to co-localize with other markers

This protocol follows established immunohistochemistry techniques that have been successful with other HOX proteins .

Advanced Research Questions

  • How do I select the appropriate epitope for generating a HOX15-specific antibody?

Selecting an optimal epitope for HOX15 antibody development requires careful bioinformatic analysis and structural considerations:

Epitope Selection Criteria:

ConsiderationMethodological ApproachRationale
Sequence uniquenessPerform BLAST analysis against proteomeEnsures specificity and reduces cross-reactivity
Surface accessibilityUse prediction algorithms (e.g., Emini Surface, BepiPred)Enhances antibody binding to native protein
Secondary structureAnalyze using Chou-Fasman, Garnier-Osguthorpe-Robson methodsHelps identify flexible regions more suitable as epitopes
HydrophilicityApply Kyte-Doolittle scale analysisHydrophilic regions are more likely to be surface-exposed
Conserved vs. variable regionsMultiple sequence alignment of HOX15 across speciesChoose conserved regions for broad reactivity or species-specific regions for selective detection

HOX15-Specific Considerations:

  • For the homeobox domain: Generally well-conserved but may lead to cross-reactivity with other HOX proteins

  • C-terminal region: Often more variable and potentially more specific for HOX15

  • N-terminal region: May offer specificity but check for potential post-translational modifications that could affect antibody binding

Technical Implementation:

  • Generate peptides of 15-20 amino acids from the unique regions

  • Evaluate peptide solubility and conjugation potential

  • Ensure selected peptides have minimal homology with other HOX family members

  • Consider synthesizing multiple peptides to increase success probability

This approach aligns with successful epitope selection strategies used for other transcription factors, ensuring both specificity and functionality of the resulting antibody .

  • What are the key differences in detecting HOX15 protein in different experimental systems (plant vs. animal models)?

Detection of HOX15 protein varies significantly between plant and animal systems due to fundamental biological differences:

Plant HOX15 (Oryza sativa) Detection:

ParameterMethodological ConsiderationsPractical Implementation
Tissue extractionHigher content of interfering compounds (phenolics, polysaccharides)Use PVPP, β-mercaptoethanol and specific plant protein extraction buffers
Cell wall barriersRequires stronger extraction methodsInclude cell wall digestion steps or mechanical disruption (bead-beating)
Expression patternsTissue-specific expression in seedlings, stems, leaf blades, paniclesSample at appropriate developmental stages; consider tissue-specific extraction protocols
Subcellular localizationPredominantly nuclearInclude nuclear extraction protocols
Cross-reactivityPlant-specific HOX family membersValidate against plant proteome databases

Animal HOX15 (AmphiHox15) Detection:

ParameterMethodological ConsiderationsPractical Implementation
Model systemsLimited to amphioxus and select speciesOptimize protocols specifically for these less common model organisms
Developmental timingSpatially and temporally regulated during embryonic developmentSample at correct developmental stages
Evolutionary contextPotential absence in vertebrate modelsConsider using amphioxus-specific protocols; not applicable to mouse/human samples
Conservation concernsMay have low homology with commercially available antibodiesCustom antibody development may be necessary
Detection methodsIn situ hybridization may complement antibody methodsUse FISH techniques to validate antibody staining patterns

Key Technical Adaptations:

  • Plant tissues require stronger lysis buffers and may benefit from TCA/acetone precipitation to remove contaminants

  • Animal tissues (especially amphioxus) may require specialized fixation techniques to preserve epitope structure

  • Cross-validation using transcript detection (RNA in situ hybridization) is particularly important for HOX15 given its evolutionary significance

  • How can I optimize antibody screening for anti-HOX15 antibodies with low expression targets?

Optimization of antibody screening for low-expression HOX15 targets requires specialized techniques:

Advanced Screening Methodology:

  • Microarray-Based Approach:

    • Implement a microarray-based screening format similar to the protocol described for antibody screening

    • Use an antibody-immobilized format rather than antigen-immobilized formats

    • Perform true competitive format tests to identify high-affinity binders

    • This technique allows for simultaneous competition experiments and affinity ranking

  • Enhanced Signal Amplification:

    • Employ tyramide signal amplification (TSA) to enhance detection sensitivity

    • Utilize biotin-streptavidin systems for multi-layer signal enhancement

    • Consider quantum dot-conjugated secondary antibodies for improved signal-to-noise ratio

    • Implement digital droplet PCR for absolute quantification of low-abundance transcripts as validation

  • High-Expression System Selection:

    • For initial validation, use systems with induced overexpression of HOX15

    • Develop stable cell lines with controlled HOX15 expression

    • Consider enrichment techniques (e.g., nuclear fraction isolation) when HOX15 represents a small fraction of total protein

  • Machine Learning-Assisted Screening:

    • Implement active learning strategies to improve experimental efficiency in library screening

    • Begin with small labeled subsets and iteratively expand based on computational predictions

    • This approach has been shown to reduce the number of required antigen mutant variants by up to 35%

  • Combining Orthogonal Methods:

    • Validate antibody binding using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or bio-layer interferometry (BLI)

    • Confirm specificity through mass spectrometry identification of immunoprecipitated proteins

    • Integrate computational approaches to predict antibody-antigen binding

This multi-faceted approach incorporates advanced techniques demonstrated to be effective for detecting low-abundance targets and optimizing experimental resources .

  • What are the best approaches for studying HOX15 expression in different developmental stages?

Studying HOX15 expression across developmental stages requires integrated methodological approaches:

Comprehensive Developmental Expression Analysis Framework:

TechniqueApplicationMethodological DetailsAdvantages
RNA-seq time courseTranscript profilingSample key developmental stages; use spike-in controls for absolute quantificationProvides global context and identifies co-expressed genes
RT-qPCRTargeted transcript quantificationDesign intron-spanning primers; validate using multiple reference genesHigh sensitivity for low-abundance transcripts
Whole-mount in situ hybridizationSpatial localizationUse DIG-labeled antisense probes; include sense probes as controlsVisualizes expression domains within intact embryos
ImmunohistochemistryProtein localizationUse antigen retrieval methods; multiplex with developmental markersConfirms protein expression matches transcript patterns
ChIP-seqIdentify target genesOptimize crosslinking conditions; validate antibody specificity for ChIPReveals downstream regulatory networks
Lineage tracingCell fate mappingGenerate HOX15 reporter constructs; perform time-lapse imagingTracks HOX15-expressing cells through development

Developmental Stage-Specific Considerations:

For plant HOX15:

  • Focus on seedling stages, stems, leaf blades, and panicles where expression has been documented

  • Include various stress conditions as HOX transcription factors often respond to environmental cues

  • Compare multiple cultivars to assess expression conservation

For amphioxus HOX15:

  • Carefully stage embryos according to established developmental series

  • Focus on developmental windows when Hox genes are activated

  • Compare with expression patterns of other Hox cluster genes

Analytical Framework:

  • Begin with transcriptome profiling to identify expression windows

  • Validate with targeted quantitative approaches

  • Establish spatial patterns through imaging techniques

  • Confirm protein expression patterns correlate with transcript data

  • Integrate with functional analyses (knockout/knockdown phenotypes)

This comprehensive approach provides multiple lines of evidence for HOX15 expression patterns and functional significance during development .

  • How can I distinguish between cross-reactivity and specific binding when using HOX15 antibodies?

Distinguishing specific HOX15 antibody binding from cross-reactivity requires systematic validation:

Comprehensive Cross-Reactivity Assessment Protocol:

  • Knockout/Knockdown Validation:

    • Generate HOX15 knockout or knockdown systems

    • Compare antibody signal between wildtype and knockout samples

    • Complete absence of signal in knockout samples indicates specificity

    • This approach has been demonstrated effective for validating antibody specificity

  • Peptide Competition Assay:

    • Pre-incubate antibody with excess immunizing peptide

    • Apply to parallel samples alongside non-blocked antibody

    • Specific binding should be significantly reduced/eliminated

    • Remaining signal indicates non-specific binding

  • Epitope Mapping:

    • Test antibody against a panel of overlapping peptides covering HOX15 sequence

    • Identify precisely which amino acid sequences are recognized

    • Cross-reference recognized sequences against other HOX family members

    • This provides molecular-level evidence for potential cross-reactivity

  • Multiple Antibody Approach:

    • Use antibodies raised against different HOX15 epitopes

    • Compare staining/binding patterns

    • Concordant results from multiple antibodies increase confidence in specificity

    • Discordant results warrant further investigation

  • Mass Spectrometry Validation:

    • Perform immunoprecipitation using HOX15 antibody

    • Analyze precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry

    • Identify all proteins captured by the antibody

    • This unbiased approach reveals both target binding and cross-reactivity

Quantitative Assessment Table:

TestPositive ResultNegative ResultInterpretation
Western blot of HOX15-KO sampleNo band at expected MWBand at expected MWNon-specific binding present
Peptide competition>80% signal reduction<20% signal reductionHigh proportion of non-specific binding
IP-Mass SpecHOX15 as top hitOther proteins as top hitsSignificant cross-reactivity
Multiple antibodiesConcordant patternsDiscordant patternsPossible cross-reactivity
Recombinant protein panelBinds only HOX15Binds multiple HOX proteinsCross-reactivity with family members

This systematic approach provides multiple independent lines of evidence for antibody specificity, critical for accurate interpretation of experimental results .

  • What are the advanced techniques for improving HOX15 antibody detection in samples with low antigen expression?

Advanced techniques for enhancing HOX15 antibody detection in low-expression samples:

Signal Amplification Strategies:

TechniqueMethodologySensitivity EnhancementApplication Notes
Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA)Use HRP-conjugated secondary antibody to catalyze tyramide deposition10-100× signal enhancementExcellent for IHC and IF; requires careful optimization to prevent background
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA)Uses paired antibodies and rolling circle amplificationSingle-molecule sensitivityIdeal for protein-protein interactions; can detect HOX15 in complex with cofactors
Quantum Dot ConjugationReplace traditional fluorophores with quantum dots20× brighter, no photobleachingSuperior for long-exposure imaging and multi-color detection
Metal-Enhanced ImmunoassayUse plasmonic gold nanoparticles as labels10-50× enhancementUseful for ELISA-based detection of HOX15
Super-Resolution MicroscopySTORM, PALM or STED imagingSub-diffraction resolutionReveals nuclear distribution patterns of HOX15 at nanoscale

Sample Preparation Optimization:

  • Target Enrichment Approaches:

    • Perform subcellular fractionation to isolate nuclei (where HOX15 localizes)

    • Use affinity purification to concentrate HOX15 before detection

    • Apply laser capture microdissection to isolate specific tissues with higher expression

  • Novel Fixation Methods:

    • PAXgene tissue fixation: Better preserves both protein and nucleic acids

    • Adaptive focused acoustics: Improves epitope availability

    • Targeted protein denaturation: Enhances exposure of buried epitopes

  • Integration with Advanced Computational Approaches:

    • Apply machine learning algorithms to distinguish signal from noise

    • Implement biophysics-informed models for identifying binding modes

    • Use quantitative image analysis for precise signal quantification

Practical Implementation for HOX15:

  • For plant HOX15, focus on tissues with known expression (seedlings, stems, leaf blades, panicles)

  • For amphioxus HOX15, concentrate on developmental stages with peak expression

  • Combine protein detection with transcript analysis (RNAscope) for validation

  • Consider using recombinant HOX15 protein as a positive control

This integrated approach combines cutting-edge technologies with optimized sample preparation to maximize detection sensitivity while maintaining specificity .

  • How does HOX15 antibody detection compare to other methods for studying HOX15 function?

Comparative analysis of HOX15 detection methods versus functional studies:

Comprehensive Method Comparison Matrix:

MethodPrimary Data GeneratedAdvantagesLimitationsComplementarity with Antibody Detection
Antibody DetectionProtein localization, expression levelsDirect protein visualization, compatible with fixed specimensLimited temporal resolution, potential cross-reactivityBaseline method
RNA-seq/qPCRTranscript abundanceHigh sensitivity, quantitative, isoform detectionPost-transcriptional changes missed, indirect measure of functionValidates whether protein levels correlate with transcript levels
CRISPR-Cas9 KnockoutPhenotypic consequences of gene deletionDefinitive functional evidence, systemic effectsPotential compensatory mechanisms, developmental lethalityAntibody confirms complete protein loss in knockout models
ChIP-seqGenome-wide binding sitesDirect measurement of transcription factor activityRequires validated ChIP-grade antibody, static binding snapshotAntibody validation critical for reliable ChIP-seq data
HiChIP/CUT&RUNChromatin interactions, precise binding sitesHigher resolution than ChIP, requires fewer cellsTechnical complexity, specialized equipmentAntibody quality directly impacts data reliability
Single-cell multi-omicsHeterogeneity in expression and functionCellular resolution, correlates multiple parametersExpensive, computationally intensiveAntibodies enable protein-level validation of single-cell findings
ATAC-seqChromatin accessibilityIdentifies potential binding regions, antibody-independentIndirect measure of TF activityAntibody detection confirms TF presence at accessible regions
Ribosome ProfilingTranslation efficiencyDirect measurement of protein synthesisCannot determine final protein levels or localizationAntibodies confirm translation results in stable protein

Integrated Functional Analysis Strategy:

  • Begin with transcript analysis (RNA-seq, qPCR) to establish expression patterns

  • Validate protein expression using optimized antibody detection methods

  • Perform loss-of-function studies (CRISPR-Cas9, RNAi) to determine phenotypic consequences

  • Use ChIP-seq (requiring validated antibodies) to identify direct target genes

  • Integrate with chromatin accessibility data (ATAC-seq) to define regulatory landscape

  • Apply functional genomics approaches to validate target gene regulation

This comprehensive approach provides multiple lines of evidence regarding HOX15 function, with antibody detection serving as a critical link between transcriptional data and functional outcomes .

  • What are the emerging technologies for improving HOX15 antibody specificity and sensitivity?

Emerging technologies enhancing HOX15 antibody performance:

Cutting-Edge Antibody Engineering Approaches:

TechnologyMethodological PrinciplesApplication to HOX15Implementation Status
Phage Display with Deep SequencingIterative selection with NGS analysis of enriched clonesCreates highly specific HOX15 binders through directed evolutionEstablished technology with recent advances in computational analysis
Biophysics-informed ModelingMachine learning models incorporating physical constraintsPredicts and designs antibodies with tailored HOX15 specificity profilesEmerging approach with demonstrated success in antibody engineering
Nanobodies/Single-Domain AntibodiesCamelid-derived single-domain antibodies with small sizeSuperior penetration into nuclear compartments where HOX15 localizesIncreasingly available with simplified production methods
Active Learning AlgorithmsComputational methods that iteratively prioritize experimentsReduces number of required antigen variants by up to 35%Recently validated for antibody-antigen binding prediction
Synthetic Antibody LibrariesRationally designed diversity with optimal structural frameworksHigher starting affinity and specificity for difficult targets like HOX15Commercial platforms available
CRISPR DisplayUses CRISPR-dCas9 system to deliver detection reagentsCan be combined with fluorescent reporters for live HOX15 visualizationExperimental stage with promising early results

Recent Advances in Detection Technologies:

  • Microfluidic Antibody Validation:

    • High-throughput microfluidic platforms for rapid antibody characterization

    • Enables testing against hundreds of protein variants simultaneously

    • Quantifies cross-reactivity profile with minimal sample consumption

  • Spatial Multi-omics Integration:

    • Combines antibody detection with in situ sequencing

    • Correlates HOX15 protein expression with transcriptome in spatial context

    • Provides unprecedented insight into HOX15 function in tissue architecture

  • Computational Specificity Enhancement:

    • Advanced algorithms identify optimal epitopes with minimal homology to related HOX proteins

    • Machine learning models predict cross-reactivity before antibody production

    • Computational deconvolution of signal to separate specific binding from background

  • Binding Mode Analysis:

    • New models can identify different binding modes associated with specific ligands

    • Enables design of antibodies with customized specificity profiles

    • Particularly valuable for distinguishing between closely related HOX family members

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.