HSP90-6 is a specific isoform of the heat shock protein 90 family involved in protein folding and cellular stress responses. While HSP90 proteins generally function as molecular chaperones regulating signaling pathways and correcting misfolded proteins, HSP90-6 appears to have specific roles in nutrient metabolism, particularly in plant systems. Research has shown that HSP90-6 is involved in grain filling via carbon and nitrogen metabolism in maize . It differs from other commonly studied isoforms like HSP90α (HSP90AA1) and HSP90β (HSP90AB1) which share approximately 90% sequence identity with each other but have distinct functions and expression patterns .
HSP90-6 antibodies are valuable tools for multiple research applications including:
Western blotting for protein expression analysis
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for tissue localization
Immunofluorescence (IF) for subcellular localization
Immunoprecipitation (IP) for protein-protein interaction studies
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) for complex formation analysis
These applications allow researchers to investigate HSP90-6 expression patterns, cellular distribution, and functional interactions with client proteins in various experimental systems.
To validate HSP90-6 antibody specificity:
Perform Western blotting with positive and negative control samples
Include recombinant HSP90-6 protein as a reference standard
Test cross-reactivity against other HSP90 isoforms (particularly HSP90α and HSP90β)
Use knockout or knockdown samples as negative controls
Verify results using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of HSP90-6
Conduct peptide competition assays to confirm binding specificity
In particular, HSP90 antibodies should be carefully validated to distinguish between the highly homologous isoforms, as seen in validation studies where researchers include recombinant HSP90α and HSP90β proteins for reference .
| Application | Recommended Dilution Range |
|---|---|
| Western Blot | 1:5000-1:50000 |
| Immunoprecipitation | 0.5-4.0 μg for 1.0-3.0 mg of total protein lysate |
| Immunohistochemistry | 1:50-1:500 |
| Immunofluorescence | 1:50-1:500 |
| Co-Immunoprecipitation | 0.5-4.0 μg for 1.0-3.0 mg of total protein lysate |
Note: These dilutions should be optimized for each specific antibody and experimental system. The appropriate dilution is sample-dependent and should be determined empirically for optimal results .
For optimal Western blotting results with HSP90-6 antibodies:
Prepare protein lysates in an appropriate buffer (RIPA or NP-40 based buffers)
Load 10-30 μg of total protein per lane
Separate proteins using 8-10% SDS-PAGE (HSP90 proteins appear at ~85-90 kDa)
Transfer to PVDF membrane
Block with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST
Incubate with primary HSP90-6 antibody at optimized dilution (typically 1:5000-1:50000) overnight at 4°C
Wash with TBST (3-5 times, 5-10 minutes each)
Incubate with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody
Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence
For loading control, strip and reprobe with antibodies against housekeeping proteins like α-tubulin or GAPDH
This protocol has been validated in multiple cell lines including human (HeLa, LNCaP, HEK-293, MCF-7, Jurkat), rat (HSC-T6, ROS1728), and mouse (NIH/3T3, 4T1) models .
For optimal immunohistochemical detection of HSP90-6:
Section formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues at 4-6 μm thickness
Primary antigen retrieval recommendation: TE buffer pH 9.0
Alternative method: Citrate buffer pH 6.0
Heat-induced epitope retrieval is typically more effective than enzymatic retrieval
Apply primary antibody at 1:50-1:500 dilution
Incubate overnight at 4°C or 1-2 hours at room temperature
Use appropriate detection system (e.g., HRP-polymer or avidin-biotin complex)
The chosen antigen retrieval method should be optimized based on the specific tissue type and fixation conditions.
To investigate HSP90-6's role in nutrient metabolism, particularly in plant systems:
Perform comparative expression analysis between wild-type and HSP90.6 mutant tissues
Use Western blotting to quantify HSP90-6 protein levels at different developmental stages
Conduct immunohistochemistry to localize HSP90-6 in specific tissues like endosperm and embryo
Apply co-immunoprecipitation to identify HSP90-6 interactions with carbon and nitrogen metabolism enzymes
Combine with transcriptomic analysis to identify downstream gene expression changes in amino acid biosynthesis and carbon metabolism pathways
Use in situ hybridization in parallel with immunofluorescence to correlate transcript and protein localization
Research has shown that HSP90.6 is highly expressed in early stages of grain development and its expression pattern changes throughout development, being highly distributed in kernels at 5 days after pollination (DAP) and present in embryo and endosperm at 12 DAP .
When applying HSP90-6 antibodies in cancer research:
Verify antibody specificity for HSP90 isoforms relevant to your cancer model
Consider differential expression of HSP90 isoforms in various cancer types
Evaluate cell surface versus intracellular HSP90 expression (extracellular HSP90 is significantly higher in tumor cells than normal cells)
Correlate HSP90 expression with client oncoproteins and tumor progression markers
When studying HSP90 inhibitors, examine effects on multiple signaling pathways simultaneously
Consider using HSP90 antibodies to monitor therapy response in cancer models
HSP90 is critically involved in cancer biology by interacting with oncogenic client proteins, making it a potential therapeutic target. Plasma concentrations of HSP90 have been shown to positively correlate with tumor malignancy in cancer patients .
To differentiate between highly homologous HSP90 isoforms:
Select antibodies raised against unique epitopes, particularly targeting the N-terminal regions where sequence divergence is greatest
Verify specificity using recombinant proteins of each isoform
Perform Western blotting with controls expressing individual isoforms
Consider using antibodies raised against synthetic peptides corresponding to isoform-specific regions
Note that HSP90α (HSP90AA1) and HSP90β (HSP90AB1) share 90% identity but have distinguishable sequences, particularly at the N-terminus
Include appropriate positive controls (e.g., PA3-013 specifically detects HSP90α/HSP86 but not HSP84)
For example, the PA3-013 antibody was raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to residues P(2) E E T Q T Q D Q P M(12) of mouse HSP86, a region where the N-terminal sequences of HSP84 and HSP86 show the largest differences .
Multiple bands in Western blotting with HSP90-6 antibodies may occur due to:
Post-translational modifications like phosphorylation or acetylation
Cross-reactivity with other HSP90 isoforms (HSP90α, HSP90β)
Proteolytic degradation during sample preparation
Alternative splice variants of HSP90
Non-specific binding to related heat shock proteins
To address this issue:
Include recombinant HSP90 isoforms as reference standards
Optimize lysis buffer composition with appropriate protease inhibitors
Test different blocking agents (BSA vs. non-fat milk)
Verify antibody specificity using knockout or knockdown controls
Consider preabsorption with potential cross-reactive proteins
HSP90 proteins typically appear at approximately 85-90 kDa molecular weight range on Western blots, with some variation depending on post-translational modifications and isoform .
For successful immunoprecipitation of HSP90-6:
Use mild lysis buffers (e.g., NP-40 based) to preserve protein-protein interactions
Add 0.5-4.0 μg antibody per 1.0-3.0 mg of total protein lysate
Pre-clear lysates with appropriate control IgG and protein A/G beads
Include both positive (known HSP90-6 expressing) and negative control samples
Optimize incubation time and temperature (typically overnight at 4°C)
For co-immunoprecipitation, consider crosslinking to stabilize transient interactions
Use appropriate elution conditions to preserve co-precipitated proteins
Control for non-specific binding using isotype-matched control antibodies
Immunoprecipitation experiments have demonstrated that HSP90 exists primarily as homodimers in cells and can be precipitated when complexed with other proteins such as the aryl hydrocarbon receptor .
Essential controls for HSP90-6 antibody experiments include:
Positive control: Cells/tissues known to express HSP90-6 (e.g., HeLa, HEK-293, Jurkat cells for mammalian HSP90)
Negative control:
Isotype-matched irrelevant antibody
HSP90-6 knockout or knockdown samples
Tissues from relevant mutant models (e.g., hsp90.6 mutant in plant studies)
Loading control: Housekeeping proteins like α-tubulin, GAPDH, or β-actin
Specificity controls:
Peptide competition assay
Recombinant HSP90 isoforms
Technical controls:
For instance, research on maize HSP90.6 utilized hsp90.6 knockout mutant and single-amino acid mutant (ehsp90.6) as controls to validate antibody specificity and functional studies .
Research on HSP90.6 in plants has revealed:
HSP90.6 regulates nutrient metabolism in maize grain development
A single-amino acid mutation in the HATPase_c domain reduces ATPase activity, resulting in smaller grains
Functional loss of HSP90.6 downregulates expression of amino acid biosynthesis and carbon metabolism-related genes
HSP90.6 mutants show differences in kernel development as early as 10 days after pollination (DAP)
HSP90.6 is highly expressed in early grain development stages
Expression patterns change during development:
These findings suggest HSP90.6 plays a critical role in grain filling and development in maize, with potential implications for crop improvement.
HSP90 inhibitors are being developed as therapeutic agents through several approaches:
Targeting mechanisms:
N-terminal domain (NTD) inhibitors targeting ATP-binding site
C-terminal domain (CTD) inhibitors
Isoform-selective inhibitors
Current challenges:
Drug resistance development
Dose-limiting toxicity
Poor pharmacokinetic profiles
Research strategies:
Combination therapies with chemotherapy agents
Co-administration with targeted therapies
Integration with immunotherapy approaches
Progress:
Research indicates that HSP90 inhibition suppresses oncogenic pathways in cancer cells by interrupting the ATPase activity of HSP90, making it a promising target for targeted cancer therapies .
Recent advances in understanding extracellular HSP90 functions include:
Differential expression: Cell surface HSP90 expression is considerably higher in tumor cells compared to normal cells
ATP independence: Extracellular HSP90 can function independently of ATP to adapt to reduced ATP-extracellular environment
Secretion patterns: Tumor cells secrete HSP90 consecutively, while healthy cells secrete it only under stress conditions
Clinical correlation: Plasma concentrations of HSP90 positively associate with tumor malignancy in cancer patients
Therapeutic potential: Blocking or neutralizing HSP90 secretion can inhibit cancer invasion and migration
Functional discoveries: HSP90 drives functional heme maturation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC)
These findings highlight extracellular HSP90 as a potential therapeutic target, particularly for preventing malignant tumor progression through inhibition of its secretion or neutralization of its extracellular functions .