HSP90AB1 functions as a molecular chaperone that plays critical roles in promoting the maturation, structural maintenance, and proper regulation of specific target proteins involved in cell cycle control and signal transduction pathways. This protein undergoes a functional cycle linked to its ATPase activity, which induces conformational changes in client proteins and subsequently causes their activation. HSP90AB1 interacts dynamically with various co-chaperones that modulate its substrate recognition, ATPase cycle, and chaperone function .
The protein encoded by the HSP90AB1 gene participates in several essential cellular processes, including:
Protein folding, maturation, activation, and degradation
Regulation of signaling pathways for cell cycle progression
Cellular survival mechanisms and apoptotic pathways
Response to environmental stressors such as heat shock and oxidative stress
HSP90AB1 has garnered significant research interest due to its interactions with numerous oncogenic proteins, making it a potential target for cancer therapy development. Its expression is typically induced by various stress stimuli, highlighting its role in cellular stress response mechanisms .
The antibody is derived from a rabbit host immunized with a synthesized non-phosphopeptide from human HSP90B around the phosphorylation site of serine 254 (V-G-S(p)-D-E) . This approach ensures specificity for the target phosphorylation site. The following table summarizes its key characteristics:
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Host Species | Rabbit |
| Clonality | Polyclonal |
| Isotype | IgG |
| Target | HSP90AB1 (Ab-254) |
| UniProt ID | P08238 |
| Target Aliases | HS90B, HSP 84, HSP90-beta, HSP90AB1, HSPC2 |
| Species Reactivity | Human, Mouse, Rat |
| Conjugate | Non-conjugated |
| Form | Liquid |
The antibody undergoes purification through affinity chromatography using epitope-specific immunogen. This purification process enhances the specificity of the antibody by isolating antibodies that specifically recognize the target epitope, thus reducing background signals in experimental applications .
HSP90AB1 (Ab-254) Antibody has been validated for multiple experimental applications, making it a versatile tool for protein detection and localization studies. The recommended applications and their corresponding dilution ranges are detailed below.
The antibody has demonstrated efficacy in several immunological techniques :
| Application | Recommended Dilution |
|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:500-1:3000 |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:50-1:100 |
| Immunofluorescence (IF) | 1:100-1:500 |
| Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) | 1:2000-1:10000 |
These dilution ranges should be optimized for specific experimental conditions, including sample type, detection method, and desired signal intensity.
Research has validated the HSP90AB1 (Ab-254) Antibody for immunohistochemical analysis of various tissue samples. The following protocol has been successfully implemented:
Heat-mediated antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6, epitope retrieval solution) for 20 minutes
Blocking of tissue sections with 10% goat serum
Incubation with 1μg/ml rabbit anti-HSP90AB1 Antibody overnight at 4°C
Application of biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG as secondary antibody for 30 minutes at 37°C
Development using Strepavidin-Biotin-Complex with DAB as chromogen
This protocol has been effective for detecting HSP90AB1 in multiple tissue types, including human breast carcinoma, mouse testis, rat intestine, and human placenta tissues .
For immunofluorescence detection, the antibody has been validated using the following method:
Heat-mediated antigen retrieval in citrate buffer for 20 minutes
Blocking with 10% goat serum
Incubation with 2μg/mL of the antibody overnight at 4°C
Application of fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody (e.g., DyLight®488 Conjugated Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG) at 1:100 dilution for 30 minutes at 37°C
Counterstaining with DAPI
Visualization using appropriate fluorescence microscope settings
This technique has successfully visualized HSP90AB1 expression in human lung cancer tissues, mouse brain tissues, and cultured cell lines such as A431 and HeLa cells .
Immunohistochemical analyses using the HSP90AB1 (Ab-254) Antibody have revealed distinct expression patterns across different tissue types. In human breast carcinoma tissue, positive staining has been observed, suggesting a potential role of HSP90AB1 in breast cancer pathophysiology . Additionally, the antibody has effectively detected the protein in mouse testis, rat intestine, and human placenta tissues, indicating widespread expression across species and tissue types .
Immunofluorescence experiments have elucidated the subcellular localization of HSP90AB1. In human lung cancer tissues and cultured cell lines (A431, HeLa), the protein shows predominantly cytoplasmic distribution, which aligns with its known function as a cytosolic chaperone . In HeLa cells treated with TNF-alpha (20nM, 15 minutes), HSP90AB1 detection has provided insights into the protein's response to inflammatory stimuli .
Western blot analysis using the antibody has been performed on extracts from HeLa cells treated with TNF-alpha (20ng/ml, 30 minutes). This application has demonstrated the antibody's ability to detect specific protein bands corresponding to HSP90AB1, further validating its specificity and utility in protein expression studies .
The HSP90AB1 (Ab-254) Antibody has been validated for multiple applications including:
The recommended dilutions for optimal results are:
These applications allow researchers to investigate HSP90AB1 expression, localization, and interactions across multiple experimental platforms.
Human HSP90AB1 has 724 amino acids versus HSP90AA1's 732 amino acids (or 723 and 731 respectively with N-terminal methionines removed)
HSP90AB1 possesses a unique signature sequence LKID (residues 71-74) not present in other HSPs
In HSP90AB1, the amino acids ESEDK are removed between phosphorylation sites that are present in HSP90AA1
The amino acids TQTQDQPME at the N-terminal end of HSP90AA1 are replaced by VHHG in HSP90AB1
These structural differences may contribute to differential regulation and client protein specificity between HSP90 family members.
HSP90AB1 functions as an ATP-dependent molecular chaperone that:
Participates in signal transduction, protein folding, and degradation
Aids in the folding, stabilization, and modification of diverse protein substrates
Collaborates with various co-chaperones to manage ATPase-driven conformational changes
Transports client proteins between the cytoplasm and nucleus
Interacts with client proteins including kinases, ubiquitin ligases, and transcription factors
HSP90AB1 is relevant to disease research because:
It exhibits high expression across multiple cancer types including lung, esophageal, gastric, breast, and colorectal cancer
In lung adenocarcinoma, its overexpression results in imperfect clinical predictions
It's implicated in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease
Suppression of HSP90AB1 reduces the potential of endothelial cells to form tube structures, suggesting its importance in angiogenesis
The HSP90AB1 (Ab-254) Antibody was raised against a synthetic non-phosphopeptide derived from human HSP90B around the phosphorylation site of serine 254 (V-G-S(p)-D-E) . To study the phosphorylation dynamics, researchers can:
Use the HSP90AB1 (Ab-254) Antibody to immunoprecipitate total HSP90AB1, then probe with phospho-serine specific antibodies
Compare immunoblots of samples treated with or without phosphatase inhibitors to preserve the phosphorylation state
Design experiments with stimuli known to activate relevant kinases, then monitor temporal changes in HSP90AB1 phosphorylation
Perform site-directed mutagenesis (S254A or S254D) to create phospho-dead or phospho-mimetic mutants for functional studies
Use phospho-specific antibodies in parallel with the HSP90AB1 (Ab-254) Antibody to determine the ratio of phosphorylated to total protein
This methodological approach can reveal how phosphorylation at Ser-254 regulates HSP90AB1 function in different cellular contexts.
For optimal immunohistochemistry results with HSP90AB1 (Ab-254) Antibody:
Tissue Preparation:
Use freshly prepared 10% neutral buffered formalin for fixation (12-24 hours)
Process and embed in paraffin following standard protocols
Section at 4-6 μm thickness
Antigen Retrieval:
Test both citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and EDTA buffer (pH 9.0)
Heat treatment: 95-98°C for 15-20 minutes followed by cooling
Blocking and Antibody Incubation:
Detection and Visualization:
Counterstaining:
Light hematoxylin counterstain to allow clear visualization of positively stained cells
The validation images show successful staining of human breast carcinoma tissue, which can serve as an appropriate positive control .
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) with HSP90AB1 (Ab-254) Antibody offers a powerful approach to identify novel client proteins and co-chaperones:
Experimental Design:
Prepare lysates under non-denaturing conditions to preserve protein-protein interactions
Immunoprecipitate HSP90AB1 complexes using the antibody (typically 2-5 μg per 500 μg of protein lysate)
Analyze precipitated complexes by mass spectrometry or Western blotting
Controls to Include:
IgG control: Use non-immune rabbit IgG to assess non-specific binding
Input control: Analyze pre-IP lysate to confirm target presence
Validation: Confirm known interactions with established HSP90AB1 partners
Competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to demonstrate specificity
Modifications for Different Research Questions:
To identify stress-responsive interactions: Compare normal vs. heat-shocked or drug-treated cells
To find disease-specific clients: Compare normal vs. cancer or neurodegenerative disease models
To identify ATP-dependent interactions: Include ATP vs. ADP in binding buffers
Validation of Novel Interactions:
Reverse Co-IP with antibodies against the identified interacting proteins
Proximity ligation assays to confirm interactions in situ
Functional studies to determine biological relevance of the interaction
This approach has successfully identified numerous HSP90 client proteins involved in cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and aging-related conditions .
When experiencing inconsistent Western blot results with this antibody, consider these common issues and solutions:
Optimizing these parameters should improve consistency and specificity of HSP90AB1 detection.
To minimize background in immunofluorescence experiments:
Fixation Optimization:
Test different fixatives (4% PFA, methanol, or acetone)
Optimize fixation time (typically 10-20 minutes for PFA)
Quench aldehyde groups with glycine (100 mM) or NH₄Cl (50 mM)
Improved Blocking:
Extend blocking time (1-2 hours at room temperature)
Use 5-10% normal serum from secondary antibody species
Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for proper permeabilization
Include 1% BSA to reduce non-specific binding
Antibody Optimization:
Titrate antibody beyond the recommended dilution range
Increase washing steps (5-6 times for 5 minutes each)
Centrifuge diluted antibody before use to remove aggregates
Incubate primary antibody at 4°C overnight instead of shorter room temperature incubation
Autofluorescence Reduction:
Treat with 0.1% Sudan Black B in 70% ethanol after antibody incubation
Use specialized quenching reagents for tissues with high autofluorescence
Select fluorophores with emission spectra distinct from autofluorescence wavelengths
Controls:
Secondary antibody only control to assess non-specific binding
Peptide competition control to verify specificity
Negative control tissues known to express low levels of HSP90AB1
These optimizations should significantly improve signal-to-noise ratio in immunofluorescence studies.
Distinguishing between HSP90 isoforms requires careful experimental design:
Antibody Selection:
Molecular Techniques:
RT-qPCR with isoform-specific primers targeting unique regions
siRNA/shRNA knockdown specific to HSP90AB1 as validation control
Recombinant protein standards of different isoforms for size comparison
Protein Separation:
Use high-resolution SDS-PAGE (8% gels) to separate HSP90AB1 (724 aa) from HSP90AA1 (732 aa)
Consider 2D electrophoresis to separate based on both molecular weight and isoelectric point
Employ Phos-tag™ gels to distinguish based on phosphorylation status
Mass Spectrometry Approach:
Tryptic digestion followed by MS/MS analysis to identify isoform-specific peptides
Focus on regions with sequence divergence between isoforms
Quantify isoform ratios using label-free or labeled quantification methods
Verification Strategy:
Compare staining patterns with multiple antibodies against different HSP90 isoforms
Use tissues or cell lines with known differential expression of HSP90 isoforms
Include genetic manipulation (overexpression, knockdown) as specificity controls
This multi-faceted approach enables reliable discrimination between HSP90AB1 and other HSP90 family members.
HSP90AB1 (Ab-254) Antibody can be employed in multiple strategies to investigate cancer progression:
Expression Analysis Across Cancer Stages:
IHC on tissue microarrays containing primary tumors and metastatic lesions
Quantitative Western blot comparing expression across cell lines representing different stages
Correlation with clinical outcomes using patient-derived samples
Subcellular Localization Studies:
Immunofluorescence to track potential translocation between cytoplasm and nucleus
Co-localization with client proteins relevant to cancer progression
Fractionation followed by Western blot to quantify compartment-specific distribution
Functional Studies:
Immunoprecipitation to identify cancer-specific client proteins and co-chaperones
Analysis of phosphorylation status at Ser-254 in different tumor grades
Assessment of HSP90AB1-client protein interactions after treatment with HSP90 inhibitors
Therapeutic Response Monitoring:
IHC of tumor biopsies before and after treatment with HSP90 inhibitors
Correlation between HSP90AB1 expression/phosphorylation and treatment resistance
Changes in client protein stability following therapeutic intervention
HSP90AB1 is overexpressed in multiple cancer types including lung, esophageal, gastric, breast, and colorectal cancer , making it a relevant target for cancer progression studies.
To investigate HSP90AB1's role in neurodegenerative diseases:
Colocalization Studies:
Double immunofluorescence with HSP90AB1 (Ab-254) Antibody and markers of protein aggregation (tau, β-amyloid, α-synuclein)
Confocal microscopy to assess spatial relationships with disease-specific inclusions
Quantification of colocalization in patient tissues versus controls
Protein-Protein Interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify interactions with disease-associated proteins
Proximity ligation assays to visualize and quantify interactions in situ
Pull-down assays to determine direct binding to misfolded proteins
Functional Intervention:
Analysis of HSP90AB1 expression after treatment with HSP90 inhibitors (e.g., 17-AAG)
Assessment of protein aggregation following HSP90AB1 knockdown/overexpression
Evaluation of neuronal function (electrophysiology, calcium imaging) in relation to HSP90AB1 modulation
Animal Model Studies:
IHC for HSP90AB1 in transgenic disease models at different disease stages
Correlation between HSP90AB1 levels and disease progression
Therapeutic targeting of HSP90AB1 and assessment of cognitive/behavioral outcomes
Research has shown that in Alzheimer's disease, tau tangles and β-amyloid deposits colocalize with HSP90, and HSP90 plays a role in regulating their aggregation and degradation. HSP90 inhibitors like 17-AAG can mitigate β-amyloid-induced neurotoxicity .
For aging and senescence research applications:
Expression Analysis During Senescence:
Western blot to quantify HSP90AB1 levels in young versus senescent cells
IHC or IF to examine spatial distribution changes during senescence
Co-staining with senescence markers (p16, SA-β-gal) to correlate expression patterns
HSF1-HSP90AB1 Regulatory Axis:
Chromatin immunoprecipitation to assess HSF1 binding to HSP90AB1 promoter
HSF1 knockdown/overexpression followed by HSP90AB1 expression analysis
Monitoring of the p38–NF-κB–SASP pathway components in relation to HSP90AB1 levels
Phosphorylation Dynamics:
Analysis of Ser-254 phosphorylation status in young versus senescent cells
Investigation of AKT-HSP90AB1 interaction using co-IP before and after HSP90 inhibitor treatment
Assessment of phosphorylation-dependent client protein interactions
Intervention Studies:
Titration of HSP90 inhibitors (e.g., 17-DMAG, GA) at different concentrations
Monitoring senescence markers after treatment
Comparing effects in different cell types and senescence models
Research indicates complex relationships between HSP90AB1 and senescence, with HSP90 inhibitors showing senolytic effects at specific concentrations. 17-DMAG has demonstrated the ability to enhance mouse health and longevity in aging models .
For rigorous quantification and interpretation of HSP90AB1 IHC in cancer tissues:
Quantification Methods:
H-score: Multiply staining intensity (0-3) by percentage of positive cells (0-100) for score range 0-300
Allred score: Sum of proportion score (0-5) and intensity score (0-3) for range 0-8
Digital image analysis using specialized software for more objective assessment
Pattern Analysis:
Subcellular localization (cytoplasmic, nuclear, or both)
Homogeneous versus heterogeneous expression within tumor
Expression at tumor margins versus tumor core
Stromal versus tumor cell expression
Comparative Analysis:
Compare with matched normal tissue when available
Assess gradient changes from normal to dysplastic to malignant areas
Correlate with tumor grade, stage, and histological subtype
Clinical Correlation:
Link expression patterns to clinical outcomes (survival, treatment response)
Consider HSP90AB1 expression in context of known prognostic markers
Analyze in relation to treatment history (pre- vs. post-therapy)
In lung adenocarcinoma, HSP90AB1 overexpression has been linked to imperfect clinical predictions , highlighting the importance of contextual interpretation.
When faced with contradictory results across detection methods:
Method-Specific Considerations:
Western blot: Detects denatured protein, may miss conformation-specific epitopes
IHC/IF: Preserves tissue architecture but may have epitope accessibility issues
ELISA: Quantitative but lacks spatial information
qPCR: Measures mRNA rather than protein levels
Technical Resolution Strategies:
Use multiple antibodies targeting different HSP90AB1 epitopes
Compare different fixation methods for IHC/IF
Include appropriate controls for each technique
Optimize protocols for each specific application
Biological Explanations for Discrepancies:
Post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition
Protein-protein interactions masking antibody binding sites
Differential isoform expression across tissues
Subcellular compartmentalization affecting extraction efficiency
Integrated Analysis Approach:
Weight results based on technical reliability of each method
Prioritize functional validation over pure detection
Consider cellular context and disease state
Use orthogonal techniques (genetic manipulation, activity assays)
This systematic approach helps resolve contradictions and develop a more complete understanding of HSP90AB1 biology in your specific research context.
For robust statistical analysis of HSP90AB1 expression in clinical studies:
These approaches provide rigorous assessment of HSP90AB1's clinical significance while accounting for the complexities of biological data.