HSPA1B Antibody, Biotin conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Product dispatch typically occurs within 1-3 business days of order receipt. Delivery times may vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Synonyms
HSPA1B antibody; HSP72 antibody; Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1B antibody; Heat shock 70 kDa protein 2 antibody; HSP70-2 antibody; HSP70.2 antibody
Target Names
HSPA1B
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

HSPA1B (Heat Shock Protein Family A (Hsp70) Member 1B) is a molecular chaperone crucial for a wide array of cellular processes. Its functions include protecting the proteome from stress, facilitating the folding and transport of newly synthesized polypeptides, activating the proteolysis of misfolded proteins, and modulating the formation and dissociation of protein complexes. HSPA1B plays a pivotal role in protein quality control, ensuring proper protein folding, refolding of misfolded proteins, and targeting proteins for degradation. This is achieved through ATP-dependent cycles of binding, hydrolysis, and ADP release, a process modulated by co-chaperones.

These co-chaperones regulate the ATPase cycle and exhibit substrate specificity; some promote folding, while others promote degradation. HSPA1B's polypeptide affinity is regulated by its nucleotide-bound state. In the ATP-bound state, affinity is low; ATP hydrolysis to ADP induces a conformational change, increasing substrate affinity. Repeated ATP hydrolysis and nucleotide exchange cycles facilitate substrate binding and release. Three types of co-chaperones are involved: J-domain co-chaperones (e.g., HSP40s, stimulating ATPase hydrolysis), nucleotide exchange factors (NEFs) such as BAG1/2/3 (facilitating the conversion of HSP70 from the ADP-bound to the ATP-bound state, promoting substrate release), and TPR domain chaperones (e.g., HOPX and STUB1).

HSPA1B maintains protein homeostasis during cellular stress via protein refolding and degradation. Its acetylation/deacetylation state determines its function: acetylation favors protein refolding via HOPX binding, while deacetylation promotes ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation through STUB1 binding. HSPA1B regulates centrosome integrity during mitosis, essential for maintaining a functional mitotic centrosome and bipolar mitotic spindle assembly. Furthermore, HSPA1B enhances STUB1-mediated SMAD3 ubiquitination and degradation, inhibiting TGF-beta signaling. It is also crucial for STUB1-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of FOXP3 in regulatory T-cells (Tregs) during inflammation. In rotavirus A infection, HSPA1B acts as a post-attachment receptor, facilitating viral entry into the cell.

Database Links

HGNC: 5233

OMIM: 140550

KEGG: hsa:3303

UniGene: Hs.274402

Protein Families
Heat shock protein 70 family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Cytoplasm, cytoskeleton, microtubule organizing center, centrosome. Note=Localized in cytoplasmic mRNP granules containing untranslated mRNAs.
Tissue Specificity
HSPA1B is testis-specific.

Q&A

What is HSPA1B and why is it significant in biological research?

HSPA1B (Heat Shock Protein Family A Member 1B) is a 70kDa heat shock protein that performs critical cellular functions in protein homeostasis. It operates in conjunction with other heat shock proteins to stabilize existing proteins against aggregation and mediate the folding of newly translated polypeptides in both cytosolic and organellar contexts. HSPA1B's significance stems from its ability to recognize non-native conformations of other proteins, allowing it to bind extended peptide segments with hydrophobic character that become exposed during translation, membrane translocation, or following stress-induced damage. The protein is encoded by an intronless gene located in the major histocompatibility complex class III region. HSPA1B has been implicated in several pathological conditions, including pulmonary edema and acute pancreatitis, making it a valuable research target for understanding stress response mechanisms and potential therapeutic interventions.

What are the primary research applications for HSPA1B antibodies?

HSPA1B antibodies, particularly biotin-conjugated variants, are versatile research tools employed across multiple immunological detection techniques. The primary applications include:

  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): Biotin-conjugated HSPA1B antibodies serve as detection antibodies in sandwich ELISA formats, allowing for sensitive quantification of HSPA1B in biological samples.

  • Western Blotting (WB): These antibodies enable detection of HSPA1B protein expression levels in tissue or cell lysates, providing insights into regulation patterns under various experimental conditions.

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): HSPA1B antibodies facilitate visualization of protein localization within tissue sections, allowing for assessment of expression patterns in different cell types.

  • Immunocytochemistry (ICC): Similar to IHC but applied to cultured cells, allowing for subcellular localization studies.

  • Protein Interaction Studies: Biotin-conjugated antibodies can be utilized in pull-down assays and co-immunoprecipitation experiments to investigate HSPA1B's interactions with other proteins.

These diverse applications make HSPA1B antibodies invaluable for investigating heat shock response mechanisms, stress-induced cellular adaptations, and pathological processes involving protein misfolding.

How do I select the appropriate HSPA1B antibody for my specific research needs?

Selecting the optimal HSPA1B antibody requires systematic evaluation of several critical parameters based on your experimental objectives:

Species Compatibility: First, determine the species origin of your experimental samples. For mouse models, select antibodies with verified mouse reactivity, such as rabbit-raised polyclonal antibodies against recombinant mouse HSPA1B protein (amino acids 2-642). Cross-reactivity with other species should be experimentally validated if working with human or other mammalian systems.

Application Suitability: Verify that the antibody has been validated for your specific application:

  • For ELISA: Confirm the antibody has been tested in sandwich ELISA formats with established detection limits and dynamic range.

  • For Western blotting: Look for published evidence of specific band detection at approximately 70 kDa.

  • For IHC/ICC: Ensure the antibody has demonstrated specific tissue/cellular staining patterns without background issues.

Antibody Format: Consider whether a conjugated or unconjugated antibody best suits your protocol:

  • Biotin-conjugated antibodies offer amplification advantages for detection systems utilizing streptavidin-HRP or streptavidin-fluorophore conjugates.

  • Unconjugated antibodies may be preferable for certain applications requiring subsequent custom labeling.

Clonality Considerations: Polyclonal antibodies typically offer broader epitope recognition but potentially greater batch-to-batch variation compared to monoclonals:

  • Polyclonal HSPA1B antibodies raised in rabbits against full-length or large fragments of the protein offer robust recognition.

  • Monoclonal antibodies provide consistent production and may confer greater specificity for certain applications.

Technical Validation: Request or review technical validation data demonstrating:

  • Specificity testing (including Western blots showing a single band)

  • Titration experiments to determine optimal working concentrations

  • Cross-reactivity profiles with related heat shock proteins

For quantitative applications, prioritize antibodies with established intra-assay and inter-assay precision metrics (CV<10% and CV<12%, respectively).

What is the principle behind ELISA detection using biotin-conjugated HSPA1B antibodies?

The detection of HSPA1B using biotin-conjugated antibodies in an ELISA format follows the sandwich enzyme immunoassay principle, which enables highly sensitive and specific protein quantification. The methodology involves the following sequential steps:

  • Capture Phase: Microtiter wells are pre-coated with an antibody specifically recognizing HSPA1B, creating an immobilized capture surface.

  • Sample Binding: When standards or experimental samples containing HSPA1B are added to the wells, the target protein binds to the immobilized capture antibody.

  • Detection Antibody Addition: A biotin-conjugated antibody specific to HSPA1B is introduced, which binds to a different epitope on the captured HSPA1B molecules, forming the "sandwich" complex.

  • Signal Amplification: Avidin (or streptavidin) conjugated to Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) is added, which forms an extremely strong non-covalent bond with the biotin molecules on the detection antibody.

  • Substrate Reaction: TMB (3,3',5,5'-Tetramethylbenzidine) substrate solution is added, which is enzymatically converted by HRP to produce a colored product.

  • Reaction Termination: The enzymatic reaction is stopped with sulfuric acid solution, causing a color change that is measured spectrophotometrically at 450nm (±10nm).

  • Quantification: The optical density (O.D.) values of the samples are compared against a standard curve generated from known concentrations of HSPA1B to determine the concentration in the experimental samples.

This method leverages the biotin-avidin system's exceptional affinity (Kd ≈ 10^-15 M) to achieve high sensitivity, while the sandwich format provides excellent specificity through dual epitope recognition. The precision of this approach has been validated with intra-assay CV<10% and inter-assay CV<12%, demonstrating reliable reproducibility for quantitative applications.

What are the critical steps in optimizing Western blot protocols for HSPA1B detection?

Optimizing Western blot protocols for HSPA1B detection with biotin-conjugated antibodies requires attention to several critical parameters:

Sample Preparation:

  • Include appropriate protease inhibitors to prevent HSPA1B degradation during lysis

  • Standardize protein quantification methods (BCA or Bradford) to ensure equal loading

  • Consider heat shock induction protocols (e.g., 42°C for 1 hour) for positive controls

Gel Electrophoresis:

  • Use 10-12% polyacrylamide gels for optimal resolution of the 70 kDa HSPA1B protein

  • Include molecular weight markers that clearly demarcate the 70 kDa region

  • Load 20-50 μg of total protein per lane for standard detection methods

Transfer Conditions:

  • Optimize transfer time (typically 60-90 minutes at 100V) for complete transfer of the 70 kDa protein

  • Use PVDF membranes for better protein retention and higher signal-to-noise ratio

  • Verify transfer efficiency with reversible protein stains before immunodetection

Blocking and Antibody Incubation:

  • Test different blocking agents (5% non-fat dry milk vs. 3-5% BSA) to determine optimal background reduction

  • Titrate primary antibody concentration (typically starting at 1:1000 dilution)

  • For biotin-conjugated antibodies, implement additional blocking steps with avidin/biotin blocking kits to reduce endogenous biotin interference

Detection Strategy:

  • Employ streptavidin-HRP conjugates at optimized dilutions (typically 1:2000 to 1:5000)

  • Consider enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrates with appropriate sensitivity range

  • For quantitative analysis, validate linear dynamic range of detection system

Controls and Validation:

  • Include positive controls (heat-shocked cell lysates) and negative controls (non-heat shocked samples)

  • Use HSPA1B knockout/knockdown samples when available for antibody specificity verification

  • Consider loading controls appropriate for your experimental conditions (β-actin, GAPDH, or total protein stains)

Troubleshooting guidance for common Western blot issues with HSPA1B detection:

IssuePossible CauseSolution
No signalInsufficient proteinIncrease loading amount or enrich for HSPA1B
Inefficient transferOptimize transfer conditions for 70 kDa proteins
Antibody concentration too lowIncrease antibody concentration or incubation time
Multiple bandsCross-reactivity with HSPA1AVerify antibody specificity; consider alternative antibody
Protein degradationAdd fresh protease inhibitors; avoid freeze-thaw cycles
High backgroundInsufficient blockingExtend blocking time; try alternative blocking agents
Excessive antibody concentrationDilute antibody further; reduce incubation time
Endogenous biotin interferenceImplement specific avidin/biotin blocking steps

Implementing these optimization steps will significantly enhance the specificity and sensitivity of HSPA1B detection in Western blotting applications.

What storage and handling conditions are essential for maintaining antibody activity?

Maintaining optimal activity of biotin-conjugated HSPA1B antibodies requires adherence to specific storage and handling protocols that preserve both the immunoglobulin structure and the biotin conjugation. Based on manufacturer recommendations, the following guidelines should be implemented:

Shipping and Initial Processing:

  • Antibodies are typically shipped at 4°C to maintain stability during transport

  • Upon receipt, the antibody should be promptly inspected for any visible precipitation or contamination

  • For long-term storage preparation, aliquoting should be performed within 24 hours of delivery

Aliquoting Strategy:

  • Prepare single-use aliquots (typically 10-20 μl) to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

  • Use sterile, RNase/DNase-free microcentrifuge tubes for aliquoting

  • Label each aliquot with antibody information, dilution factor, and date of preparation

Temperature Requirements:

  • Short-term storage (less than 1 month): -20°C freezer

  • Long-term storage (more than 1 month): -80°C freezer

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can significantly reduce antibody activity and binding capacity

Buffer Considerations:

  • The antibody is typically supplied in a stabilizing buffer containing:

    • 0.03% Proclin 300 (antimicrobial agent)

    • 50% Glycerol (cryoprotectant)

    • 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4 (physiological buffer)

  • This formulation should not be altered unless specifically required by experimental protocols

Working Solution Preparation:

  • Thaw aliquots on ice or at 4°C (never at room temperature)

  • Gently mix by inverting the tube or mild vortexing (avoid vigorous agitation)

  • Centrifuge briefly (5-10 seconds) before opening to collect liquid at the bottom

  • Prepare working dilutions immediately before use and discard any unused diluted antibody

Contamination Prevention:

  • Use clean pipette tips for each handling

  • Avoid introducing microorganisms by working in clean environments

  • Never return unused antibody to the original container

Performance Monitoring:

  • Include positive controls in experiments to verify antibody activity over time

  • Document lot number and activity observations to track potential degradation

Special Considerations for Biotin Conjugates:

  • Protect from prolonged light exposure which may affect the biotin moiety

  • Consider potential endogenous biotin competition in experimental design

  • Verify consistency of results between experiments using the same aliquot standards

Adherence to these protocols will maximize antibody shelf-life and ensure consistent experimental results across studies.

What are common sources of false positives or false negatives when using HSPA1B antibodies?

Sources of False Positive Results:

  • Cross-reactivity with related heat shock proteins: HSPA1B shares significant sequence homology with other HSP70 family members, particularly HSPA1A (90-95% sequence identity). This can lead to antibody cross-reactivity and false positive signals. Validation using knockout/knockdown systems or comparing patterns with multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes can help distinguish true signals.

  • Endogenous biotin interference: Mammalian samples, particularly liver, kidney, and brain tissues, contain high levels of endogenous biotin that can directly bind to streptavidin-based detection systems, producing false positive signals. Pre-blocking with avidin/biotin blocking kits and including appropriate negative controls can mitigate this issue.

  • Non-specific binding to Fc receptors: Samples containing immune cells with Fc receptors can bind the Fc region of antibodies non-specifically. Using appropriate blocking reagents (Fc blocking solutions) and fragment antibodies (F(ab')2) can reduce this interference.

  • Hook effect in high-concentration samples: Extremely high concentrations of HSPA1B can paradoxically result in reduced signal in sandwich ELISA formats. Serial dilutions of samples and validation with spike-recovery experiments help identify this phenomenon.

Sources of False Negative Results:

  • Epitope masking: Post-translational modifications, protein-protein interactions, or conformational changes can obscure antibody binding sites. Using denaturing conditions for Western blots or multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes can address this issue.

  • Insufficient sensitivity: Detection methods may have inadequate sensitivity for samples with low HSPA1B expression. Implementing signal amplification strategies (such as tyramide signal amplification) or more sensitive detection systems can improve detection limits.

  • Sample processing artifacts: Inappropriate fixation (for IHC/ICC) or harsh extraction conditions can destroy epitopes. Optimizing fixation protocols and extraction buffers specifically for heat shock proteins can preserve antigenicity.

  • Antibody degradation: Improper storage or handling of antibodies can reduce their binding capacity. Following strict storage guidelines and including positive controls in each experiment helps monitor antibody performance.

Validation Strategies:

Potential IssueValidation ApproachImplementation
Cross-reactivitySpecificity testingCompare results in HSPA1B-depleted samples vs. controls
Endogenous biotinBlocking controlsInclude avidin/biotin blocking steps and biotin-free detection alternatives
Hook effectDilution seriesPerform serial dilutions to identify potential high-dose hooks
Epitope maskingMultiple detection methodsCompare native vs. denatured detection systems
Sensitivity limitationsPositive controlsInclude samples with known HSPA1B expression levels

By systematically addressing these potential sources of false results, researchers can significantly enhance the reliability and interpretability of HSPA1B detection experiments.

How can I troubleshoot inconsistent results in HSPA1B ELISA assays?

Troubleshooting inconsistent results in HSPA1B ELISA assays requires a systematic approach to identify and address factors affecting reproducibility:

Analytical Variables Assessment:

  • Standard Curve Evaluation: First, examine the quality of your standard curve, as this forms the foundation for quantification.

    • Ensure R² value exceeds 0.98 for proper curve fitting

    • Verify that the curve spans the expected concentration range of your samples

    • Check that the lower limit of detection is appropriate for your research question

  • Precision Metrics Analysis: Calculate and monitor both intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation:

    • Intra-assay CV should be <10% (run samples in triplicate or quadruplicate)

    • Inter-assay CV should be <12% (include reference samples across plates)

    • Maintain a quality control chart to track performance over time

  • Reagent Stability Assessment:

    • Antibody degradation can occur with improper storage or excessive freeze-thaw cycles

    • TMB substrate is light-sensitive and can deteriorate with exposure

    • Check expiration dates and storage conditions of all reagents

Procedural Consistency Factors:

  • Temperature and Timing Standardization:

    • Ensure all reagents reach room temperature before use

    • Maintain consistent incubation times (±1 minute) between experiments

    • Use calibrated timers for critical steps

  • Washing Technique Optimization:

    • Standardize washing procedures (volume, force, number of washes)

    • Consider automated washers for improved consistency

    • Verify complete aspiration between washes

  • Technical Execution Variables:

    • Use calibrated pipettes with appropriate techniques

    • Maintain consistent plate reading parameters

    • Standardize plate tapping techniques to remove residual wash buffer

Sample-Related Considerations:

  • Sample Handling Protocol:

    • Establish standardized collection, processing, and storage procedures

    • Document freeze-thaw cycles for each sample

    • Consider protease inhibitors to preserve HSPA1B integrity

  • Matrix Effects Evaluation:

    • Perform spike-recovery experiments to assess sample matrix interference

    • Consider sample dilution optimization to minimize matrix effects

    • Evaluate potential interfering substances specific to your sample type

Systematic Troubleshooting Approach:

IssueObservationPotential CauseCorrective Action
High CVs between replicates>15% variation between duplicate/triplicate wellsInconsistent pipettingUse calibrated multichannel pipettes; practice technique
Incomplete washingIncrease wash cycles; verify washer function
Edge effectsOuter wells show systematically different valuesTemperature gradientsEquilibrate plates at room temperature before assay
EvaporationUse plate sealers during incubations
Plate-to-plate variationsSignificant shifts in standard curvesInconsistent reagent preparationPrepare larger volumes of working solutions
Time drift between platesProcess fewer plates simultaneously
Low or decreasing sensitivityReduced signal intensityAntibody degradationUse fresh aliquots; verify storage conditions
TMB substrate issuesProtect from light; check expiration

For optimal reproducibility, implement a comprehensive quality control program including:

  • Reference sample inclusion across all plates

  • Documented verification of critical parameters

  • Regular calibration of equipment

  • Detailed protocol with specific timing annotations

How should I interpret HSPA1B expression data in the context of cellular stress responses?

Interpreting HSPA1B expression data requires nuanced understanding of its regulation and function within the cellular stress response network. Consider the following analytical framework when evaluating your experimental results:

Baseline Expression Considerations:

HSPA1B exhibits variable baseline expression across different tissues and cell types. When interpreting changes, it's essential to establish appropriate reference points:

  • Tissue-specific basal levels: Certain tissues (e.g., lymphoid tissues, brain) naturally express higher HSPA1B levels than others, requiring tissue-specific normalization.

  • Developmental stage variations: HSPA1B expression fluctuates during development and aging, necessitating age-matched controls.

  • Cell cycle dependency: Expression levels can vary with cell cycle phase, requiring synchronization or cell cycle analysis for precise interpretation.

Stress-Induced Regulation Patterns:

HSPA1B upregulation follows distinct temporal patterns depending on stressor type and intensity:

  • Acute heat shock response: Typically shows rapid induction (2-4 hours) followed by gradual return to baseline (8-24 hours) unless stress persists.

  • Chronic stress adaptation: Sustained moderate stressors often lead to elevated but lower-than-peak expression levels as cells adapt.

  • Severe stress conditions: Extreme stress may cause initial upregulation followed by decline if cellular damage becomes too extensive for effective response.

Contextual Interpretation Guidelines:

When analyzing HSPA1B expression data, consider these interpretive frameworks:

  • Relationship to other heat shock proteins: HSPA1B expression should be evaluated alongside other stress markers (HSP40, HSP90, HSF1 activation) to distinguish between specific and general stress responses.

  • Correlation with cellular outcomes: Connect expression patterns with functional readouts (cell viability, protein aggregation, apoptotic markers) to determine if observed changes are protective or insufficient.

  • Temporal resolution importance: Single timepoint measurements may miss critical dynamics; time-course studies provide more complete understanding of stress response progression.

Comparative Analysis Framework:

ContextInterpretation of Elevated HSPA1BInterpretation of Reduced HSPA1B
Acute stress exposureNormal protective responseCompromised stress response capacity
Chronic disease statesOngoing proteostasis challengeExhaustion of stress response system
Cancer tissuesPotential adaptation to proteotoxic stressPossible vulnerability to proteotoxic therapies
Neurodegenerative disordersCompensatory mechanism against protein aggregationPotential contributor to disease progression

Genetic Variation Considerations:

Polymorphisms in the HSPA1B gene can influence expression patterns and stress responsiveness. The rs539689 polymorphism, for example, has been associated with altered disease susceptibility, with the minor C allele potentially conferring protective effects in certain populations. When interpreting expression data, considering genetic background may provide valuable context for observed variations.

Integration with Functional Studies:

To fully interpret the significance of HSPA1B expression changes, integrate expression data with:

  • Protein activity assays that assess chaperone function

  • Protein-protein interaction studies examining client binding

  • Subcellular localization analysis

  • Post-translational modification profiling

This comprehensive approach allows distinction between functional and non-functional HSPA1B upregulation, a critical difference in stress response interpretation.

How can HSPA1B antibodies be utilized in studying neurodegenerative disease mechanisms?

HSPA1B antibodies offer powerful tools for investigating the complex relationship between heat shock protein dysfunction and neurodegenerative pathologies. These research applications extend beyond basic detection to mechanistic studies of protein misfolding diseases:

Protein Aggregation Interactions:

Neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's diseases are characterized by pathological protein aggregation. HSPA1B antibodies can be employed to:

  • Co-localization studies: Using biotin-conjugated HSPA1B antibodies in combination with antibodies against disease-specific aggregates (β-amyloid, α-synuclein, huntingtin) enables visualization of HSPA1B recruitment to sites of protein aggregation through confocal microscopy.

  • Sequential extraction analysis: Biochemical fractionation of brain tissues followed by immunoblotting with HSPA1B antibodies can reveal the association of HSPA1B with different solubility fractions of disease proteins, providing insights into chaperone engagement with aggregation intermediates.

  • Proximity ligation assays: Advanced microscopy techniques using biotin-conjugated HSPA1B antibodies can detect direct molecular interactions between HSPA1B and client proteins at nanoscale resolution, quantifying changes in these interactions during disease progression.

Stress Response Dynamics in Neuronal Models:

  • Stress granule association: Immunofluorescence studies employing biotin-conjugated HSPA1B antibodies can track the recruitment of HSPA1B to stress granules in neuronal cells under various stressors, illuminating potential cytoprotective mechanisms.

  • Temporal expression profiling: Time-course studies following stressor application can map the dynamics of HSPA1B induction in different neuronal populations, identifying potentially vulnerable neural circuits with delayed or diminished heat shock responses.

  • Cell-type specific responses: Dual immunolabeling with HSPA1B antibodies and cell-type markers (neurons, astrocytes, microglia) can reveal differential stress responses across neural cell populations in disease models.

Therapeutic Modulation Assessment:

HSPA1B antibodies provide crucial tools for evaluating potential therapeutic strategies targeting the heat shock response:

  • Drug efficacy monitoring: Compounds designed to induce heat shock protein expression can be evaluated through quantitative analysis of HSPA1B levels using antibody-based detection methods.

  • Gene therapy validation: Viral vector-mediated HSPA1B overexpression can be confirmed and quantified using specific antibodies that distinguish between endogenous and introduced variants.

  • Patient stratification biomarkers: Analysis of HSPA1B expression patterns in patient-derived samples might identify responder/non-responder populations for heat shock-targeting therapies.

Genetic Variation Impact Assessment:

The rs539689 polymorphism in HSPA1B has shown potential association with neuropsychiatric conditions. Antibody-based approaches can help elucidate the functional consequences of such variations:

  • Allele-specific expression analysis: Using antibodies in conjunction with genetic sequencing to determine if polymorphisms affect protein expression levels or patterns.

  • Stress response capacity testing: Evaluating whether cells carrying different HSPA1B variants exhibit differential induction of HSPA1B protein under standardized stress challenges.

These advanced applications demonstrate how HSPA1B antibodies extend beyond simple detection to enable sophisticated investigation of neurodegenerative disease mechanisms and potential therapeutic interventions.

What are the methodological considerations for studying HSPA1B in animal models of disease?

Investigating HSPA1B in animal disease models requires careful methodological planning to ensure reliable results and meaningful biological insights. Here are comprehensive considerations for researchers employing HSPA1B antibodies in animal studies:

Model Selection and Characterization:

  • Species-specific antibody validation: Confirm that your biotin-conjugated HSPA1B antibody demonstrates verified reactivity with the species under investigation. For mouse models, select antibodies raised against recombinant mouse HSPA1B protein (amino acids 2-642).

  • Baseline expression mapping: Before studying disease conditions, establish an atlas of normal HSPA1B expression across tissues and developmental stages in your model organism using immunohistochemistry and Western blotting.

  • Genetic background considerations: HSPA1B polymorphisms can influence expression patterns and stress responsiveness; therefore, document the genetic background of your animal model and consider potential strain-specific variations.

Tissue Processing Optimization:

  • Fixation protocol refinement: For immunohistochemical detection of HSPA1B in tissue sections:

    • Optimize fixation time in 4% paraformaldehyde (typically 24-48 hours)

    • Consider antigen retrieval methods (heat-induced citrate buffer pH 6.0 often works well)

    • Test multiple antibody dilutions on control tissues before processing experimental samples

  • Protein extraction considerations: For biochemical analyses:

    • Employ rapid tissue harvesting to prevent artificial stress induction

    • Include phosphatase and protease inhibitors in lysis buffers

    • Consider tissue-specific extraction modifications based on lipid or extracellular matrix content

  • Perfusion considerations: For brain and highly vascularized tissues, transcardial perfusion with fixative before tissue collection can significantly improve immunostaining quality.

Disease Model-Specific Approaches:

  • Stress induction standardization: When studying stress responses:

    • Establish precise protocols for stress application (temperature, duration, intensity)

    • Include recovery time-course analyses to capture the complete response profile

    • Document environmental variables that might influence stress responses

  • Intervention study design:

    • For therapeutic modulation studies, determine optimal timing for intervention relative to HSPA1B expression patterns

    • Include both early and late intervention timepoints to assess preventive vs. treatment effects

    • Design appropriate controls for vehicle effects and handling stress

Quantification and Analysis Strategies:

  • Immunohistochemical quantification:

    • Employ stereological principles for unbiased quantification

    • Utilize automated image analysis systems with validated algorithms

    • Include cell type-specific markers to distinguish expression in different populations

  • Biochemical quantification:

    • Use appropriate loading controls (considering that traditional housekeeping proteins may change in stress conditions)

    • Employ technical replicates (minimum triplicate) for Western blotting quantification

    • Consider absolute quantification methods using purified standards

Experimental Controls Framework:

Control TypePurposeImplementation
Positive stress controlVerify antibody function and stress responseInclude heat-shocked tissue/cells (42°C for 1 hour, 6-hour recovery)
Negative controlAssess non-specific bindingOmit primary antibody; use isotype control antibody
Genetic controlValidate antibody specificityWhen possible, include HSPA1B knockout/knockdown samples
Technical reproductionEnsure consistent detectionProcess multiple sections from each sample
Biological replicationAccount for inter-individual variationUse adequate animal numbers (power analysis-determined)

Ethical and Refinement Considerations:

  • Refinement strategies: Design studies that maximize data obtained from each animal:

    • Collect multiple tissues for comprehensive HSPA1B expression profiling

    • Consider in vivo imaging approaches with labeled antibodies for longitudinal studies

    • Develop sampling strategies that allow for both protein and RNA extraction from the same specimens

  • Stress minimization: Unintended stress can artificially induce HSPA1B expression:

    • Acclimate animals to handling and experimental procedures

    • Control environmental variables (temperature, noise, housing density)

    • Consider time of day effects on stress responses when scheduling experiments

These methodological considerations will enhance the reliability and translational value of HSPA1B studies in animal models of disease.

How can researchers distinguish between HSPA1A and HSPA1B in experimental systems?

Antibody-Based Discrimination Strategies:

  • Epitope-specific antibody selection: Although challenging to develop, antibodies targeting non-conserved regions between HSPA1A and HSPA1B offer the most direct approach:

    • Focus on C-terminal regions where sequence divergence is greatest

    • Validate specificity using recombinant proteins and genetic knockout/knockdown systems

    • Employ monoclonal antibodies with narrower epitope recognition when available

  • Differential immunoprecipitation approach:

    • Perform sequential immunoprecipitation with one paralog-specific antibody followed by Western blotting with a pan-HSP70 antibody

    • Quantify the remaining signal to determine relative abundance of each paralog

  • Isoform-specific assay development:

    • Design sandwich ELISA systems with capture antibodies targeting shared epitopes and detection antibodies targeting paralog-specific regions

    • Validate using purified recombinant proteins at various ratios to establish discrimination capacity

Genetic and Molecular Approaches:

  • Gene-specific silencing:

    • Design and validate siRNA or shRNA constructs targeting unique UTR regions of each paralog

    • Create single-knockout cell lines for each paralog to serve as controls for antibody specificity

    • Employ CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to tag endogenous proteins with different epitope tags

  • Transcriptional analysis methods:

    • Implement RT-qPCR with primers spanning unique regions (typically in untranslated regions)

    • Design hybridization probes for in situ hybridization that target non-conserved nucleotide sequences

    • Use RNA-sequencing data with paralog-specific read mapping algorithms

Biochemical Separation Techniques:

  • 2D electrophoresis differentiation:

    • Leverage subtle differences in isoelectric points between HSPA1A and HSPA1B

    • Follow with Western blotting using a pan-HSP70 antibody

    • Identify spots using mass spectrometry for definitive confirmation

  • Mass spectrometry-based discrimination:

    • Target unique tryptic peptides that differ between HSPA1A and HSPA1B

    • Implement selected reaction monitoring (SRM) or parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) for quantitative assessment

    • Develop heavy isotope-labeled internal standards for absolute quantification

Functional Discrimination Approaches:

  • Differential induction kinetics:

    • HSPA1A and HSPA1B can exhibit different induction kinetics under certain stressors

    • Time-course experiments with specific stressors may reveal paralog-specific patterns

    • Correlate protein expression with transcriptional analysis for comprehensive profiling

  • Paralog-specific interaction partners:

    • Identify and leverage protein-protein interactions unique to each paralog

    • Develop proximity ligation assays targeting these differential interactions

    • Use co-immunoprecipitation followed by specific detection of interaction partners

Methodological Validation Framework:

ApproachAdvantagesLimitationsValidation Strategy
Epitope-specific antibodiesDirect protein detectionLimited availability; cross-reactivity riskTest on knockout systems; peptide competition assays
Transcript-specific detectionHigh specificity; readily implementedDoesn't reflect protein levelsCorrelate with protein measurements when possible
2D electrophoresisDistinguishes post-translational modificationsLabor-intensive; requires specialized equipmentMass spectrometry confirmation of spots
Mass spectrometryHighest specificity; quantitative capabilityRequires specialized expertise and equipmentSpike-in experiments with purified proteins

By combining multiple approaches—typically at least one antibody-based method with one genetic or biochemical technique—researchers can achieve reliable distinction between these highly similar heat shock protein paralogs, enabling more precise understanding of their potentially non-redundant functions in cellular stress responses.

What role does HSPA1B play in immunological research and how can antibodies facilitate these studies?

HSPA1B serves critical functions at the intersection of cellular stress responses and immunological processes, making it a valuable target for immunological research. Biotin-conjugated antibodies provide sophisticated tools for exploring these connections through multiple experimental approaches:

Immunomodulatory Functions of HSPA1B:

HSPA1B exhibits diverse immunological activities beyond its classical chaperone function:

  • Danger Signal Activity: Extracellular HSPA1B acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) that can:

    • Activate antigen-presenting cells through receptors including TLR2/4, CD91, and SREC-1

    • Induce pro-inflammatory cytokine production (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6)

    • Enhance dendritic cell maturation and antigen cross-presentation

  • Antigen Chaperoning: HSPA1B can bind peptide antigens and facilitate their delivery to:

    • MHC class I molecules for cross-presentation

    • MHC class II pathway for conventional presentation

    • This property has been exploited in vaccine development strategies

  • Regulatory T-cell Modulation: HSPA1B plays a critical role in Treg function through:

    • Facilitating STUB1-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of FOXP3 during inflammation

    • Influencing Treg stability and plasticity under stress conditions

    • Potentially affecting autoimmune disease susceptibility

Antibody-Facilitated Research Applications:

Biotin-conjugated HSPA1B antibodies enable sophisticated investigation of these immunological functions:

  • Extracellular HSPA1B Detection:

    • Flow cytometry with biotin-conjugated antibodies can quantify surface-bound HSPA1B on immune cells

    • ELISA assays can measure soluble HSPA1B in biological fluids as a potential biomarker of immune activation

    • Immunocytochemistry can visualize HSPA1B release from cells under various stress conditions

  • Tracking Antigen-HSPA1B Complexes:

    • Biotin-conjugated antibodies can precipitate HSPA1B-peptide complexes for subsequent antigen identification

    • Dual-staining approaches can visualize co-localization of HSPA1B with antigens during uptake and processing

    • Live-cell imaging using fluorescently-labeled antibody derivatives can track trafficking of complexes

  • FOXP3-HSPA1B Interaction Studies:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation with biotinylated HSPA1B antibodies can pull down FOXP3 complexes

    • Proximity ligation assays can quantify HSPA1B-FOXP3 interactions under inflammatory conditions

    • HSPA1B localization in Tregs can be visualized during activation and inflammatory challenges

Disease-Relevant Research Applications:

  • Autoimmune Disease Models:

    • Biotin-conjugated HSPA1B antibodies can track changes in HSPA1B expression in specific immune cell subsets during disease progression

    • Differential expression patterns between responders and non-responders to therapy may reveal predictive biomarkers

    • Correlation of HSPA1B polymorphisms with expression patterns might identify risk factors

  • Tumor Immunology:

    • Detection of HSPA1B expression in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes can provide insights into anti-tumor immunity

    • Monitoring HSPA1B-facilitated antigen presentation may reveal mechanisms of immunosurveillance

    • HSPA1B manipulation might enhance cancer vaccine efficacy through improved antigen delivery

  • Transplantation Immunology:

    • Assessment of HSPA1B upregulation in allografts may serve as an early marker of rejection

    • Monitoring HSPA1B-specific immune responses could indicate tolerance development

    • Therapeutic approaches targeting HSPA1B might modulate graft rejection processes

Methodological Framework for HSPA1B in Immunological Research:

Research FocusAntibody ApplicationTechnical Approach
Cell-surface HSPA1BDetection of membrane-associated HSPA1BFlow cytometry with biotin-streptavidin amplification
HSPA1B secretionQuantification in culture supernatants or biological fluidsSandwich ELISA with biotin-conjugated detection antibody
Antigen associationIdentification of HSPA1B-bound peptidesImmunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
FOXP3 regulationTracking STUB1-mediated degradationProximity ligation assay with FOXP3 and HSPA1B antibodies

The biotin conjugation provides significant advantages for these applications through:

  • Signal amplification via streptavidin-based detection systems

  • Compatibility with multiple secondary detection methods

  • Reduced background in immune tissues with high endogenous immunoglobulin content

These sophisticated research applications highlight how biotin-conjugated HSPA1B antibodies serve as versatile tools for understanding the complex interplay between cellular stress responses and immunity.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.