Y51H4A.7 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Database and Literature Review

A thorough search of PubMed, PMC, antibody-specific databases (e.g., PLAbDab, Thera-SAbDab), and commercial repositories (Abcam, R&D Systems, Sigma-Aldrich) revealed no entries matching "Y51H4A.7" ( ). Key observations:

  • Patent and Literature Antibody Database (PLAbDab): Contains ~150,000 antibody sequences and structures but lacks entries with the identifier "Y51H4A.7" ( ).

  • Therapeutic Antibody Databases: Antibodies like teplizumab (anti-CD3) and 10E8 (anti-HIV) are well-documented, but no analogous naming conventions or functional profiles align with "Y51H4A.7" ( ).

Nomenclature Issues

  • The identifier "Y51H4A.7" does not conform to standard antibody naming systems (e.g., WHO’s INN, CD nomenclature, or clone-based identifiers like "EPR4513-32-7" for CDK4 antibodies) ( ).

  • Possible typographical errors or internal laboratory designations not yet published.

Proprietary or Preclinical Status

  • If "Y51H4A.7" is a proprietary research tool, its details may be restricted to internal R&D pipelines or pending patent approval.

Recommendations for Further Investigation

To resolve ambiguities, consider:

  1. Re-verification of the Identifier: Cross-check with institutional repositories or collaborators for potential nomenclature mismatches.

  2. Specialized Antibody Databases:

Comparative Analysis of Antibody Naming Conventions

Antibody ExampleNaming ConventionSource
TeplizumabINN (International Nonproprietary Name)
ab108357 (anti-CDK4)Clone + catalog number
10E8/P140 (bispecific)Target antigen + clone

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
Y51H4A.7 antibody; Probable urocanate hydratase antibody; Urocanase antibody; EC 4.2.1.49 antibody; Imidazolonepropionate hydrolase antibody
Target Names
Y51H4A.7
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is Y51H4A.7 and what applications are suitable for its antibody in research?

Y51H4A.7 refers to a gene designation typically found in C. elegans research. Antibodies against the protein product would likely be used in applications similar to other research antibodies, including:

  • Western blotting (WB)

  • Immunoprecipitation (IP)

  • Immunofluorescence (IF)

  • Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

When selecting applications, researchers should consider validation criteria similar to those used for other antibodies such as B7-H4 antibodies, which demonstrate specificity through multiple techniques including indirect ELISA, flow cytometry, and immunofluorescence analysis . The application range is determined by careful validation across multiple techniques to ensure specificity and sensitivity.

How should I validate an Y51H4A.7 antibody before using it in my research?

Thorough validation is critical before using any research antibody. Based on established protocols for antibodies like B7-H4 mAbs, a comprehensive validation approach should include:

  • Specificity testing through multiple methods:

    • Indirect ELISA against recombinant target protein

    • Flow cytometry using transfected versus non-transfected cells

    • Immunofluorescence analysis of positive and negative cell lines

    • Western blotting to confirm recognition of the target protein at the expected molecular weight

  • Functional validation:

    • Testing the antibody's biological activity in relevant assays

    • Confirming that biological effects are dose-dependent

    • Comparing results with isotype controls

What controls should I include when designing experiments with Y51H4A.7 antibody?

Proper experimental controls are essential for antibody-based research. The following controls should be included:

  • Isotype-matched control antibodies (e.g., mouse IgG1 κ or IgG2b κ depending on the antibody isotype)

  • Negative cell lines or tissues (not expressing the target protein)

  • Positive cell lines or tissues (known to express the target protein)

  • Secondary antibody-only controls (to detect non-specific binding)

  • Blocking peptide controls when available (to confirm specificity)

For functional studies, dose-response experiments should be performed with appropriate controls, similar to the functional studies conducted with the B7-H4 antibody clone 7E1, which demonstrated dose-dependent effects on PBMC proliferation compared to mouse IgG control .

What are the optimal conditions for using Y51H4A.7 antibody in different applications?

While specific conditions for Y51H4A.7 antibody would need to be empirically determined, the following table provides general guidance based on established antibody research protocols:

ApplicationRecommended DilutionBuffer ConditionsIncubationSpecial Considerations
Western Blot1:500-1:2000TBST with 5% BSA or milk1-2 hours at RT or overnight at 4°CReducing conditions may affect epitope recognition
Immunofluorescence1:50-1:500PBS with 1-3% BSA1-2 hours at RTFixation method affects epitope accessibility
ELISA1:1000-1:10000PBS with 1% BSA1-2 hours at RTPre-optimization of coating concentration needed
Flow Cytometry1:50-1:200PBS with 1% BSA, 0.1% sodium azide30-60 min on iceLive vs. fixed cells may require different conditions

Each new lot of antibody should be titrated to determine optimal working concentrations, similar to how BMP-7 antibody is recommended to be titrated for optimal performance for each application .

How can I develop an ELISA assay using Y51H4A.7 antibody?

Developing an ELISA assay requires careful optimization. Based on the methodology used for the B7-H4 ELISA system , follow these steps:

  • Determine antibody pair compatibility:

    • Two antibodies recognizing different epitopes of the target protein are required

    • Test various combinations of capture and detection antibodies

    • Evaluate sensitivity and specificity for each pair

  • Optimize assay conditions:

    • Coating concentration (typically 1-10 μg/ml)

    • Blocking buffer (BSA, casein, or commercial blocking buffers)

    • Sample dilution series

    • Detection antibody concentration

    • Substrate development time

  • Validate the assay:

    • Determine lower and upper limits of detection

    • Assess precision (intra- and inter-assay CV%)

    • Confirm specificity using recombinant proteins

    • Test for cross-reactivity with related proteins

    • Evaluate recovery in biological matrices

The B7-H4 ELISA system mentioned in the research demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity through careful selection of two mAbs (8D4 and 7E1) with different epitope specificities .

How can I troubleshoot common issues with Y51H4A.7 antibody experiments?

IssuePossible CausesTroubleshooting Steps
No signal- Antibody degradation
- Target protein denaturation
- Incorrect antibody dilution
- Use fresh antibody aliquot
- Optimize protein extraction/fixation methods
- Titrate antibody concentration
- Verify target protein expression
High background- Non-specific binding
- Insufficient blocking
- Secondary antibody issues
- Increase blocking time/concentration
- Add 0.1-0.5% Tween-20 to wash buffer
- Pre-adsorb secondary antibody
- Reduce antibody concentration
Inconsistent results- Lot-to-lot variation
- Protocol inconsistency
- Sample degradation
- Test new lots alongside previous ones
- Standardize protocols
- Prepare fresh samples
- Include positive controls
Unexpected bands/staining- Cross-reactivity
- Protein degradation
- Post-translational modifications
- Perform peptide competition
- Add protease inhibitors
- Test multiple antibody clones

When encountering issues, it's important to systematically evaluate each component of your experimental system, similar to the quality control steps used to validate the BMP-7 antibody .

How can I use Y51H4A.7 antibody for functional studies?

Functional studies with antibodies can provide valuable insights into protein function. Based on the functional studies performed with the B7-H4 antibody (clone 7E1) , consider these methodological approaches:

  • Design a co-culture system:

    • Establish a relevant cell culture model that expresses the target protein

    • Co-culture with cells that respond to the protein's function

    • Introduce the antibody at various concentrations to assess dose-dependent effects

  • Measure functional endpoints:

    • Cell proliferation (using MTT, BrdU, or CFSE assays)

    • Cytokine production (using ELISA or cytometric bead array)

    • Signaling pathway activation (using Western blot or phospho-flow)

    • Gene expression changes (using qPCR or RNA-seq)

  • Include appropriate controls:

    • Isotype-matched control antibody

    • Positive control antibody (if available)

    • Recombinant protein competition

For example, the B7-H4 antibody (7E1) was characterized as a functional antibody with antagonistic activity by demonstrating its ability to promote T cell proliferation and regulate cytokine production (increasing TNF-α and IFN-γ while decreasing IL-10 and IL-4) in a co-culture system with PBMC and CHO/B7-H4 cells .

What are the considerations for conjugating Y51H4A.7 antibody for advanced applications?

Antibody conjugation expands research applications. When considering conjugating Y51H4A.7 antibody, consider these factors:

  • Conjugation chemistry options:

    • Direct chemical conjugation (NHS esters, maleimides)

    • Site-specific enzymatic conjugation

    • Biotin-streptavidin systems

  • Common conjugates and their applications:

    • Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) for Western blot and ELISA

    • Fluorophores (FITC, PE, Alexa Fluor®) for flow cytometry and IF

    • Biotin for versatile detection systems

    • Agarose/Sepharose for immunoprecipitation

  • Quality control for conjugates:

    • Degree of labeling determination

    • Functional activity post-conjugation

    • Stability assessment

As seen with Rab 7 Antibody (B-3), which is available in multiple formats including agarose, HRP, PE, FITC, and various Alexa Fluor® conjugates, different conjugates serve specific experimental purposes .

How can Y51H4A.7 antibody be used in studying protein-protein interactions?

Understanding protein interactions is crucial in biological research. Methodological approaches include:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Optimize lysis conditions to preserve native interactions

    • Use cross-linking agents if interactions are transient

    • Perform reciprocal Co-IPs with antibodies against both partners

    • Include appropriate negative controls

    • Analyze precipitates by Western blot or mass spectrometry

  • Proximity ligation assay (PLA):

    • Use Y51H4A.7 antibody in combination with antibodies against potential interaction partners

    • Requires optimization of fixation and permeabilization conditions

    • Carefully select appropriate negative controls

    • Quantify PLA signals with appropriate imaging software

  • FRET/BRET analysis with antibody fragments:

    • Generate Fab fragments through enzymatic digestion

    • Label fragments with appropriate donor/acceptor fluorophores

    • Optimize labeling density to avoid over-labeling

    • Include appropriate controls for non-specific FRET

How should I analyze data from Y51H4A.7 antibody-based ELISA experiments?

Proper analysis of ELISA data ensures accurate and reproducible results:

  • Standard curve preparation:

    • Use purified recombinant protein at multiple concentrations

    • Include at least 7-8 points spanning the expected range

    • Use appropriate curve-fitting (typically 4-parameter logistic regression)

    • Ensure R² > 0.98 for reliable quantification

  • Sample analysis:

    • Run all samples in at least duplicate

    • Calculate intra-assay CV% (should be <10%)

    • Include quality control samples at low, medium, and high concentrations

    • Calculate inter-assay CV% across plates (should be <15%)

  • Data interpretation:

    • Samples falling below detection limit should be reported as "<LLOD"

    • Samples exceeding standard curve should be diluted and re-tested

    • Compare results to appropriate reference ranges or control groups

For example, in the B7-H4 ELISA study, researchers found significantly higher levels of sB7-H4 in patients with SLE (137.6 ± 114.3 pg/ml), T1D (79.78 ± 54.79 pg/ml), and GD (65.29 ± 42.55 pg/ml) compared to healthy controls (49.49 ± 40.09 pg/ml) .

What statistical approaches are appropriate for Y51H4A.7 antibody experiments?

Selecting appropriate statistical methods is essential for rigorous analysis:

  • Comparison between groups:

    • For normally distributed data: t-test (two groups) or ANOVA (multiple groups)

    • For non-normally distributed data: Mann-Whitney U (two groups) or Kruskal-Wallis (multiple groups)

    • For paired samples: paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test

  • Correlation analysis:

    • Pearson correlation for normally distributed data

    • Spearman correlation for non-parametric data

    • Consider multiple testing correction (Bonferroni or FDR)

  • Advanced analyses:

    • Multivariate analysis to account for confounding factors

    • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for diagnostic potential

    • Survival analysis for prognostic biomarkers

Statistical significance should typically be set at p < 0.05, as demonstrated in the B7-H4 study which reported significant differences between patient groups and controls .

How can I ensure reproducibility in Y51H4A.7 antibody experiments?

Reproducibility is a cornerstone of scientific research:

  • Antibody validation and documentation:

    • Document complete antibody information (clone, lot, supplier, isotype)

    • Validate each new lot against previous lots

    • Include validation data in publications and reports

  • Standardized protocols:

    • Document detailed protocols including all buffer compositions

    • Specify exact incubation times and temperatures

    • Note equipment models and settings

    • Include all quality control criteria

  • Sample handling and storage:

    • Document sample collection and processing procedures

    • Record storage conditions and freeze-thaw cycles

    • Use consistent sampling procedures

  • Data management:

    • Maintain raw data alongside analyzed results

    • Document all data processing steps

    • Consider pre-registration of experimental designs

How can single-cell techniques enhance Y51H4A.7 antibody research?

Single-cell approaches revolutionize antibody-based research:

  • Single-cell western blotting:

    • Allows protein analysis at single-cell resolution

    • Requires optimization of antibody concentrations

    • Enables correlation between protein expression and cellular phenotype

    • Useful for heterogeneous cell populations

  • Mass cytometry (CyTOF):

    • Requires metal-conjugated antibodies

    • Enables simultaneous detection of 40+ proteins

    • Optimized for panel design to minimize signal spillover

    • Advanced clustering algorithms needed for data analysis

  • Imaging mass cytometry:

    • Combines single-cell resolution with spatial information

    • Requires careful optimization of antibody panels

    • Preserves tissue architecture and cellular relationships

    • Advanced image analysis needed for quantification

What are the current challenges in antibody validation that might affect Y51H4A.7 research?

Understanding limitations enables more rigorous research:

  • Reproducibility challenges:

    • Lot-to-lot variations in commercial antibodies

    • Limited validation data from manufacturers

    • Difficulty reproducing published results

    • Need for independent validation

  • Specificity concerns:

    • Cross-reactivity with related proteins

    • Differences between species

    • Non-specific binding in certain applications

    • Post-translational modifications affecting binding

  • Methodological limitations:

    • Different fixation methods affecting epitope accessibility

    • Variable results across applications (WB vs. IHC vs. IP)

    • Limited standardization of validation protocols

    • Challenge of validating low-abundance targets

The field is moving toward more comprehensive validation approaches, as exemplified by the multiple validation techniques used for the B7-H4 antibodies, which included indirect ELISA, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, and Western blotting .

How might AI and computational approaches enhance Y51H4A.7 antibody research?

Emerging computational methods are transforming antibody research:

  • Epitope prediction:

    • In silico prediction of likely epitopes

    • Structure-based epitope mapping

    • Aids in antibody design and optimization

    • Helps understand cross-reactivity

  • Image analysis:

    • Automated quantification of immunofluorescence

    • Deep learning for pattern recognition

    • Reduction in subjective interpretation

    • Increased throughput in image-based assays

  • Systems biology integration:

    • Integration of antibody-derived data with other -omics data

    • Network analysis of protein interactions

    • Pathway enrichment analysis

    • Prediction of functional relationships

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.