IBS1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks (made-to-order)
Synonyms
IBS1 antibody; At1g18670 antibody; F6A14.22 antibody; Protein IMPAIRED IN BABA-INDUCED STERILITY 1 antibody; EC 2.7.11.- antibody
Target Names
IBS1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a protein crucial for beta-aminobutyric acid (BABA)-induced resistance (BABA-IR). BABA-IR confers enhanced resistance against bacterial pathogens (e.g., *Pseudomonas syringae*) and oomycete pathogens (e.g., *Hyaloperonospora parasitica*) through priming of salicylate (SA)-dependent defense responses. These responses include pathogenesis-related (PR) gene expression (such as PR-1) and the development of trailing necrosis. Furthermore, this protein is involved in BABA-mediated sterility and is essential for the transgenerational inheritance of BABA-priming. This includes the 'primed-to-be-primed' phenotype, characterized by enhanced secondary BABA-priming in plants already primed across generations.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G18670

STRING: 3702.AT1G18670.1

UniGene: At.51667

Protein Families
Protein kinase superfamily, Ser/Thr protein kinase family

Q&A

What is the relationship between IL-1β and irritable bowel syndrome?

IL-1β (interleukin 1β) is an important modulator of inflammatory processes that shows significantly elevated expression in patients who develop post-infectious IBS (PI-IBS). Research demonstrates that PI-IBS patients exhibit greater IL-1β mRNA expression both during acute gastroenteritis and for at least three months afterward compared to infected individuals who do not develop IBS. This persistent inflammatory response suggests IL-1β may play a key role in the pathogenesis of PI-IBS. The inflammatory component appears to be a critical organic factor alongside previously identified behavioral determinants in the development of IBS following infection .

How does IL-1β expression differ between IBS patients and controls?

Studies show quantifiable differences in IL-1β expression across different subject groups. During acute gastroenteritis, those who later develop IBS (INF-IBS) show IL-1β mRNA:β-actin ratios of approximately 9.8 × 10⁻², significantly higher than infection controls (INF-CON) who show ratios of 3.6 × 10⁻². Intriguingly, this difference becomes even more pronounced three months post-infection, with INF-IBS patients showing increased expression (16.6 × 10⁻²) compared to both INF-CON patients (4.4 × 10⁻²) and normal controls (6.3 × 10⁻²). These findings demonstrate that patients who develop PI-IBS have a distinct inflammatory profile that persists beyond the acute infection phase .

What is the significance of IL-1β antagonism in IBS research?

IL-1β bioactivity is naturally regulated by its antagonist (IL-1ra), and the balance between these cytokines determines IL-1β's contribution to inflammation. Research indicates that while IL-1β expression differs significantly between IBS and control groups, IL-1ra mRNA expression remains relatively consistent. During acute infection, the IL-1ra mRNA:β-actin ratio was 5.3 × 10⁻² in INF-IBS patients versus 8.6 × 10⁻² in INF-CON patients, and post-infection showed 7.4 × 10⁻² versus 6.6 × 10⁻², respectively. This imbalance between pro-inflammatory IL-1β and its regulatory antagonist may contribute to ongoing inflammation in IBS, making antibodies targeting IL-1β potentially valuable research and therapeutic tools .

What techniques are used to measure IL-1β expression in IBS studies?

The gold standard method for quantifying IL-1β expression in IBS research involves reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) followed by optical densitometry after electrophoresis on agarose gel. This technique allows for reliable quantification of IL-1β mRNA expression in rectal biopsy samples. Researchers typically normalize IL-1β expression against β-actin expression to account for variations in total RNA content between samples. Additionally, histological examination of biopsy samples should be performed to exclude inflammatory bowel disease or microscopic colitis that might confound results. Sequential biopsies during and after infection provide valuable longitudinal data on inflammatory changes .

How should antibodies against IL-1β be validated for IBS research?

Validation of anti-IL-1β antibodies for IBS research requires a multi-step approach. First, antibody specificity must be confirmed through techniques like Western blotting and ELISA to ensure selective binding to IL-1β without cross-reactivity to related cytokines, particularly IL-1ra. Second, the antibody's ability to neutralize IL-1β biological activity should be demonstrated in functional assays. Third, researchers should verify antibody performance in relevant tissue samples by immunohistochemistry on rectal biopsies. Finally, verification of consistent performance across multiple sample types (blood, mucosal tissue, cell culture) is essential to ensure reliability in diverse experimental contexts. Positive and negative controls, including recombinant IL-1β and samples from inflammatory bowel disease patients, should be included in validation protocols .

What controls are essential when studying IL-1β in IBS models?

Robust experimental design requires multiple control groups to properly contextualize IL-1β findings in IBS research. Three essential control groups include: (1) infection controls (INF-CON) - patients who experience gastroenteritis but do not develop IBS symptoms; (2) normal controls (NOR-CON) - healthy volunteers without recent gastroenteritis history; and (3) inflammatory bowel disease controls - to distinguish IBS-specific changes from general inflammatory pathology. Timepoint controls are also critical, with measurements taken during acute infection and at defined intervals post-infection (e.g., three months) to track inflammatory resolution or persistence. Technical controls include using β-actin as a housekeeping gene for normalization and including both positive and negative controls for antibody staining or detection procedures .

What relationship exists between IL-1β expression and severity of IBS symptoms?

Research indicates a correlation between IL-1β expression levels and clinical manifestations of IBS. Patients with more severe gastroenteritis are more likely to develop PI-IBS, and these patients demonstrate higher IL-1β mRNA expression. This correlation suggests that the magnitude of the initial inflammatory response may predispose individuals to more significant post-infectious symptoms. Researchers should consider designing studies that correlate quantitative IL-1β measurements with standardized IBS symptom scores to establish whether antibody-mediated reduction of IL-1β correlates with symptom improvement. Such studies require careful symptom documentation using validated scales alongside molecular measurements of cytokine expression to establish meaningful clinical correlations .

What insights can IL-1β antibody studies provide about IBS pathophysiology?

IL-1β antibody studies can illuminate critical aspects of IBS pathophysiology beyond simple symptom management. Research suggests that certain individuals may have a genetically determined predisposition to mount stronger inflammatory responses, potentially explaining why only approximately 25% of patients develop IBS after infectious gastroenteritis. Some IBS patients demonstrate immunological profiles similar to inflammatory bowel disease patients, being low secretors of counter-inflammatory cytokines like interleukin 10 and transforming growth factor β. This inefficient downregulation of inflammation may contribute to persistent IL-1β elevation. Antibody-based studies can help distinguish between IBS subgroups with predominantly inflammatory versus non-inflammatory mechanisms, potentially leading to more personalized treatment approaches based on individual cytokine profiles .

What experimental design best captures IL-1β dynamics in IBS research?

The optimal experimental design for studying IL-1β in IBS requires a prospective longitudinal approach with sequential sampling. Based on successful research protocols, investigators should recruit patients during acute gastroenteritis and collect initial rectal biopsy samples within approximately 5 days of symptom onset. Follow-up biopsies should be obtained at 3 months post-infection, with careful documentation of symptom development. This design should include three distinct subject groups: those who develop PI-IBS (INF-IBS), those who recover completely (INF-CON), and healthy controls (NOR-CON). The design should incorporate multiple inflammatory markers beyond IL-1β, including IL-1ra, to understand cytokine balance. Sample size calculations should account for the approximately 25% conversion rate from gastroenteritis to PI-IBS to ensure adequate statistical power .

How should researchers interpret IL-1β data in the context of contradictory findings?

Interpreting contradictory IL-1β findings requires careful consideration of methodological differences between studies. First, researchers should examine normalization methods, as different housekeeping genes or protein standards can influence relative expression values. Second, timing of sample collection is critical, as IL-1β expression changes significantly from acute infection through recovery phase. Third, subject selection criteria may differ between studies, particularly regarding IBS subtypes (PI-IBS vs. other forms) and symptom severity thresholds. Fourth, technical differences in antibody specificity, detection methods, and tissue preparation can significantly impact results. When contradictions arise, researchers should compare IL-1β:IL-1ra ratios rather than absolute IL-1β levels alone, as this balance may better reflect inflammatory status. Finally, genetic factors influencing inflammatory responses may vary between study populations, necessitating analysis of genetic background alongside cytokine data .

What statistical approaches are appropriate for analyzing IL-1β antibody data in IBS research?

Appropriate statistical analysis of IL-1β antibody data requires methods that account for the typically non-normal distribution of cytokine measurements. For comparing IL-1β levels between groups (e.g., INF-IBS vs. INF-CON), non-parametric tests such as Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis are often more appropriate than parametric t-tests. For longitudinal data tracking IL-1β changes over time, repeated measures ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc testing should be employed, potentially with log transformation if data show marked skewness. Correlation analyses between IL-1β levels and symptom scores should utilize Spearman's rank correlation coefficient rather than Pearson's. Power calculations should account for typically high biological variability in cytokine expression, often requiring larger sample sizes than other biomarkers. Multivariate approaches are recommended to control for confounding variables such as age, sex, and prior IBS symptoms that may influence inflammatory responses .

What technological advances are improving IL-1β antibody research in IBS?

Recent technological advances are enhancing the precision and applicability of IL-1β antibody research in IBS. Computational antibody design methods are enabling the development of more specific monoclonal antibodies with optimized binding properties and reduced immunogenicity. Multi-frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis provides superior assessment of body composition compared to BMI in metabolic studies related to inflammatory conditions like IBS. Advanced molecular techniques now allow for the study of not only IL-1β expression but also downstream signaling pathways, particularly STAT-related mechanisms that may mediate cytokine effects. Single-cell analysis techniques permit identification of specific cellular sources of IL-1β within the intestinal mucosa, providing greater insight into immune cell involvement in IBS pathophysiology. Finally, advances in bioinformatics are improving our ability to correlate genetic variants in inflammatory regulation with IL-1β expression patterns and clinical outcomes .

What is the potential for using IL-1β antibodies in combination with other therapeutic approaches for IBS?

The future of IBS treatment likely involves combination approaches that may include IL-1β antibodies alongside other targeted interventions. Research suggests that anti-IL-1β antibodies might be particularly effective when combined with treatments addressing gut microbiota, as post-infectious IBS involves both inflammatory responses and dysbiosis. Potential synergistic approaches include combining IL-1β antibodies with probiotics designed to enhance anti-inflammatory cytokine production, or with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors that address both neurological symptoms and potentially modulate immune responses. For patients with demonstrated food sensitivities, elimination diets guided by validated testing (not IgG-based) combined with anti-inflammatory therapy might provide enhanced benefits. The development of gut-targeted delivery systems for antibodies could also improve efficacy while reducing systemic effects. Future research should establish optimal sequencing of treatments, whether inflammatory pathways should be targeted before, after, or concurrently with other IBS interventions .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.