The 4S.B3 antibody is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that specifically binds to human IFN-γ, a 17 kDa cytokine produced by activated T and NK cells . Its structure includes:
Heavy chains: CH1, CH2, CH3 domains with a hinge region.
Light chains: κ or λ chains with complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) for antigen recognition .
Conjugation: Available in eFluor™ 450 or FITC formats for fluorescence-based assays .
The antibody’s specificity is not affected by IFN-γ glycosylation states, enabling robust detection in intracellular staining .
Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS): The 4S.B3 antibody is validated for flow cytometric analysis of IFN-γ in human peripheral blood cells .
Therapeutic relevance: IFN-γ modulates macrophage activation, tumor surveillance, and class II MHC expression, critical in cancer and autoimmune diseases .
Elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) IFN-γ levels correlate with astrocyte injury and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) release in neuromyelitis optica (NMO) . The 4S.B3 antibody could aid in monitoring such conditions by quantifying IFN-γ in CSF .
The 4S.B3 antibody aligns with platforms like:
ART-Ig/FAST-Ig: Enables heterodimeric antibody assembly for bispecific targeting (e.g., ERY947) .
Duobody/Fab-arm exchange: Facilitates dynamic antibody recombination for dual-antigen binding .
While not directly linked to IF3-4, these technologies highlight the broader utility of IFN-γ-targeting antibodies in immuno-oncology and infectious diseases .
Key sources:
IF3-4 Antibody targets a chloroplast translation initiation factor crucial for coordinated leaf and chloroplast development. This factor binds to the 30S ribosomal subunit, shifting the equilibrium between 70S ribosomes and their constituent 50S and 30S subunits towards the free subunits. This action increases the availability of 30S subunits, a necessary condition for initiating protein synthesis.
IF3 is a critical translation initiation factor that plays an essential role in preventing pseudo-initiation complex formation and initiation from non-canonical start codons . The protein consists of an N-terminal domain (NTD) and a C-terminal domain (CTD) linked through a flexible lysine-rich inter-domain helix linker . IF3-4 specifically refers to a variant of this initiation factor found in Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress) .
The molecular architecture of IF3 is particularly important for its function:
The NTD lies on the 30S subunit platform near ribosomal protein uS11
The linker helix spans from the platform to the P site and interacts with h23 and h24
The CTD is located near h44, closer to the P-site, and interacts with h44, h24 and h45
IF3 prevents incorrect translation initiation by ensuring proper start codon selection and ribosomal assembly. Recent research shows that "the interactions between NTD of IF3 and i-tRNA are crucial for coupling the movements of NTD and CTD of IF3 during the initiation pathway" .
The IF3-4 Antibody (product code CSB-PA233527XA01DOA) has been specifically validated for:
This polyclonal antibody is raised in rabbit against recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana IF3-4 protein and demonstrates specific reactivity with Arabidopsis thaliana . The antibody is supplied in liquid form containing preservative (0.03% Proclin 300) and constituents (50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4) .
For maintaining antibody integrity:
Store antibody at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt
The antibody is supplied in a buffer containing 50% glycerol, which helps maintain stability during storage
For long-term storage, aliquoting the antibody is recommended to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
The antibody is purified using antigen affinity methods, which enhances its specificity for the target protein . This purification method is particularly important for applications requiring high specificity.
For optimal Western blotting results with IF3-4 Antibody, researchers should implement the following protocol:
Sample preparation and loading:
Extract total protein from Arabidopsis thaliana samples using appropriate lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors
Quantify protein concentrations using standard methods (Bradford or BCA assay)
Load 20-50 μg of total protein per lane
Antibody incubation parameters:
Use a dilution range of 1:500-1:2000 as a starting point (based on similar antibodies from search results)
Incubate membrane with primary antibody overnight at 4°C
Follow with appropriate HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody
Controls and validation:
Include a positive control (wild-type Arabidopsis extract)
Include a negative control (non-plant sample or IF3-4 knockout if available)
Use housekeeping proteins (actin, tubulin) as loading controls
If detecting weak signals, consider using enhanced chemiluminescence substrates or increasing protein concentration. For quantitative analysis, digital imaging systems rather than film exposure provide more accurate results.
Research exploring IF3-4 interactions with initiator tRNA requires sophisticated approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Lyse plant cells under non-denaturing conditions
Immunoprecipitate using IF3-4 Antibody
Analyze pulled-down complexes for presence of initiator tRNA using RT-PCR or Northern blotting
Molecular interaction studies:
Building on research that "IF3 indirectly modulates the A-minor interactions of G1338 and A1339 of 16S rRNA with the 3GC base pairs in i-tRNA"
Use site-directed mutagenesis to modify interaction sites
Analyze effects on translation initiation efficiency
Structural analysis:
Cryo-EM studies of ribosomal complexes containing IF3-4
Analysis of NTD and CTD domain movements during initiation
The coupling of NTD-tRNA interactions to CTD movement is critical for proper translation initiation, as indicated by research showing these interactions are "crucial for coupling the movements of NTD and CTD of IF3 during the initiation pathway" .
For cross-species research using IF3-4 Antibody:
Determining cross-reactivity:
Test antibody on protein extracts from different plant species
Confirm specificity using Western blot analysis
Sequence alignment analysis to predict potential cross-reactivity
Experimental design for comparative studies:
Standardize protein extraction protocols across species
Use equal protein loading and identical experimental conditions
Include appropriate controls for each species
Data interpretation considerations:
Account for potential differences in epitope conservation
Consider evolutionary relationships between species
Correlate antibody binding with functional studies
While the antibody has been specifically validated for Arabidopsis thaliana , conservation of IF3 across species may enable limited cross-reactivity with closely related plant species. Researchers should validate cross-reactivity experimentally before conducting comparative studies.
Accurate quantification requires rigorous methodology:
Quantification protocol:
Capture digital images of Western blots using a calibrated imaging system
Measure band intensities using image analysis software
Subtract background signal from each measurement
Normalize to loading controls (housekeeping proteins or total protein stains)
Example quantification table:
| Sample | IF3-4 Band Intensity | Loading Control Intensity | Normalized Ratio | Fold Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 15,642 | 25,301 | 0.618 | 1.00 |
| Treatment 1 | 23,415 | 24,893 | 0.940 | 1.52 |
| Treatment 2 | 8,721 | 25,117 | 0.347 | 0.56 |
Statistical analysis:
Perform experiments with at least three biological replicates
Apply appropriate statistical tests (t-test for two conditions, ANOVA for multiple conditions)
Report both mean values and measures of variation (standard deviation or standard error)
For publication-quality data, researchers should validate results using complementary techniques such as qRT-PCR to correlate protein levels with transcript abundance.
Troubleshooting non-specific signals:
Common sources of non-specificity:
Insufficient blocking during Western blotting procedures
Excessive antibody concentration
Cross-reactivity with structurally similar proteins
Sample degradation or protein modification
Secondary antibody issues
Mitigation strategies:
Optimize blocking conditions (5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST)
Titrate antibody concentration to determine optimal dilution
Include additional washing steps with higher stringency buffers
Pre-absorb antibody with recombinant similar proteins if cross-reactivity is suspected
Use freshly prepared samples with protease inhibitors
Test alternative secondary antibodies
If non-specific bands persist, consider using immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm the identity of detected proteins.
Integrative approaches enhance research depth:
Integration methodology:
Design experiments that collect both protein and RNA samples in parallel
Normalize protein quantification data from Western blots using IF3-4 Antibody
Correlate with transcript abundance data from RNA-Seq or qRT-PCR
Analyze temporal relationships between transcript and protein changes
Apply computational approaches to identify regulatory patterns
Interpretation framework:
Consider post-transcriptional regulation when transcript and protein levels don't correlate
Examine protein half-life and stability factors
Investigate potential translational control mechanisms
Account for protein localization changes that may not reflect total abundance changes
This integrative approach can reveal regulatory mechanisms controlling IF3-4 expression and function that might be missed by examining either dataset in isolation.
Plants modulate translation initiation in response to various stresses, making IF3-4 a valuable target for stress studies:
Experimental design:
Subject plants to relevant stresses (drought, salt, temperature, pathogen)
Collect samples at multiple timepoints (0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 hours)
Extract protein under conditions that preserve native complexes
Analyze IF3-4 protein levels using quantitative Western blotting
Examine IF3-4 subcellular localization using fractionation followed by Western blotting
Analysis approaches:
Compare stress-induced changes in IF3-4 protein levels across conditions
Correlate changes with physiological responses
Investigate post-translational modifications using 2D gel electrophoresis
Examine association with stress-specific mRNAs using RIP-Seq (RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing)
This approach can reveal how plants modulate translation initiation machinery during stress adaptation, potentially identifying novel mechanisms for improving crop stress tolerance.
Optimizing immunoprecipitation protocols:
Key considerations:
Lysis conditions: Use gentle non-denaturing buffers to preserve native interactions
Antibody amount: Typically 2-5 μg of antibody per mg of total protein
Incubation conditions: 4°C overnight with gentle rotation
Washing stringency: Balance between preserving specific interactions and reducing background
Elution methods: Consider native elution with peptide competition versus denaturing elution
Controls and validation:
Input control (pre-immunoprecipitation sample)
Negative control (non-specific IgG from same species)
Validation of pulled-down complexes by Western blot and mass spectrometry
For studying IF3-4 interactions with the translation machinery, researchers should consider crosslinking before immunoprecipitation to capture transient interactions that occur during the dynamic process of translation initiation.
Translation factors exist in multiple functional states, which can be distinguished using sophisticated approaches:
Differentiation strategies:
Phosphorylation-specific detection:
Combine IF3-4 Antibody immunoprecipitation with phospho-specific staining
Use phosphatase treatment as a control
Conformation-specific analysis:
Compare native versus denaturing conditions in Western blotting
Use limited proteolysis to reveal structural differences
Interaction-based differentiation:
Co-immunoprecipitation followed by detection of state-specific binding partners
Size exclusion chromatography combined with Western blotting
Subcellular localization:
Fractionation followed by Western blotting
Compare cytoplasmic versus organelle-associated pools
Understanding the different functional states of IF3-4 can provide insights into its regulatory mechanisms and role in translation control under different physiological conditions.
Evolutionary divergence has created distinct features in IF3 across domains of life:
Key differences:
Domain organization: Plant IF3-4 may contain unique structural elements compared to bacterial IF3
Subcellular localization: Plant IF3-4 might function in multiple cellular compartments (cytoplasm, chloroplasts, mitochondria)
Regulatory mechanisms: Post-translational modifications specific to plants
Interaction partners: Plant-specific binding proteins
Investigation approaches using antibodies:
Use IF3-4 Antibody to immunoprecipitate plant complexes and compare composition to known bacterial/mammalian complexes
Compare subcellular localization patterns across species
Analyze post-translational modifications unique to plant IF3-4
This comparative approach can reveal plant-specific adaptations in translation initiation machinery that may relate to unique aspects of plant biology.
Emerging technologies offer new applications:
Advanced applications:
Super-resolution microscopy:
Track IF3-4 localization at nanometer resolution
Visualize dynamic association with ribosomes
Proximity labeling:
Combine with BioID or APEX2 systems to identify proteins in close proximity to IF3-4
Map the dynamic interactome during various cellular conditions
Single-molecule studies:
Track individual IF3-4 molecules during translation initiation
Measure binding kinetics in real-time
CRISPR-based studies:
Generate epitope-tagged IF3-4 variants for enhanced detection
Create reporter systems to monitor IF3-4 activity in vivo
These approaches represent the cutting edge of translation research and could reveal new insights into the fundamental mechanisms of protein synthesis in plants.