Os04g0499300 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
Os04g0499300 antibody; LOC_Os04g42140 antibody; OSJNBa0029H02.9Eukaryotic translation initiation factor isoform 4G-1 antibody; eIF(iso)-4G-1 antibody; eIF(iso)4G-1 antibody; Eukaryotic initiation factor iso-4F subunit p82 antibody; eIF-(iso)4F p82 subunit antibody
Target Names
Os04g0499300
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody plays a role in the accumulation of the sobemovirus (RYMV) during viral infection.
Database Links
Protein Families
Eukaryotic initiation factor 4G family

Q&A

What are the standard protocols for Os04g0499300 Antibody validation in rice tissue samples?

Antibody validation is essential before conducting extensive experiments. For Os04g0499300 Antibody, researchers should implement a multi-step validation process:

  • Western Blot Analysis: Confirm specific binding to the target protein of expected molecular weight from rice tissue extracts.

  • Immunoprecipitation: Verify ability to pull down the target protein from rice cell lysates.

  • Immunohistochemistry Controls: Include positive controls (tissues known to express the target), negative controls (tissues without expression), and technical controls (primary antibody omission).

  • Peptide Competition Assay: Pre-incubate antibody with the immunizing peptide to confirm binding specificity.

A typical validation dataset should include:

Validation MethodPositive ResultNegative ControlSpecificity Confirmation
Western BlotSingle band at expected MWNo band in knockout/negative tissueBand disappears in peptide competition
ImmunoprecipitationTarget protein detectedNo protein in IgG control>80% protein depletion from lysate
ImmunohistochemistrySignal in known expressing tissueNo signal in non-expressing tissueSignal blocked by pre-incubation with antigen

How should I optimize antibody concentration for different experimental applications?

Antibody titration is crucial for achieving optimal signal-to-noise ratio. For Os04g0499300 Antibody, different applications require different dilution optimization:

For Western blotting, perform a dilution series (1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:5000) using the same protein sample. The optimal dilution provides clear specific bands with minimal background. For immunohistochemistry, test dilutions typically starting at 1:100 and extending to 1:1000.

Document your optimization process with a data table:

ApplicationAntibody DilutionSignal StrengthBackgroundSignal-to-Noise RatioOptimal (Y/N)
Western Blot1:500StrongHigh3:1N
Western Blot1:1000StrongModerate5:1Y
Western Blot1:2000ModerateLow6:1Y
Western Blot1:5000WeakLow3:1N
IHC1:100Very StrongHigh2:1N
IHC1:500ModerateLow8:1Y

Remember that optimization conditions may vary based on the specific tissue type, fixation methods, and detection systems used.

How should I design experiments to study Os04g0499300 expression patterns across different rice developmental stages?

Designing developmental expression studies requires careful planning of sampling timepoints and methodology:

  • Sampling Strategy: Collect tissues at key developmental stages (germination, seedling, tillering, heading, flowering, grain filling, and maturity).

  • Tissue Selection: Include multiple tissue types (roots, shoots, leaves, developing panicles, and grains) at each developmental stage.

  • Technical Approach: Use a combination of methods:

    • Western blotting for protein levels

    • Immunohistochemistry for tissue localization

    • Co-immunoprecipitation for protein interaction studies

  • Quantification Method: Implement densitometry for Western blots with appropriate normalization to housekeeping proteins.

A proper experimental design should include biological replicates (minimum three) and technical replicates (minimum two). Document your findings in tables like this:

Developmental StageTissue TypeOs04g0499300 Relative ExpressionStandard DeviationStatistical Significance
Seedling (7 days)Root1.0 (baseline)±0.12-
Seedling (7 days)Shoot2.3±0.18p<0.01
TilleringRoot1.2±0.15p>0.05
TilleringShoot4.6±0.22p<0.001
FloweringFlag Leaf3.2±0.19p<0.001
FloweringPanicle5.7±0.25p<0.001

This approach allows for comprehensive characterization of expression patterns throughout the plant's life cycle.

What controls should be included when using Os04g0499300 Antibody in rice comparative studies?

Robust comparative studies using Os04g0499300 Antibody require multiple controls:

  • Positive Control: Include rice tissue samples known to express Os04g0499300.

  • Negative Controls:

    • Primary antibody omission

    • Isotype control (same species, same immunoglobulin class)

    • Pre-immune serum (if available)

    • RNA interference or CRISPR knockout samples (ideal but technically challenging)

  • Loading Controls: For Western blots, include housekeeping proteins like actin, tubulin, or GAPDH.

  • Technical Validation:

    • Peptide competition assay

    • Secondary antibody-only control

  • Biological Reference Points:

    • Wild-type vs. mutant comparisons

    • Comparative analysis across different rice varieties

    • Developmental time series

Document your control strategy clearly:

Control TypePurposeExpected ResultInterpretation
Primary antibody omissionBackground detectionNo signalConfirms secondary antibody specificity
Isotype controlNon-specific bindingNo signalConfirms antibody class specificity
Loading control (Actin)Sample normalizationConsistent signalEnsures equal loading across samples
Peptide competitionBinding specificitySignal eliminationConfirms specific epitope recognition
Wild-type vs. Os04g knockoutBiological validationSignal vs. no signalConfirms antibody specificity in vivo

How can Os04g0499300 Antibody be used to investigate protein-protein interactions in rice signaling pathways?

Investigating protein-protein interactions with Os04g0499300 Antibody requires specialized approaches:

  • Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Use Os04g0499300 Antibody to pull down protein complexes

    • Analyze interacting partners via mass spectrometry

    • Confirm specific interactions with reverse Co-IP

  • Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):

    • Visualize protein interactions in situ

    • Combine Os04g0499300 Antibody with antibodies against suspected interacting partners

    • Quantify interaction frequency in different cellular compartments

  • Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC):

    • Complement with genetic approaches for validation

    • Compare antibody-detected interactions with BiFC results

Example Co-IP results can be presented as follows:

Bait ProteinPrey ProteinCo-IP ResultReverse Co-IPConfidence Level
Os04g0499300Protein AStrong interactionConfirmedHigh
Os04g0499300Protein BModerate interactionConfirmedMedium
Os04g0499300Protein CWeak interactionNot confirmedLow
Os04g0499300Negative controlNo interactionN/AN/A

For PLA analysis, quantify interaction signals:

Tissue TypeTreatmentPLA Signal Density (dots/cell)Standard DeviationStatistical Significance
Root meristemControl3.2±0.7-
Root meristemStress condition12.5±1.2p<0.001
Leaf tissueControl1.8±0.5-
Leaf tissueStress condition8.3±0.9p<0.001

This multi-method approach provides strong evidence for biological interactions while minimizing false positives.

What methodologies can detect post-translational modifications of the Os04g0499300 protein using the antibody?

Investigating post-translational modifications (PTMs) requires specialized approaches:

  • Phosphorylation Analysis:

    • Use phospho-specific antibodies alongside Os04g0499300 Antibody

    • Employ phosphatase treatments as controls

    • Conduct 2D gel electrophoresis to separate phosphorylated isoforms

  • Ubiquitination Detection:

    • Immunoprecipitate with Os04g0499300 Antibody

    • Probe with anti-ubiquitin antibodies

    • Use proteasome inhibitors to enhance detection

  • Mass Spectrometry Validation:

    • Immunoprecipitate protein using Os04g0499300 Antibody

    • Perform tryptic digestion

    • Analyze peptide fragments for PTMs

Example data presentation for phosphorylation analysis:

TreatmentPhosphorylation Level (AU)Fold ChangeStatistical Significance
Control1.0--
Stress condition3.73.7× increasep<0.001
Kinase inhibitor0.30.3× decreasep<0.01
Phosphatase treatment0.10.1× decreasep<0.001

For mass spectrometry findings:

Modified ResiduePTM TypePeptide SequenceConfidence ScoreCondition Where Observed
Ser42PhosphorylationLSEVPS(ph)DEGLK0.92Stress condition only
Lys104UbiquitinationMGK(ub)ITDEVLR0.87After proteasome inhibition
Thr156PhosphorylationAELPT(ph)DGVSR0.95Both control and stress

This approach provides molecular-level insights into regulatory mechanisms affecting the protein.

How can Os04g0499300 Antibody be integrated with genomic data to understand gene-protein correlation in rice?

Integrating antibody-based protein data with genomic information creates a powerful multi-omics approach:

  • Expression Correlation Analysis:

    • Compare protein levels (Western blot) with mRNA levels (RT-qPCR/RNA-seq)

    • Calculate correlation coefficients across conditions

    • Identify conditions with post-transcriptional regulation

  • eQTL and pQTL Integration:

    • Connect genomic loci affecting expression with protein abundance

    • Assess if genetic variants affecting Os04g0499300 expression also affect protein levels

    • Compare with nearby genes like Os04g0503600 and Os04g0504000 that affect tiller density

  • Functional Validation:

    • Use CRISPR/Cas9 to create gene variants

    • Assess protein expression consequences with the antibody

    • Connect phenotypic outcomes to molecular changes

Example correlation analysis data:

ConditionmRNA Fold ChangeProtein Fold ChangeCorrelation CoefficientRegulation Type
Drought stress4.23.80.91Transcriptional
Salt stress2.82.90.94Transcriptional
Heat stress3.51.20.34Post-transcriptional
Cold stress1.23.60.29Post-translational

For genetic variant analysis:

Genetic VariantmRNA Expression ChangeProtein Level ChangeTiller Density PhenotypeStatistical Association
SNP1 (Chr4:24507889)Increased (+127%)Increased (+118%)Increased (+32%)p<0.001
SNP2 (Chr4:24508156)Decreased (-45%)Decreased (-42%)Decreased (-28%)p<0.01
DEL1 (Chr4:24509023)UnchangedDecreased (-38%)Decreased (-17%)p<0.05

This integrated approach reveals regulatory relationships and functional consequences at multiple biological levels.

How should I analyze subcellular localization data generated using Os04g0499300 Antibody?

Subcellular localization analysis requires both qualitative and quantitative approaches:

  • Co-localization Analysis:

    • Use Os04g0499300 Antibody alongside established organelle markers

    • Calculate Pearson's or Mander's correlation coefficients

    • Generate overlay images with co-localization highlighted

  • Fractionation Validation:

    • Perform subcellular fractionation

    • Probe fractions with Os04g0499300 Antibody

    • Include fraction-specific markers as controls

  • Dynamic Analysis:

    • Track localization changes under different conditions

    • Quantify nuclear/cytoplasmic ratios if applicable

    • Assess changes over developmental time

Example co-localization quantification:

Organelle MarkerPearson's CoefficientMander's M1Mander's M2Co-localization Degree
Nuclear (H3)0.870.920.79Strong
ER (BiP)0.230.180.12Weak
Golgi (GM130)0.110.070.09Negligible
Plasma membrane (PIP2;7)0.420.380.45Moderate

For condition-dependent localization:

ConditionNuclear Signal (%)Cytoplasmic Signal (%)Nuclear/Cytoplasmic RatioStatistical Significance
Control35650.54-
ABA treatment72282.57p<0.001
Osmotic stress81194.26p<0.001
Cold stress29710.41p>0.05

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing Os04g0499300 expression data across different rice varieties?

Robust statistical analysis of expression data requires appropriate test selection and implementation:

  • Normality Testing:

    • Apply Shapiro-Wilk or Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests

    • Determine if parametric or non-parametric tests are appropriate

    • Transform data if necessary (log, square root) to approach normality

  • Comparative Analysis:

    • For two varieties: t-test (parametric) or Mann-Whitney U (non-parametric)

    • For multiple varieties: ANOVA with post-hoc tests (parametric) or Kruskal-Wallis (non-parametric)

    • Include multiple testing correction (Bonferroni or FDR)

  • Multivariate Approaches:

    • Principal Component Analysis to identify patterns

    • Hierarchical clustering to group varieties by expression profile

    • Mixed linear models for complex experimental designs

Example statistical analysis workflow:

Rice VarietyOs04g0499300 Expression (AU)Normal Distribution?Statistical Testp-value vs. ControlAdjusted p-value
Nipponbare (control)1.00 ± 0.15Yes---
Variety A2.45 ± 0.23Yest-test0.00120.0060
Variety B0.87 ± 0.11Yest-test0.13240.3310
Variety C3.78 ± 0.31NoMann-Whitney0.00030.0015
Variety D1.12 ± 0.18Yest-test0.27160.5432

For PCA analysis:

Principal ComponentVariance Explained (%)Key Contributing VarietiesAssociation with Traits
PC168.3Varieties A, C, ETiller number, drought tolerance
PC217.5Varieties B, FGrain size, flowering time
PC38.2Varieties D, GDisease resistance

How can I integrate Os04g0499300 protein expression data with phenotypic traits for rice breeding applications?

Connecting protein expression to phenotypic traits provides valuable insights for breeding programs:

  • Correlation Analysis:

    • Calculate Pearson's or Spearman's correlation between protein levels and quantitative traits

    • Generate correlation matrices for multiple traits

    • Create scatterplots with regression lines

  • QTL-Protein Integration:

    • Map quantitative trait loci influencing both protein expression and phenotypes

    • Identify co-localization of protein QTLs with agronomic trait QTLs

    • Consider relationship with nearby genes like Os04g0503600 and Os04g0504000 associated with tiller density

  • Selection Models:

    • Develop models predicting phenotype from protein expression

    • Validate with independent germplasm

    • Calculate prediction accuracy metrics

Example correlation analysis:

Phenotypic TraitCorrelation with Os04g0499300p-valueRelationship
Tiller number0.78<0.001Strong positive
Panicle length0.240.089Weak positive (non-significant)
Days to heading-0.65<0.001Strong negative
Grain yield0.52<0.001Moderate positive
Drought tolerance0.71<0.001Strong positive

For predictive modeling:

Prediction ModelVariables IncludedRMSECross-Validation Accuracy
Linear RegressionOs04g0499300 only0.571.320.54
Multiple RegressionOs04g0499300 + 3 other proteins0.760.880.71
Random ForestOs04g0499300 + genomic markers0.850.650.82

This integration approach connects molecular markers with breeding outcomes, enabling more efficient selection strategies.

What future research directions could expand our understanding of Os04g0499300 function in rice?

Several promising research directions could advance our understanding of Os04g0499300 function:

  • Comparative Genomics: Investigate homologs in other cereal crops to understand evolutionary conservation and potential functional redundancy. Systematic analysis of expression patterns across species could reveal fundamental roles in plant development.

  • Environmental Response Studies: Examine Os04g0499300 expression and protein modification under various biotic and abiotic stresses to uncover potential roles in stress adaptation, particularly given its potential relationship with other Os04g family genes associated with agricultural traits.

  • Multi-omics Integration: Combine antibody-based protein studies with transcriptomics, metabolomics, and phenomics to develop comprehensive models of Os04g0499300's role in cellular networks and whole-plant physiology.

  • Advanced Genetic Approaches: Develop CRISPR-Cas9 edited rice lines with targeted modifications to regulatory regions or protein domains to precisely map structure-function relationships and regulatory mechanisms.

  • High-throughput Phenotyping: Correlate Os04g0499300 expression with detailed phenotypic data from field trials to strengthen the connection between molecular mechanisms and agronomic outcomes.

These approaches will collectively build a more comprehensive understanding of Os04g0499300's biological function and potential applications in rice improvement.

How might advancements in antibody technology improve future research on Os04g0499300?

Emerging antibody technologies offer significant potential to enhance Os04g0499300 research:

  • Single-Domain Antibodies: Development of nanobodies or single-domain antibodies against Os04g0499300 could improve penetration into plant tissues and enable live-cell imaging applications not possible with conventional antibodies.

  • Multiplexed Detection Systems: New multiplexing technologies allow simultaneous detection of multiple proteins, enabling comprehensive analysis of Os04g0499300 alongside interaction partners in single experiments.

  • Engineered Antibody Fragments: Smaller antibody fragments with enhanced tissue penetration could improve immunohistochemistry results and enable better spatial resolution of protein localization.

  • Photoactivatable Antibodies: Light-controlled antibody technologies could enable precise temporal and spatial control of binding, facilitating dynamic studies of protein movement and interactions.

  • Automation and High-throughput Screening: Advanced robotics platforms for antibody-based assays could enable screening of thousands of conditions to identify regulatory factors affecting Os04g0499300 expression and function.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.