ifb-2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Antibody Characterization

The IFB-2 antibody is a mouse monoclonal antibody (clone MH33) developed by the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank . It recognizes IFB-2 isoforms (IFB-2a and IFB-2c) and has been validated for:

  • Immunofluorescence: Localizes IFB-2 to the apical endotube and CeAJ (circumapical junction) in intestinal cells .

  • Immunoblotting: Detects IFB-2 isoforms at ~65 kDa (IFB-2a) and ~50 kDa (IFB-2c) .

  • Immunoelectron Microscopy: Confirms IFB-2 enrichment in the electron-dense endotube and proximity to microvillar actin rootlets .

(i) Role in Intestinal Structure

  • Endotube Maintenance: IFB-2 is indispensable for forming the electron-dense endotube, a cytoskeletal structure underlying intestinal microvilli. Depletion of IFB-2 (ifb-2(kc14) knockout) abolishes endotube formation, despite the presence of other IF polypeptides .

  • CeAJ Association: IFB-2 localizes to CeAJs, anchoring IF networks to cell junctions .

(ii) Stress Response Mechanisms

  • Cry5B Toxin Challenge: IFB-2 expression increases during Cry5B intoxication, with a shift toward hypophosphorylated isoforms and elevated IFB-2a/IFB-2c ratios. This correlates with endotube thickening as a defense mechanism .

  • Phosphorylation Dynamics: Hyperphosphorylation of IFB-2 (e.g., at S2/S5/S7/S16–19) disrupts IF network resilience, reducing lifespan but not developmental viability .

Table 2: Key Phenotypes of IFB-2 Perturbation

Mutation/ManipulationObserved EffectCitation
ifb-2(kc14) (knockout)Complete loss of endotube; increased Cry5B sensitivity
ifb-2(kc27) (coil 1A/B deletion)Aberrant apical IF granules; reduced cytoplasmic IFB-2 levels
IFB-2 K255R/K341R (ubiquitination-deficient)Shortened lifespan; increased IFB-2 protein accumulation

Mechanistic Contributions to Disease Models

  • Toxic IF Aggregates: Aberrant IFB-2 networks in sma-5 MAPK mutants drive luminal widening and cytoplasmic invaginations. Deleting IFB-2 rescues these structural and systemic dysfunctions, supporting a "toxic gain-of-function" model seen in human IF-aggregation diseases .

  • Aging and Ubiquitination: Lysine residues K255/K341 in IFB-2 are critical for ubiquitination. Mutations here increase IFB-2 stability, accelerating aging phenotypes .

Isoform-Specific Regulation

IFB-2 exists in two major isoforms:

  1. IFB-2a: Full-length isoform dominating under stress conditions.

  2. IFB-2c: Truncated isoform with upregulated expression during Cry5B challenge .
    The antibody’s ability to distinguish these isoforms has been pivotal in studying stress-induced cytoskeletal remodeling .

Technical Applications in Research

  • CRISPR Mutagenesis Validation: Used to confirm IFB-2 depletion in ifb-2(kc14) and phosphorylation-site mutants .

  • Network Assembly Studies: Demonstrated that IFB-2’s aminoterminal domain (up to A184) is essential for filament polymerization, while truncated mutants retain partial apical localization .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 Weeks (Made-to-Order)
Synonyms
ifb-2 antibody; F10C1.7 antibody; Intermediate filament protein ifb-2 antibody; Cel IF B2 antibody; Intermediate filament protein B2 antibody; IF-B2 antibody
Target Names
ifb-2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Cytoplasmic intermediate filaments provide essential mechanical support to cells, although they are not themselves essential proteins. They are a key component of the terminal web—an organelle-poor, intermediate filament-rich cytoplasmic layer underlying the apical microvilli of polarized epithelial cells. This structure is present from embryonic development through to adulthood in gut cells. Proper localization of these filaments is dependent on let-413.
Database Links

STRING: 6239.F10C1.7a.1

UniGene: Cel.21361

Protein Families
Intermediate filament family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.
Tissue Specificity
Expression is restricted to a discrete circumferential subapical layer within the intestinal terminal web (known as the 'endotube'); this layer joins directly to the apical junction complexes that connect adjacent gut cells.

Q&A

What is IFB-2 and why are antibodies against it valuable in C. elegans research?

IFB-2 is an intestinal intermediate filament protein in C. elegans that forms part of the apical cytoskeleton structure known as the endotube. Antibodies against IFB-2 are valuable tools for studying intestinal cytoskeleton organization, as IFB-2 is predominantly, if not completely, restricted to the intestine .

The endotube, composed of IFB-2 and other intermediate filament proteins, functions as a mechanical stress protector and is essential for intestinal integrity. Disruption of the endotube structure is linked to increased susceptibility to microbial, oxidative, and osmotic stress . Therefore, IFB-2 antibodies enable researchers to:

  • Visualize intestinal cytoskeletal architecture

  • Study intestinal development

  • Investigate mechanisms of stress protection

  • Assess phenotypic consequences of genetic mutations affecting intermediate filaments

How should researchers validate the specificity of IFB-2 antibodies?

Validating antibody specificity is crucial for reliable experimental results. For IFB-2 antibodies, consider these validation approaches:

  • CRISPR/Cas9 knockout controls: Generate IFB-2 knockout strains using CRISPR/Cas9 gene inactivation as negative controls for antibody specificity .

  • Western blot analysis: Verify single band detection at the expected molecular weight (~65 kDa for IFB-2).

  • Immunofluorescence pattern verification: Confirm that the antibody localizes exclusively to the apical domain of intestinal cells in wild-type worms, consistent with known endotube distribution .

  • Co-localization studies: Demonstrate co-localization with fluorescently tagged IFB-2 reporters (such as IFB-2::CFP or IFB-2::GFP) .

  • Immunoelectron microscopy: Confirm specific labeling of the electron-dense endotube structure. Gold particles should be detectable throughout the endotube with minimal cytoplasmic staining .

What are the optimal fixation methods for using IFB-2 antibodies in immunostaining?

The preservation of intermediate filament structure is critical for successful antibody detection. For optimal results with IFB-2 antibodies:

For immunofluorescence applications:

  • Post-fixation permeabilization with 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 improves antibody accessibility

  • For immuno-electron microscopy, light fixation followed by LR White embedding preserves antigenicity while enabling ultrastructural visualization

  • When designing multi-labeling experiments, ensure secondary antibodies come from the same host species to minimize cross-reactivity

What controls should be included when using IFB-2 antibodies?

Proper controls are essential for interpreting antibody staining results:

  • Negative controls:

    • Primary antibody omission

    • Isotype control (using the same IgG class/subclass at equivalent concentration)

    • Blocking peptide competition (pre-incubation of antibody with excess IFB-2 peptide)

    • IFB-2 mutant or knockout samples

  • Positive controls:

    • Wild-type C. elegans with known IFB-2 expression pattern

    • Samples with fluorescently-tagged IFB-2 for co-localization analysis

  • Technical controls:

    • Secondary antibody-only control to assess non-specific binding

    • Fc receptor blocking when staining tissues with potential Fc receptor expression

How can IFB-2 antibodies be used to investigate the mechanical properties of the intestinal cytoskeleton?

Recent advances in biophysical techniques have enabled researchers to correlate IFB-2 distribution with mechanical properties of intestinal tissues. These approaches provide insights into how intermediate filaments contribute to cellular mechanics:

Brillouin microscopy studies have revealed that the IFB-2-containing endotube marks a transition zone between regions of high and low stiffness in intestinal cells . To conduct similar studies:

  • Use IFB-2 antibodies for immunofluorescence to map protein distribution

  • Overlay with Brillouin frequency shift data that serves as a proxy for tissue stiffness

  • Correlate IFB-2 localization with mechanical property measurements

Research has shown that the region of high stiffness (yellow to red in Brillouin imaging) corresponds to the apical domain containing microvilli with bundled actin filaments, while the region of low stiffness (blue) represents the less organized cytoplasm below .

What approaches can researchers use to study interactions between IFB-2 and other intestinal intermediate filament proteins?

C. elegans intestinal cells contain multiple intermediate filament proteins (IFB-2, IFC-1, IFC-2, IFD-1, IFD-2, and IFP-1) that co-localize to form the endotube . To investigate their interactions:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation with IFB-2 antibodies:

    • Use crosslinking approaches to stabilize transient interactions

    • Perform mass spectrometry on immunoprecipitated complexes to identify binding partners

    • Validate interactions with reciprocal co-IPs using antibodies against other IF proteins

  • Proximity labeling approaches:

    • Generate BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins with IFB-2

    • Use antibodies against IFB-2 to confirm proper localization of fusion proteins

    • Identify proximal proteins through streptavidin pulldown and mass spectrometry

  • Super-resolution microscopy:

    • Combine IFB-2 antibodies with antibodies against other IF proteins

    • Use Airyscan confocal laser scanning microscopy to visualize co-localization at nanoscale resolution

    • Implement expansion microscopy for enhanced resolution of the endotube structure

Research has shown that IFB-2 and IFC-2 precisely co-localize at the apical domain of intestinal cells, positioned slightly below the actin-binding protein ERM-1 .

How can researchers overcome challenges in detecting endogenous IFB-2 in mutant backgrounds with disrupted endotube structure?

Detecting IFB-2 in mutants with altered endotube morphology presents unique challenges. Consider these methodological approaches:

  • Antibody concentration optimization:

    • Titrate antibody concentrations for each mutant background

    • For collapsed or disorganized endotubes (as in ifo-1 mutants), increase primary antibody concentration by 2-3 fold

  • Alternative fixation strategies:

    • Test multiple fixation methods for each mutant

    • For aggregated IFB-2 (as seen in sma-5 mutants), methanol fixation may improve epitope accessibility

  • Signal amplification methods:

    • Implement tyramide signal amplification for weak signals

    • Use multiple secondary antibodies targeting different regions of the primary antibody

  • Tissue clearing techniques:

    • Apply tissue clearing methods to improve antibody penetration

    • Modify permeabilization steps for mutants with altered intestinal permeability

Comparisons between wild-type and mutant detection may require standardization using fluorescently tagged IFB-2 as an internal reference .

What are the considerations for using F(ab) or F(ab')2 fragments of IFB-2 antibodies for specific research applications?

F(ab) and F(ab')2 fragments offer advantages for certain applications by eliminating Fc-mediated interactions:

Fragment TypeGeneration MethodKey Applications in IFB-2 Research
F(ab)Papain digestion of whole IgGBlocking endogenous immunoglobulins in multiple labeling; Better penetration in dense intestinal tissues
F(ab')2Pepsin digestion of whole IgGDouble labeling experiments; Reduced background in tissues with Fc receptors

Benefits for intermediate filament research:

  • Improved tissue penetration: F(ab) and F(ab')2 fragments penetrate tissues more efficiently due to their smaller size (50-110 kDa vs. 150 kDa for whole IgG)

  • Reduced non-specific binding: Elimination of Fc regions prevents interaction with Fc receptors on cells

  • Enhanced co-localization studies: Particularly useful when investigating IFB-2 interactions with other intestinal proteins

Consider that F(ab')2 fragment antibodies react with light chains and may recognize immunoglobulins beyond the IgG isotype, which can be advantageous if your primary antibody is not an IgG isotype .

How can researchers use IFB-2 antibodies to investigate stress-induced changes in intestinal cytoskeleton organization?

The intestinal endotube serves as a stress protector against various environmental challenges . To investigate stress-induced changes:

  • Stress induction protocols:

    • Microbial stress: Expose worms to pathogenic bacteria

    • Oxidative stress: Treat with paraquat or hydrogen peroxide

    • Osmotic stress: Culture in high salt media

    • Mechanical stress: Apply controlled mechanical compression

  • Quantitative immunofluorescence analysis:

    • Use IFB-2 antibodies to visualize endotube changes

    • Implement image analysis workflows to quantify:

      • Signal intensity changes

      • Endotube thickness

      • Continuity of the IF network

      • Localization shifts

  • Time-course experiments:

    • Fix worms at multiple timepoints after stress exposure

    • Track dynamic changes in IFB-2 organization

    • Correlate with physiological outcomes and survival

Research has demonstrated that dysfunctional endotubes (as in sma-5 or ifo-1 mutants) lead to increased susceptibility to various stressors, highlighting the protective role of this IFB-2-containing structure .

What are the recommended approaches for using IFB-2 antibodies in western blotting of C. elegans lysates?

Western blotting with IFB-2 antibodies requires specific considerations due to the nature of intermediate filament proteins:

  • Sample preparation:

    • Use strong lysis buffers containing 9.5M urea or 4% SDS to solubilize intermediate filaments

    • Include phosphatase inhibitors to preserve post-translational modifications

    • Sonicate samples thoroughly to disrupt filamentous structures

  • Gel electrophoresis conditions:

    • Use 10-12% acrylamide gels for optimal resolution of IFB-2 (~65 kDa)

    • Include positive controls from wild-type worms

    • Consider gradient gels (4-15%) when analyzing potential degradation products

  • Transfer and detection optimization:

    • Implement wet transfer methods with 10-15% methanol for efficient transfer

    • Block with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA depending on antibody specifications

    • Incubate primary antibody overnight at 4°C for optimal binding

Unlike some anti-integrin antibodies that don't blot well , most IF protein antibodies perform adequately in western blotting when sample preparation is optimized.

How can researchers utilize IFB-2 antibodies for immunoprecipitation studies?

Immunoprecipitation (IP) with IFB-2 antibodies enables identification of interaction partners and post-translational modifications:

  • Optimized IP protocol:

    • Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding

    • Use crosslinking approaches (DSP, formaldehyde) to stabilize transient interactions

    • Implement stringent washing conditions to minimize background

  • Co-IP strategies for identifying interacting proteins:

    • Crosslink antibodies to beads to prevent antibody contamination in eluates

    • Use non-denaturing conditions to preserve protein-protein interactions

    • Analyze precipitates by mass spectrometry to identify novel binding partners

  • Modifications for phosphorylation studies:

    • Include phosphatase inhibitors in all buffers

    • Use phospho-specific antibodies alongside general IFB-2 antibodies

    • Consider titanium dioxide enrichment for phosphopeptide analysis

When investigating IFB-2 interactions with other intestinal filament proteins like IFC-2, comparison with controls using antibodies against the potential interaction partners can validate specific associations .

What strategies can be employed to minimize background when using IFB-2 antibodies in whole-mount immunostaining?

C. elegans whole-mount immunostaining with IFB-2 antibodies can present background challenges. Consider these approaches:

  • Specimen preparation optimization:

    • Perform freeze-crack permeabilization for consistent antibody access

    • Test multiple fixation protocols to identify optimal epitope preservation

    • Include additional permeabilization steps with detergents or brief protease treatment

  • Blocking strategies:

    • Use animal serum (5-10%) from the same species as the secondary antibody

    • Incorporate BSA (0.5-3%) to reduce non-specific binding

    • Consider adding 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 during blocking and antibody incubation

  • Advanced background reduction techniques:

    • Implement F(ab) fragment antibodies when Fc-mediated background is suspected

    • Pre-adsorb secondary antibodies with fixed C. elegans tissue powder

    • Use longer washing steps (4-6 hours) with multiple buffer changes

  • Signal-to-noise enhancement:

    • Optimize primary antibody concentration through titration experiments

    • Consider fluorophores with spectral properties distinct from C. elegans autofluorescence

    • Implement spectral unmixing during image acquisition or processing

Researchers have successfully used these approaches to achieve clean IFB-2 immunostaining that precisely co-localizes with fluorescently tagged IFB-2 reporters .

How can AI-driven technologies like RFdiffusion be leveraged to develop next-generation IFB-2 antibodies?

Recent advances in AI-driven protein design offer new opportunities for developing highly specific IFB-2 antibodies:

The Baker Lab has recently developed RFdiffusion, an AI system fine-tuned to design human-like antibodies . This technology could be applied to develop:

  • Epitope-specific IFB-2 antibodies:

    • Design antibodies targeting specific domains or post-translational modifications

    • Generate antibodies that distinguish between IFB-2 conformational states

    • Create antibodies with enhanced specificity for IFB-2 versus other intestinal IFs

  • Implementation strategy:

    • Define target epitopes based on structural models of IFB-2

    • Use RFdiffusion to generate candidate antibody blueprints

    • Synthesize the most promising candidates as single-chain variable fragments (scFvs)

    • Validate binding specificity and function experimentally

  • Potential advantages:

    • Higher specificity than traditional monoclonal antibodies

    • Ability to target previously inaccessible epitopes

    • Reduction in cross-reactivity with other intermediate filament proteins

    • Customizable properties for specific applications

This computational approach represents a significant departure from traditional antibody development methods that rely on immunizing animals, which often struggle with generating antibodies against conserved proteins like intermediate filaments .

What approaches can be used to generate antibodies specific to different phosphorylation states of IFB-2?

Phosphorylation of intermediate filament proteins regulates their assembly and disassembly. Generating phospho-specific IFB-2 antibodies enables studies of dynamic regulation:

  • Peptide immunization strategy:

    • Synthesize phosphopeptides corresponding to known or predicted IFB-2 phosphorylation sites

    • Conjugate to carrier proteins (KLH or BSA)

    • Immunize rabbits or other suitable host species

    • Purify antibodies using dual affinity approaches:

      • Positive selection on phosphopeptide columns

      • Negative selection using non-phosphorylated peptide columns

  • Validation of phospho-specificity:

    • Western blot comparison using phosphatase-treated versus untreated samples

    • Peptide competition assays with phospho and non-phospho peptides

    • Immunostaining of wild-type versus phospho-site mutant C. elegans

  • Applications in stress response studies:

    • Monitor phosphorylation changes during intestinal development

    • Track dynamic phosphorylation in response to various stressors

    • Correlate phosphorylation with changes in endotube structure and function

By generating antibodies specific to different phosphorylation states, researchers can gain insights into how post-translational modifications regulate IFB-2 function during normal development and stress responses.

How can protein fusion approaches improve IFB-2 antibody generation for difficult epitopes?

Research published in March 2025 demonstrates that fusing protein complexes can enhance antibody generation against challenging targets . This approach could be adapted for IFB-2:

  • Protein fusion strategy:

    • Create fusion proteins containing IFB-2 domains of interest

    • Fuse with carrier proteins that enhance immunogenicity

    • Design constructs that stabilize specific IFB-2 conformations

    • Express and purify fusion proteins for immunization

  • Implementation for IFB-2:

    • Identify poorly immunogenic regions through epitope mapping

    • Engineer fusion proteins containing these regions

    • Immunize animals with stabilized fusion proteins

    • Screen antibodies for specificity to native IFB-2

  • Advantages for intermediate filament research:

    • Overcome challenges related to conserved domains

    • Generate antibodies against conformational epitopes

    • Improve antibody yield and specificity

    • Enable detection of specific assembly states

This approach has shown promise in generating antibodies against challenging protein complexes and could address limitations in current IFB-2 antibody repertoires.

What are the considerations for using IFB-2 antibodies in quantitative super-resolution microscopy studies?

Super-resolution microscopy enables detailed analysis of endotube structure beyond the diffraction limit. Special considerations for IFB-2 antibodies include:

  • Antibody selection for super-resolution techniques:

    • For STORM/PALM: Use antibodies conjugated to photoswitchable fluorophores

    • For STED: Select antibodies with bright, photostable fluorophores

    • For SIM: Ensure high signal-to-noise ratio with minimal background

  • Sample preparation optimization:

    • Implement thinner sections (70-100 nm) for improved resolution

    • Use expansion microscopy protocols to physically enlarge specimens

    • Apply clearing techniques to improve imaging depth and signal quality

  • Quantitative analysis approaches:

    • Develop custom image analysis pipelines for endotube measurements

    • Implement reference standards for calibration

    • Apply statistical tests appropriate for nanoscale measurements

    • Consider machine learning approaches for pattern recognition

  • Validation strategies:

    • Compare antibody-based detection with fluorescently-tagged IFB-2

    • Use correlative light and electron microscopy to confirm structure

    • Implement multi-color imaging to assess co-localization precision

Researchers have successfully used Airyscan confocal laser scanning microscopy to reveal that fluorescent IFB-2 and IFC-2 reporters form dense filamentous networks at intestinal cell borders , indicating that super-resolution approaches could yield even greater structural insights.

How can IFB-2 antibodies be used to investigate the role of intermediate filaments in aging and stress resistance in C. elegans?

C. elegans is a premier model for aging research, and IFB-2 antibodies can help elucidate how intestinal cytoskeleton changes contribute to aging phenotypes:

  • Age-related changes in endotube structure:

    • Use IFB-2 antibodies to compare endotube morphology across different ages

    • Quantify changes in thickness, continuity, and organization

    • Correlate structural changes with functional decline

  • Stress response during aging:

    • Challenge worms of different ages with various stressors

    • Use IFB-2 antibodies to assess cytoskeletal responses

    • Compare wild-type with long-lived mutants (e.g., daf-2, age-1)

  • Methodological approaches:

    • Implement standardized fixation protocols for aged worms

    • Develop automated image analysis workflows for quantification

    • Use age-synchronized populations for consistent results

Dysfunctional endotubes have been linked to increased susceptibility to microbial, oxidative, and osmotic stress , suggesting that age-related changes in this structure may contribute to the declining stress resistance observed in aging organisms.

This research direction could provide insights into how cytoskeletal elements contribute to organismal aging and identify potential interventions to enhance resilience during aging.

What are the latest approaches for generating monoclonal antibodies against conserved domains of IFB-2?

Generating antibodies against highly conserved domains presents challenges due to self-tolerance. Novel approaches include:

  • Innovative immunization strategies:

    • Use DNA immunization with IFB-2 expression constructs

    • Implement dendritic cell-targeted delivery of IFB-2 antigens

    • Apply prime-boost protocols with different antigen presentations

  • Alternative host species:

    • Utilize camelids for single-domain antibody (nanobody) production

    • Consider chickens for IgY antibodies against mammalian-conserved epitopes

    • Explore cartilaginous fish for single-variable domain antibodies

  • In vitro selection methods:

    • Apply phage display with synthetic or immune libraries

    • Implement yeast display with affinity maturation

    • Use ribosome display for completely in vitro selection

  • Computational design approaches:

    • Utilize AI-driven antibody design platforms like RFdiffusion

    • Apply structure-based design targeting specific epitopes

    • Implement directed evolution in silico

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.